land within 600 miles to the pole, or ocean currents, which causes "glaciation?"

EMH

Diamond Member
Apr 5, 2021
22,123
13,365
2,288
This specific issue has derailed many other threads because my opponent is a factless spazzed out "faux skeptic" funded by the Co2 FRAUD and obsessed with shouting down the truth.

ALL LAND within 600 miles of an Earth pole is IN ICE AGE. What happens when land moves within approximately 600 miles = the annual snowfall ceases to fully melt in the summer, and hence starts to stack. That stacking is the start of an ice age and ice ages are continent specific, because glaciers, even 2.5 miles thick, break off in ocean water, they do not grow out and over deep ocean to the next continent.

Where is Earth ice today?

90% is on land mass Antarctica
7% is on land mass Greenland

R.9de336d08f1b19004ec8bfea19287822




This really isn't that hard. Land moves tectonically. Greenland has been moving NW and just recently arrived in the 600 miles to the pole zone. The advance of Greenland's ice, north to south, is well documented.

Northernmost Greenland was completely green 2 million years ago...



Center of Greenland went from forest to ice age 450-800k years ago



Advance of Greenland's ice age finished off the Viking settlement on the southern tip in the 1400s


All of that gives us data. How fast is an ice age? It moves about a mile every thousand years aka GLACIAL SPEED.

Ice cores document the stacking and age of the upper layers. They also document that the ice has grown EVERY YEAR, including during the Co2 FRAUD's bogus "interglacials." Greenland has 130k years of useful ice core data, Antarctica has 800k. What Ding and the Co2 FRAUD push is the laughable concept that 2.5 mile thick glacier on or near Chicago was only 75k years old, "Milankovich cycles" already busted here...


and here



It is not hard to understand Earth climate change. Each polar area is essentially an Earth AC unit that cools both air and water. Antarctica is 50F colder than Arctic, meaning air that passes over AA cools more than air that passes over Arctic. AA dumps 9 times the ice of the Arctic into the oceans, some 46 times the molecular H2O the Mississippi dumps in the Gulf every year. AA cools the oceans more than Arctic.

If Earth had two polar oceans, it would have no ice, higher surface air pressure, higher oceans, it would be warmer and canes would be bigger and stronger
If Earth had two polar continents, two Antarcticas, it would have more than double the ice, lower oceans, lower surface air pressure, and little to no cane activity.

and we know this from Jurassic about two polar oceans...

From Google...

During the Jurassic Period, the Earth's climate was much warmer and wetter than it is today.

The atmospheric pressure during the Jurassic period was likely significantly higher than it is today, at least 3.2–5.0 bar compared to the current 1 bar.



Now, the side arguing ocean currents are responsible for "glaciation" well...

1. they do not have any data. What were oceans currents doing 50, 100, 1000 years ago? They have NO IDEA, NO DATA
2. they cannot refute 600 miles to the pole
3. they accept Milankovich and hence all of its falsehoods documented in the links above
4. they, really we the American taxpayer, pay morons like Ding to troll and cut and paste fudged fraud
5. their 800k global temp chart is really about Oxygen isotopes, not temperature, and hence is, at best, not controlled and certifiably DIRTY "data" if it isn't outright fudged fraud. A big volcano changes Earth's Oxygen isotope ratio, and there is no way to "correct" for that. The data is trash.


So instead of turning every thread into this debate, keep it here...
 
This specific issue has derailed many other threads because my opponent is a factless spazzed out "faux skeptic" funded by the Co2 FRAUD and obsessed with shouting down the truth.

ALL LAND within 600 miles of an Earth pole is IN ICE AGE. What happens when land moves within approximately 600 miles = the annual snowfall ceases to fully melt in the summer, and hence starts to stack. That stacking is the start of an ice age and ice ages are continent specific, because glaciers, even 2.5 miles thick, break off in ocean water, they do not grow out and over deep ocean to the next continent.

