Warren Commission was correct........Oswald acted alone

[rightwinger]

Proof of a conspiracy goes something like this....

I think the CIA was involved because
I think the mafia was involved because
I think the Russians were involved because

Conjecture isn’t meant to be proof. If you think he just woke up one day and decided to kill Kennedy for zero tangible reason...cool. I see in LHO someone who is a loser but has a history of being nothing if not transactional. He does things for reasons or at least usually did. I’m not buying the, “well it’s Tuesday so I guess I’ll kill the President” argument

No onrade such an argument.

Oswald had a history of seeking notoriety through violence.

JFK was a quick opportunity for something he was already seeking.

rightwinger did

No I didn’t

I said it was a spontaneous decision to kill JFK but his passion to assasination was already there

JFK was a prime target

"I believe he did just wake up one day and decide to kill JFK.”— rightwinger

Absolutely

He didn’t know JFK was driving by till the day before
Instant target

 

[candycorn]

Conjecture isn’t meant to be proof. If you think he just woke up one day and decided to kill Kennedy for zero tangible reason...cool. I see in LHO someone who is a loser but has a history of being nothing if not transactional. He does things for reasons or at least usually did. I’m not buying the, “well it’s Tuesday so I guess I’ll kill the President” argument

No onrade such an argument.

Oswald had a history of seeking notoriety through violence.

JFK was a quick opportunity for something he was already seeking.

rightwinger did

No I didn’t

I said it was a spontaneous decision to kill JFK but his passion to assasination was already there

JFK was a prime target

"I believe he did just wake up one day and decide to kill JFK.”— rightwinger

Absolutely

He didn’t know JFK was driving by till the day before
Instant target

ok?

Anyway, getting back to your reasoning…

If Oswald was a nut job and the President was a target of opportunity….

It would stand to reason that the greater population we have now would have more nut jobs.
It would stand to reason that the greater # of firearms we have now would mean more armed nut jobs.
It would stand to reason that there would be more attempts on the lives of the President and his family.

We’ve had one since Reagan unless you want to count fence jumpers at the White House who have zero hope of success.

History reports your reasoning faulty.

 

[rightwinger]

No onrade such an argument.

Oswald had a history of seeking notoriety through violence.

JFK was a quick opportunity for something he was already seeking.

rightwinger did

No I didn’t

I said it was a spontaneous decision to kill JFK but his passion to assasination was already there

JFK was a prime target

"I believe he did just wake up one day and decide to kill JFK.”— rightwinger

Absolutely

He didn’t know JFK was driving by till the day before
Instant target

ok?

Anyway, getting back to your reasoning…

If Oswald was a nut job and the President was a target of opportunity….

It would stand to reason that the greater population we have now would have more nut jobs.
It would stand to reason that the greater # of firearms we have now would mean more armed nut jobs.
It would stand to reason that there would be more attempts on the lives of the President and his family.

We’ve had one since Reagan unless you want to count fence jumpers at the White House who have zero hope of success.

History reports your reasoning faulty.

Don’t follow your logic

Are you claiming people can’t kill someone without CIA help?

 

[hadit]

Because she was run down by a rightwing lunatic?

She has something in common with JFK.

They both were murdered by right wingers.

Oswald was a left wing comminist which you damn well know.

WRONG AGAIN.

Oswald was a left wing communist. What's the problem with admitting that?

He clearly was.

He clearly was NOT. get educated. Stop believing the lying State. He was a CIA asset.

He wanted to be a Soviet/communist hero. They didn't want him. He was a leftist communist. It's history. What did he have to offer the CIA?

 

[hadit]

No onrade such an argument.

Oswald had a history of seeking notoriety through violence.

JFK was a quick opportunity for something he was already seeking.

rightwinger did

No I didn’t

I said it was a spontaneous decision to kill JFK but his passion to assasination was already there

JFK was a prime target

"I believe he did just wake up one day and decide to kill JFK.”— rightwinger

Absolutely

He didn’t know JFK was driving by till the day before
Instant target

ok?

Anyway, getting back to your reasoning…

If Oswald was a nut job and the President was a target of opportunity….

It would stand to reason that the greater population we have now would have more nut jobs.
It would stand to reason that the greater # of firearms we have now would mean more armed nut jobs.
It would stand to reason that there would be more attempts on the lives of the President and his family.

We’ve had one since Reagan unless you want to count fence jumpers at the White House who have zero hope of success.

History reports your reasoning faulty.

It would also stand to reason that our security is a lot tighter.

