We will get him THIS time....

[BWK]

The dems are so desperate to get him out, they'll do literally anything they can to get him back for winning. What the dems are doing is pure malice on public display.

An illegal election to pay off porn stars is not winning. It's showing who and what you are. And the cheerleaders for those criminals are worse than they are.

 

[lantern2814]

Regardless, since there is no limit to how much a candidate can contribute to his own campaign no crime has been committed by Trump. Of course, no one with a brain believes the House hearing are for any other reason than to allow Congressional Democrats to make the same unsubstantiated allegations against the President they have been making for the last two years, thus proving, at least for Democrats, politics is show business for ugly people.

Regardless, since there is no limit to how much a candidate can contribute to his own campaign no crime has been committed by Trump.

Regardless of how much money a candidate contributes to her own campaign, all that money has to be declared and reported; trump did neither, and he lied to the American people about his "donations."
Trump says he didn't know about Stormy Daniels payment

Here's your problem. You know what destroys you here? The John Edwards case. Established precedent. Established as NOT a campaign finance violation. You also have to prove this was a ONE TIME thing to influence an election. Since Trump and other rich men do this frequently, you lose again. In other words, you and BWK can cry all you want. You have NOTHING. Case closed.

Stop being an idiot about John Edwards; Stop Comparing Donald Trump’s Campaign Finance Fraud With John Edwards’s Case

Sorry little moron. Established precedent. So STFU and go lie in another thread. You've lost again. You have nothing. All your crying doesn't change the LEGAL precedent. Another loss in your life full of nothing but losing..

The John Edwards case and Trump's have nothing to do with one another. Just ask Michael Cohen dumb ass.

Ask Cohen? Hahahahahaha! Too bad Dershowitz, other nationally known lawyers, and former election commissioners have said you have nothing here. And they cite, wait for it, the JOHN EDWARDS CASE. Slapping you around is just too easy.

 

[BWK]

David Pecker can provide a great deal of evidence as to what "...that check was for..."

https://www.washingtonpost.com/life...ory.html?noredirect=on&utm_term=.9f9b3d3d2dab

Regardless, since there is no limit to how much a candidate can contribute to his own campaign no crime has been committed by Trump. Of course, no one with a brain believes the House hearing are for any other reason than to allow Congressional Democrats to make the same unsubstantiated allegations against the President they have been making for the last two years, thus proving, at least for Democrats, politics is show business for ugly people.

Regardless, since there is no limit to how much a candidate can contribute to his own campaign no crime has been committed by Trump.

Regardless of how much money a candidate contributes to her own campaign, all that money has to be declared and reported; trump did neither, and he lied to the American people about his "donations."
Trump says he didn't know about Stormy Daniels payment

Here's your problem. You know what destroys you here? The John Edwards case. Established precedent. Established as NOT a campaign finance violation. You also have to prove this was a ONE TIME thing to influence an election. Since Trump and other rich men do this frequently, you lose again. In other words, you and BWK can cry all you want. You have NOTHING. Case closed.

Stop being an idiot about John Edwards; Stop Comparing Donald Trump’s Campaign Finance Fraud With John Edwards’s Case

Sorry little moron. Established precedent. So STFU and go lie in another thread. You've lost again. You have nothing. All your crying doesn't change the LEGAL precedent. Another loss in your life full of nothing but losing..

There is no established precedent for not reporting hush money to porn stars in a financial disclosure. That belongs to Trump and his other co-conspirators.

 

[BWK]

Regardless of how much money a candidate contributes to her own campaign, all that money has to be declared and reported; trump did neither, and he lied to the American people about his "donations."
Trump says he didn't know about Stormy Daniels payment

Here's your problem. You know what destroys you here? The John Edwards case. Established precedent. Established as NOT a campaign finance violation. You also have to prove this was a ONE TIME thing to influence an election. Since Trump and other rich men do this frequently, you lose again. In other words, you and BWK can cry all you want. You have NOTHING. Case closed.