Where is Earth ice today?

90% is on land mass Antarctica
7% is on land mass Greenland

R.9de336d08f1b19004ec8bfea19287822




This really isn't that hard. Land moves tectonically. Greenland has been moving NW and just recently arrived in the 600 miles to the pole zone. The advance of Greenland's ice, north to south, is well documented.

Northernmost Greenland was completely green 2 million years ago...



Center of Greenland went from forest to ice age 450-800k years ago



Advance of Greenland's ice age finished off the Viking settlement on the southern tip in the 1400s


All of that gives us data. How fast is an ice age? It moves about a mile every thousand years aka GLACIAL SPEED.

Ice cores document the stacking and age of the upper layers. They also document that the ice has grown EVERY YEAR, including during the Co2 FRAUD's bogus "interglacials." Greenland has 130k years of useful ice core data, Antarctica has 800k. What Ding and the Co2 FRAUD push is the laughable concept that 2.5 mile thick glacier on or near Chicago was only 75k years old, "Milankovich cycles" already busted here...


and here



It is not hard to understand Earth climate change. Each polar area is essentially an Earth AC unit that cools both air and water. Antarctica is 50F colder than Arctic, meaning air that passes over AA cools more than air that passes over Arctic. AA dumps 9 times the ice of the Arctic into the oceans, some 46 times the molecular H2O the Mississippi dumps in the Gulf every year. AA cools the oceans more than Arctic.

If Earth had two polar oceans, it would have no ice, higher surface air pressure, higher oceans, it would be warmer and canes would be bigger and stronger
If Earth had two polar continents, two Antarcticas, it would have more than double the ice, lower oceans, lower surface air pressure, and little to no cane activity.

and we know this from Jurassic about two polar oceans...

From Google...

During the Jurassic Period, the Earth's climate was much warmer and wetter than it is today.

The atmospheric pressure during the Jurassic period was likely significantly higher than it is today, at least 3.2–5.0 bar compared to the current 1 bar.



Now, the side arguing ocean currents are responsible for "glaciation" well...

1. they do not have any data. What were oceans currents doing 50, 100, 1000 years ago? They have NO IDEA, NO DATA
2. they cannot refute 600 miles to the pole
3. they accept Milankovich and hence all of its falsehoods documented in the links above
4. they, really we the American taxpayer, pay morons like Ding to troll and cut and paste fudged fraud
5. their 800k global temp chart is really about Oxygen isotopes, not temperature, and hence is, at best, not controlled and certifiably DIRTY "data" if it isn't outright fudged fraud. A big volcano changes Earth's Oxygen isotope ratio, and there is no way to "correct" for that. The data is trash.


So instead of turning every thread into this debate, keep it here...

Is it the Jews?
 
This specific issue has derailed many other threads because my opponent is a factless spazzed out "faux skeptic" funded by the Co2 FRAUD and obsessed with shouting down the truth.

ALL LAND within 600 miles of an Earth pole is IN ICE AGE. What happens when land moves within approximately 600 miles = the annual snowfall ceases to fully melt in the summer, and hence starts to stack. That stacking is the start of an ice age and ice ages are continent specific, because glaciers, even 2.5 miles thick, break off in ocean water, they do not grow out and over deep ocean to the next continent.

Where is Earth ice today?

90% is on land mass Antarctica
7% is on land mass Greenland

R.9de336d08f1b19004ec8bfea19287822




This really isn't that hard. Land moves tectonically. Greenland has been moving NW and just recently arrived in the 600 miles to the pole zone. The advance of Greenland's ice, north to south, is well documented.

Northernmost Greenland was completely green 2 million years ago...

[/URL]


Center of Greenland went from forest to ice age 450-800k years ago



Advance of Greenland's ice age finished off the Viking settlement on the southern tip in the 1400s


All of that gives us data. How fast is an ice age? It moves about a mile every thousand years aka GLACIAL SPEED.