 

[candycorn]

rightwinger did

No I didn’t

I said it was a spontaneous decision to kill JFK but his passion to assasination was already there

JFK was a prime target

"I believe he did just wake up one day and decide to kill JFK.”— rightwinger

Absolutely

He didn’t know JFK was driving by till the day before
Instant target

ok?

Anyway, getting back to your reasoning…

If Oswald was a nut job and the President was a target of opportunity….

It would stand to reason that the greater population we have now would have more nut jobs.
It would stand to reason that the greater # of firearms we have now would mean more armed nut jobs.
It would stand to reason that there would be more attempts on the lives of the President and his family.

We’ve had one since Reagan unless you want to count fence jumpers at the White House who have zero hope of success.

History reports your reasoning faulty.

Don’t follow your logic

Are you claiming people can’t kill someone without CIA help?

No. the argument that Oswald was a low self esteem nut job who just treated Kennedy as a target of opportunity doesn’t hold water in light of the 50+ years since and we’ve had only a few instances of low self esteem nuts taking shots at our presidents. We have more nutjobs with more access to guns and fewer attempts. The SS is good but they are vastly outnumbered.

 

[Soupnazi630]

No onrade such an argument.

Oswald had a history of seeking notoriety through violence.

JFK was a quick opportunity for something he was already seeking.

rightwinger did

No I didn’t

I said it was a spontaneous decision to kill JFK but his passion to assasination was already there

JFK was a prime target

"I believe he did just wake up one day and decide to kill JFK.”— rightwinger

Absolutely

He didn’t know JFK was driving by till the day before
Instant target

ok?

Anyway, getting back to your reasoning…

If Oswald was a nut job and the President was a target of opportunity….

It would stand to reason that the greater population we have now would have more nut jobs.
It would stand to reason that the greater # of firearms we have now would mean more armed nut jobs.
It would stand to reason that there would be more attempts on the lives of the President and his family.

We’ve had one since Reagan unless you want to count fence jumpers at the White House who have zero hope of success.

History reports your reasoning faulty.

History reports no such ting.

As has been pointed out the president is almost never exposed as he was in 64.

Security around the president has been vastly increased.

Just once again just because it was an uncommon occurrence does not argue it was unlikely,

It is actually your reasoning which is faulty. For example yes we have more firearms but fewer people own them.

You're so called reasoning is actually very illogical

 

[Soupnazi630]

No I didn’t

I said it was a spontaneous decision to kill JFK but his passion to assasination was already there

JFK was a prime target

"I believe he did just wake up one day and decide to kill JFK.”— rightwinger

Absolutely

He didn’t know JFK was driving by till the day before
Instant target

ok?

Anyway, getting back to your reasoning…

If Oswald was a nut job and the President was a target of opportunity….

It would stand to reason that the greater population we have now would have more nut jobs.
It would stand to reason that the greater # of firearms we have now would mean more armed nut jobs.
It would stand to reason that there would be more attempts on the lives of the President and his family.

We’ve had one since Reagan unless you want to count fence jumpers at the White House who have zero hope of success.

History reports your reasoning faulty.

Don’t follow your logic

Are you claiming people can’t kill someone without CIA help?

No. the argument that Oswald was a low self esteem nut job who just treated Kennedy as a target of opportunity doesn’t hold water in light of the 50+ years since and we’ve had only a few instances of low self esteem nuts taking shots at our presidents. We have more nutjobs with more access to guns and fewer attempts. The SS is good but they are vastly outnumbered.

Yes it does hold water as the lack of other known attempts does not argue against known facts.

It is not speculation that Oswald was a lone nut it is fact. It is not speculation that he took advantage of an opportunity it is fact.

Once again we have more guns but fewer people own them and security is massively increased now. For example the limousine Kennedy rode in was custom modified but with little or no increased security measures. The limo the president rides in now is massively modified to withstand missile attacks, It carries emergency first aid to include bags of the presidents blood for replacement. It can be instantly hermetically sealed with an internal oxygen supply in case of gas attacks.

Yes the secret service is good but they are light years beyond where they were in 63. The presidential detail in 63 was a small number of people with no where near the training and qualifications they have today.

By your logic murder and crime should be increasing as the number of people and guns increase but in fact it has been in decline for some time now,

The fact remains there is no evidence of a conspiracy but massive evidence Oswald did it with little planning or preparation because the opportunity presented itself. Nothing which has happened or not happened since then is relevant.

 

[gipper]

She has something in common with JFK.

They both were murdered by right wingers.

