Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Again you nor anyone else can prove that check was for anything specific. Trump paid Cohen as his lawyer NUMEROUS times over the years.Criminal liability! He said he knew nothing of the payment, yet, his signature is on the check of reimbursing Cohen. It's a legal embarrassment. It's also evidence of an illegal election.Proof of what? That is was embarrassing?Trump said he didn't know about the $130,000 dollar payment, and he lied about that. That is proof.According to Cohen Trump lied, but what proof is there?6 explosive revelations from former Trump lawyer Michael Cohen's testimony to Congress
"Michael Cohen will present a check to the House Oversight Committee Wednesday signed by Donald Trump, which the president’s former lawyer says was reimbursement for hush money payments to porn star Stormy Daniels.
"In prepared remarks published hours before his testimony, Cohen said the check is proof that Trump knowingly conspired to prevent negative stories about his personal life becoming public.
"The testimony will also include allegations of..."
Trump lied to the American people about paying off Stormy Daniels.
Why shouldn't he be impeached?
David Pecker can provide a great deal of evidence as to what "...that check was for..."Again you nor anyone else can prove that check was for anything specific. Trump paid Cohen as his lawyer NUMEROUS times over the years.
With the hot water David Pecker is in, once again, I'm sure prosecutors already have that information.Again you nor anyone else can prove that check was for anything specific. Trump paid Cohen as his lawyer NUMEROUS times over the years.Criminal liability! He said he knew nothing of the payment, yet, his signature is on the check of reimbursing Cohen. It's a legal embarrassment. It's also evidence of an illegal election.Proof of what? That is was embarrassing?Trump said he didn't know about the $130,000 dollar payment, and he lied about that. That is proof.According to Cohen Trump lied, but what proof is there?David Pecker can provide a great deal of evidence as to what "...that check was for..."Again you nor anyone else can prove that check was for anything specific. Trump paid Cohen as his lawyer NUMEROUS times over the years.
"Publisher of the National Enquirer admits to hush-money payments made on Trump’s behalf"
https://www.washingtonpost.com/life...ory.html?noredirect=on&utm_term=.9f9b3d3d2dab
Regardless, since there is no limit to how much a candidate can contribute to his own campaign no crime has been committed by Trump. Of course, no one with a brain believes the House hearing are for any other reason than to allow Congressional Democrats to make the same unsubstantiated allegations against the President they have been making for the last two years, thus proving, at least for Democrats, politics is show business for ugly people.Again you nor anyone else can prove that check was for anything specific. Trump paid Cohen as his lawyer NUMEROUS times over the years.Criminal liability! He said he knew nothing of the payment, yet, his signature is on the check of reimbursing Cohen. It's a legal embarrassment. It's also evidence of an illegal election.Proof of what? That is was embarrassing?Trump said he didn't know about the $130,000 dollar payment, and he lied about that. That is proof.According to Cohen Trump lied, but what proof is there?David Pecker can provide a great deal of evidence as to what "...that check was for..."Again you nor anyone else can prove that check was for anything specific. Trump paid Cohen as his lawyer NUMEROUS times over the years.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/life...ory.html?noredirect=on&utm_term=.9f9b3d3d2dab
Like I said, please continue. Your ignorance is quite the treat for those who really understand what the law is saying.Regardless, since there is no limit to how much a candidate can contribute to his own campaign no crime has been committed by Trump. Of course, no one with a brain believes the House hearing are for any other reason than to allow Congressional Democrats to make the same unsubstantiated allegations against the President they have been making for the last two years, thus proving, at least for Democrats, politics is show business for ugly people.Again you nor anyone else can prove that check was for anything specific. Trump paid Cohen as his lawyer NUMEROUS times over the years.Criminal liability! He said he knew nothing of the payment, yet, his signature is on the check of reimbursing Cohen. It's a legal embarrassment. It's also evidence of an illegal election.Proof of what? That is was embarrassing?Trump said he didn't know about the $130,000 dollar payment, and he lied about that. That is proof.David Pecker can provide a great deal of evidence as to what "...that check was for..."Again you nor anyone else can prove that check was for anything specific. Trump paid Cohen as his lawyer NUMEROUS times over the years.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/life...ory.html?noredirect=on&utm_term=.9f9b3d3d2dab
Regardless, since there is no limit to how much a candidate can contribute to his own campaign no crime has been committed by Trump. Of course, no one with a brain believes the House hearing are for any other reason than to allow Congressional Democrats to make the same unsubstantiated allegations against the President they have been making for the last two years, thus proving, at least for Democrats, politics is show business for ugly people.Again you nor anyone else can prove that check was for anything specific. Trump paid Cohen as his lawyer NUMEROUS times over the years.Criminal liability! He said he knew nothing of the payment, yet, his signature is on the check of reimbursing Cohen. It's a legal embarrassment. It's also evidence of an illegal election.Proof of what? That is was embarrassing?Trump said he didn't know about the $130,000 dollar payment, and he lied about that. That is proof.David Pecker can provide a great deal of evidence as to what "...that check was for..."Again you nor anyone else can prove that check was for anything specific. Trump paid Cohen as his lawyer NUMEROUS times over the years.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/life...ory.html?noredirect=on&utm_term=.9f9b3d3d2dab
Regardless of how much money a candidate contributes to her own campaign, all that money has to be declared and reported; trump did neither, and he lied to the American people about his "donations."Regardless, since there is no limit to how much a candidate can contribute to his own campaign no crime has been committed by Trump.