Ice cores document the stacking and age of the upper layers. They also document that the ice has grown EVERY YEAR, including during the Co2 FRAUD's bogus "interglacials." Greenland has 130k years of useful ice core data, Antarctica has 800k. What Ding and the Co2 FRAUD push is the laughable concept that 2.5 mile thick glacier on or near Chicago was only 75k years old, "Milankovich cycles" already busted here...


and here



It is not hard to understand Earth climate change. Each polar area is essentially an Earth AC unit that cools both air and water. Antarctica is 50F colder than Arctic, meaning air that passes over AA cools more than air that passes over Arctic. AA dumps 9 times the ice of the Arctic into the oceans, some 46 times the molecular H2O the Mississippi dumps in the Gulf every year. AA cools the oceans more than Arctic.

If Earth had two polar oceans, it would have no ice, higher surface air pressure, higher oceans, it would be warmer and canes would be bigger and stronger
If Earth had two polar continents, two Antarcticas, it would have more than double the ice, lower oceans, lower surface air pressure, and little to no cane activity.

and we know this from Jurassic about two polar oceans...

From Google...

During the Jurassic Period, the Earth's climate was much warmer and wetter than it is today.

The atmospheric pressure during the Jurassic period was likely significantly higher than it is today, at least 3.2–5.0 bar compared to the current 1 bar.



Now, the side arguing ocean currents are responsible for "glaciation" well...

1. they do not have any data. What were oceans currents doing 50, 100, 1000 years ago? They have NO IDEA, NO DATA
2. they cannot refute 600 miles to the pole
3. they accept Milankovich and hence all of its falsehoods documented in the links above
4. they, really we the American taxpayer, pay morons like Ding to troll and cut and paste fudged fraud
5. their 800k global temp chart is really about Oxygen isotopes, not temperature, and hence is, at best, not controlled and certifiably DIRTY "data" if it isn't outright fudged fraud. A big volcano changes Earth's Oxygen isotope ratio, and there is no way to "correct" for that. The data is trash.


So instead of turning every thread into this debate, keep it here...
In the last 50 million years when did Antarctica become ice covered?
F2.large.jpg



glacial cycles.gif
 
In the last 50 million years when did Antarctica become ice covered?


40-50 million years ago is when AA first entered 600 miles to the pole.
 
Indeed, further comment on Vostok ice cores showing "spikes down" in "temps" aka O isotope ratios.

The Antarctic Peninsula is active and does release magma. It is quite possible that the "spikes down" are really "spikes up" and misread entirely because a periodic volcanic eruption from the Peninsula re-arranged the O isotopes AT THE SPOT of the ice core. So what the Vostok "temp" chart really shows is....

1. nothing, except periodic volcanic activity
2. that using Oxygen isotopes as a proxy for temps is DEEPLY FLAWED, DIRTY, NOT CONTROLLED
 
Was there ice on on Antarctica 40-50 million years ago?


Correct. There likely was always ice on the mountains.

The Antarctic Ice Age began 40-50 million years ago, and Antarctica has grown ice every year since.
 
Another indication of the "relative accuracy" of counting ancient O isotope ratios and claiming that is a "global temperature..."



In laboratories, the temperature, humidity, ventilation and so on affect the accuracy of oxygen isotope measurements.[2] Solid samples (organic and inorganic) for oxygen isotope measurements are usually stored in silver cups and measured with pyrolysis and mass spectrometry. Researchers need to avoid improper or prolonged storage of the samples for accurate measurements.[2]




Dirty data from an uncontrolled test, and wiki doesn't even get into volcanos....

If Vlostok was downwind of a periodic volcanic eruption on the Peninsula, it would show a "spike" in the O ratio from that... which is what it shows.... just the O ratio isn't quite right for volcanic outbursts... it is in fact upside down.
 
Correct. There likely was always ice on the mountains.

