What Carbon emissions looks like, and why Antarctica is colder than the Arctic

The oceans surrounding it have nothing to do with it? You've been telling us for the last month that the tectonic placement of continents controlled the occurrence of ice ages. You don't get one side of an equation without the other. Suggesting an ocean has no impact on local climate is gross ignorance.
 
You've been telling us for the last month that the tectonic placement of continents controlled the occurrence of ice ages


Correct - "ice ages" are continent specific and begin when land gets approximately 600 miles from a pole.


You don't get one side of an equation without the other


There is truth to the notion that the current Antarctic ice age would be larger if Antarctic land extended further from the pole than it does. That doesn't change anything as to the truth of Earth climate change, that it is 99% about WHERE LAND IS and 0.000000000000000000000000000000000000% about CO2
 
Do you not even understand my point? If, as you contend, it is about where LAND IS, it is also about where LAND IS NOT.

Fucking idiot.
 
Carbon is not destroying the planet. Carbon is blamed for climate change because it can be measured and taxed and most importantly traded on the worlds markets which is what Gore and his rich buddies around the planet have been salivating for for decades now.
 
Carbon is not destroying the planet.

Cabon dioxide is a greenhouse gas and the increased levels of it in our atmosphere, due entirely to human emissions and deforestation, are the primary cause of the warming observed over the past 150 years.

Carbon is blamed for climate change because it can be measured

Are you suggesting that other components of the atmosphere can NOT be measured?

and taxed and most importantly traded on the worlds markets

How about hydrogen? How about metals? How about polymers? Complex organics? Energy release? What is it about CO2 that you think is so special regarding measurement and taxation?

which is what Gore and his rich buddies around the planet have been salivating for for decades now.

Let's compare Gore's wealth to the wealth of the people who own and operate the world's oil, gas and coal industries. Or do they not salivate at such things?
 
Carbon is not destroying the planet.

Cabon dioxide is a greenhouse gas and the increased levels of it in our atmosphere, due entirely to human emissions and deforestation, are the primary cause of the warming observed over the past 150 years.

Carbon is blamed for climate change because it can be measured

Are you suggesting that other components of the atmosphere can NOT be measured?

and taxed and most importantly traded on the worlds markets

How about hydrogen? How about metals? How about polymers? Complex organics? Energy release? What is it about CO2 that you think is so special regarding measurement and taxation?

which is what Gore and his rich buddies around the planet have been salivating for for decades now.

Let's compare Gore's wealth to the wealth of the people who own and operate the world's oil, gas and coal industries. Or do they not salivate at such things?
Cabon dioxide is a greenhouse gas and the increased levels of it in our atmosphere, due entirely to human emissions and deforestation, are the primary cause of the warming observed over the past 150 years.

never proven to affect the atmosphere or surface. lie.
 
Cabon dioxide is a greenhouse gas and the increased levels of it in our atmosphere, due entirely to human emissions and deforestation, are the primary cause of the warming observed over the past 150 years.


only if you believe that the 2 and only 2 measures of atmospheric temperatures, satellites and balloons, each which showed NO WARMING in HIGHLY CORRELATED fashion, needed to be "corrected" to show "warming" so that crick and his fraudulent band of fearmongering leeches can continue to bilk the taxpayer.

If you believe that when something is measured by two different instruments (which return highly correlated data) should be accepted, then the atmosphere has not warmed at all despite rising CO2. There was no reason to question that data. There was a reason for manipulating it = left wing GREED.
 
People have been making temperature measurements on the ground, in the air, in the sea and now from space, for decades. There are millions of records. Yet you think all of our thoughts and conclusions should be based on two of them - and two of them that the world's experts on all sides of the issue have agreed WERE IN ERROR.

What a fucking nitwit
 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top