Was this outcome anticipated? If it wasn't, why not?

More lies.
1. R's were criticizing Biden for abandoning $80b of US military equipment to the Taliban
2. R's were criticizing Biden for not authorizing a US sniper to kill the ISIS suicide bomber, after the Taliban said to kill him
3. R's were criticizing Biden for being held in CONTEMPT by the Brits and other US allies
Dotard has been criticized for not considering the consequences of an attack, conflicting rationales, unspecified conditions for victory, and producing juvenile videos of war.
 
I'm sure, Trump was going to push to keep Bagram open.

Ok, this link says $10b, so $80b is too high. Still too much to gift to the Taliban
Equipment falling in to the hands of the Taliban was always going to happen after a withdrawal. It was exacerbated by the collapse of the cowardly Afghan army.
 
Iran doesn’t need to close the strait in a conventional sense. Simply creating a non-trivial risk that tankers might be damaged or sunk is enough to keep most tanker traffic from going through. In other words, even if Iran is militarily on its back, just keeping aerial and naval drones at ready or on patrol might be enough to cause a global oil supply crisis for the foreseeable future.
They need to conserve their drones to bonb american targets.The threat is enough.
 
Dotard has been criticized for not considering the consequences of an attack,
That makes no sense, even for you.
conflicting rationales,
What conflicting rationales?
unspecified conditions for victory,
Not true.
1773757851681.webp

and producing juvenile videos of war.
Nonsense.
 
2. R's were criticizing Biden for not authorizing a US sniper to kill the ISIS suicide bomber, after the Taliban said to kill him
Can't find any source for that. It sounds like horseshit. Got credible a link?
 
Equipment falling in to the hands of the Taliban was always going to happen after a withdrawal. It was exacerbated by the collapse of the cowardly Afghan army.
We can agree on that. A well armed Afghan army of 700,000 got slaughtered by 30,000 Taliban.
 
No, he probably wants to be on the MSM circuit like Adam Kinzinger.
Finding a R willing to give an honest assessment of Dotard, not spew talking points, is rare. But becoming less rare as the orange brain stem sinks in the polls.
 
Finding a R willing to give an honest assessment of Dotard, not spew talking points, is rare. But becoming less rare as the orange brain stem sinks in the polls.
Trump is holding steady at 41%, democrats are steady at 18%.
 
What consequences were not considered? Its not a fact yet because none are listed.
Perhaps it's time to expand the universe of media outlets you read.
 
IOW, this..........."2. R's were criticizing Biden for not authorizing a US sniper to kill the ISIS suicide bomber, after the Taliban said to kill him".............is based on a lie. Unless you have evidence the sniper spoke to Biden.
 
What consequences were not considered? Its not a fact yet because none are listed.

Top Gabbard counterterrorism official Joe Kent resigns in opposition to Iran war​

In a bombshell announcement, the intelligence community’s top counterterrorism official said Tuesday he was resigning over the U.S. and Israeli war on Iran.

“After much reflection, I have decided to resign,” Joe Kent, the head of the National Counterterrorism Center, posted on X. “I cannot in good conscience support the ongoing war in Iran.’’

Kent continued: “Iran posed no imminent threat to our nation, and it is clear that we started this war due to pressure from Israel and its powerful American lobby.’’


You may need to take a moment to absorb this considering the amount of regime KoolAid you've consumed.
 
15th post

Top Gabbard counterterrorism official Joe Kent resigns in opposition to Iran war​

In a bombshell announcement, the intelligence community’s top counterterrorism official said Tuesday he was resigning over the U.S. and Israeli war on Iran.
“After much reflection, I have decided to resign,” Joe Kent, the head of the National Counterterrorism Center, posted on X. “I cannot in good conscience support the ongoing war in Iran.’’
Kent continued: “Iran posed no imminent threat to our nation, and it is clear that we started this war due to pressure from Israel and its powerful American lobby.’’
You may need to take a moment to absorb this considering the amount of regime KoolAid you've consumed.
Iran was developing nuclear weapons and ICBMs. Kent can whine all he wants.
 
Iran MURDERS 30,000 of it's own citizens, Democrats silent. Trump steps in to protect Americans and Iranians, evil Dem shit stains protest.
Bullshit. No, we are not silent, but how does launching an ill thought out war that kills even more Iranians aid with that? In fact, it pushes many Iranians back to backing what is there because it is a foreign power blowing their nation. The regime in Iran deserved to be hammered, but this is not doing the job, in fact, with Iran's predictable response, it is earning the US enmity worldwide. Protect Iranians? How does killing even more Iranians protect Iranians? Protect Americans? How does having a war that is already starting to get Americans killed and wounded protect Americans? There is zero evidence that Iran was planning to attack America militarily. Their support of murdering terrorists is a fact, and that needed to be dealt with, but doing a military attack that will end up harming the whole world more that Iran is hardly a wise decision.
 
Back
Top Bottom