Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So liberals do wish saddam was still in power torturing and murdering people?
Watch now....as we witness the great liberal dance.
I call it the "left wing two step."
They are glad saddam is not around but......
So liberals do wish saddam was still in power torturing and murdering people?
Watch now....as we witness the great liberal dance.
I call it the "left wing two step."
They are glad saddam is not around but......
Saddam was contained and was not a threat to anyone
We ended up with over 100,000 dead Iraqis, Saddam would not have killed that many.
It cost us 5000 dean, tens of thousand wounded and 2 trillion dollars that could have been better spent
So liberals do wish saddam was still in power torturing and murdering people?
Watch now....as we witness the great liberal dance.
I call it the "left wing two step."
They are glad saddam is not around but......
Saddam was contained and was not a threat to anyone
We ended up with over 100,000 dead Iraqis, Saddam would not have killed that many.
It cost us 5000 dean, tens of thousand wounded and 2 trillion dollars that could have been better spent
Damn...I guess Montana newspapers have finally come to their senses...
Newspaper: We Were Wrong To Endorse Obama; Hes Even Worse Than George Bush
The Billings Gazette, a Montana newspaper that endorsed Barack Obama over John McCain in 2008, admitted Friday that it was wrong. It appears that the unraveling of Iraq is the proverbial straw that broke the camels back.
Obama, the paper said, is even worse than George W. Bush:
[W]e were wrong. We said things couldnt get much worse after the sub-par presidency of George W. Bush. But, President Barack Obamas administration has us yearning for the good ol days when we were at least winning battles in Iraq.
Heres what the paper wrote about Obama in 2008:
At this extremely challenging time, America needs a uniter, not a divider. In this economic turmoil, America needs a thoughtful, cool-headed optimist who envisions a bright future for all citizens.
*
After several years in which worldwide respect for America has been diminished, our great nation needs a new leader who can inspire confidence at home and abroad.
A uniter, not a divider who could restore worldwide respect for America? LOL.
Obama is that leader. As Gen. Colin Powell said last week, Obama is the president America needs now ecause of his ability to inspire, because of the inclusive nature of his campaign, because he is reaching out all across America, because of who he is and his rhetorical abilities. He has both style and substance.
After painting his opposition as enemies for 5 ever-more polarizing years, its clear that this couldnt be any further from reality.
If youre one of the people who voted for Obama in 2008, 2012 or both and now regret it, The Billings Gazette officially feels your pain. Finally.
Why do we want to be winning battles in Iraq? We should never have invaded that country to begin with.
Damn...I guess Montana newspapers have finally come to their senses...
Newspaper: We Were Wrong To Endorse Obama; Hes Even Worse Than George Bush
The Billings Gazette, a Montana newspaper that endorsed Barack Obama over John McCain in 2008, admitted Friday that it was wrong. It appears that the unraveling of Iraq is the proverbial straw that broke the camels back.
Obama, the paper said, is even worse than George W. Bush:
[W]e were wrong. We said things couldnt get much worse after the sub-par presidency of George W. Bush. But, President Barack Obamas administration has us yearning for the good ol days when we were at least winning battles in Iraq.
Heres what the paper wrote about Obama in 2008:
At this extremely challenging time, America needs a uniter, not a divider. In this economic turmoil, America needs a thoughtful, cool-headed optimist who envisions a bright future for all citizens.
*
After several years in which worldwide respect for America has been diminished, our great nation needs a new leader who can inspire confidence at home and abroad.
A uniter, not a divider who could restore worldwide respect for America? LOL.
Obama is that leader. As Gen. Colin Powell said last week, Obama is the president America needs now ecause of his ability to inspire, because of the inclusive nature of his campaign, because he is reaching out all across America, because of who he is and his rhetorical abilities. He has both style and substance.
After painting his opposition as enemies for 5 ever-more polarizing years, its clear that this couldnt be any further from reality.
If youre one of the people who voted for Obama in 2008, 2012 or both and now regret it, The Billings Gazette officially feels your pain. Finally.
Why do we want to be winning battles in Iraq? We should never have invaded that country to begin with.
i agree, but the progressive liberal congress at the time insisted (actually forced) GW Bush to attack due to the WMD situation where Saddamn was killing his own countrymen.
today those same assholes, and the libertools on USMB are saying, "it's Booooooosh's war"..., lying scumbags.
^The Obama Fluff is strong in this one.What a stupid newspaper editorial staff. Iraq was an illegal invasion of a sovereign nation - why is that so hard to accept? Is Montana now becoming another one of America's stupid states? Excellent piece below, and check out the veteran's op.
The Philosopher's Stone: IRAQ -- PART ONE
"With Iraq's Sunni insurgents taking over increasing amounts of territory, and with splits among Shiite factions in the country, I called up Thomas E. Ricks, the Pulitzer Prize-winning reporter who became well known for his work covering the war in Iraq. Over the course of numerous newspaper articles and two books, Ricks traced the conflict from its beginning all the way until the American withdrawal. Currently the National Security advisor at the New America Foundation, he also writes the blog The Best Defense for Foreign Policy magazine."
