Can Republicans have as many white house members as they want?

[BluesLegend]

Past injustices have created the current reality. White districts were created due to racial gerrymandering.

Riiiiight blacks are not permitted to live in white neighborhoods...oh wait they are.

 

[IM2]

You're forgetting one thing, States are required to redistrict to comply with the SCOTUS ruling. TX can't because we are already voting based on the current maps, which contains race based districts.

.

What you and others who think like you forget is that white is a race. Therefore, white districts were and are created because of race. Until we start seeing majority white districts are erased by merging them with black/brown ones, then whites are only doing this to ensure white elected majoities.

 

[IM2]

Riiiiight blacks are not permitted to live in white neighborhoods...oh wait they are.

Until white districts are gutted and merged with a black majority district, you can shut up.

 

[BluesLegend]

Until white districts are gutted and merged with a black majority district, you can shut up.

There's a house for sale down the street from me, any black who's interested can make an offer. The only party that's herded blacks into ghettos they can control and exploit are the Democrats.

 

[MarcATL]

According to the defense arm of the Republican Party masquerading as the SCOTUS, apparently yes OP.

 

[jknowgood]

8 states out of 50, and the majority of the people in these states are Democrats.

Another disingenuous Republican post.

This gerrymandering Trump has asked for is not about political parties.

Okay for you loons to do it, I see.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

You've missed everything if that's what you think. White districts were created because of race. White identity is what the Republicans are all about. If it was about R vs D, then why are only black districts being cut up? Do not fool yourself with that Republican colorblind lie. These Republicans will tell you how they don't see race, but you can't be stupid enough not to see what they ae doing.

White districts were created because of race.

Because of math.

If it was about R vs D, then why are only black districts being cut up?

Districts created because of race are unconstitutional.
But don't worry, all dem districts are being "cut up".

but you can't be stupid enough not to see what they ae doing.

You're stupid enough not to see what they are doing.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

I think you need to realize that white is a race an that when you consider that TRUTH, then Repubicans have had a huge advantage. Then, as you purposefully ignore the facts presented in the OP, you will understand how we got white and black districts is because whites treated citizens like different breeds of dogs. I really get tired of whites such as yourself who choose to ignore what has been done, then try virtue signaling about race.

WHAT THIS RULING DID WAS GIVE RACISTS THE ABILITY TO RACIALLY GERRYMANDER DISTRICTS, THEN SAY THEY CHANGED THE DISTRICTS POLITICALLY.

because whites treated citizens like different breeds of dogs.

Exactly. Dems didn't let black dogs vote.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

No deflection. When the thread I linked shows proof supporting their claim, I will show proof that everybody has seen of how Alabama, Louisiana, Mississippi, South Carolina, Tennessee, and Florida have eliminated just black districts.

Do not ask me to provide things you don't ask white right-wing posters for.

I will show proof that everybody has seen of how Alabama, Louisiana, Mississippi, South Carolina, Tennessee, and Florida have eliminated just black districts.

"Just black" districts are unconstitutional.
Like "Just black" bathrooms and "Just black" water fountains are unconstitutional.

 

[IM2]

There's a house for sale down the street from me, any black who's interested can make an offer. The only party that's herded blacks into ghettos they can control and exploit are the Democrats.

No, housing segregation was bipartisan white man. So stop being white and Republican, thinking you can tell me how it was only Democrats who enforced segregation.

 

[IM2]

Okay for you loons to do it, I see.

Trump started it by calling Texas asking them to change districts to help Republicans.

So stop lying.

 

[MarcATL]

No, housing segregation was bipartisan white man. So stop being white and Republican, thinking you can tell me how it was only Democrats who enforced segregation.

Remind him that it was all done by racist white men and based on his logic we should demean those motherfµckers.

 

[IM2]

Remind him that it was all done by racist white men and based on his logic we should demean those motherfµckers.

He keeps trying to deflect this by blaming Democrats when we have always said it was racist whites. His kind never takes responsibility.

 

[LordBrownTrout]

You've missed everything if that's what you think. White districts were created because of race. White identity is what the Republicans are all about. If it was about R vs D, then why are only black districts being cut up? Do not fool yourself with that Republican colorblind lie. These Republicans will tell you how they don't see race, but you can't be stupid enough not to see what they ae doing.

The board racist continues to spew his racist venom. Sad. Your obsession with racism while quickly overlooking where racism started, dems, is astounding and yet you vote for the party that oppresses you. Its poetic.

 

[LordBrownTrout]

Remind him that it was all done by racist white men and based on his logic we should demean those motherfµckers.

Blacks sold their own into slavery before the white men ever appeared. Talk about racism.

 

[jknowgood]

Trump started it by calling Texas asking them to change districts to help Republicans.

So stop lying.

You loons have been doing it for years. That's why we have the list I showed you.

 

[IM2]

The board racist continues to spew his racist venom. Sad. Your obsession with racism while quickly overlooking where racism started, dems, is astounding and yet you vote for the party that oppresses you. Its poetic.

The racist history of the Democratic party is well documented. The Democratic Party was founded in 1828. Slavery had been in this country since at least 1619. Slavery existed for 209 years before the democratic party was founded. Republicans today love telling blacks how the Democratic Party was pro-slavery and how it was the Republican Party that freed the slaves. There is a lot modern republicans choose not to tell young blacks as they try luring blacks into supporting a move back into Jim Crow. First, not all Republicans were for racial equality. The Party had several factions in the beginning. One was the Radical Republicans. The Radical Republicans were for the eradication of slavery. They were not conservatives. Frederick Douglass was a Radical Republican. Lincoln was moderate politically. He opposed the expansion of slavery but did not believe in racial equality.

Last, if you want to play your little game white man, realize that it was Republicans who promised us reparations. Special Field Order 15 and Circular 13 were reparations promised to us by Republicans. REPARATIONS THAT ARE UNIVERSALLY OPPOSED BY ALL REPUBLICANS TODAY.

So SHUT UP!

 

[IM2]

You loons have been doing it for years. That's why we have the list I showed you.

Your list ignores the population of those states. They are all majority Democratic states.

That is why they have no Republican representatives. The Republicans lose elections.

That is how Democracy happens, victim.

No Democratic president has called governors telling them to change districts before a midterm election so his party can stay in the majority.

Your list of false equivalences is pathetic.

 

[BlindBoo]

Yes they can. The Roberts Court has turn back the clock centuries. The remedies to the injustices that were done, enacted by our elected representatives, have been systematically overturned by Republican's recently appointed to the Supreme Courts. Since the country has ethically diversified so much since 1790, the best way to make the People's House truly representative of that new and changing diversity is to do away with federal districting altogether. Replace it with a system of proportional representation where the % of the entire vote determines the number of seats each party gets to send to Washington to represent the state. It would allow for the formation of viable 3rd or 4th parties and even independent runs for the House seats.

Of course that means a new amendment to the Constitution. The MediaSpheres of both major parties oppose even discussing the idea. It is mostly a dead in the water idea.

 

[ColonelAngus]

Can Trump give blanket federal pardons to everyone who was a registered Republican for the 2024 election?