Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
The intel was bad...Yes, of course he could have. He could have not moved the date back in an attempt to have a made for TV moment on 9/11. Had he left in May as was per the agreement the Taliban was nowhere near Kubal and none of that would have been necessary.
It was not about staying any later, it is about him staying too long in the first place. Biden wanted a big win for the TV on the anniversary of 9/11, and that fucked up everything.
The intel was bad...
Biden was told he had much more time... But the collapse of the Afghan forces at such would have happened just as quick in May as it did in August... They took over the country in 5 days... 31st August was a deadline set by the Taliban and it was an extension of an earlier one...
only meaningless to you because it hurts your narrativeIntentions are meaningless. The road to hell is paved with intentions...not one thing was every completed due to having intentions.
The fact that is all you have to hang your hat on shows just how weak your argument is.
I am sure they do feel guilt for a nano-second while in Church, but Jesus will forgive them if they ask....
only meaningless to you because it hurts your narrative
and arent you saying trump intended to leave them there??
so intention mean something when it supports your narrative but not when it hurts your narrative,,,
What kind of better deal do you imagine he could have gotten?Trump made a bad deal with the Taliban, INSTEAD of the government, not that they were worth much. Then left the clean up to the next administration. Getting out is a good thing. War is always a mess. Am sure there was a better way, our government prefers fighting with each other rather than work together toward better solutions.
so it is your TDS causing you to rant incoherently,,,I am saying Trump did leave them there. That is all that I know for sure. I do not care what he intended
No, intentions mean nothing to me. But since they are so very important to you, be consistent with your views and prove that Biden intended to fuck things up as badly as he did.
how do you prove intention when it actually happened??
its self proving,,
trumps actions of starting the process of ending a useless war are not in dispute or an intention,, its what he did,,You worship of Trump is causing you to rant incoherently...
People can intend to do one thing and end up doing something else. Pretty much nobody intends to wreck their car, yet it happens every day. I intended to put in a 6 mile run today, but instead went to the gym. Intentions and actions often do not match.
But it is cute now that all of a sudden actions are important for Biden but for your god all that matters is intentions.
you cult members are so hard to deal with some days
as for youre claims he intended to leave weapons because he didnt meet your precious time table is just your TDS talking,,
did he leave them there or were the scheduled for a later date to be removed??why do you keep lying about me? I have never said once what Trump intended, all I have said is what he did. He left the weapons, you cannot dispute this fact so you keep talking about intentions .
One more time...fuck intentions
Oh, and it is "your claims" not "youre claims"....
you may want to look up the definition of "leave" cause I did and what you said trump did isnt true,,,why do you keep lying about me? I have never said once what Trump intended, all I have said is what he did. He left the weapons, you cannot dispute this fact so you keep talking about intentions .
One more time...fuck intentions
Oh, and it is "your claims" not "youre claims"....
did he leave them there or were the scheduled for a later date to be removed??
leaving them means all troops are out and only equipment remains,, thats not what trump did,,
you may want to look up the definition of "leave" cause I did and what you said trump did isnt true,,,
and because there were still troops there he didnt LEAVE anything,,He left them there. That is the only known fact. Nothing else matters.
That is not what leaving means.
The equipment was allowed to remain under Trump. That is a fact.
View attachment 558820
and because there were still troops there he didnt LEAVE anything,,
now biden did leave them because he pulled all the troops out in the middle of the night along with civilians,,
but sure lets talk about what trump didnt do,,
who said it was for 2500 troops?? thats not the issue,, not sure why youre spinning into that,,There were 2500 troops, the equipment left was not for those 2500 troops...thus he left it.
Yes, Biden did do that. But he could not have done that had Trump not left it there.
No matter how you spin it, your god fucked it up also...but you will never be able to say those words.
as per your definition "allow to remain" that would mean there werent any troops or people still there, and as you said 2500 troops remained,, therefor didnt "go away from" as per the other definition,,
the definition isnt about troops,, its about the meaning of a word and why you are not using it correctly or are intentionally lying by using it,,No, there is nothing in the definition that requires troops or people still there, you are just making that up. How deeply desperate can you be to defend your god that you have to add words to a definition.
nor could it be "ALLOWED TO REMAIN" if there were people still there,,