So what? He didn't say it under oath, so it is no crime.Regardless, since there is no limit to how much a candidate can contribute to his own campaign no crime has been committed by Trump. Of course, no one with a brain believes the House hearing are for any other reason than to allow Congressional Democrats to make the same unsubstantiated allegations against the President they have been making for the last two years, thus proving, at least for Democrats, politics is show business for ugly people.Again you nor anyone else can prove that check was for anything specific. Trump paid Cohen as his lawyer NUMEROUS times over the years.Criminal liability! He said he knew nothing of the payment, yet, his signature is on the check of reimbursing Cohen. It's a legal embarrassment. It's also evidence of an illegal election.Proof of what? That is was embarrassing?David Pecker can provide a great deal of evidence as to what "...that check was for..."Again you nor anyone else can prove that check was for anything specific. Trump paid Cohen as his lawyer NUMEROUS times over the years.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/life...ory.html?noredirect=on&utm_term=.9f9b3d3d2dabRegardless of how much money a candidate contributes to her own campaign, all that money has to be declared and reported; trump did neither, and he lied to the American people about his "donations."Regardless, since there is no limit to how much a candidate can contribute to his own campaign no crime has been committed by Trump.
Trump says he didn't know about Stormy Daniels payment
Wearing blinders and watching Faux News exclusively clouds judgement. But then again, Trumpanzees are just like lemmings, following the great orange pied piper!I have yet to see a single item from Cohen that damns the President. So much for the pipe dreams of the democrats AGAIN.
View attachment 248043
Regardless, since there is no limit to how much a candidate can contribute to his own campaign no crime has been committed by Trump. Of course, no one with a brain believes the House hearing are for any other reason than to allow Congressional Democrats to make the same unsubstantiated allegations against the President they have been making for the last two years, thus proving, at least for Democrats, politics is show business for ugly people.Again you nor anyone else can prove that check was for anything specific. Trump paid Cohen as his lawyer NUMEROUS times over the years.Criminal liability! He said he knew nothing of the payment, yet, his signature is on the check of reimbursing Cohen. It's a legal embarrassment. It's also evidence of an illegal election.Proof of what? That is was embarrassing?David Pecker can provide a great deal of evidence as to what "...that check was for..."Again you nor anyone else can prove that check was for anything specific. Trump paid Cohen as his lawyer NUMEROUS times over the years.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/life...ory.html?noredirect=on&utm_term=.9f9b3d3d2dabRegardless of how much money a candidate contributes to her own campaign, all that money has to be declared and reported; trump did neither, and he lied to the American people about his "donations."Regardless, since there is no limit to how much a candidate can contribute to his own campaign no crime has been committed by Trump.
