Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
No you're not and you know it. Successful people don't spend their life pissed off at millionaires and billionaires. Welfare queens who feel sorry for themselves do that. Successful people are too busy being successful to care how someone else is doing.And I am likely more financially more successful than you.
No shit. That's exactly what I said. A GUI (Graphical User Interface).Windows originally was just a graphical image manipulation on top of DOS as first.
Now you're just taking the accurate information I'm spoon-feeding you and attempting to make it your own.
"Devastating"Humans NEED a social life, and the transition from high school to college can be devastating for most people.
"Devastating"Humans NEED a social life, and the transition from high school to college can be devastating for most people.
Dude...your desperation is causing you to resort to hyperbole now. Anyone transitioning from high school to college still has their parents, still has their siblings, still has their friends, still has their co-workers.
You're just unable to admit you were completely wrong. Anyone can attend college for "free". What you want is for government to unconstitutionally steal from some people to let others party and live it up in college. Fuck that.
By "cheating". Like business is a game of tag or something.Gates destroyed these other better operating systems of those times by cheating, not making a better operating system.
Psst...dumb ass...that's not "illegal". Google gives Android away.He did it by doing things like temporarily giving Windows away, until the competition was dead. That is called dumping, and is illegal.
Not "wrong". Bill Gates personally wrote Windows. No amount of your socialist propaganda bullshit will change that.Wrong. Windows is written in C++ and Gates can't write a single line of C++.
I'm a Microsoft Certified Professional, chief. I'll run circles around you all day on this. Of course once Microsoft became a global corporation and he was CEO, he was no longer writing Windows. Stop being obtuse. He wrote the original Windows codes that launched the product and thus the company.I have worked on Windows, and have seen the masses of green card armies from India, China, Vietnam, the Philippines, etc. that Gates used to write Windows.
An innovator in the free market would create an alternative without that "rare resource". It's been done millions of times. It's the difference between innovation (capitalist) and copying (socialist).There are lots of unfair advantages. For example, someone with enough money can prevent the competition from accessing a rare resource.
Completely fair and proper. If your competition cannot figure out how to compete at a lower price, they deserve to be out of business.You can temporarily sell for a loss until the competition goes broke, and then you can jack prices way up and recoup your loses.
Nobody is going to restore the Constitutional government.The people tasked with enforcing our laws are the same people violating our most important laws....
The Constitution sucks. The state constitutions suck.
The three-part separation theory is improperly deployed, and the inadequacies in the separation of powers provide the opportunity for corruption. It should not be that difficult to figure out that the Justice Department needs to be separated from the presidency in order to satisfy the citizens sense of favored cronyism. It is absurd to expect the person that was nominated by the president to then investigate the president - it absurd, yet I am the only person smart enough to figure that out.
It is also absurd to believe that the judiciary is separated from the other branches, when they are expected to graduate their hierarchy of offices.
The 17th Amendment eliminated a check on the reliability of the state governments to demonstrate that they can agree on issues - indicating that the state constitutions are faulty.
Gerrymandering representative districts and limiting the number of representatives fails to properly represent the diversity that the nation has evolved to.
The system sucks, and I am the only one who figured it out.
A Better Subdivisioning of the Three-part Model will Provide Better Checks & Balances
http://www.us4cc.infowww.usmessageboard.com
Every single person in American can attend college for free. Scholarships, tuition reimbursement, etc. Lots of options for anyone who isn't a whiny socialist.No one can attend college for free.
That's the exact same with me. You know what students would do with that money? Buy beer. They loved that they could get drunk with less beer because they had given blood. Less blood meant a lower tolerance.When I went to college, there were 5 bloodbanks nearby, and selling blood was a main source of food money.
Why...are they attending college in Siberia? And if so, do they not have a telephone in their dorm, a laptop for email, a cell phone for FaceTime, and all of the other communications that keeps people in a constant state of connection?No, that was my whole point in that going off to college is separation from their parents, siblings, friends, and co-workers except on a few holidays they get off and can travel back home.
By "cheating". Like business is a game of tag or something.Gates destroyed these other better operating systems of those times by cheating, not making a better operating system.
Psst...dumb ass...that's not "illegal". Google gives Android away.He did it by doing things like temporarily giving Windows away, until the competition was dead. That is called dumping, and is illegal.
Please stop talking. I'm embarrassed for you.
Not "wrong". Bill Gates personally wrote Windows. No amount of your socialist propaganda bullshit will change that.Wrong. Windows is written in C++ and Gates can't write a single line of C++.
I'm a Microsoft Certified Professional, chief. I'll run circles around you all day on this. Of course once Microsoft became a global corporation and he was CEO, he was no longer writing Windows. Stop being obtuse. He wrote the original Windows codes that launched the product and thus the company.I have worked on Windows, and have seen the masses of green card armies from India, China, Vietnam, the Philippines, etc. that Gates used to write Windows.
An innovator in the free market would create an alternative without that "rare resource". It's been done millions of times. It's the difference between innovation (capitalist) and copying (socialist).There are lots of unfair advantages. For example, someone with enough money can prevent the competition from accessing a rare resource.
Completely fair and proper. If your competition cannot figure out how to compete at a lower price, they deserve to be out of business.You can temporarily sell for a loss until the competition goes broke, and then you can jack prices way up and recoup your loses.
Every single person in American can attend college for free. Scholarships, tuition reimbursement, etc. Lots of options for anyone who isn't a whiny socialist.No one can attend college for free.