Oswald was a left wing comminist which you damn well know.

WRONG AGAIN.

Oswald was a left wing communist. What's the problem with admitting that?

He clearly was.

He clearly was NOT. get educated. Stop believing the lying State. He was a CIA asset.

He wanted to be a Soviet/communist hero. They didn't want him. He was a leftist communist. It's history. What did he have to offer the CIA?

The only US marine to ever defect to the USSR and return without even the slightest consequences, at the height of the Cold War. He was was given various jobs by acquaintances with ties to the CIA,upon his return with his Russian wife. Then, magically, the only US marine to defect to the USSR just magically happens to be working in a building on JFK’s route through Dallas, yet the FBI nor the Secret Service bother to pick him up. Yet he was well know to anyone paying attention, with his public displays of commie adoration.

A truly magical story.

 

[rightwinger]

No I didn’t

I said it was a spontaneous decision to kill JFK but his passion to assasination was already there

JFK was a prime target

"I believe he did just wake up one day and decide to kill JFK.”— rightwinger

Absolutely

He didn’t know JFK was driving by till the day before
Instant target

ok?

Anyway, getting back to your reasoning…

If Oswald was a nut job and the President was a target of opportunity….

It would stand to reason that the greater population we have now would have more nut jobs.
It would stand to reason that the greater # of firearms we have now would mean more armed nut jobs.
It would stand to reason that there would be more attempts on the lives of the President and his family.

We’ve had one since Reagan unless you want to count fence jumpers at the White House who have zero hope of success.

History reports your reasoning faulty.

Don’t follow your logic

Are you claiming people can’t kill someone without CIA help?

No. the argument that Oswald was a low self esteem nut job who just treated Kennedy as a target of opportunity doesn’t hold water in light of the 50+ years since and we’ve had only a few instances of low self esteem nuts taking shots at our presidents. We have more nutjobs with more access to guns and fewer attempts. The SS is good but they are vastly outnumbered.

Sorry....Your logic makes no sense

 

[Soupnazi630]

Oswald was a left wing comminist which you damn well know.

WRONG AGAIN.

Oswald was a left wing communist. What's the problem with admitting that?

He clearly was.

He clearly was NOT. get educated. Stop believing the lying State. He was a CIA asset.

He wanted to be a Soviet/communist hero. They didn't want him. He was a leftist communist. It's history. What did he have to offer the CIA?

The only US marine to ever defect to the USSR and return without even the slightest consequences, at the height of the Cold War. He was was given various jobs by acquaintances with ties to the CIA,upon his return with his Russian wife. Then, magically, the only US marine to defect to the USSR just magically happens to be working in a building on JFK’s route through Dallas, yet the FBI nor the Secret Service bother to pick him up. Yet he was well know to anyone paying attention, with his public displays of commie adoration.

A truly magical story.

Being the only Marine to do so prove nothing.

None of his acquaintances had CIA ties.

Until he shot Kennedy he was an obscure nobody and made public displays of communism because he was a communist,

You still have no evidence.

You are proven wrong

 

[gipper]

Oswald was a left wing comminist which you damn well know.

WRONG AGAIN.

Oswald was a left wing communist. What's the problem with admitting that?

He clearly was.

He clearly was NOT. get educated. Stop believing the lying State. He was a CIA asset.

He wanted to be a Soviet/communist hero. They didn't want him. He was a leftist communist. It's history. What did he have to offer the CIA?

The only US marine to ever defect to the USSR and return without even the slightest consequences, at the height of the Cold War. He was was given various jobs by acquaintances with ties to the CIA,upon his return with his Russian wife. Then, magically, the only US marine to defect to the USSR just magically happens to be working in a building on JFK’s route through Dallas, yet the FBI nor the Secret Service bother to pick him up. Yet he was well know to anyone paying attention, with his public displays of commie adoration.

A truly magical story.

...and this all happened just a few short years after the US executed the Rosenbergs.

It’s magic.

 

[Soupnazi630]

WRONG AGAIN.

Oswald was a left wing communist. What's the problem with admitting that?

He clearly was.

He clearly was NOT. get educated. Stop believing the lying State. He was a CIA asset.

He wanted to be a Soviet/communist hero. They didn't want him. He was a leftist communist. It's history. What did he have to offer the CIA?

The only US marine to ever defect to the USSR and return without even the slightest consequences, at the height of the Cold War. He was was given various jobs by acquaintances with ties to the CIA,upon his return with his Russian wife. Then, magically, the only US marine to defect to the USSR just magically happens to be working in a building on JFK’s route through Dallas, yet the FBI nor the Secret Service bother to pick him up. Yet he was well know to anyone paying attention, with his public displays of commie adoration.

