‘A Moral, Ethical, Legal, Constitutional Travesty’

[Lesh]

Payback is a *****.

Governing by paranoia and perceived payback
Wonderful

Real good for the nation huh?

 

[Nostra]

Even if that were true, the court's blunders have been exceedingly consequential (especially the Roberts court).......and not in a good way. Their errors have changed the direction of the country on everything from gun rights to abortion to campaign finance to presidential immunity.

Did Presidents not have immunity from getting charged for their official actions prior to this last ruling confirming that fact?

 

[Nostra]

Governing by paranoia and perceived payback
Wonderful

Real good for the nation huh?

WTF do you think Biden did to Trump for 4 years, Simp?

 

[Lesh]

Did Presidents not have immunity from getting charged for their official actions prior to this last ruling confirming that fact?

Nixon didn’t

 

[pknopp]

Not sure if that’s accurate but Dobbs points out the effect of one bad decision

I believe it was correct.

 

[LAUGHatLEFTISTS]

Governing by paranoia and perceived payback
Wonderful

Real good for the nation huh?

Only when your side does it right?

 

[Nostra]

It's kinda fair to start with the presumption that Trump is wrong.

If you are a Dimwinger Cult moron like you.

 

[struth]

Nixon didn’t

Really when was he charged? Or convicted?

 

[Rawley]

.and not in a good way.

Only for your cult. They have been excellent for America.

 

[Nostra]

Nixon didn’t

Was covering up a break in an official duty of the POTUS?

Was Nixon charged with something criminally?

Dumbass.

 

[Lesh]

WTF do you think Biden did to Trump for 4 years, Simp?

Biden didn’t do shit to Trump.

Garland and the DOJ slow walked charges … many for which Trump was impeached

And Trump was convicted by a STATE court… which had nothing at ALL to do with Biden

Face it… we have a criminal in the White House doing crimey things all the time

 

[Lesh]

Was covering up a break in an official duty of the POTUS?

Was Nixon charged with something criminally?

Dumbass.

Was firing an AG an official act?

 

[pknopp]

If you are a Dimwinger Cult moron like you.

9-0, 7-2.

 

[berg80]

I believe it was correct.

It was a religious decision, not a legally based one. The law and precedent were clearly against the majority.

 

[j-mac]

Wow. Their completely opposite opinions on whether national injunctions are appropriate are available for you to read. But you let ignorance get in the way.

Ignorance is passing off some twaddle from a group of liberals sitting around a table, quibbling on how to arrive at a conclusion already decided, and calling that a debate...

 

[pknopp]

It was a religious decision, not a legally based one. The law and precedent was clearly against the majority.

The majority? The people? Irrelevant.

 

[j-mac]

9-0, 7-2.

312 - 226 + popular vote + ALL swing states.

 

[sartre play]

To many locked on party mentality, Not enough looking for good stuff that serves us all.

 

[pknopp]

312 - 226 + popular vote + ALL swing states.

Cool.

 

[j-mac]

Cool.

It is...And now, every morning, you wake up and hopefully brush your teeth, and don't get all upset at the up coming day under a Trump presidency...I doubt that's the case though...

But, either way, you'd never be honest enough to tell us...