We must restore constitutional government

[$ecular#eckler]

The people tasked with enforcing our laws are the same people violating our most important laws....

Nobody is going to restore the Constitutional government.
The Constitution sucks. The state constitutions suck.
The three-part separation theory is improperly deployed, and the inadequacies in the separation of powers provide the opportunity for corruption. It should not be that difficult to figure out that the Justice Department needs to be separated from the presidency in order to satisfy the citizens sense of favored cronyism. It is absurd to expect the person that was nominated by the president to then investigate the president - it absurd, yet I am the only person smart enough to figure that out.

It is also absurd to believe that the judiciary is separated from the other branches, when they are expected to graduate their hierarchy of offices.

The 17th Amendment eliminated a check on the reliability of the state governments to demonstrate that they can agree on issues - indicating that the state constitutions are faulty.

Gerrymandering representative districts and limiting the number of representatives fails to properly represent the diversity that the nation has evolved to.

The system sucks, and I am the only one who figured it out.

A Better Subdivisioning of the Three-part Model will Provide Better Checks & Balances

http://www.us4cc.info

www.usmessageboard.com

 

[$ecular#eckler]

This is our "mission statement" for our form of Constitutional Government.

We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.

Right, and the fact is the operations of the government cannot fulfill the mission. It is not that the mission is not a noble mission, or unreasonable; it is that the operations are erroneously organized.

 

[Rigby5]

The people tasked with enforcing our laws are the same people violating our most important laws....

Nobody is going to restore the Constitutional government.
The Constitution sucks. The state constitutions suck.
The three-part separation theory is improperly deployed, and the inadequacies in the separation of powers provide the opportunity for corruption. It should not be that difficult to figure out that the Justice Department needs to be separated from the presidency in order to satisfy the citizens sense of favored cronyism. It is absurd to expect the person that was nominated by the president to then investigate the president - it absurd, yet I am the only person smart enough to figure that out.

It is also absurd to believe that the judiciary is separated from the other branches, when they are expected to graduate their hierarchy of offices.

The 17th Amendment eliminated a check on the reliability of the state governments to demonstrate that they can agree on issues - indicating that the state constitutions are faulty.

Gerrymandering representative districts and limiting the number of representatives fails to properly represent the diversity that the nation has evolved to.

The system sucks, and I am the only one who figured it out.

A Better Subdivisioning of the Three-part Model will Provide Better Checks & Balances

http://www.us4cc.info

www.usmessageboard.com

Had to look that one up.
{...
The Seventeenth Amendment (Amendment XVII) to the United States Constitution established the direct election of United States senators in each state.
...}

Not sure I agree with all of what you wrote, but good food for thought.
Presidents are and always were too powerful.

 

[danielpalos]

What a difference a Constitution makes.

1. You wouldn't know the US Constitution if it slapped you in the face
2. Left-wing thugs don't care about constitutions. They ignore them, then destroy them

The constitution is mostly left wing.
It is restricting government and protecting individual rights.

This is our "mission statement" for our form of Constitutional Government.

We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.

Correct.
All that we want government for, is socialism, like to protect us from capitalist dictators, monarchs, and feudal barons.
All the bad comes from when a few want to abuse others for unearned profits.
And government is designed and intended to protect us from that.

The fact government can also become a corrupt danger, usually is from capitalists infiltrating and manipulating government away from its original purposes.

Yet, all it should require is social morals for free not the Expense of Government.

We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.

 

[danielpalos]

This is our "mission statement" for our form of Constitutional Government.

We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.

Right, and the fact is the operations of the government cannot fulfill the mission. It is not that the mission is not a noble mission, or unreasonable; it is that the operations are erroneously organized.

We have a First Amendment. What would be better?

 

[Rigby5]

What a difference a Constitution makes.

1. You wouldn't know the US Constitution if it slapped you in the face
2. Left-wing thugs don't care about constitutions. They ignore them, then destroy them

The constitution is mostly left wing.
It is restricting government and protecting individual rights.

This is our "mission statement" for our form of Constitutional Government.

We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.

Correct.
All that we want government for, is socialism, like to protect us from capitalist dictators, monarchs, and feudal barons.
All the bad comes from when a few want to abuse others for unearned profits.
And government is designed and intended to protect us from that.

The fact government can also become a corrupt danger, usually is from capitalists infiltrating and manipulating government away from its original purposes.

Yet, all it should require is social morals for free not the Expense of Government.

We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.

I do not believe socialism requires the redistribution of wealth.
But we do need minimal social safety net because while primitive societies allow people to survive by simple foraging, not only make property private so that is no longer possible, but we also have greatly over populated by eliminating most natural threats, while not taking birth control seriously enough.

 

[Rigby5]

This is our "mission statement" for our form of Constitutional Government.

We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.

Right, and the fact is the operations of the government cannot fulfill the mission. It is not that the mission is not a noble mission, or unreasonable; it is that the operations are erroneously organized.

We have a First Amendment. What would be better?

We had a first amendment, but between monopolistic controls, censorship, federal overstep, etc., it is not clear we do any more.
Look at the last election.
I can't believe the 2 choices forced upon us were the best possible.
And none of the media makes any sense any more.
For example, the media knew there were no significant WMD in Iraq, and yet we invaded because the media had 69% of the people believing Saddam was behind the 9/11 attacks.

 

[P@triot]

You must love Right Wing fantasy where you only have the "gospel Truth" in whatever you claim.

The evidence is undeniable. We haven't seen a leftist in over 100 years show the slightest respect for the US Constitution. After all, you can't build large, unlimited government if you're restricted.

 

[P@triot]

I know about all there is to know about economics.

You literally don't even know the most fundamental basics about economics. I know this, because you embrace socialism. A failed ideology that has resulted in mass poverty everywhere it has ever been instituted. People educated on even basic economics do not embrace socialism.