Trump says he didn't know about Stormy Daniels payment
Regardless, since there is no limit to how much a candidate can contribute to his own campaign no crime has been committed by Trump. Of course, no one with a brain believes the House hearing are for any other reason than to allow Congressional Democrats to make the same unsubstantiated allegations against the President they have been making for the last two years, thus proving, at least for Democrats, politics is show business for ugly people.Again you nor anyone else can prove that check was for anything specific. Trump paid Cohen as his lawyer NUMEROUS times over the years.Criminal liability! He said he knew nothing of the payment, yet, his signature is on the check of reimbursing Cohen. It's a legal embarrassment. It's also evidence of an illegal election.David Pecker can provide a great deal of evidence as to what "...that check was for..."Again you nor anyone else can prove that check was for anything specific. Trump paid Cohen as his lawyer NUMEROUS times over the years.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/life...ory.html?noredirect=on&utm_term=.9f9b3d3d2dabRegardless of how much money a candidate contributes to her own campaign, all that money has to be declared and reported; trump did neither, and he lied to the American people about his "donations."Regardless, since there is no limit to how much a candidate can contribute to his own campaign no crime has been committed by Trump.
Trump says he didn't know about Stormy Daniels payment
Here's your problem. You know what destroys you here? The John Edwards case. Established precedent. Established as NOT a campaign finance violation. You also have to prove this was a ONE TIME thing to influence an election. Since Trump and other rich men do this frequently, you lose again. In other words, you and BWK can cry all you want. You have NOTHING. Case closed.
Stop Comparing Donald Trump’s Campaign Finance Fraud With John Edwards’s CaseHere's your problem. You know what destroys you here? The John Edwards case. Established precedent. Established as NOT a campaign finance violation
Regardless, since there is no limit to how much a candidate can contribute to his own campaign no crime has been committed by Trump. Of course, no one with a brain believes the House hearing are for any other reason than to allow Congressional Democrats to make the same unsubstantiated allegations against the President they have been making for the last two years, thus proving, at least for Democrats, politics is show business for ugly people.Again you nor anyone else can prove that check was for anything specific. Trump paid Cohen as his lawyer NUMEROUS times over the years.Criminal liability! He said he knew nothing of the payment, yet, his signature is on the check of reimbursing Cohen. It's a legal embarrassment. It's also evidence of an illegal election.David Pecker can provide a great deal of evidence as to what "...that check was for..."Again you nor anyone else can prove that check was for anything specific. Trump paid Cohen as his lawyer NUMEROUS times over the years.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/life...ory.html?noredirect=on&utm_term=.9f9b3d3d2dabRegardless of how much money a candidate contributes to her own campaign, all that money has to be declared and reported; trump did neither, and he lied to the American people about his "donations."Regardless, since there is no limit to how much a candidate can contribute to his own campaign no crime has been committed by Trump.
Trump says he didn't know about Stormy Daniels payment
Here's your problem. You know what destroys you here? The John Edwards case. Established precedent. Established as NOT a campaign finance violation. You also have to prove this was a ONE TIME thing to influence an election. Since Trump and other rich men do this frequently, you lose again. In other words, you and BWK can cry all you want. You have NOTHING. Case closed.
Why would I have to do that?You also have to prove this was a ONE TIME thing to influence an election.
So what? He didn't say it under oath, so it is no crime.Regardless, since there is no limit to how much a candidate can contribute to his own campaign no crime has been committed by Trump. Of course, no one with a brain believes the House hearing are for any other reason than to allow Congressional Democrats to make the same unsubstantiated allegations against the President they have been making for the last two years, thus proving, at least for Democrats, politics is show business for ugly people.Again you nor anyone else can prove that check was for anything specific. Trump paid Cohen as his lawyer NUMEROUS times over the years.Criminal liability! He said he knew nothing of the payment, yet, his signature is on the check of reimbursing Cohen. It's a legal embarrassment. It's also evidence of an illegal election.David Pecker can provide a great deal of evidence as to what "...that check was for..."Again you nor anyone else can prove that check was for anything specific. Trump paid Cohen as his lawyer NUMEROUS times over the years.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/life...ory.html?noredirect=on&utm_term=.9f9b3d3d2dabRegardless of how much money a candidate contributes to her own campaign, all that money has to be declared and reported; trump did neither, and he lied to the American people about his "donations."Regardless, since there is no limit to how much a candidate can contribute to his own campaign no crime has been committed by Trump.
Trump says he didn't know about Stormy Daniels payment
You might believe Trump was too stupid to know that Michael Cohen's money was a campaign contribution, but it goes way beyond stupidity to believe Trump did not know the National Enquirer's money was not a contribution, or that he didn't recognize catching and killing McDougal's story was an "in-kind" contribution.So what? He didn't say it under oath, so it is no crime.