Stop being an idiot about John Edwards; Stop Comparing Donald Trump’s Campaign Finance Fraud With John Edwards’s Case

Sorry little moron. Established precedent. So STFU and go lie in another thread. You've lost again. You have nothing. All your crying doesn't change the LEGAL precedent. Another loss in your life full of nothing but losing..

The John Edwards case and Trump's have nothing to do with one another. Just ask Michael Cohen dumb ass.

Ask Cohen? Hahahahahaha! Too bad Dershowitz, other nationally known lawyers, and former election commissioners have said you have nothing here. And they cite, wait for it, the JOHN EDWARDS CASE. Slapping you around is just too easy.

Too bad for Dershowitz and you, there has been no precedent set that tells us Edwards didn't report payments to porn stars on a financial disclosure . Can he or you produce evidence that Edwards did that? Of course not. So you and Dershowitz are saying absolutely nothing. Try again. If Dershowitz knew what he was talking about, Edwards would have gone to jail. Cohen is, and so will Trump for the same crime.

 

[lantern2814]

Regardless, since there is no limit to how much a candidate can contribute to his own campaign no crime has been committed by Trump. Of course, no one with a brain believes the House hearing are for any other reason than to allow Congressional Democrats to make the same unsubstantiated allegations against the President they have been making for the last two years, thus proving, at least for Democrats, politics is show business for ugly people.

Regardless, since there is no limit to how much a candidate can contribute to his own campaign no crime has been committed by Trump.

Regardless of how much money a candidate contributes to her own campaign, all that money has to be declared and reported; trump did neither, and he lied to the American people about his "donations."
Trump says he didn't know about Stormy Daniels payment

Here's your problem. You know what destroys you here? The John Edwards case. Established precedent. Established as NOT a campaign finance violation. You also have to prove this was a ONE TIME thing to influence an election. Since Trump and other rich men do this frequently, you lose again. In other words, you and BWK can cry all you want. You have NOTHING. Case closed.

Stop being an idiot about John Edwards; Stop Comparing Donald Trump’s Campaign Finance Fraud With John Edwards’s Case

Sorry little moron. Established precedent. So STFU and go lie in another thread. You've lost again. You have nothing. All your crying doesn't change the LEGAL precedent. Another loss in your life full of nothing but losing..

There is no established precedent for not reporting hush money to porn stars in a financial disclosure. That belongs to Trump and his other co-conspirators.

Keep grasping for that last straw as your ship sinks. It's still not illegal and has noting to do with the campaign. Not a campaign expense no matter how much crying you do. You are still a loser troll.

 

[lantern2814]

Here's your problem. You know what destroys you here? The John Edwards case. Established precedent. Established as NOT a campaign finance violation. You also have to prove this was a ONE TIME thing to influence an election. Since Trump and other rich men do this frequently, you lose again. In other words, you and BWK can cry all you want. You have NOTHING. Case closed.

Stop being an idiot about John Edwards; Stop Comparing Donald Trump’s Campaign Finance Fraud With John Edwards’s Case

Sorry little moron. Established precedent. So STFU and go lie in another thread. You've lost again. You have nothing. All your crying doesn't change the LEGAL precedent. Another loss in your life full of nothing but losing..

The John Edwards case and Trump's have nothing to do with one another. Just ask Michael Cohen dumb ass.

Ask Cohen? Hahahahahaha! Too bad Dershowitz, other nationally known lawyers, and former election commissioners have said you have nothing here. And they cite, wait for it, the JOHN EDWARDS CASE. Slapping you around is just too easy.

Too bad for Dershowitz and you, there has been no precedent set that tells us Edwards didn't report payments to porn stars on a financial disclosure . Can he or you produce evidence that Edwards did that? Of course not. So you and Dershowitz are saying absolutely nothing. Try again.

