Warren Commission was correct........Oswald acted alone

No onrade such an argument.

Oswald had a history of seeking notoriety through violence.

JFK was a quick opportunity for something he was already seeking.

rightwinger did
No he didn't really.

He clearly stated the opportunity dropped in Oswald's lap but Oswald already had a history of such attempts

It would help greatly if you read the thread before posting.

"I believe he did just wake up one day and decide to kill JFK.”— rightwinger
Yes because one day he woke up and saw he had the opportunity.

If you read the thread you will see that right winger has pointed out many times that oswald had a history of such attempts.
:th_spinspin:
Not spin fact you misinterpreted what he said
 
Where the assailant fired a shot?
Yes

Care to tell us where and when?
Yes Clinton.

A man attacked the white house with a full auto weapon firing several shots while clinton was inside.

hardly the same thing as the President being out in the open and exposed and very much off the spirit of the discussion we were having but thanks for confirming the rarity of the occurrence.
No two assassinations are the same or attempted assassinations.

But it was a shots fired attempt.

The fact that it is known to happen rarely means nothing and is not an argument.

Just because something is uncommon does not mean it is unlikely or improbable.

Again, thanks for confirming the absurdity of the stance taken by rightwinger
 
No he didn't really.

He clearly stated the opportunity dropped in Oswald's lap but Oswald already had a history of such attempts

It would help greatly if you read the thread before posting.

"I believe he did just wake up one day and decide to kill JFK.”— rightwinger
Yes because one day he woke up and saw he had the opportunity.

If you read the thread you will see that right winger has pointed out many times that oswald had a history of such attempts.
:th_spinspin:
Not spin fact you misinterpreted what he said

A direct quote is hardly a mis-representation but whatever.
 

Care to tell us where and when?
Yes Clinton.

A man attacked the white house with a full auto weapon firing several shots while clinton was inside.

hardly the same thing as the President being out in the open and exposed and very much off the spirit of the discussion we were having but thanks for confirming the rarity of the occurrence.
No two assassinations are the same or attempted assassinations.

But it was a shots fired attempt.

The fact that it is known to happen rarely means nothing and is not an argument.

Just because something is uncommon does not mean it is unlikely or improbable.

Again, thanks for confirming the absurdity of the stance taken by rightwinger
You misinterpreted his stance.

But either way it is not absurd.

Most murders are done on the spur of the moment which means it would not have been ridiculous for Oswald.
 
No he didn't really.

He clearly stated the opportunity dropped in Oswald's lap but Oswald already had a history of such attempts

It would help greatly if you read the thread before posting.

"I believe he did just wake up one day and decide to kill JFK.”— rightwinger
Yes because one day he woke up and saw he had the opportunity.

If you read the thread you will see that right winger has pointed out many times that oswald had a history of such attempts.
:th_spinspin:
Not spin fact you misinterpreted what he said

A direct quote is hardly a mis-representation but whatever.
Yes it is when it is cherry picked and all his other relevant posts ignored which is what you did
 
Oswald was a left wing lunatic (the most dangerous kind)
Heather Heyer would disagree, if she could.
Clearly she is a fool
Because she was run down by a rightwing lunatic?
She has something in common with JFK.

They both were murdered by right wingers.
Oswald was a left wing comminist which you damn well know.
WRONG AGAIN.
 
Heather Heyer would disagree, if she could.
Clearly she is a fool
Because she was run down by a rightwing lunatic?
She has something in common with JFK.

They both were murdered by right wingers.
Oswald was a left wing comminist which you damn well know.
WRONG AGAIN.
No I am not wrong.

Oswald was a left wing communist.

You have been lying about this for years. You have been asked many times for evidence and have never posted any.

You are proven liar and wrong and you know it boy
 
Heather Heyer would disagree, if she could.
Clearly she is a fool
Because she was run down by a rightwing lunatic?
She has something in common with JFK.

They both were murdered by right wingers.
Oswald was a left wing comminist which you damn well know.
WRONG AGAIN.

Oswald was a left wing communist. What's the problem with admitting that?

He clearly was.
 
Proof of a conspiracy goes something like this....

