Warren Commission was correct........Oswald acted alone

[MisterBeale]

The simple fact is, if the paradigm is as the Warren Commission says it is, there would not be so many files that are classified, and the POTUS would not have kept them classified in the period of internecine conflict between the public state and the bureaucratic intelligence and corporate establishment that run the nation.

2017 & 2018 JFK Releases: Progress, Issues, Recommendations
2017 & 2018 JFK Releases: Progress, Issues, Recommendations


"SUMMARY


Under the President John F. Kennedy Records Collection Act of 1992 (“JFK Records Act”), the Assassination Records Review Board (“ARRB”) oversaw the declassification of millions of pages of formerly classified records. But a significant number of documents were withheld in full, and many more were withheld with “redactions” (portions withheld from view).


As noted in the ARRB’s Final Report, the JFK Records Act included a provision for full release 25 years after its passage. Specifically, it “mandated that all postponed assassination records be opened to the public no later than the year 2017” unless the President certifies that (1) “continued postponement is made necessary by an identifiable harm to the military, defense, intelligence operations, law enforcement, or conduct of foreign relations” and (2) “the identifiable harm is of such gravity that it outweighs the public interest in disclosure.” (showDoc.html).


Instead of full disclosure, what occurred was a rolling set of partial releases, 7 so far, along with continued withholding. On the positive side, for the first time the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) published the newly released documents online in PDF format, a huge boon to researchers. But this process has been marred by errors and confusion, as documented herein.


Currently according to NARA, 15,834 documents remain withheld in part, along with a smaller set still withheld in full. Both the current state of affairs, and the process by which releases have occurred, are less than satisfactory.


This paper documents the recent history of releases and the numerous problems with the process and the current state of affairs. It does not discuss the question of “what’s in the new records?” – suffice to say that there are important documents being uncovered, related to the assassination investigations and also the context of Kennedy Cold War policies, and that the full “digestion” process will take time.


RELEASE HISTORY


After an early release of records in July of 2017, the 25-year anniversary arrived on October 26. Against a backdrop of lobbying by federal agencies, President Trump
signed an authorization for continued withholding of most of the remaining records, release of some, and an accompanying review process with a 6-month deadline.


In November and December of 2017, 4 additional releases happened. When the 6month review deadline came on April 26, 2018, a seventh release occurred, along with continued withholding and a new review deadline set for 2020.


In all, tens of thousands of documents were released or re-released, though over 15,000 documents remain withheld at least in part.


Continue reading: DOWNLOAD THE ENTIRE ARTICLE . . . . "

Just because something is classified or withheld from public release does not mean it is hiding a secret conspiracy.

None of the thousands of documents just released had anything to do with conspiracy

Nah, it's a pretty good indicator you rube.

The Deep State’s JFK Triumph Over Trump
The Deep State's JFK Triumph Over Trump
"The New Delay Is the Story


You might have thought that almost 54 years after Kennedy was murdered in the streets of Dallas – and after knowing for a quarter century the supposedly final deadline for releasing the JFK files – the CIA and FBI would not have needed a six-month extension to decide what secrets that they still must hide.



Autopsy photo of President John F. Kennedy.


Journalist Caitlin Johnstone hits the nail on the head in pointing out that the biggest revelation from last week’s limited release of the JFK files is “the fact that the FBI and CIA still desperately need to keep secrets about something that happened 54 years ago.”


What was released on Oct. 26, was a tiny fraction of what had remained undisclosed in the National Archives. To find out why, one needs to have some appreciation of a 70-year-old American political tradition that might be called “fear of the spooks.”


That the CIA and FBI are still choosing what we should be allowed to see concerning who murdered John Kennedy may seem unusual, but there is hoary precedent for it. After JFK’s assassination on Nov. 22, 1963, the well-connected Allen Dulles, whom Kennedy had fired as CIA director after the Bay of Pigs fiasco, got himself appointed to the Warren Commission and took the lead in shaping the investigation of JFK’s murder.


By becoming de facto head of the Commission, Dulles was perfectly placed to protect himself and his associates, if any commissioners or investigators were tempted to question whether Dulles and the CIA played any role in killing Kennedy. When a few independent-minded journalists did succumb to that temptation, they were immediately branded – you guessed it – “conspiracy theorists.”


And so, the big question remains: Did Allen Dulles and other “cloak-and-dagger” CIA operatives have a hand in John Kennedy’s assassination and subsequent cover-up? In my view and the view of many more knowledgeable investigators, the best dissection of the evidence on the murder appears in James Douglass’s 2008 book, JFK and the Unspeakable: Why He Died and Why It Matters.