A truly magical story.

...and this all happened just a few short years after the US executed the Rosenbergs.

It’s magic.

Not at all it is history not magic.

You still have no evidence.

It is proven Oswald was a communist that is fact end of story.

There is zero evidence that he was CIA you fail massively.

 

[gipper]

WRONG AGAIN.

Oswald was a left wing communist. What's the problem with admitting that?

He clearly was.

He clearly was NOT. get educated. Stop believing the lying State. He was a CIA asset.

He wanted to be a Soviet/communist hero. They didn't want him. He was a leftist communist. It's history. What did he have to offer the CIA?

The only US marine to ever defect to the USSR and return without even the slightest consequences, at the height of the Cold War. He was was given various jobs by acquaintances with ties to the CIA,upon his return with his Russian wife. Then, magically, the only US marine to defect to the USSR just magically happens to be working in a building on JFK’s route through Dallas, yet the FBI nor the Secret Service bother to pick him up. Yet he was well know to anyone paying attention, with his public displays of commie adoration.

A truly magical story.

Being the only Marine to do so prove nothing.

None of his acquaintances had CIA ties.

Until he shot Kennedy he was an obscure nobody and made public displays of communism because he was a communist,

You still have no evidence.

You are proven wrong

If one is a commie leftist, you don’t freely enlist in the Marines. Plus you don’t get to defect and give up US intelligence secrets and return untouched.

All his acquaintances were CIA

He was known to many even went on a major national tv talk show.

He was the PATSY. So he was untouchable by the FBI and SS.

 

[gipper]

Oswald was a left wing communist. What's the problem with admitting that?

He clearly was.

He clearly was NOT. get educated. Stop believing the lying State. He was a CIA asset.

He wanted to be a Soviet/communist hero. They didn't want him. He was a leftist communist. It's history. What did he have to offer the CIA?

The only US marine to ever defect to the USSR and return without even the slightest consequences, at the height of the Cold War. He was was given various jobs by acquaintances with ties to the CIA,upon his return with his Russian wife. Then, magically, the only US marine to defect to the USSR just magically happens to be working in a building on JFK’s route through Dallas, yet the FBI nor the Secret Service bother to pick him up. Yet he was well know to anyone paying attention, with his public displays of commie adoration.

A truly magical story.

...and this all happened just a few short years after the US executed the Rosenbergs.

It’s magic.

Not at all it is history not magic.

You still have no evidence.

It is proven Oswald was a communist that is fact end of story.

There is zero evidence that he was CIA you fail massively.

You believe in magic. How naive. Is Santa coming to your house?

 

[Soupnazi630]

He clearly was NOT. get educated. Stop believing the lying State. He was a CIA asset.

He wanted to be a Soviet/communist hero. They didn't want him. He was a leftist communist. It's history. What did he have to offer the CIA?

The only US marine to ever defect to the USSR and return without even the slightest consequences, at the height of the Cold War. He was was given various jobs by acquaintances with ties to the CIA,upon his return with his Russian wife. Then, magically, the only US marine to defect to the USSR just magically happens to be working in a building on JFK’s route through Dallas, yet the FBI nor the Secret Service bother to pick him up. Yet he was well know to anyone paying attention, with his public displays of commie adoration.

A truly magical story.

...and this all happened just a few short years after the US executed the Rosenbergs.

It’s magic.

Not at all it is history not magic.

You still have no evidence.

It is proven Oswald was a communist that is fact end of story.

There is zero evidence that he was CIA you fail massively.

You believe in magic. How naive. Is Santa coming to your house?

It is not magic it is history.

Your assertion is meaningless as it comes from an immature and foolish brain.

Present some evidence.

 

[Soupnazi630]

Oswald was a left wing communist. What's the problem with admitting that?

He clearly was.

He clearly was NOT. get educated. Stop believing the lying State. He was a CIA asset.

He wanted to be a Soviet/communist hero. They didn't want him. He was a leftist communist. It's history. What did he have to offer the CIA?

The only US marine to ever defect to the USSR and return without even the slightest consequences, at the height of the Cold War. He was was given various jobs by acquaintances with ties to the CIA,upon his return with his Russian wife. Then, magically, the only US marine to defect to the USSR just magically happens to be working in a building on JFK’s route through Dallas, yet the FBI nor the Secret Service bother to pick him up. Yet he was well know to anyone paying attention, with his public displays of commie adoration.