An Interview With Tom Ricks on the Crisis in Iraq: How Bad Can It Get? | New Republic
"The Wikipedia says Operation Iraqi Freedom started on the 20th of March, 2003, which is just another reason why you shouldnt believe anything you read in the Wikipedia (dont, just dont). Thats not correct, the war began a day earlier. See, I was there on the night the war really started, at precisely 2200 hours, on the 19th of March in the Northern Arabian Gulf. I was there when US Navy SEALs and Polish GROM stormed the MABOT and KAAOT oil terminals a full day before Saddam Hussein discovered that his time was finally up. In point of fact, I had arrived there four months before, a few days before Christmas in December of 2002. From the day of my arrival (and before that really) to the day the war started, and for months after, I was a Navy intelligence officer working in support of the invasion force. Theres not much I dont know about the events leading up to war and the aftermath of the invasion.
Absolutely Nothing: A Veterans Savage Indictment of the Iraq War | Americans Against the Tea Party
Damn...I guess Montana newspapers have finally come to their senses...
Newspaper: We Were Wrong To Endorse Obama; Hes Even Worse Than George Bush
The Billings Gazette, a Montana newspaper that endorsed Barack Obama over John McCain in 2008, admitted Friday that it was wrong. It appears that the unraveling of Iraq is the proverbial straw that broke the camels back.
Obama, the paper said, is even worse than George W. Bush:
[W]e were wrong. We said things couldnt get much worse after the sub-par presidency of George W. Bush. But, President Barack Obamas administration has us yearning for the good ol days when we were at least winning battles in Iraq.
Heres what the paper wrote about Obama in 2008:
At this extremely challenging time, America needs a uniter, not a divider. In this economic turmoil, America needs a thoughtful, cool-headed optimist who envisions a bright future for all citizens.
*
After several years in which worldwide respect for America has been diminished, our great nation needs a new leader who can inspire confidence at home and abroad.
A uniter, not a divider who could restore worldwide respect for America? LOL.
Obama is that leader. As Gen. Colin Powell said last week, Obama is the president America needs now ecause of his ability to inspire, because of the inclusive nature of his campaign, because he is reaching out all across America, because of who he is and his rhetorical abilities. He has both style and substance.
After painting his opposition as enemies for 5 ever-more polarizing years, its clear that this couldnt be any further from reality.
If youre one of the people who voted for Obama in 2008, 2012 or both and now regret it, The Billings Gazette officially feels your pain. Finally.
Why do we want to be winning battles in Iraq? We should never have invaded that country to begin with.
I am trying to understand why liberals who supposedly stand up for the tortured, oppressed and down trodden always seem to wish saddam was still around.
This country did not "invade Iraq" and I am still waiting for liberals to explain to me why Obama never called for an independent investigation into Bush and Cheney. Liberals, like you, always say Bush is as guilty as hitler. Get that? Guilty as hitler. One liberal (rightwinger) said the reason Obama did not conduct an investigation was the same reason Gerald Ford did not conduct one into Nixon. That means to rightwinger, the spying on a handful of democrats is akin to mass murder. Which, liberals not only say Bush is as guilty as hitler, they also say he targeted Iraqi civilians and killed millions.
Do you follow that? I doubt it.
So, let us know when Bush gets charged with high war crimes by the UN (who independently investigated Iraq and determined they violated at least 17 resolutions and voted unanimously to LIBERATE Iraq from saddam.)
Too bad so sad for the morons on the left who insist it is so obvious Cheney and Bush cooked up all of this terrorism stuff for oil. Hell, we already know the morons on the left are truthers.
They still think Bush started TWO unwarranted wars. I think they still think the war on terror is a myth. For the ones that supposedly don't, they were stupid enough to believe the war on terror was isolated getting one person and one organization. Osama and al aqeda.
Have those morons noticed that bin laden has been dead for nearly 3 years, and al qaeda is on the run (according to obama...remember) and there are still mass terror killings?
Oh never mind. Liberals will not get it. They will stick with their bullshit and all of the irrational rantings with out proof.
So liberals do wish saddam was still in power torturing and murdering people?
Watch now....as we witness the great liberal dance.
I call it the "left wing two step."
They are glad saddam is not around but......
Saddam was contained and was not a threat to anyone
We ended up with over 100,000 dead Iraqis, Saddam would not have killed that many. They are still at war ten years later
It cost us 5000 dead, tens of thousand wounded and 2 trillion dollars that could have been better spent on helping Americans
The Billings Gazette is correct
They were wrong to endorse Obama. McCain said he would keep us in Iraq for 50 years. If McCain were President, we would still have troops in Iraq. We would be losing 4-5 soldiers a week, but Iraq would be policed.
