Anchor babies. You talk about Chinese and Russian anchor babies...what about the 30M squatemalan orcs that hop the border and shit out a roach egg that immediately becomes a new American citizen?
Amazing how many of you focus on all the wrong things.
Instead of improving the Constitution to bring it into the 21st Century, you’re focusing on stupid shit birthright citizenship and voter ID.
Your obsession with illegal voting is the biggest waste of time and energy in the world.
People are not coming to your country to vote against Republicans. Every other nation in the world is making it easier for their citizens to vote not more difficult.
The American republican party is afraid of Americans voting. Perhaps they should consider getting a platform that doesn’t impoverish their voters.
The U.S. Constitution can be amended two ways, either by 2/3 votes in the House and Senate, or by a Convention of States where 3/4 of the States must ratify new amendments for the new amendment to pass. So if in 2022 or 2024 the GOP can get 38 state legislatures they can amend the US Constitution. Not an impossible task.
The US president has no say in either of the amendment processes.
The authority to amend the Constitution of the United States is derived from Article V of the Constitution. After Congress proposes an amendment, the Archivist of the United States, who heads the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA), is charged with responsibility for...
www.archives.gov
The Constitution provides that an amendment may be proposed either by the Congress with a two-thirds majority vote in both the House of Representatives and the Senate or by a constitutional convention called for by two-thirds of the State legislatures. None of the 27 amendments to the Constitution have been proposed by constitutional convention. The Congress proposes an amendment in the form of a joint resolution. Since the President does not have a constitutional role in the amendment process, the joint resolution does not go to the White House for signature or approval. The original document is forwarded directly to NARA's Office of the Federal Register (OFR) for processing and publication. The OFR adds legislative history notes to the joint resolution and publishes it in slip law format. The OFR also assembles an information package for the States which includes formal "red-line" copies of the joint resolution, copies of the joint resolution in slip law format, and the statutory procedure for ratification under 1 U.S.C. 106b.
A proposed amendment becomes part of the Constitution as soon as it is ratified by three-fourths of the States (38 of 50 States). When the OFR verifies that it has received the required number of authenticated ratification documents, it drafts a formal proclamation for the Archivist to certify that the amendment is valid and has become part of the Constitution. This certification is published in the Federal Register and U.S. Statutes at Large and serves as official notice to the Congress and to the Nation that the amendment process has been completed.
So what new amendments would you support? I'll start the ball rolling with a few in a poll.
Some Proposed Amendments Vote 🗳️ Show Results 📊 (watch ad for results) View Next Poll ➡️ The Constitution is a living and evolving document. One of the ways that the Constitution is changed is through the amendment process. It can be an arduous process, requiring agreement by many different...
I support a new amendment that states ALL men are created equal, with no racial exceptions: as in the current provision that says Blacks will be considered 3/5ths human. (make sense?)
Just stop with accusing everyone you disagree of "lying". It makes you look stupid, which at this point is almost a given with Trumpists.
Your problem with corruption has nothing to do with term limits and everything to do with election financing. Your system is set up to require politicians to fund raise right from day one to win re-election. Those with money, like PAC's and lobbyists, are a requirement to the system.
It doesn't matter how long people are in office, if being in office is a setup to corrupt them.
I feel very strongly that there should be an Amendment that says that Congress' power is limited to exactly what is set forth in Article One, and all other powers are reserved to the states and the people.
States are states. They can handle themselves...or not ?
The US corp need to be eliminated completely... except for a few folks with DA CODE, In case some scumbags want to dance.
The other meatheads can quit fucking whores and doing drugs all over the world and come home to build shit with YOUR tax dollars, each group controlled by the states directors
I support a new amendment that states ALL men are created equal, with no racial exceptions: as in the current provision that says Blacks will be considered 3/5ths human. (make sense?)
Failed high school civics, did you? The 3/5th representation requirement went away with ratification of the 14th Amendment. Perhaps you should go back to high school and learn what you missed by sleeping in class.
The amendments in the OP will never be agreed to by the democrats. That's why I'm suggesting that we need a convention of states.
I agree with the repeal of the 14th amendment, which is the basis for "anchor babies" from Russia and China.
Only US citizens should be able to make a US citizen.
Same as now, the courts would need to enforce the laws as written.
So far no one has said any of the proposed amendments are "unconstitutional". That's good.
I just haven't gotten around to it yet. Many are already in the Constitution also. I suggest you read it.
As an example,
To guarantee the right to use the word "God" in the Pledge of Allegiance and the national motto
Is a direct violation of the 1st Amendment, regarding freedom of religion. What you have in that proposal is an infringement of the establishment clause.
Voting is a guaranteed right that no state can deny any citizen for any reason.
Any state can pass and enforce restrictions on firearms possession.
No filibuster shall be allowed on an legislation, and all laws can only be passed through regular order.
The congress or any state shall pass any law based upon any religious belief whatsoever, and any state legislator that attempts to pass such a law shall be guilty of a felony, punishable by a minimum of 5 years imprisonment, $100,000 or both.
The congress or any state shall pass any laws denying the right of a woman to induce medial abortion, and any state legislator that attempts to pass such a law shall be guilty of a felony punishable by a minimum of 10 yrars imprisonment, $1,000,000 or both.
Congress or any state shall pass any law denying the rights of its cutizens to form organized labor parties.
Bribery or any political donation above $10 Shall be deemed a felony punishable by a minimum of 10 yeats imprisonment. And anyone recieving any such donation shall be guilty of the sane
Proportional Representation for the House, changing the Senate to something useful, changing the presidency, either getting rid of it so it's like the German system, or changing it so it's a multi elected body like Congress. Switzerland has a good system with 7 people on the executive and one is chosen to be head of state for a bit. There are plenty of possibilities, like electing heads of departments who deal with their own part and interact with Congress, like foreign affairs, education, etc etc.
Perhaps I missed it glancing through the replies here but from what I see from the lack of its mention in the thread is that all the pissing and moaning about the Congress' ability to set the number of Sumpreme Court justices was rather insincere.