After updating and arraying the abundant evidence, and conducting still more interviews, Douglass concludes that the answer to the big question is Yes. Reading Douglass’s book today may help explain why so many records are still withheld from release, even in redacted form, and why, indeed, we may never see them in their entirety. . . .

<snip>

. . . . During a Jan. 3, 2017 interview with MSNBC’S Rachel Maddow, Schumer told Maddow nonchalantly about the dangers awaiting President-elect Donald Trump if he kept on “taking on the intelligence community.” She and Schumer were discussing Trump’s sharp tweeting regarding U.S. intelligence and evidence of “Russian hacking” (which both Schumer and Maddow treat as flat fact).

Schumer said: “Let me tell you, you take on the intelligence community, they have six ways from Sunday at getting back at you. So even for a practical, supposedly hard-nosed businessman, he’s being really dumb to do this.”

Three days after that interview, President Obama’s intelligence chiefs released a nearly evidence-free “assessment” claiming that the Kremlin engaged in a covert operation to put Trump into office, fueling a “scandal” that has hobbled Trump’s presidency. On Monday, Russia-gate special prosecutor Robert Mueller indicted Trump’s one-time campaign manager Paul Manafort on unrelated money laundering, tax and foreign lobbying charges, apparently in the hope that Manafort will provide incriminating evidence against Trump.

So, President Trump has been in office long enough to have learned how the game is played and the “six ways from Sunday” that the intelligence community has for “getting back at you.” He appears to be as intimidated as was President Obama.

Trump’s awkward acquiescence in the Deep State’s last-minute foot-dragging regarding release of the JFK files is simply the most recent sign that he, too, is under the thumb of what the Soviets used to call “the organs of state security.”

Again...does NOTHING to indicate a conspiracy

Information is classified or withheld for many reasons

What many reasons would those be?

 

[rightwinger]

The simple fact is, if the paradigm is as the Warren Commission says it is, there would not be so many files that are classified, and the POTUS would not have kept them classified in the period of internecine conflict between the public state and the bureaucratic intelligence and corporate establishment that run the nation.

2017 & 2018 JFK Releases: Progress, Issues, Recommendations
2017 & 2018 JFK Releases: Progress, Issues, Recommendations


"SUMMARY


Under the President John F. Kennedy Records Collection Act of 1992 (“JFK Records Act”), the Assassination Records Review Board (“ARRB”) oversaw the declassification of millions of pages of formerly classified records. But a significant number of documents were withheld in full, and many more were withheld with “redactions” (portions withheld from view).


As noted in the ARRB’s Final Report, the JFK Records Act included a provision for full release 25 years after its passage. Specifically, it “mandated that all postponed assassination records be opened to the public no later than the year 2017” unless the President certifies that (1) “continued postponement is made necessary by an identifiable harm to the military, defense, intelligence operations, law enforcement, or conduct of foreign relations” and (2) “the identifiable harm is of such gravity that it outweighs the public interest in disclosure.” (showDoc.html).


Instead of full disclosure, what occurred was a rolling set of partial releases, 7 so far, along with continued withholding. On the positive side, for the first time the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) published the newly released documents online in PDF format, a huge boon to researchers. But this process has been marred by errors and confusion, as documented herein.


Currently according to NARA, 15,834 documents remain withheld in part, along with a smaller set still withheld in full. Both the current state of affairs, and the process by which releases have occurred, are less than satisfactory.


This paper documents the recent history of releases and the numerous problems with the process and the current state of affairs. It does not discuss the question of “what’s in the new records?” – suffice to say that there are important documents being uncovered, related to the assassination investigations and also the context of Kennedy Cold War policies, and that the full “digestion” process will take time.


RELEASE HISTORY


After an early release of records in July of 2017, the 25-year anniversary arrived on October 26. Against a backdrop of lobbying by federal agencies, President Trump
signed an authorization for continued withholding of most of the remaining records, release of some, and an accompanying review process with a 6-month deadline.


In November and December of 2017, 4 additional releases happened. When the 6month review deadline came on April 26, 2018, a seventh release occurred, along with continued withholding and a new review deadline set for 2020.


In all, tens of thousands of documents were released or re-released, though over 15,000 documents remain withheld at least in part.


Continue reading: DOWNLOAD THE ENTIRE ARTICLE . . . . "

Just because something is classified or withheld from public release does not mean it is hiding a secret conspiracy.

None of the thousands of documents just released had anything to do with conspiracy

Nah, it's a pretty good indicator you rube.

