rightwinger
Award Winning USMB Paid Messageboard Poster
- Aug 4, 2009
- 308,087
- 262,013
- 3,615
- Thread starter
- #1,281
No evidence to the contraryThe evidence suggests otherwiseOnce againThe number of nut jobs does nothing to disprove Oswald acted alone
Oswald was on the sixth floor of the depository, Oswaldās gun did the killing, Oswald fled the scene
Zero evidence he had help and plenty of evidence he was a lone wolf
Okay, here we go again.
If Oswald just woke up one day and decided to kill the President because he was a nut with a gun, why isnāt this happening all the time now that we have more nuts and more guns than ever?
I have no doubt he was the only gunman. I doubt that he just came up with this all by himself.
What happened afterward has no bearing on what Oswald did in 1963
Youāre right about that.
What it does have a bearing on is your reasoning. In my mind, it disqualifies the āhe woke up one day and decided to kill the presidentā stance you have. I donāt think Oswald had such flimsy motivation. His pasts suggests that he (like most of us) was transactional. I donāt see the upside for him in doing this without something else being in the mix. There is no evidence of this something else; maybe there was nothing there maybe it was because Jack Ruby killed him. Weāll never know.
Again, this is a small matter in the larger question of what happened that day. I think we have beaten the horse enough; agreed?
Sure. If you want to believe that one day Oswald woke up, got his gun and decided on the spur of the moment to kill the Presidentā¦.the evidence fits perfectly. It doesnāt explain why he did it, why other vapid nut jobs havenāt done the same thing even though the president and his family are routinely exposedātheir movements announced well in advance, or especially why he didnāt collect his entire arsenal prior to the day he shot Kennedy.
Again, we will never know these things.
There is evidence he did not prepare to shoot the president. He had to go home to get his gun