 

[P@triot]

But you are wrong about someone inheriting millions and just putting it into mutual funds.

Again, you sound like buffoon discussing economics. Very few people "inherit" millions. Most people inherit a business. And rather than cash in and live life like a lazy socialist, they realize that they have a responsibility to continue (and grow) that business for all of the employees who rely on it.

You're a socialist. Stick to idiotic theories dreamed up in academia where results aren't required. When you attempt to talk real world, you just sound insane.

 

[Rigby5]

You must love Right Wing fantasy where you only have the "gospel Truth" in whatever you claim.

The evidence is undeniable. We haven't seen a leftist in over 100 years show the slightest respect for the US Constitution. After all, you can't build large, unlimited government if you're restricted.

You don't know what progressive liberalism is.
It is not about big government, but individual liberties.
And in fact, the most leftest people are the Anarchist, who want no coercive government at all.
They are very similar to the right wing Libertarians.

 

[P@triot]

Gates has essentially nothing to do with Windows

Bill Gates literally wrote the code for Microsoft Windows. You know you're on the wrong side when you have to resort to blatantly lying over and over.

and it is about the worst operating system ever invented.

Well that's a matter of personal opinion. But at the end of the day, it was adopted by over 95% of the pc's in the world. So clearly they were doing something right (namely it wasn't a closed system like alternatives).

There were dozens of better OSs before Windows that were far better, and Gates hired most of the programmers who made them, after he caused them to become unemployed.

You just defeated your own argument for me

Those other programmers wouldn't have been unemployed if they had created a superior product. There's a reason Windows ended up on over 95% of all pc's across the entire world at one point.

 

[Rigby5]

I know about all there is to know about economics.

You literally don't even know the most fundamental basics about economics. I know this, because you embrace socialism. A failed ideology that has resulted in mass poverty everywhere it has ever been instituted. People educated on even basic economics do not embrace socialism.

You not only do not know economics, but you don't know anything about socialism.
Socialism has only been tried on small levels, like Wisconsin and New Hampshire.
There is nothing any government does that is not socialist in a democratic republic, because good government is always and only for socialist ends, like police, fire protection, transportation, schools, etc.,

 

[P@triot]

Windows originally was just a graphical image manipulation on top of DOS as first.

No shit. That's exactly what I said. A GUI (Graphical User Interface).

Now you're just taking the accurate information I'm spoon-feeding you and attempting to make it your own.

 

[justinacolmena]

Nobody is going to restore the Constitutional government.
The Constitution sucks. The state constitutions suck.

Donald Trump.

The three-part separation theory is improperly deployed, and the inadequacies in the separation of powers provide the opportunity for corruption. It should not be that difficult to figure out that the Justice Department needs to be separated from the presidency in order to satisfy the citizens sense of favored cronyism. It is absurd to expect the person that was nominated by the president to then investigate the president - it absurd, yet I am the only person smart enough to figure that out.

You've got too many ideas of what we should be forced to do against our will, and how to prohibit us from doing things that we might like to do.

 

[P@triot]

For example, no real operating system should ever be susceptible to virus attacks like Windows always has been.

You spend your life steeped in welfare, away from the real world. For example, there has never been an OS that isn't susceptible to malware and there never will be. Not MAC OS. Not iOS. Not Android (which actually had over 55,000 security flaws). Not Blackberry OS. Not Linux. Not Unix. Nothing. It has never happened.

The rest just achieved "security through obscurity". Since nobody owned them, hackers didn't care about them. Since Windows ran on 95% of the world's computers, hackers made it their only target.

 

[P@triot]

The whole point of capitalism is to leverage unfair advantages.

There are no "unfair advantages" in the free market. That only occurs when government gets involved and starts picking winners and losers. You'll understand this more once you graduate.

 

[P@triot]

And I am likely more financially more successful than you.

No you're not and you know it. Successful people don't spend their life pissed off at millionaires and billionaires. Welfare queens who feel sorry for themselves do that. Successful people are too busy being successful to care how someone else is doing.

 

[Rigby5]

Gates has essentially nothing to do with Windows

Bill Gates literally wrote the code for Microsoft Windows. You know you're on the wrong side when you have to resort to blatantly lying over and over.

and it is about the worst operating system ever invented.

Well that's a matter of personal opinion. But at the end of the day, it was adopted by over 95% of the pc's in the world. So clearly they were doing something right (namely it wasn't a closed system like alternatives).

There were dozens of better OSs before Windows that were far better, and Gates hired most of the programmers who made them, after he caused them to become unemployed.

You just defeated your own argument for me

Those other programmers wouldn't have been unemployed if they had created a superior product. There's a reason Windows ended up on over 95% of all pc's across the entire world at one point.

Wrong.
Windows is written in C++ and Gates can't write a single line of C++.
I have worked on Windows, and have seen the masses of green card armies from India, China, Vietnam, the Philippines, etc. that Gates used to write Windows.

Windows also never was adopted by more than about half the computers in the world, with Unix, Linux, Chrome, Android, AppleOS, BSD Unix, and other systems

And no, I did not defeat my own argument. Gates destroyed these other better operating systems of those times by cheating, not making a better operating system. He did it by doing things like temporarily giving Windows away, until the competition was dead. That is called dumping, and is illegal.

 

[Rigby5]

The whole point of capitalism is to leverage unfair advantages.

There are no "unfair advantages" in the free market. That only occurs when government gets involved and starts picking winners and losers. You'll understand this more once you graduate.

There are lots of unfair advantages.
For example, someone with enough money can prevent the competition from accessing a rare resource.
You can temporarily sell for a loss until the competition goes broke, and then you can jack prices way up and recoup your loses.