The Deep State’s JFK Triumph Over Trump
The Deep State's JFK Triumph Over Trump
"The New Delay Is the Story


You might have thought that almost 54 years after Kennedy was murdered in the streets of Dallas – and after knowing for a quarter century the supposedly final deadline for releasing the JFK files – the CIA and FBI would not have needed a six-month extension to decide what secrets that they still must hide.



Autopsy photo of President John F. Kennedy.


Journalist Caitlin Johnstone hits the nail on the head in pointing out that the biggest revelation from last week’s limited release of the JFK files is “the fact that the FBI and CIA still desperately need to keep secrets about something that happened 54 years ago.”


What was released on Oct. 26, was a tiny fraction of what had remained undisclosed in the National Archives. To find out why, one needs to have some appreciation of a 70-year-old American political tradition that might be called “fear of the spooks.”


That the CIA and FBI are still choosing what we should be allowed to see concerning who murdered John Kennedy may seem unusual, but there is hoary precedent for it. After JFK’s assassination on Nov. 22, 1963, the well-connected Allen Dulles, whom Kennedy had fired as CIA director after the Bay of Pigs fiasco, got himself appointed to the Warren Commission and took the lead in shaping the investigation of JFK’s murder.


By becoming de facto head of the Commission, Dulles was perfectly placed to protect himself and his associates, if any commissioners or investigators were tempted to question whether Dulles and the CIA played any role in killing Kennedy. When a few independent-minded journalists did succumb to that temptation, they were immediately branded – you guessed it – “conspiracy theorists.”


And so, the big question remains: Did Allen Dulles and other “cloak-and-dagger” CIA operatives have a hand in John Kennedy’s assassination and subsequent cover-up? In my view and the view of many more knowledgeable investigators, the best dissection of the evidence on the murder appears in James Douglass’s 2008 book, JFK and the Unspeakable: Why He Died and Why It Matters.


After updating and arraying the abundant evidence, and conducting still more interviews, Douglass concludes that the answer to the big question is Yes. Reading Douglass’s book today may help explain why so many records are still withheld from release, even in redacted form, and why, indeed, we may never see them in their entirety. . . .

<snip>

. . . . During a Jan. 3, 2017 interview with MSNBC’S Rachel Maddow, Schumer told Maddow nonchalantly about the dangers awaiting President-elect Donald Trump if he kept on “taking on the intelligence community.” She and Schumer were discussing Trump’s sharp tweeting regarding U.S. intelligence and evidence of “Russian hacking” (which both Schumer and Maddow treat as flat fact).

Schumer said: “Let me tell you, you take on the intelligence community, they have six ways from Sunday at getting back at you. So even for a practical, supposedly hard-nosed businessman, he’s being really dumb to do this.”

Three days after that interview, President Obama’s intelligence chiefs released a nearly evidence-free “assessment” claiming that the Kremlin engaged in a covert operation to put Trump into office, fueling a “scandal” that has hobbled Trump’s presidency. On Monday, Russia-gate special prosecutor Robert Mueller indicted Trump’s one-time campaign manager Paul Manafort on unrelated money laundering, tax and foreign lobbying charges, apparently in the hope that Manafort will provide incriminating evidence against Trump.

So, President Trump has been in office long enough to have learned how the game is played and the “six ways from Sunday” that the intelligence community has for “getting back at you.” He appears to be as intimidated as was President Obama.

Trump’s awkward acquiescence in the Deep State’s last-minute foot-dragging regarding release of the JFK files is simply the most recent sign that he, too, is under the thumb of what the Soviets used to call “the organs of state security.”

Again...does NOTHING to indicate a conspiracy

Information is classified or withheld for many reasons

What many reasons would those be?

CIA agents, tactics and capabilities
Personal information damaging to the Kennedys
Information relating to other active cases
Information we have on other governments

 

[Soupnazi630]

With the possible theory of the negligent discharge by the Secret Service agent there is no credible evidence that anybody other than Oswald shot Kennedy.

That means the Mob got to Oswald long before Kennedy announced he was going to Dallas and set him to be a "patsy" shooter. Somebody that had no previsions ties to the Mafia or was even a professional hitman. Then they arranged for Ruby to whack him and for Ruby to die later. Years afterwards then they whacked Bobby by using a Palestinian kid who said he did he for political reasons and who is still alive today..

While certainly they had a motive for getting rid of the Kennedy boys it simply doesn't seem feasible.

