Dogmaphobe
Diamond Member
one diagnostic tool that should be used to test the veracity of his various claims: it would stand to reason (and I realize here that reason is in particularly short supply among those who believe might makes right) that any given poster's infractions would be distributed fairly equally among the various mods.After all, the claim has been made that mods are impartial and are extremely limited in how they enforce the rules.
By this same use of reason, the greater disparity in infractions for any given poster, the less this statement is true. If one mod accounts for a great majority of any poster's infractions, it is OBVIOSLY untrue.
All any outside observer would need to do is pull up a list of infractions meted out to any given poster. If one mod is hugely overtepresented, corruption is involved. If this same mod is hugely overrepresented for a great number of many posters, then this mod should be removed as they have rendered ALL the claims being made as untrue
By this same use of reason, the greater disparity in infractions for any given poster, the less this statement is true. If one mod accounts for a great majority of any poster's infractions, it is OBVIOSLY untrue.
All any outside observer would need to do is pull up a list of infractions meted out to any given poster. If one mod is hugely overtepresented, corruption is involved. If this same mod is hugely overrepresented for a great number of many posters, then this mod should be removed as they have rendered ALL the claims being made as untrue