The Court is already "packed". How do you propose "unpacking" it when Democrats hold the 6-3 majority?
Do you seriously think that Brett Kavanaugh won't do something stupid to get himself impeached? He doesn't seem to be that bright. He's already been admonished for his partisanship by the Chief Justice.
That's not a Republic, that's an oligarchy. That's pretty much the system you have now, and it's been a disaster for working and middle class Americans.
The most successful economies, are the most democratic economies - Norway, Switzerland, Canada, New Zealand, Australia, Germany, Finland, Great Britain.
The least successful economies - Russia, any of the South American economies, Turkey, are all Oligarchies - where the wealthy control the nation, and the poor and middle class are left to fend for themselves. The USA is already at Second World status with your unstable government, and your crashed economy.
You can rejoin the first world, or continue to descend into chaos. Either ALL of the people vote, and ALL of their votes are counted, or your nation is doomed to become a fascist dictatorship. Choose wisely.
That's not a Republic, that's an oligarchy. That's pretty much the system you have now, and it's been a disaster for working and middle class Americans.
The most successful economies, are the most democratic economies - Norway, Switzerland, Canada, New Zealand, Australia, Germany, Finland, Great Britain.
The least successful economies - Russia, any of the South American economies, Turkey, are all Oligarchies - where the wealthy control the nation, and the poor and middle class are left to fend for themselves. The USA is already at Second World status with your unstable government, and your crashed economy.
You can rejoin the first world, or continue to descend into chaos. Either ALL of the people vote, and ALL of their votes are counted, or your nation is doomed to become a fascist dictatorship. Choose wisely.
I support a new amendment that states ALL men are created equal, with no racial exceptions: as in the current provision that says Blacks will be considered 3/5ths human. (make sense?)
I just haven't gotten around to it yet. Many are already in the Constitution also. I suggest you read it.
As an example,
To guarantee the right to use the word "God" in the Pledge of Allegiance and the national motto
Is a direct violation of the 1st Amendment, regarding freedom of religion. What you have in that proposal is an infringement of the establishment clause.
OK, that was already proposed as an amendment. I'm fine dropping that one, but:
But "In God We Trust" seems fine as a motto to me.
Also, "One nation under God..." seems fine in the Pledge.
Are you saying they should be revised?
The U.S. Constitution can be amended two ways, either by 2/3 votes in the House and Senate, or by a Convention of States where 3/4 of the States must ratify new amendments for the new amendment to pass. So if in 2022 or 2024 the GOP can get 38 state legislatures they can amend the US Constitution. Not an impossible task.
The US president has no say in either of the amendment processes.
The authority to amend the Constitution of the United States is derived from Article V of the Constitution. After Congress proposes an amendment, the Archivist of the United States, who heads the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA), is charged with responsibility for...
www.archives.gov
The Constitution provides that an amendment may be proposed either by the Congress with a two-thirds majority vote in both the House of Representatives and the Senate or by a constitutional convention called for by two-thirds of the State legislatures. None of the 27 amendments to the Constitution have been proposed by constitutional convention. The Congress proposes an amendment in the form of a joint resolution. Since the President does not have a constitutional role in the amendment process, the joint resolution does not go to the White House for signature or approval. The original document is forwarded directly to NARA's Office of the Federal Register (OFR) for processing and publication. The OFR adds legislative history notes to the joint resolution and publishes it in slip law format. The OFR also assembles an information package for the States which includes formal "red-line" copies of the joint resolution, copies of the joint resolution in slip law format, and the statutory procedure for ratification under 1 U.S.C. 106b.
A proposed amendment becomes part of the Constitution as soon as it is ratified by three-fourths of the States (38 of 50 States). When the OFR verifies that it has received the required number of authenticated ratification documents, it drafts a formal proclamation for the Archivist to certify that the amendment is valid and has become part of the Constitution. This certification is published in the Federal Register and U.S. Statutes at Large and serves as official notice to the Congress and to the Nation that the amendment process has been completed.
So what new amendments would you support? I'll start the ball rolling with a few in a poll.
