Conservative65
Gold Member
- Oct 14, 2014
- 26,127
- 2,208
- 265
- Banned
- #381
The 70s were a long time ago. Most of the people doing the hiring then, are probably retired if not dead by now.
Today? It's been reversed.
The white guy getting screwed today, probably wasn't even in the workforce back in the 70s, hell, he probably wasn't even alive.
So you want a meritocracy--hire based on merit/skills only. OK, but how do you safeguard the meritocracy? Remember, we weren't practicing a meritocracy beforehand, that is how AA came about. People were ruled out based on appearence, not skill.
By the way, I am for a meritocracy except in the cases of small family businesses.
You're saying it's OK to benefit those not passed over by giving them a benefit based on race. At the same time, those that had nothing to do with the passing over now have to suffer the consequences of something they didn't do. If using race to deny is wrong, trying to make up for it by using race to benefit is also wrong.
If you hire on merit/skill only how does race come into play?
I take it you are new to this planet?
We do this in the military--Why not in the workplace?
Are you claiming EVERY promotion in the military is done solely on merit/skill?