No, I believe you are stupid. There is nothing new here. Mueller has had all this information for months and has not seen any crime the President might have committed in it.So what? He didn't say it under oath, so it is no crime.Regardless, since there is no limit to how much a candidate can contribute to his own campaign no crime has been committed by Trump. Of course, no one with a brain believes the House hearing are for any other reason than to allow Congressional Democrats to make the same unsubstantiated allegations against the President they have been making for the last two years, thus proving, at least for Democrats, politics is show business for ugly people.Again you nor anyone else can prove that check was for anything specific. Trump paid Cohen as his lawyer NUMEROUS times over the years.David Pecker can provide a great deal of evidence as to what "...that check was for..."Again you nor anyone else can prove that check was for anything specific. Trump paid Cohen as his lawyer NUMEROUS times over the years.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/life...ory.html?noredirect=on&utm_term=.9f9b3d3d2dabRegardless of how much money a candidate contributes to her own campaign, all that money has to be declared and reported; trump did neither, and he lied to the American people about his "donations."Regardless, since there is no limit to how much a candidate can contribute to his own campaign no crime has been committed by Trump.
Trump says he didn't know about Stormy Daniels paymentYou might believe Trump was too stupid to know that Michael Cohen's money was a campaign contribution, but it goes way beyond stupidity to believe Trump did not know the National Enquirer's money was not a contribution, or that he didn't recognize catching and killing McDougal's story was an "in-kind" contribution.So what? He didn't say it under oath, so it is no crime.
Which means Trump is left arguing he didn't know the Enquirer (a corporation) was making illegal campaign donations to pay off his mistress on his behalf.
Do you believe Trump is that stupid?
Again, you know zero about the law. Paying money to a porn star and not disclosing that payment right before the election is a federal crime, "PERIOD".Regardless, since there is no limit to how much a candidate can contribute to his own campaign no crime has been committed by Trump.Again you nor anyone else can prove that check was for anything specific. Trump paid Cohen as his lawyer NUMEROUS times over the years.Criminal liability! He said he knew nothing of the payment, yet, his signature is on the check of reimbursing Cohen. It's a legal embarrassment. It's also evidence of an illegal election.Proof of what? That is was embarrassing?Trump said he didn't know about the $130,000 dollar payment, and he lied about that. That is proof.David Pecker can provide a great deal of evidence as to what "...that check was for..."Again you nor anyone else can prove that check was for anything specific. Trump paid Cohen as his lawyer NUMEROUS times over the years.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/life...ory.html?noredirect=on&utm_term=.9f9b3d3d2dab
You just said absolutely nothing.Of course, no one with a brain believes the House hearing are for any other reason than to allow Congressional Democrats to make the same unsubstantiated allegations against the President they have been making for the last two years, thus proving, at least for Democrats, politics is show business for ugly people.
Stop being an idiot about John Edwards; Stop Comparing Donald Trump’s Campaign Finance Fraud With John Edwards’s CaseRegardless, since there is no limit to how much a candidate can contribute to his own campaign no crime has been committed by Trump. Of course, no one with a brain believes the House hearing are for any other reason than to allow Congressional Democrats to make the same unsubstantiated allegations against the President they have been making for the last two years, thus proving, at least for Democrats, politics is show business for ugly people.Again you nor anyone else can prove that check was for anything specific. Trump paid Cohen as his lawyer NUMEROUS times over the years.Criminal liability! He said he knew nothing of the payment, yet, his signature is on the check of reimbursing Cohen. It's a legal embarrassment. It's also evidence of an illegal election.David Pecker can provide a great deal of evidence as to what "...that check was for..."Again you nor anyone else can prove that check was for anything specific. Trump paid Cohen as his lawyer NUMEROUS times over the years.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/life...ory.html?noredirect=on&utm_term=.9f9b3d3d2dabRegardless of how much money a candidate contributes to her own campaign, all that money has to be declared and reported; trump did neither, and he lied to the American people about his "donations."Regardless, since there is no limit to how much a candidate can contribute to his own campaign no crime has been committed by Trump.
Trump says he didn't know about Stormy Daniels payment
Here's your problem. You know what destroys you here? The John Edwards case. Established precedent. Established as NOT a campaign finance violation. You also have to prove this was a ONE TIME thing to influence an election. Since Trump and other rich men do this frequently, you lose again. In other words, you and BWK can cry all you want. You have NOTHING. Case closed.