Given Oswald's background it is actually more feasible that the CIA set up Oswald and Ruby. I suspect there were CIA agents very pissed about Kennedy's betrayal at the Bay of Pigs. They were just as capable of doing it as the Mafia.

However, the most logical explanation is that Oswald was a nutcase that acted alone. He certainly was a loony tune.

Maybe the reason that 55 years later the reason why no credibly evidence exist for it being somebody other than Oswald acting alone is because there is no other evidence. Only speculation about motives but no facts.

The Kennedy family was a collection of corrupt and arrogant assholes. I am sure there was a lot of people that would have liked to have seen them whacked. However, it looks like Joe died of old age, Johnny Boy was killed by a commie nutcase and Bobby was shot by a pissed off Palestinian. Teddy lived and was a murderous asshole Senator.

Inconceivable. Oswald was not a nutcase or a loony. This is a fabrication of our lying government.

He was very intelligent and well liked by his buddies in the CIA and FBI.

Wrong.

he was a nut and a marxist which you have never cited evidence to dispute.

Wrong. Oswald was a right wing anti-commie like all your buddies at the CIA,

Now cite one thing from the WC that is true.

I have already offerred such a citation now it is your turn.

you have never offered any evidence of any kind that Oswald was a right winger.

Show some evidence or it proves you are merely a foolish liar.

He was a marxist by his own account and you have nothing to refute that fact.

Now since I offered the citation you asked for cite a specific passage from the WC which is a lie or fabrication and provide evidence.

Magic bullets! A bolt action rifle that could have never of caused the kind of damage with simply two shots and especially by a patsy that never fired a shot.

You believe in leprechauns, trolls, unicorns and other legends of lore since you buy the Warren Commission loaded full of fetid shit.....and you put a bib around your neck, pull out a spoon and fork so you can dine.....bon appetit.

Clearly you know nothing about firearms.

Yes it was capable of causing such damage with two shots and Oswald was no patsy he did in fact fire all three shots.

Funny you have no evidence of any sort for your claims.

I have sunk you with evidence however

 

[Soupnazi630]

Rightwinger, I have utterly destroyed your lame argument......it was too easy. A logical discussion requires two parties willing to discuss an issue in a rational manner, which you have never been willing to do.

With the possible theory of the negligent discharge by the Secret Service agent there is no credible evidence that anybody other than Oswald shot Kennedy.

That means the Mob got to Oswald long before Kennedy announced he was going to Dallas and set him to be a "patsy" shooter. Somebody that had no previsions ties to the Mafia or was even a professional hitman. Then they arranged for Ruby to whack him and for Ruby to die later. Years afterwards then they whacked Bobby by using a Palestinian kid who said he did he for political reasons and who is still alive today..

While certainly they had a motive for getting rid of the Kennedy boys it simply doesn't seem feasible.

Given Oswald's background it is actually more feasible that the CIA set up Oswald and Ruby. I suspect there were CIA agents very pissed about Kennedy's betrayal at the Bay of Pigs. They were just as capable of doing it as the Mafia.

However, the most logical explanation is that Oswald was a nutcase that acted alone. He certainly was a loony tune.

Maybe the reason that 55 years later the reason why no credibly evidence exist for it being somebody other than Oswald acting alone is because there is no other evidence. Only speculation about motives but no facts.

The Kennedy family was a collection of corrupt and arrogant assholes. I am sure there was a lot of people that would have liked to have seen them whacked. However, it looks like Joe died of old age, Johnny Boy was killed by a commie nutcase and Bobby was shot by a pissed off Palestinian. Teddy lived and was a murderous asshole Senator.

You had credibility until you destroyed it with your babble that oswald was a nutcase that acted alone and all the other rambles after that. I just destroyed this ramble of yours in post# 669 here http://www.usmessageboard.com/threa...correct-oswald-acted-alone.692966/page-67here and so did dale in post# 653 Warren Commission was correct........Oswald acted alone you have been checkmated by us both.here is the crying towel.

Nobody has yet to provide any evidence that Oswald received assistance

What assistance?

A. $19.95 rifle and no car

Why would he need assistance? He did nothing.

Tell it to Jackie and Tippets widow

Jackie knew Oswald was a patsy. Fool.

Citation needed.

Oh sorry I forgot you only make crap up and never offer any evidence to support it,

She never made any such claim fool.

The evidence shows he was not a patsy.

 

[Soupnazi630]

Wrong.

he was a nut and a marxist which you have never cited evidence to dispute.

Wrong. Oswald was a right wing anti-commie like all your buddies at the CIA,

Now cite one thing from the WC that is true.