Poor little illiterate jackass. Braying at the moon and crying like crazy. Edwards was housing, supporting, and quieting his mistress. And you know more about law than Dershowitz? Now you're just pathetic. Try again loser, you're 0 for your life.

 

[BWK]

Stop being an idiot about John Edwards; Stop Comparing Donald Trump’s Campaign Finance Fraud With John Edwards’s Case

Sorry little moron. Established precedent. So STFU and go lie in another thread. You've lost again. You have nothing. All your crying doesn't change the LEGAL precedent. Another loss in your life full of nothing but losing..

The John Edwards case and Trump's have nothing to do with one another. Just ask Michael Cohen dumb ass.

Ask Cohen? Hahahahahaha! Too bad Dershowitz, other nationally known lawyers, and former election commissioners have said you have nothing here. And they cite, wait for it, the JOHN EDWARDS CASE. Slapping you around is just too easy.

Too bad for Dershowitz and you, there has been no precedent set that tells us Edwards didn't report payments to porn stars on a financial disclosure . Can he or you produce evidence that Edwards did that? Of course not. So you and Dershowitz are saying absolutely nothing. Try again.

Poor little illiterate jackass. Braying at the moon and crying like crazy. Edwards was housing, supporting, and quieting his mistress. And you know more about law than Dershowitz? Now you're just pathetic. Try again loser, you're 0 for your life.

So is Cohen, and Trump will be joining him soon.

 

[BWK]

Regardless of how much money a candidate contributes to her own campaign, all that money has to be declared and reported; trump did neither, and he lied to the American people about his "donations."
Trump says he didn't know about Stormy Daniels payment

Here's your problem. You know what destroys you here? The John Edwards case. Established precedent. Established as NOT a campaign finance violation. You also have to prove this was a ONE TIME thing to influence an election. Since Trump and other rich men do this frequently, you lose again. In other words, you and BWK can cry all you want. You have NOTHING. Case closed.

Stop being an idiot about John Edwards; Stop Comparing Donald Trump’s Campaign Finance Fraud With John Edwards’s Case

Sorry little moron. Established precedent. So STFU and go lie in another thread. You've lost again. You have nothing. All your crying doesn't change the LEGAL precedent. Another loss in your life full of nothing but losing..

There is no established precedent for not reporting hush money to porn stars in a financial disclosure. That belongs to Trump and his other co-conspirators.

Keep grasping for that last straw as your ship sinks. It's still not illegal and has noting to do with the campaign. Not a campaign expense no matter how much crying you do. You are still a loser troll.

If it had never been considered a campaign finance expense, Cohen wouldn't be going to jail. Lol! What a dumb ass.

 

[lantern2814]

Here's your problem. You know what destroys you here? The John Edwards case. Established precedent. Established as NOT a campaign finance violation. You also have to prove this was a ONE TIME thing to influence an election. Since Trump and other rich men do this frequently, you lose again. In other words, you and BWK can cry all you want. You have NOTHING. Case closed.

Stop being an idiot about John Edwards; Stop Comparing Donald Trump’s Campaign Finance Fraud With John Edwards’s Case

Sorry little moron. Established precedent. So STFU and go lie in another thread. You've lost again. You have nothing. All your crying doesn't change the LEGAL precedent. Another loss in your life full of nothing but losing..

There is no established precedent for not reporting hush money to porn stars in a financial disclosure. That belongs to Trump and his other co-conspirators.

Keep grasping for that last straw as your ship sinks. It's still not illegal and has noting to do with the campaign. Not a campaign expense no matter how much crying you do. You are still a loser troll.

If it had never been considered a campaign finance expense, Cohen wouldn't be going to jail. Lol! What a dumb ass.

Cohen isn't going to jail for that dumbass. Learn to read. Lying to Congress, lying on loan applications, and taxi medallion fraud. Try again moron.

 

[Trinnity]

What are the board lefties going to do when Trump is re-elected? Tears and screaming at the sky? Pearl clutching? Civil war? Gun violence??