If that is what you wanted, you would be better off with McCain/ Palin
The Billings Gazette is correct
They were wrong to endorse Obama. McCain said he would keep us in Iraq for 50 years. If McCain were President, we would still have troops in Iraq. We would be losing 4-5 soldiers a week, but Iraq would be policed.
If that is what you wanted, you would be better off with McCain/ Palin
Once again you are oh so close to being right, it was Bush who said 50 years, McCain said 100. Not that he said he expected it to take 100 years but that it COULD be 100 years. So what happens? Both Obama and Hillary attack the President, you know in a time if war, and McCain.
Here is what McCain said:
"It's not a matter of how long we're in Iraq, it's if we succeed or not," McCain said to CNN's Larry King.
"And both Sen. Obama and Clinton want to set a date for withdrawal -- that means chaos, that means genocide, that means undoing all the success we've achieved and al Qaeda tells the world they defeated the United States of America.
Seems as if he has been proven correct.
Damn...I guess Montana newspapers have finally come to their senses...
Newspaper: We Were Wrong To Endorse Obama; Hes Even Worse Than George Bush
The Billings Gazette, a Montana newspaper that endorsed Barack Obama over John McCain in 2008, admitted Friday that it was wrong. It appears that the unraveling of Iraq is the proverbial straw that broke the camels back.
Obama, the paper said, is even worse than George W. Bush:
[W]e were wrong. We said things couldnt get much worse after the sub-par presidency of George W. Bush. But, President Barack Obamas administration has us yearning for the good ol days when we were at least winning battles in Iraq.
Heres what the paper wrote about Obama in 2008:
At this extremely challenging time, America needs a uniter, not a divider. In this economic turmoil, America needs a thoughtful, cool-headed optimist who envisions a bright future for all citizens.
*
After several years in which worldwide respect for America has been diminished, our great nation needs a new leader who can inspire confidence at home and abroad.
A uniter, not a divider who could restore worldwide respect for America? LOL.
Obama is that leader. As Gen. Colin Powell said last week, Obama is the president America needs now ecause of his ability to inspire, because of the inclusive nature of his campaign, because he is reaching out all across America, because of who he is and his rhetorical abilities. He has both style and substance.
After painting his opposition as enemies for 5 ever-more polarizing years, its clear that this couldnt be any further from reality.
If youre one of the people who voted for Obama in 2008, 2012 or both and now regret it, The Billings Gazette officially feels your pain. Finally.
Fuck the Billings Gazette and the rest of the media. While I am no big fan of the President, I am even less of a fan of the media that all but refused to take a good deep look at Obama when he was a candidate.
The Billings Gazette is correct
They were wrong to endorse Obama. McCain said he would keep us in Iraq for 50 years. If McCain were President, we would still have troops in Iraq. We would be losing 4-5 soldiers a week, but Iraq would be policed.
If that is what you wanted, you would be better off with McCain/ Palin
Once again you are oh so close to being right, it was Bush who said 50 years, McCain said 100. Not that he said he expected it to take 100 years but that it COULD be 100 years. So what happens? Both Obama and Hillary attack the President, you know in a time if war, and McCain.
Here is what McCain said:
"It's not a matter of how long we're in Iraq, it's if we succeed or not," McCain said to CNN's Larry King.
"And both Sen. Obama and Clinton want to set a date for withdrawal -- that means chaos, that means genocide, that means undoing all the success we've achieved and al Qaeda tells the world they defeated the United States of America.
Seems as if he has been proven correct.
The far left would much rather see the world burn than admit they were wrong!
McCain was also for campaign finance reform, so why did so many vote for Obama and against Campaign finance reform?
Why would conservatives move away from being correct? Strange notion you have.Damn I thought the cons had come to their senses and were ready to apologize for Bush.
Oh well...
I see once again that any critique of Obama turns into a diatribe about Iraq. OK, we got it, you don't think that removing a sadistic dictator like Saddam was worth it in Iraq but you do in Syria, Libia, and of course the Balkans. You don't think that the freeing millions of Iraqis so they too can have the freedom to vote is worth it, got ya. You didn't much care about Saddam's sons and their torture chambers, OK then. You think it was all about oil yet I don't see where we stole a drop, should have, didn't.
That said, I would have voted no for war but what the hell do I know? I am glad that the war didn't cause a huge disruption in the world economy. If anything it stimulated the US economy. Had we bombed the crap out of Saddam he would have done what he did in Kuwait and blew up his oil fields, and quite frankly I am addicted to oil, I like the stuff and I don't want to mortgage my house to be able to drive to work.
The president of Iraq wanted us out, made a big deal of it, we left to give our puppet some legitimacy, he thanks us for setting him up by fanning the flames of sectarian conflict and now he wants us back. Fuck him, and fuck anyone who wants to help him retain power.
Damn I thought the cons had come to their senses and were ready to apologize for Bush.
Oh well...
Damn I thought the cons had come to their senses and were ready to apologize for Bush.
Oh well...
Apologize...? Are you kidding? If Bush had run in 2012, I would have voted for him again, over Obama.
You crazy!