It's not that I disagree with objective of the policy.

berg80

Diamond Member
Joined
Oct 28, 2017
Messages
36,484
Reaction score
29,662
Points
2,820
I was in favor of Biden's bipartisan, legislative attempt (and ultimately his EO) to put restrictions on asylum seekers. The one trump sabotaged to keep the immigration issue front and center for the election.

I just don't like the way the SC facilitates the illegal nature of what the regime is doing by bowing to the unitary executive theory. Which essentially cedes complete control of the government to the executive.

The Trump administration has taken steps to dismantle the asylum process for migrants more broadly and told the Supreme Court it wanted the flexibility to reinstitute the policy if needed to address a surge of migrants at the border. In separate cases, a judge in Rhode Island this month rejected the government’s indefinite hold on asylum applications and an appeals court in Washington said in April that the administration could not categorically deny asylum claims from people crossing from Mexico into the United States.

The Supreme Court’s conservative majority has generally been receptive to the Trump administration’s assertions of presidential power
and has issued a series of temporary orders allowing Mr. Trump to carry out his policies while litigation proceeds in the lower courts.

 
Illegal immigration was a serious problem for many decades and there are hundreds of examples of dumocraps complaining about it. Yet the problem persisted because no one was capable of solving the problem on both sides of the aisle. Trump solved the problem and is correcting much of the damage done by the incompetence of the last 5 or 6 other presidents. This is what you leftists really hate, he is revealing just how much your beloved party is incompetent and how it earned the nickname "The Do-Nothing Democrats."
 
Back
Top Bottom