I think the CIA was involved because
I think the mafia was involved because
I think the Russians were involved because

Conjecture isn’t meant to be proof. If you think he just woke up one day and decided to kill Kennedy for zero tangible reason...cool. I see in LHO someone who is a loser but has a history of being nothing if not transactional. He does things for reasons or at least usually did. I’m not buying the, “well it’s Tuesday so I guess I’ll kill the President” argument
No onrade such an argument.

Oswald had a history of seeking notoriety through violence.

JFK was a quick opportunity for something he was already seeking.

rightwinger did
No I didn’t

I said it was a spontaneous decision to kill JFK but his passion to assasination was already there

JFK was a prime target
 
Care to tell us where and when?
Yes Clinton.

A man attacked the white house with a full auto weapon firing several shots while clinton was inside.

hardly the same thing as the President being out in the open and exposed and very much off the spirit of the discussion we were having but thanks for confirming the rarity of the occurrence.
No two assassinations are the same or attempted assassinations.

But it was a shots fired attempt.

The fact that it is known to happen rarely means nothing and is not an argument.

Just because something is uncommon does not mean it is unlikely or improbable.

Again, thanks for confirming the absurdity of the stance taken by rightwinger
You misinterpreted his stance.

But either way it is not absurd.

Most murders are done on the spur of the moment which means it would not have been ridiculous for Oswald.
The spur of the moment decision was why a conspiracy theory is unwarranted
 
15th post
Clearly she is a fool
Because she was run down by a rightwing lunatic?
She has something in common with JFK.

They both were murdered by right wingers.
Oswald was a left wing comminist which you damn well know.
WRONG AGAIN.

Oswald was a left wing communist. What's the problem with admitting that?

He clearly was.
He clearly was NOT. get educated. Stop believing the lying State. He was a CIA asset.
 
Because she was run down by a rightwing lunatic?
She has something in common with JFK.

They both were murdered by right wingers.
Oswald was a left wing comminist which you damn well know.
WRONG AGAIN.

Oswald was a left wing communist. What's the problem with admitting that?

He clearly was.
He clearly was NOT. get educated. Stop believing the lying State. He was a CIA asset.
Yes he absolutely was a left wing communist.

You have never tried to produce evieende to the contrary and all the evidende proves you wrong.

These are facts and you know it and are simply being a childish liar because you have been duped.

You also have no evidence he was in the CIA or ancia asset.

You are massively ignorant about how the cia works and they would not have used a fool like Oswald

Try again dumbass and present some evieende for your retarded assertions.
 
Proof of a conspiracy goes something like this....

I think the CIA was involved because
I think the mafia was involved because
I think the Russians were involved because

Conjecture isn’t meant to be proof. If you think he just woke up one day and decided to kill Kennedy for zero tangible reason...cool. I see in LHO someone who is a loser but has a history of being nothing if not transactional. He does things for reasons or at least usually did. I’m not buying the, “well it’s Tuesday so I guess I’ll kill the President” argument
No onrade such an argument.

Oswald had a history of seeking notoriety through violence.

JFK was a quick opportunity for something he was already seeking.

rightwinger did
No I didn’t

I said it was a spontaneous decision to kill JFK but his passion to assasination was already there

JFK was a prime target

"I believe he did just wake up one day and decide to kill JFK.”— rightwinger
 
Proof of a conspiracy goes something like this....

I think the CIA was involved because
I think the mafia was involved because
I think the Russians were involved because

Conjecture isn’t meant to be proof. If you think he just woke up one day and decided to kill Kennedy for zero tangible reason...cool. I see in LHO someone who is a loser but has a history of being nothing if not transactional. He does things for reasons or at least usually did. I’m not buying the, “well it’s Tuesday so I guess I’ll kill the President” argument
No onrade such an argument.

Oswald had a history of seeking notoriety through violence.

JFK was a quick opportunity for something he was already seeking.

rightwinger did
No I didn’t

I said it was a spontaneous decision to kill JFK but his passion to assasination was already there

JFK was a prime target

"I believe he did just wake up one day and decide to kill JFK.”— rightwinger
Like I said cherry picked while ignoring all other posts.
 
Back
Top Bottom