A truly magical story.

Being the only Marine to do so prove nothing.

None of his acquaintances had CIA ties.

Until he shot Kennedy he was an obscure nobody and made public displays of communism because he was a communist,

You still have no evidence.

You are proven wrong

If one is a commie leftist, you don’t freely enlist in the Marines. Plus you don’t get to defect and give up US intelligence secrets and return untouched.

All his acquaintances were CIA

He was known to many even went on a major national tv talk show.

He was the PATSY. So he was untouchable by the FBI and SS.

Wrong yes you can enlist in the Marines despite being a communist you can even be commissioned in the military as a communist as we have recently seen.

He gave up no intelligence secrets and yes anyone including a communist is free to leave to go to the USSR. One could then leave the USSR if they did not really like or want you in the first place which is precisely how they felt about Oswald.

He had no known CIA acquaintances. Sorry you pulled that out of your and and it is false.

He was known to few and never went on a national Tv talk show he went on local shows and was laughed at as a communist because he was one.

He was not a patsy period and you still have no evidence you have only ignorant claims you dreamed up. You are not well informed or educated about any of these subjects

HE was a communist and a lone assassin and you have no evidence to the contrary

 

[candycorn]

"I believe he did just wake up one day and decide to kill JFK.”— rightwinger

Absolutely

He didn’t know JFK was driving by till the day before
Instant target

ok?

Anyway, getting back to your reasoning…

If Oswald was a nut job and the President was a target of opportunity….

It would stand to reason that the greater population we have now would have more nut jobs.
It would stand to reason that the greater # of firearms we have now would mean more armed nut jobs.
It would stand to reason that there would be more attempts on the lives of the President and his family.

We’ve had one since Reagan unless you want to count fence jumpers at the White House who have zero hope of success.

History reports your reasoning faulty.

Don’t follow your logic

Are you claiming people can’t kill someone without CIA help?

No. the argument that Oswald was a low self esteem nut job who just treated Kennedy as a target of opportunity doesn’t hold water in light of the 50+ years since and we’ve had only a few instances of low self esteem nuts taking shots at our presidents. We have more nutjobs with more access to guns and fewer attempts. The SS is good but they are vastly outnumbered.

Sorry....Your logic makes no sense

Sorry yours doesn’t.

 

[Soupnazi630]

Absolutely

He didn’t know JFK was driving by till the day before
Instant target

ok?

Anyway, getting back to your reasoning…

If Oswald was a nut job and the President was a target of opportunity….

It would stand to reason that the greater population we have now would have more nut jobs.
It would stand to reason that the greater # of firearms we have now would mean more armed nut jobs.
It would stand to reason that there would be more attempts on the lives of the President and his family.

We’ve had one since Reagan unless you want to count fence jumpers at the White House who have zero hope of success.

History reports your reasoning faulty.

Don’t follow your logic

Are you claiming people can’t kill someone without CIA help?

No. the argument that Oswald was a low self esteem nut job who just treated Kennedy as a target of opportunity doesn’t hold water in light of the 50+ years since and we’ve had only a few instances of low self esteem nuts taking shots at our presidents. We have more nutjobs with more access to guns and fewer attempts. The SS is good but they are vastly outnumbered.

Sorry....Your logic makes no sense

Sorry yours doesn’t.

Yes it does your clearly does not

 

[rightwinger]

Absolutely

He didn’t know JFK was driving by till the day before
Instant target

ok?

Anyway, getting back to your reasoning…

If Oswald was a nut job and the President was a target of opportunity….

It would stand to reason that the greater population we have now would have more nut jobs.
It would stand to reason that the greater # of firearms we have now would mean more armed nut jobs.
It would stand to reason that there would be more attempts on the lives of the President and his family.

We’ve had one since Reagan unless you want to count fence jumpers at the White House who have zero hope of success.

History reports your reasoning faulty.

Don’t follow your logic

Are you claiming people can’t kill someone without CIA help?

No. the argument that Oswald was a low self esteem nut job who just treated Kennedy as a target of opportunity doesn’t hold water in light of the 50+ years since and we’ve had only a few instances of low self esteem nuts taking shots at our presidents. We have more nutjobs with more access to guns and fewer attempts. The SS is good but they are vastly outnumbered.

Sorry....Your logic makes no sense

Sorry yours doesn’t.

Your claim that nobody has killed a president since does not prove that Oswald did not kill one 55 years ago