Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
First of all it was made up years after jesus by men who never met Jesus. Told to them by 11 cult leaders who made it all up. Only logical explanationHow Badly Was the New Testament Corrupted? | Veritas at SDSU (2018)
I have found this YouTube discussion to be very enlightening. It is long but does in fact agree with my own consideration of both the New and Old Testament translations.
And you know this for a fact ---- HOW?First of all it was made up years after jesus by men who never met Jesus. Told to them by 11 cult leaders who made it all up. Only logical explanationHow Badly Was the New Testament Corrupted? | Veritas at SDSU (2018)
I have found this YouTube discussion to be very enlightening. It is long but does in fact agree with my own consideration of both the New and Old Testament translations.
It tells of a man who rose from the dead. It’s very premise is a lie.
Which king and what did he gain?You think a king would alter something to suit it's purposes ?
I might have misunderstood. The New Testament itself is incorruptible, if I understand you right. Translations of it on the other hand may well be corrupt.Jesus wasn't a mere mortal. Jesus was the Son of GOD. The premise of the New Testament is entirely logical. Anyone who could heal the sick, lame, blind, and bring others back from the grave --- not to mention walk on water and calm storms must be GOD's Son.
It tells of a man who actually existed. Whether his ascension was physical or spiritual is up for debate.It tells of a man who rose from the dead.
ObviousAnd you know this for a fact ---- HOW?First of all it was made up years after jesus by men who never met Jesus. Told to them by 11 cult leaders who made it all up. Only logical explanationHow Badly Was the New Testament Corrupted? | Veritas at SDSU (2018)
How many versions of the Bible are there? Yea yea, king James is the best translation supposedlyI might have misunderstood. The New Testament itself is incorruptible, if I understand you right. Translations of it on the other hand may well be corrupt.Jesus wasn't a mere mortal. Jesus was the Son of GOD. The premise of the New Testament is entirely logical. Anyone who could heal the sick, lame, blind, and bring others back from the grave --- not to mention walk on water and calm storms must be GOD's Son.
I don't read much Greek, but that is the original. -- Has anything been lost or changed or added to that?
Who supposedly actually existed. Yes 11 men did spread the word around the world and ignorant people swallowed impossible stories. In later years so did mexicans, indians and asians.It tells of a man who actually existed. Whether his ascension was physical or spiritual is up for debate.It tells of a man who rose from the dead.
I think a better question might be, what is meant by corrupt. I personally do not feel that the New Testament has been corrupted in the sense that what the original text intended was distorted. If you watch the video, I believe that what has been proven is that even with thousands of translations, the New Testament conveys what the HOLY SPIRIT intended. They all collaborate with each other. And the main differences involve spelling and the arrangement of some wordage. However, no doctrine of the CHURCH has come into question. Namely, JESUS is both man and deity. JESUS was born to a virgin. JESUS claimed divinity through both word and deed. JESUS gave HIS life as the only viable sacrifice for all sin. JESUS arose from the grave, ascended, and is returning.I might have misunderstood. The New Testament itself is incorruptible, if I understand you right. Translations of it on the other hand may well be corrupt.Jesus wasn't a mere mortal. Jesus was the Son of GOD. The premise of the New Testament is entirely logical. Anyone who could heal the sick, lame, blind, and bring others back from the grave --- not to mention walk on water and calm storms must be GOD's Son.
I don't read much Greek, but that is the original. -- Has anything been lost or changed or added to that?
Not all versions were translated in the right spirit. I go by the King James because I find time and time again that's the only version I can trust in the English language, even 409 years later.I believe that what has been proven is that even with thousands of translations, the New Testament conveys what the HOLY SPIRIT intended. They all collaborate with each other.
Presently in English alone there exist the following (NOTE: I didn't include the NEW WORLD TRANSLATION because it isn't an honest translation but based on JW philosophy and is printed by them and for them).How many versions of the Bible are there? Yea yea, king James is the best translation supposedlyI might have misunderstood. The New Testament itself is incorruptible, if I understand you right. Translations of it on the other hand may well be corrupt.Jesus wasn't a mere mortal. Jesus was the Son of GOD. The premise of the New Testament is entirely logical. Anyone who could heal the sick, lame, blind, and bring others back from the grave --- not to mention walk on water and calm storms must be GOD's Son.
I don't read much Greek, but that is the original. -- Has anything been lost or changed or added to that?
The King James is a very fine translation.Not all versions were translated in the right spirit. I go by the King James because I find time and time again that's the only version I can trust in the English language, even 409 years later.I believe that what has been proven is that even with thousands of translations, the New Testament conveys what the HOLY SPIRIT intended. They all collaborate with each other.
After HE came back from the grave HE ate fish. Timothy touched/felt the wounds on HIS hands and where the spear entered HIS side. One cannot do that with a spirit.It tells of a man who actually existed. Whether his ascension was physical or spiritual is up for debate.It tells of a man who rose from the dead.
I have found this YouTube discussion to be very enlightening. It is long but does in fact agree with my own consideration of both the New and Old Testament translations.
It tells of a man who rose from the dead. It’s very premise is a lie.
Jesus wasn't a mere mortal. Jesus was the Son of GOD. The premise of the New Testament is entirely logical. Anyone who could heal the sick, lame, blind, and bring others back from the grave --- not to mention walk on water and calm storms must be GOD's Son.
