Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
It was a collective self defense that they were concerned with....Yes, it's used by us who believe in the right to carry our guns, but the court only rules on the constitutionality, not the reasons for exercising it.
Furthermore you can find quotes of our founders on the subject and even debates where self-defense was part of the debate. You will never find a debate on abortion when any of our amendments were written.
As reality sinks in, the number of people disagreeing with this decision is growing including 67% of women.
Most in new poll say overturning Roe is ‘step backward’
Over half of the Americans questioned in a new poll say the Supreme Court’s decision to overturn Roe v. Wade is a “step backward” for the U.S. In the CBS News-YouGov poll released…www.google.com
Overall, the poll found that 59 percent of respondents disapproved of the ruling and 41 percent approved. More than two-thirds of women surveyed — 67 percent — disapproved of the ruling, while 33 percent were in favor of it.
A majority of women in the survey — 56 percent — also said the court’s decision will make their lives worse, while only 16 percent said it will make their lives better. Twenty-eight percent of women said it will not make a difference.
Why would they need know if they were likely voters? It isn't an election poll, it is an opinion poll.First off as your source says, they only took a sample of about 1500 people. I went to the hyperlink (source) of the story. Here is what I found:
Views on Roe being overturned divide along partisan lines, though perhaps not as completely as political debate or legislative battles might suggest. One in six Democrats approves, and one in five Republicans disapproves.
So unless there was a hell of a lot of over sampling on one side, I fail to see how 60% disapprove of the decision. Furthermore it doesn't say where the poll was taken, how it was conducted (in person, phone, internet) or if the respondents were likely voters or not.
It was a collective self defense that they were concerned with....
An individual self defense right is NOT written IN THE CONSTITUTION....
Edit!
It doesn't mean we don't have a right to individual self defense, it is just not specifically mentioned!
Like all the aspects of our right to privacy and autonomy are not specifically mentioned
Why would they need know if they were likely voters? It isn't an election poll, it is an opinion poll.
YouGov seems to have a good track record in accuracy:
Pollster Ratings - YouGov
FiveThirtyEight’s pollster ratings are calculated by analyzing the historical accuracy and methodology of each firm’s polls.projects.fivethirtyeight.com
Other than that, a broad swath of polls consistently showing a majority support for Roe and legal abortion (with limits).
What difference does that make? The poll is guaging public not hiw they might vote. A N D it is politicized.I don't know what your link has to do with the price of rice in China. It's only telling you how great their polls are.
Voters choose their electors, and it's the President that decides what kind of justices will serve on his court when the opportunity presents itself. The reason judges are selected and not voted on is because our founders didn't want them to be politicized. They didn't want them to be pressured into their decision making. Therefore any and all polls are meaningless, even if 90% of the public doesn't support their ruling.
And so are privacy rights, they are inalienable....or fundamental to our democracy, a democratic republic.The Constitution was not written to tell the federal government what they can do, it was written to tell them what they can't do. Self-defense is an inalienable right. It needs not to be included in the text.
Really? Does Trump have any of his privacy rights respected?And so are privacy rights, they are inalienable....or fundamental to our democracy, a democratic republic.
Can you show me in the constitution where it says anything about individual self defense as the reason an individual's right to bear arms exists.....????
What difference does that make? The poll is guaging public not hiw they might vote. A N D it is politicized.
It's more than that by a lot.
The SC does not represent the population any more. It represents a minority of extremists.
And that "change" has occurred numerous times before
Simply not true.
The SC rulings that the States could not make laws about restricting contraception because it was unconstitutional, came before Roe v wade, and the Roe decision relied on those cases. Sodomy laws were struck down too, Gay marriage couldn't be restricted either, nor our own medical procedure decisions....these type things that involved personal and or private choices, could not be banned by State governments....the SC said the states were never given that kind of power over us.... in the constitution??? What changed?
It was the Democrats who originally politicized the abortion issue with Supreme court Justice candidates.What difference does that make? The poll is guaging public not hiw they might vote. A N D it is politicized.
I don’t agree. The original Roe decision Was supported by judges from both ideological sides. These last three judges were specifically chosen because they on the Federalist Societies list for overturning Roe. The fact they disregard massive amounts of case law and precedent in this and in overturning the Sullivan law is pretty indicative of how unusual and politically partisan this court has become. Mitch McConnell politicized the nomination process to a whole new level. It isn’t good for our country.It was the Democrats who originally politicized the abortion issue with Supreme court Justice candidates.
And so are privacy rights, they are inalienable....or fundamental to our democracy, a democratic republic.
That's why I listed 4 areas that are affected by this agenda.
I don’t agree. The original Roe decision Was supported by judges from both ideological sides. These last three judges were specifically chosen because they on the Federalist Societies list for overturning Roe. The fact they disregard massive amounts of case law and precedent in this and in overturning the Sullivan law is pretty indicative of how unusual and politically partisan this court has become. Mitch McConnell politicized the nomination process to a whole new level. It isn’t good for our country.
So is is the inviolability of the physical body: personal autonomy, self-ownership, and self-determination of human beings over their own bodies.The Constitution was not written to tell the federal government what they can do, it was written to tell them what they can't do. Self-defense is an inalienable right. It needs not to be included in the text.
So is is the inviolability of the physical body: personal autonomy, self-ownership, and self-determination of human beings over their own bodies.
I never screamed “make her”. If you have to lie to make a point, you have no point.LOL, yet how many months ago if a woman didn't want the jab were you screaming make her! LOL, it's her body ... when you decide it is ... What a pathetic lie, so easily proven as a lie ...