I have already offerred such a citation now it is your turn.

you have never offered any evidence of any kind that Oswald was a right winger.

Show some evidence or it proves you are merely a foolish liar.

He was a marxist by his own account and you have nothing to refute that fact.

Now since I offered the citation you asked for cite a specific passage from the WC which is a lie or fabrication and provide evidence.

Magic bullets! A bolt action rifle that could have never of caused the kind of damage with simply two shots and especially by a patsy that never fired a shot.

You believe in leprechauns, trolls, unicorns and other legends of lore since you buy the Warren Commission loaded full of fetid shit.....and you put a bib around your neck, pull out a spoon and fork so you can dine.....bon appetit.

LOL! NO one speaks of magic bullets except weak minded buffoons who ignore the science and want to wallow in conspiracy.

Here, in case you'd like to stop appearing so stupid. Using Modern Ballistics to Crack 'Cold Case JFK'

This thread, started by a dummy, is about the Warren Commission Report. That report clearly relied on the stupid, incomprehensible, and pure fiction that is the Magic Bullet.

Dumb ass!

No it did not.

You have never read the report. If you had read it you would know that the Warren Commission report never makes any reference or mention of a bullet which is magical or which zig zagged and changed directions.

The magic bullet theory is a lie created by conspiracy theorists and like a gullible fool you fell for it.

 

[Soupnazi630]

The simple fact is, if the paradigm is as the Warren Commission says it is, the there would not be so many files that are classified, and the POTUS would not have kept them classified in the period of internecine conflict between the public state and the bureaucratic intelligence and corporate establishment that run the nation.

2017 & 2018 JFK Releases: Progress, Issues, Recommendations
2017 & 2018 JFK Releases: Progress, Issues, Recommendations


"SUMMARY


Under the President John F. Kennedy Records Collection Act of 1992 (“JFK Records Act”), the Assassination Records Review Board (“ARRB”) oversaw the declassification of millions of pages of formerly classified records. But a significant number of documents were withheld in full, and many more were withheld with “redactions” (portions withheld from view).


As noted in the ARRB’s Final Report, the JFK Records Act included a provision for full release 25 years after its passage. Specifically, it “mandated that all postponed assassination records be opened to the public no later than the year 2017” unless the President certifies that (1) “continued postponement is made necessary by an identifiable harm to the military, defense, intelligence operations, law enforcement, or conduct of foreign relations” and (2) “the identifiable harm is of such gravity that it outweighs the public interest in disclosure.” (showDoc.html).


Instead of full disclosure, what occurred was a rolling set of partial releases, 7 so far, along with continued withholding. On the positive side, for the first time the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) published the newly released documents online in PDF format, a huge boon to researchers. But this process has been marred by errors and confusion, as documented herein.


Currently according to NARA, 15,834 documents remain withheld in part, along with a smaller set still withheld in full. Both the current state of affairs, and the process by which releases have occurred, are less than satisfactory.


This paper documents the recent history of releases and the numerous problems with the process and the current state of affairs. It does not discuss the question of “what’s in the new records?” – suffice to say that there are important documents being uncovered, related to the assassination investigations and also the context of Kennedy Cold War policies, and that the full “digestion” process will take time.


RELEASE HISTORY


After an early release of records in July of 2017, the 25-year anniversary arrived on October 26. Against a backdrop of lobbying by federal agencies, President Trump
signed an authorization for continued withholding of most of the remaining records, release of some, and an accompanying review process with a 6-month deadline.


In November and December of 2017, 4 additional releases happened. When the 6month review deadline came on April 26, 2018, a seventh release occurred, along with continued withholding and a new review deadline set for 2020.


In all, tens of thousands of documents were released or re-released, though over 15,000 documents remain withheld at least in part.


Continue reading: DOWNLOAD THE ENTIRE ARTICLE . . . . "

Agreed.

However it hasn't occurred to the WC report sycophant that something strange is going on for the government to withhold thousands of documents from public view, for decades. If it is as simple a one crazed nut shooting the POTUS, why would they withhold documents for over five decades?

Just one rather large contradiction in the government's story, among many others.

No contradiction at all. There are many good reasons to maintain such secrets not the least of which is to protect sources.

 

[Soupnazi630]

Great Senator and member of the Warren Commission. Gerald Ford too

Both agreed that Oswald acted alone

Not surprising since both me were disgusting elitists, corporatists, and statists...just like you and your Messiah.

Neither the Great Obama nor myself were on the Warren Commission

Well no one said you and Big Ears were, but if you were...no doubt the report would be just as it is.