Corroborating physical evidence doesn't need a liar to make a case.damn neat watching the leftists lay all their hopes on a convicted liar
--LOL
--LOL
Regardless, since there is no limit to how much a candidate can contribute to his own campaign no crime has been committed by Trump. Of course, no one with a brain believes the House hearing are for any other reason than to allow Congressional Democrats to make the same unsubstantiated allegations against the President they have been making for the last two years, thus proving, at least for Democrats, politics is show business for ugly people.Again you nor anyone else can prove that check was for anything specific. Trump paid Cohen as his lawyer NUMEROUS times over the years.David Pecker can provide a great deal of evidence as to what "...that check was for..."Again you nor anyone else can prove that check was for anything specific. Trump paid Cohen as his lawyer NUMEROUS times over the years.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/life...ory.html?noredirect=on&utm_term=.9f9b3d3d2dabRegardless of how much money a candidate contributes to her own campaign, all that money has to be declared and reported; trump did neither, and he lied to the American people about his "donations."Regardless, since there is no limit to how much a candidate can contribute to his own campaign no crime has been com
mitted by Trump.
Trump says he didn't know about Stormy Daniels payment
Here's your problem. You know what destroys you here? The John Edwards case. Established precedent. Established as NOT a campaign finance violation. You also have to prove this was a ONE TIME thing to influence an election. Since Trump and other rich men do this frequently, you lose again. In other words, you and BWK can cry all you want. You have NOTHING. Case closed.Why would I have to do that?You also have to prove this was a ONE TIME thing to influence an election.
Stop being an idiot about John Edwards; Stop Comparing Donald Trump’s Campaign Finance Fraud With John Edwards’s CaseRegardless, since there is no limit to how much a candidate can contribute to his own campaign no crime has been committed by Trump. Of course, no one with a brain believes the House hearing are for any other reason than to allow Congressional Democrats to make the same unsubstantiated allegations against the President they have been making for the last two years, thus proving, at least for Democrats, politics is show business for ugly people.Again you nor anyone else can prove that check was for anything specific. Trump paid Cohen as his lawyer NUMEROUS times over the years.David Pecker can provide a great deal of evidence as to what "...that check was for..."Again you nor anyone else can prove that check was for anything specific. Trump paid Cohen as his lawyer NUMEROUS times over the years.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/life...ory.html?noredirect=on&utm_term=.9f9b3d3d2dabRegardless of how much money a candidate contributes to her own campaign, all that money has to be declared and reported; trump did neither, and he lied to the American people about his "donations."Regardless, since there is no limit to how much a candidate can contribute to his own campaign no crime has been committed by Trump.
Trump says he didn't know about Stormy Daniels payment
Here's your problem. You know what destroys you here? The John Edwards case. Established precedent. Established as NOT a campaign finance violation. You also have to prove this was a ONE TIME thing to influence an election. Since Trump and other rich men do this frequently, you lose again. In other words, you and BWK can cry all you want. You have NOTHING. Case closed.
The John Edwards case and Trump's have nothing to do with one another. Just ask Michael Cohen dumb ass.Stop being an idiot about John Edwards; Stop Comparing Donald Trump’s Campaign Finance Fraud With John Edwards’s CaseRegardless, since there is no limit to how much a candidate can contribute to his own campaign no crime has been committed by Trump. Of course, no one with a brain believes the House hearing are for any other reason than to allow Congressional Democrats to make the same unsubstantiated allegations against the President they have been making for the last two years, thus proving, at least for Democrats, politics is show business for ugly people.David Pecker can provide a great deal of evidence as to what "...that check was for..."
https://www.washingtonpost.com/life...ory.html?noredirect=on&utm_term=.9f9b3d3d2dabRegardless of how much money a candidate contributes to her own campaign, all that money has to be declared and reported; trump did neither, and he lied to the American people about his "donations."Regardless, since there is no limit to how much a candidate can contribute to his own campaign no crime has been committed by Trump.
Trump says he didn't know about Stormy Daniels payment
Here's your problem. You know what destroys you here? The John Edwards case. Established precedent. Established as NOT a campaign finance violation. You also have to prove this was a ONE TIME thing to influence an election. Since Trump and other rich men do this frequently, you lose again. In other words, you and BWK can cry all you want. You have NOTHING. Case closed.
Sorry little moron. Established precedent. So STFU and go lie in another thread. You've lost again. You have nothing. All your crying doesn't change the LEGAL precedent. Another loss in your life full of nothing but losing..