The Antarctic Ice Age began 40-50 million years ago, and Antarctica has grown ice every year since.
Prove it because this says there wasn't. This says ice was not present on the south pole until about 30 million years ago. So show me YOUR data that shows the south pole had ice on it 50 million years ago.

1729164785680.png
 
Prove it because this says there wasn't. This says ice was not present on the south pole until about 30 million years ago. So show me YOUR data that shows the south pole had ice on it 50 million years ago.

View attachment 1027418


Actually McBullshit says something completely different.

This is what you are supposed to parrot as a Co2 FRAUD "faux skeptic"

 
Actually McBullshit says something completely different.

This is what you are supposed to parrot as a Co2 FRAUD "faux skeptic"

Post the data. You have no data.

1729165040669.png
 
Post the data.


LOL!!

When you state that it was 30 million years ago not 40-50, you are doing it off bullshit "isotope "data" as proxy for temps" from one spot on the Antarctic ice sheet.

The 40-50 million year estimate, and that's all we can do this far in the past, is based upon when land mass AA entered the indisputable irrefutable truth of 600 miles to the pole.
 
LOL!!

When you state that it was 30 million years ago not 40-50, you are doing it off bullshit "isotope "data" as proxy for temps" from one spot on the Antarctic ice sheet.

The 40-50 million year estimate, and that's all we can do this far in the past, is based upon when land mass AA entered the indisputable irrefutable truth of 600 miles to the pole.
Post your data. Try using google to find some.
 
Post your data. Try using google to find some.


Assuming 1 inch per year tectonic movement, that 40-50 million year range moves Antarctica back off the South Pole and on the other side of the TransAntarctic mountains, and then some. On the other side of the TransAntarctic mountains it is hard to tell where the exact land line was before the ice age started.

But, I'll stick with 40-50 million years.
 
Jurassic is our case study on the "Warm Earth Parameter" aka little to no land near the poles. What does that Earth look like...



The atmospheric pressure during the Jurassic period was likely significantly higher than it is today, at around 3.2–5.0 bar compared to the current 1 bar.

During the Jurassic Period, the Earth’s climate was much warmer and wetter than it is today


In fact, from space, Earth during Jurassic likely looked like a small gas giant, and you couldn't see the oceans or land, because there was so much H2O in the thicker wider atmosphere the dark clouds would "blot it out."


If Earth was really warming, as it did during Jurassic, we would also see more rain AND HENCE LESS FIRES and higher surface air pressure.... and we don't see that now.
 
Assuming 1 inch per year tectonic movement, that 40-50 million year range moves Antarctica back off the South Pole and on the other side of the TransAntarctic mountains, and then some. On the other side of the TransAntarctic mountains it is hard to tell where the exact land line was before the ice age started.

But, I'll stick with 40-50 million years.
Except it never happened. You can't find one source that says it did.
 
Except it never happened. You can't find one source that says it did.


Well, we do know the Atlantic Ocean is growing, and the fault there bends around the southern tip of Africa. We can see that Antarctica and South America only "recently aka 20 mil years ago" broke apart.

And we have the full laughable refutation of McBullshit on the south pole....



The breakup between AA and SA...
R.db19eb4ea7b7195ba0580ba3818ecaec




The full fault mid Atlantic from North Pole to South Pole...
GeoPicture of the Week: The Atlantic Ocean Floor

which clearly shows the fault rounding South Africa...


 
Well, we do know the Atlantic Ocean is growing, and the fault there bends around the southern tip of Africa. We can see that Antarctica and South America only "recently aka 20 mil years ago" broke apart.

And we have the full laughable refutation of McBullshit on the south pole....



The breakup between AA and SA...
R.db19eb4ea7b7195ba0580ba3818ecaec




The full fault mid Atlantic from North Pole to South Pole...
GeoPicture of the Week: The Atlantic Ocean Floor

which clearly shows the fault rounding South Africa...


And means nothing whatsoever.

 

Forum List

Back
Top