We both would have concluded the obvious......Oswald acted alone

We both have concluded you are an idiot.

The idiots are people like you claiming that the Warren Commission report described a bullet performing magic. Spector never made such a claim.

Cite the chapter and page where the Warren Commission makes such a claim.

 

[hunarcy]

LOL! NO one speaks of magic bullets except weak minded buffoons who ignore the science and want to wallow in conspiracy.

Here, in case you'd like to stop appearing so stupid. Using Modern Ballistics to Crack 'Cold Case JFK'

This thread, started by a dummy, is about the Warren Commission Report. That report clearly relied on the stupid, incomprehensible, and pure fiction that is the Magic Bullet.

Dumb ass!

The Warren Report said nothing close to a magic bullet. In fact, they documented a straight shot

History has confirmed their conclusion

BS. Remember Arlen Specter?

Great Senator and member of the Warren Commission. Gerald Ford too

Both agreed that Oswald acted alone

Not surprising since both me were disgusting elitists, corporatists, and statists...just like you and your Messiah.

We get that they were smarter and more educated than you. You might appear less stupid if you weren't clinging so doggedly to your BELIEFS in the face of scientific fact.

Why the Best Conspiracy Theories About JFK’s Assassination Are Bunk

 

[gipper]

You had credibility until you destroyed it with your babble that oswald was a nutcase that acted alone and all the other rambles after that. I just destroyed this ramble of yours in post# 669 here http://www.usmessageboard.com/threa...correct-oswald-acted-alone.692966/page-67here and so did dale in post# 653 Warren Commission was correct........Oswald acted alone you have been checkmated by us both.here is the crying towel.

Nobody has yet to provide any evidence that Oswald received assistance

What assistance?

A. $19.95 rifle and no car

Why would he need assistance? He did nothing.

Tell it to Jackie and Tippets widow

Jackie knew Oswald was a patsy. Fool.

Citation needed.

Oh sorry I forgot you only make crap up and never offer any evidence to support it,

She never made any such claim fool.

The evidence shows he was not a patsy.

Of course she never made that claim. She knew what your buddies at Langley would do to her...just what they did to her husband, brother in-law, and likely her son.

Can you blame her?

 

[hunarcy]

Nobody has yet to provide any evidence that Oswald received assistance

What assistance?

A. $19.95 rifle and no car

Why would he need assistance? He did nothing.

Tell it to Jackie and Tippets widow

Jackie knew Oswald was a patsy. Fool.

Citation needed.

Oh sorry I forgot you only make crap up and never offer any evidence to support it,

She never made any such claim fool.

The evidence shows he was not a patsy.

Of course she never made that claim. She knew what your buddies at Langley would do to her...just what they did to her husband, brother in-law, and likely her son.

Can you blame her?

That poor woman was entitled to believe whatever she wants, but SHE never investigated the assassination. She was reacting to her anger and bitterness. It's amazing that a ghoul would take advantage of her while IGNORING the truth that has been presented to you over and over again.

 

[LaDexter]

SoupNazi and Rightwinger are two Mossad liars here who knew that JFK was offed for not sending arms to Israel.

They were very happy about LBJ and this...

After the start of the 67 war, LBJ came out and told the American people that Israel was attacked and was just defending itself. He lied...


CIA Analysis of the 1967 Arab-Israeli War — Central Intelligence Agency


"Helms was awakened at 3:00 in the morning on 5 June by a call from the CIA Operations Center. The Foreign Broadcast Information Service had picked up reports that Israel had launched its attack. (OCI soon concluded that the Israelis— contrary to their claims—had fired first.) President Johnson was gratified that because of CIA analyses and Helms's tip, he could inform congressional leaders later in the day that he had been expecting Israel's move"


There is no point in discussing truth with these two traitors, as they have no interest in truth. They care about Israel and helping Israel get away with everything from 911 to JFK...

 

[Soupnazi630]

Nobody has yet to provide any evidence that Oswald received assistance

What assistance?

A. $19.95 rifle and no car

Why would he need assistance? He did nothing.

Tell it to Jackie and Tippets widow

Jackie knew Oswald was a patsy. Fool.

Citation needed.

Oh sorry I forgot you only make crap up and never offer any evidence to support it,

She never made any such claim fool.

The evidence shows he was not a patsy.

Of course she never made that claim. She knew what your buddies at Langley would do to her...just what they did to her husband, brother in-law, and likely her son.

Can you blame her?

So she never made such a claim.