That's the exact same with me. You know what students would do with that money? Buy beer. They loved that they could get drunk with less beer because they had given blood. Less blood meant a lower tolerance.When I went to college, there were 5 bloodbanks nearby, and selling blood was a main source of food money.
So we've come back full circle to - it was all about partying. Which is the reason for your position. People who are serious about getting an education have absolutely no problems achieving/affording one. None.
Amy's On It!...We must restore constitutional government...
Amy's On It!...We must restore constitutional government...
For Thanksgiving, the Supreme Court upholds religious liberty
For Thanksgiving, the Supreme Court upholds religious liberty
New York could not show that church attendance has spread COVID-19 — not in comparison to business activities and political demonstrations.
thehill.com
Amy is the Cherry On Top Of The Ice Cream Sunday of Constitutional Judicial Reform, Trump's Crowning Achievement on Job Very Well Done. A Grateful Nation Applauds.
What a difference a one-justice swing in the Supreme Court makes. Late Wednesday, the high court, in a 5-4 ruling, granted two religious organizations an injunction, relieving them from the suffocating restrictions that New York’s Democrat governor, Andrew Cuomo, had imposed on community worship.
In June the justices split 5-4 in favor of upholding restrictions that California and Illinois had similarly rationalized as necessary to deal with COVID-19. What’s different now?
Trump Judge Amy Coney Barrett. The trajectory is shifting away from deference to autocratic executive power and toward the Constitution’s protections of core liberties — the separation of powers and the Bill of Rights.
In Wednesday’s ruling, Roman Catholic Diocese of Brooklyn v. Cuomo, even Chief Justice John Roberts conceded that Gov. Cuomo’s limitations on worship “do seem unduly restrictive.” Based on his assessments of the severity of COVID-19 outbreaks, Cuomo classifies various state areas as red, orange or yellow zones. In the red zones, of greatest outbreak concern, no more than 10 people can attend a religious service, even though some of the churches seat over 1,000, and all of them at least a few hundred. In orange zones, attendance is capped at 25.
By contrast, businesses that the governor deems “essential” have no limitations on the size of meetings or other activity. As noted in the court majority’s per curiam opinion the governor denominates as “essential” such businesses as “acupuncture facilities, campgrounds, garages,” and many businesses “whose services are not limited to those that can be regarded as essential, such as all plants manufacturing chemicals and microelectronics and all transportation facilities.”
In orange zones, the court found that “the disparate treatment is even more striking.” Though religious services are limited to 25 persons, even businesses Cuomo deems “nonessential” are free to “decide for themselves how many persons to admit.”
The majority concluded that the restrictions are not “neutral” or of “general applicability.” This finding is key in the court’s religious-liberty jurisprudence. Restrictions that apply to everyone and do not target religion but incidentally affect religious observance (e.g., a general ban on peyote use that happens to burden the rites of some religious groups) are presumptively valid. By contrast, restrictions that single out religion — i.e., that are not neutral or generally applicable — are subject to the “strict scrutiny” analysis that the court applies to burdens on fundamental freedoms. That means the state, to justify its restrictions, must show that they are narrowly tailored to serve a compelling governmental interest.
The court observed that “it is hard to see how the challenged regulations can be regarded as narrowly tailored.”
The majority had little trouble concluding that the organizations are likely to win their lawsuit. The restrictions are draconian, and they appear capricious in comparison to the solicitude the governor shows to activities he subjectively considers essential.
In addition, the organizations demonstrated irreparable harm. The restrictions are so stifling that many faithful observers would be shut out of community worship — and here, the court significantly acknowledged that “remote viewing [on television] is not the same as personal attendance,” further noting that, for example, “Catholics who watch a Mass at home cannot receive communion.”
Finally, the court concluded that the state is unable to show that church attendance has spread COVID-19 more than the many business activities and social/political demonstrations the state has indulged. It is easy to conjure less restrictive alternatives that would achieve the state’s interest in combating spread of the disease. After all, many American states and cities are employing such alternatives.
Here, “the very heart of the First Amendment’s guarantee of religious liberty” is at stake. As the majority concluded, “Even in a pandemic, the Constitution cannot be put away and forgotten.”
And that makes all the difference. As the court’s liberals recognize only too well when a case involves some “right” they’ve managed to derive from “penumbras” mystically drifting from the Constitution’s “emanations,” it is not be our burden to defend our entitlement to core liberties. It is the government’s burden to prove that they must be denied, and courts eye such claims with skepticism.
Trump has done a commendable job turning this part of the system right side up.
Like all socialists, you’re completely and totally devoid of facts...No one is giving Android away totally for free...The cell phone companies that use it pay for it.
And there is nothing wrong with giving something away for free to destroy your competition. The consumer wins huge when that happens. If a company then “jacks up their prices”, someone will inevitably step in with a cheaper alternative because that is a golden opportunity. The beauty of the free market.And there is nothing wrong with giving something away for free as long as you do not use that to illegally destroy the competition, and they jack the prices way up when they are gone.
Like all socialists, you can’t bring yourself to accept that people actually earned what they have. Hang in there little buddy.Wrong. Gates never programmed anything.
I said Windows launched Microsoft. I didn’t say it founded it.The company was 10 years old by the time they came up with Windows 1.0, and Windows was pretty much worthless trash no one wanted or would buy until 3.0.