Some Proposed Amendments Vote 🗳️ Show Results 📊 (watch ad for results) View Next Poll ➡️ The Constitution is a living and evolving document. One of the ways that the Constitution is changed is through the amendment process. It can be an arduous process, requiring agreement by many different...
According to a recent Mason-Dixon poll obtained exclusively by The Daily Caller, a large majority of the public backs an amendment to the Constitution requiring a balanced budget, a reform some lawmakers say is on the table in the debt ceiling debate.
news.yahoo.com
65% of Americans favor a balanced budget amendment of some sort.
You need to keep in simple and only pursue these two. Get the ball rolling and maybe more can be done later.
You can prioritize the amendments any way you like.
1. Term Limits is on the list
2. A Balanced Budget Amendment covers your "spending restraint" priority
No, they would be a gathering of ALL legislatures, dumbass!
Election reform - the federal government is not responsible for any elections.
Balanced budget amendment - Flunked economics did we?
Filibuster - is a Senate rule and cannot be part of the Constitution.
Line Item veto - This I would support.
Mandatory retirements - I oppose. Many older people are still fully functioning and do not deserve discrimination by ageism.
Term limits - We already have term limits. They are called elections.
Politicians medical care - They do get the same medical coverage as everyone else who is a government employee. My wife's coverage from the private sector was better than mine when I worked for the federal government and cheaper.
Clarify the 14th Amendment - I would support.
The Supreme Court - I would support limiting it to 9 justices.
So there are three on your laundry list that make sense. That is not worth a Constitutional Convention which could result in a free for all of changes we don't want.
According to a recent Mason-Dixon poll obtained exclusively by The Daily Caller, a large majority of the public backs an amendment to the Constitution requiring a balanced budget, a reform some lawmakers say is on the table in the debt ceiling debate.
news.yahoo.com
65% of Americans favor a balanced budget amendment of some sort.
You need to keep in simple and only pursue these two. Get the ball rolling and maybe more can be done later.
Same as now, the courts would need to enforce the laws as written.
So far no one has said any of the proposed amendments are "unconstitutional". That's good.
Don't see how. Once it becomes an amendment it is part of the Constitution. By definition it could not be unconstitutional. Any conflicts would have to be reconciled by separate amendments.
The U.S. Constitution can be amended two ways, either by 2/3 votes in the House and Senate, or by a Convention of States where 3/4 of the States must ratify new amendments for the new amendment to pass. So if in 2022 or 2024 the GOP can get 38 state legislatures they can amend the US Constitution. Not an impossible task.
The US president has no say in either of the amendment processes.
The authority to amend the Constitution of the United States is derived from Article V of the Constitution. After Congress proposes an amendment, the Archivist of the United States, who heads the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA), is charged with responsibility for...
www.archives.gov
The Constitution provides that an amendment may be proposed either by the Congress with a two-thirds majority vote in both the House of Representatives and the Senate or by a constitutional convention called for by two-thirds of the State legislatures. None of the 27 amendments to the Constitution have been proposed by constitutional convention. The Congress proposes an amendment in the form of a joint resolution. Since the President does not have a constitutional role in the amendment process, the joint resolution does not go to the White House for signature or approval. The original document is forwarded directly to NARA's Office of the Federal Register (OFR) for processing and publication. The OFR adds legislative history notes to the joint resolution and publishes it in slip law format. The OFR also assembles an information package for the States which includes formal "red-line" copies of the joint resolution, copies of the joint resolution in slip law format, and the statutory procedure for ratification under 1 U.S.C. 106b.
A proposed amendment becomes part of the Constitution as soon as it is ratified by three-fourths of the States (38 of 50 States). When the OFR verifies that it has received the required number of authenticated ratification documents, it drafts a formal proclamation for the Archivist to certify that the amendment is valid and has become part of the Constitution. This certification is published in the Federal Register and U.S. Statutes at Large and serves as official notice to the Congress and to the Nation that the amendment process has been completed.
So what new amendments would you support? I'll start the ball rolling with a few in a poll.
Some Proposed Amendments Vote 🗳️ Show Results 📊 (watch ad for results) View Next Poll ➡️ The Constitution is a living and evolving document. One of the ways that the Constitution is changed is through the amendment process. It can be an arduous process, requiring agreement by many different...