Therefore you do not know any such thing and are merely speaking out of your consistent ignorance and stupidity.

Bur I will give you credit that for once at least you admit to being a liar since you have no idea what she thought and have fessed up to it.

 

[Soupnazi630]

SoupNazi and Rightwinger are two Mossad liars here who knew that JFK was offed for not sending arms to Israel.

They were very happy about LBJ and this...

After the start of the 67 war, LBJ came out and told the American people that Israel was attacked and was just defending itself. He lied...


CIA Analysis of the 1967 Arab-Israeli War — Central Intelligence Agency


"Helms was awakened at 3:00 in the morning on 5 June by a call from the CIA Operations Center. The Foreign Broadcast Information Service had picked up reports that Israel had launched its attack. (OCI soon concluded that the Israelis— contrary to their claims—had fired first.) President Johnson was gratified that because of CIA analyses and Helms's tip, he could inform congressional leaders later in the day that he had been expecting Israel's move"


There is no point in discussing truth with these two traitors, as they have no interest in truth. They care about Israel and helping Israel get away with everything from 911 to JFK...

None of which you have ever presented evidence for.

 

[Dale Smith]

SoupNazi and Rightwinger are two Mossad liars here who knew that JFK was offed for not sending arms to Israel.

They were very happy about LBJ and this...

After the start of the 67 war, LBJ came out and told the American people that Israel was attacked and was just defending itself. He lied...


CIA Analysis of the 1967 Arab-Israeli War — Central Intelligence Agency


"Helms was awakened at 3:00 in the morning on 5 June by a call from the CIA Operations Center. The Foreign Broadcast Information Service had picked up reports that Israel had launched its attack. (OCI soon concluded that the Israelis— contrary to their claims—had fired first.) President Johnson was gratified that because of CIA analyses and Helms's tip, he could inform congressional leaders later in the day that he had been expecting Israel's move"


There is no point in discussing truth with these two traitors, as they have no interest in truth. They care about Israel and helping Israel get away with everything from 911 to JFK...

None of which you have ever presented evidence for.

Why would he need assistance? He did nothing.

Tell it to Jackie and Tippets widow

Jackie knew Oswald was a patsy. Fool.

Citation needed.

Oh sorry I forgot you only make crap up and never offer any evidence to support it,

She never made any such claim fool.

The evidence shows he was not a patsy.

Of course she never made that claim. She knew what your buddies at Langley would do to her...just what they did to her husband, brother in-law, and likely her son.

Can you blame her?

So she never made such a claim.

Therefore you do not know any such thing and are merely speaking out of your consistent ignorance and stupidity.

Bur I will give you credit that for once at least you admit to being a liar since you have no idea what she thought and have fessed up to it.

Jackie Kennedy knew that the altered corpse of J.D Tippit wasn't that of JFK and said that it resembled something straight out of Madame Toussad's wax museum. You see, JFK had gross skeletal abnormalities all along the spine of his body as several of his vertebrae had fractures and metal pins inserted into the cartilage and bones. These conditions were due to JFK having osteoporosis as a child and injuries caused by his time in the military during his military. Now, here is the tale of the tape that more than proves that the autopsy was done on Tippit instead of JFK..... the section titled "Skeletal Structure" in the "autopsy report declares that there were "no gross skeletal abnormalities"...hmmmmm????

You lose yet again, Soup, dupe.....kicking your ass is too ******* easy.

btw, you can spew as much you desire and equally drooling dredges of this forum will applaud you....but I simply laugh at you as you attempt to wave the Warren Commission flag as the bastion of truth. You are dismissed and exposed for the fraud that you are.

To those that know the REAL truth? There is nothing more that needs to be said...morons are gonna be morons. You can lead a mule to water but there are some that are so stubborn that they would rather die of thirst than to admit that they were lead to the oasis.

 

[gipper]

Not surprising since both me were disgusting elitists, corporatists, and statists...just like you and your Messiah.

Neither the Great Obama nor myself were on the Warren Commission

Well no one said you and Big Ears were, but if you were...no doubt the report would be just as it is.

We both would have concluded the obvious......Oswald acted alone

We both have concluded you are an idiot.

The idiots are people like you claiming that the Warren Commission report described a bullet performing magic. Spector never made such a claim.

Cite the chapter and page where the Warren Commission makes such a claim.

I went to my local public library yesterday, looking for a copy of the Warren Commission Report. Guess what? I found it appropriately filed in the FICTION section.

 

[rightwinger]

SoupNazi and Rightwinger are two Mossad liars here who knew that JFK was offed for not sending arms to Israel.

They were very happy about LBJ and this...

After the start of the 67 war, LBJ came out and told the American people that Israel was attacked and was just defending itself. He lied...


CIA Analysis of the 1967 Arab-Israeli War — Central Intelligence Agency


"Helms was awakened at 3:00 in the morning on 5 June by a call from the CIA Operations Center. The Foreign Broadcast Information Service had picked up reports that Israel had launched its attack. (OCI soon concluded that the Israelis— contrary to their claims—had fired first.) President Johnson was gratified that because of CIA analyses and Helms's tip, he could inform congressional leaders later in the day that he had been expecting Israel's move"


There is no point in discussing truth with these two traitors, as they have no interest in truth. They care about Israel and helping Israel get away with everything from 911 to JFK...

None of which you have ever presented evidence for.

Tell it to Jackie and Tippets widow

Jackie knew Oswald was a patsy. Fool.

Citation needed.

Oh sorry I forgot you only make crap up and never offer any evidence to support it,

She never made any such claim fool.

The evidence shows he was not a patsy.

Of course she never made that claim. She knew what your buddies at Langley would do to her...just what they did to her husband, brother in-law, and likely her son.

Can you blame her?

So she never made such a claim.

Therefore you do not know any such thing and are merely speaking out of your consistent ignorance and stupidity.

Bur I will give you credit that for once at least you admit to being a liar since you have no idea what she thought and have fessed up to it.

Jackie Kennedy knew that the altered corpse of J.D Tippit wasn't that of JFK and said that it resembled something straight out of Madame Toussad's wax museum. You see, JFK had gross skeletal abnormalities all along the spine of his body as several of his vertebrae had fractures and metal pins inserted into the cartilage and bones. These conditions were due to JFK having osteoporosis as a child and injuries caused by his time in the military during his military. Now, here is the tale of the tape that more than proves that the autopsy was done on Tippit instead of JFK..... the section titled "Skeletal Structure" in the "autopsy report declares that there were "no gross skeletal abnormalities"...hmmmmm????

You lose yet again, Soup, dupe.....kicking your ass is too ******* easy.

btw, you can spew as much you desire and equally drooling dredges of this forum will applaud you....but I simply laugh at you as you attempt to wave the Warren Commission flag as the bastion of truth. You are dismissed and exposed for the fraud that you are.

To those that know the REAL truth? There is nothing more that needs to be said...morons are gonna be morons. You can lead a mule to water but there are some that are so stubborn that they would rather die of thirst than to admit that they were lead to the oasis.

Actually, Oswald accidentally shot JFK

He thought he was assasinating Tippet

 

[MisterBeale]

Neither the Great Obama nor myself were on the Warren Commission

Well no one said you and Big Ears were, but if you were...no doubt the report would be just as it is.

We both would have concluded the obvious......Oswald acted alone

We both have concluded you are an idiot.

The idiots are people like you claiming that the Warren Commission report described a bullet performing magic. Spector never made such a claim.

Cite the chapter and page where the Warren Commission makes such a claim.

I went to my local public library yesterday, looking for a copy of the Warren Commission Report. Guess what? I found it appropriately filed in the FICTION section.

That's gold man, even if it weren't true, though I hope it is.

 

[MisterBeale]

On JFK secrecy, Brett Kavanaugh sides with the CIA

 

[rightwinger]

Actually, it wasTed Cruz,s father who shot JFK

Our President swears it is so

 

[hunarcy]

SoupNazi and Rightwinger are two Mossad liars here who knew that JFK was offed for not sending arms to Israel.

They were very happy about LBJ and this...

After the start of the 67 war, LBJ came out and told the American people that Israel was attacked and was just defending itself. He lied...


CIA Analysis of the 1967 Arab-Israeli War — Central Intelligence Agency


"Helms was awakened at 3:00 in the morning on 5 June by a call from the CIA Operations Center. The Foreign Broadcast Information Service had picked up reports that Israel had launched its attack. (OCI soon concluded that the Israelis— contrary to their claims—had fired first.) President Johnson was gratified that because of CIA analyses and Helms's tip, he could inform congressional leaders later in the day that he had been expecting Israel's move"


There is no point in discussing truth with these two traitors, as they have no interest in truth. They care about Israel and helping Israel get away with everything from 911 to JFK...

You do love a conspiracy theory or you really hate Israel so badly you want to ignore Kennedy's support for Israel and just flat out lie.

An Israeli memorial recalls Kennedy as the president who committed the US to Israel's defense