Zone1 The democrat Lame Stream Media has no ethics at all. I am showing what i posted on MSN and they say it isnt nice.

[alang1216]

Fox News crushes CNN, MS NOW in February with 35% more viewers than both channels combined

In February, Fox News averaged 34% more primetime viewers and 35% more total day viewers than CNN and MS NOW combined, according to new Nielsen data.

nypost.com

Meet the new boss, same as the old boss:

Fox News agreed to pay Dominion Voting Systems nearly $800 million to avert a trial in the voting machine company’s lawsuit that would have exposed how the network promoted lies about the 2020 presidential election.

 

[Lockback]

Meet the new boss, same as the old boss:

Fox News agreed to pay Dominion Voting Systems nearly $800 million to avert a trial in the voting machine company’s lawsuit that would have exposed how the network promoted lies about the 2020 presidential election.

That doesn't address how miserable the ratings are for your favorite leftist pablum pushers.

 

[alang1216]

That doesn't address how miserable the ratings are for your favorite leftist pablum pushers.

It's complicated. Maybe this will help:

AI Overview

Right-leaning media audiences tend to be more concentrated around fewer, highly trusted sources (e.g., Fox News) and dominate online engagement, while left-leaning audiences consume a broader range of sources. Conservative media has a larger footprint on social media and online shows, whereas liberal audiences are more fragmented across various mainstream outlets
.
Pew Research Center +3
Media Audience Trends

• Right-Leaning Audience: Often characterized by higher distrust of mainstream, non-partisan media. They consume a narrower range of sources and gravitate toward specific outlets like Fox News, Breitbart, and radio personalities. Their online presence is massive; some reports indicate right-leaning shows have nearly 481 million followers vs. 104 million for left-leaning, with significantly higher YouTube views.
• Left-Leaning Audience: More likely to trust and consume a wider variety of mainstream, center-left, and liberal news sources. While individual left-leaning outlets often have high web traffic, audience loyalty is spread across a more diverse set of providers (e.g., CNN, MSNBC, New York Times).
• The "Bubble" Effect: Both sides tend to live in news bubbles, but right-leaning audiences are more likely to have like-minded friends, while left-leaning audiences tend to follow more issue-based groups on social media.
  Pew Research Center +4

Platforms and Engagement

• Social Media: Right-leaning outlets often have higher engagement in social media news sharing, even in partisan digital spaces, partly due to a higher frequency of sharing partisan news.
• Engagement Types: A 2025 Oxford study showed that right-leaning users dominate engagement on platforms like Truth Social, while left-leaning users dominate platforms like Blue Sky.
• Quality and Bias: Studies indicate that lower-quality news, regardless of ideological direction, gets higher engagement on social media. Both sides are susceptible to echo chambers.
  National Institutes of Health (.gov) +2

Media Coverage and Views

• Journalist Perspectives: Journalists for right-leaning audiences tend to believe in providing equal coverage for all sides (bothsidesism), while a majority of journalists for left-leaning audiences believe not all sides deserve equal coverage.
• Volume: AllSides analysis shows that while right-leaning content often has high engagement, "Lean Left" and center-left sources consistently receive the highest overall site visits due to established, traditional media dominance.

 

[ding]

Too convoluted to follow.

I’ll try to dumb it down for you in the future.

Yes. No one celebrates evil

That’s my point.

and you don't get to know what lies in another's heart.

Or suspend reason and logic?

The problem in society is not subjectivity it is a failure to grasp reality.

That’s one and the same. Maybe study the key difference between subjective and objective and look at the definition of reality.

We want to be immortal so we invent heaven.

Speak for yourself. I’m more intelligent than that.

We want an honest government and expect others to pay for it.

No. Americans want what they want regardless of whether it’s honest or fair or not. Americans rationalize that they are always honest and fair because no one celebrates evil even when they are being evil.

You are becoming what you hate.

 

[citygator]

• 3/13/26
  Comment hidden for violating our guidelines on profanity
  Lies by the leftists because they dont tell the whole story just made up shit. Every legal Hispanic other than demented democrat Hispanic voters, love what the president is doing. Every illegal Hispanic though hates him for he is cleaning up the mess the Joe Biden allowed when millions of people crossed the border many harming women and children. Why do democrats support harming women and children?
  
  This comment violates our community guidelines on profanity. As our guidelines state:
  Abusive or illegal conduct are not acceptable here. Do not post:
  Violent content
  Illegal activity
  Risk to self or others
  Abusive language
  Hate speech
• 
  3/13/26
  Comment hidden
  Back in 2020 when that election was stolen, the democrats pushed out the republican election monitors saying it was covid spread, and then proceeded to push 100s of thousands of fraudulent ballots through the voting machines. Democrats always accuse others of what they have done, because that is what Communists do. And steal elections. Democrats are the party of lies, hate, death and destruction.
  
  This comment was deleted because it didn't meet our guidelines
• 
  3/13/26
  Comment hidden for violating our guidelines on profanity
  While the democrats tax and spend their voters out of their monies, the stupid people who think it is the fault of billionaires deserve it when those with money leave. It is called the Detroitification. Places like Detroit, NYC, LA get lots of people with lots of money. The democrats think that they can take that money and give it to people who crossed the border so those people with vote for them keeping them in power. Soon there is no one left to take money from and those cities are now shitholes. Democrats are the party of lies, hate, death and destruction.
  
  This comment violates our community guidelines on profanity. As our guidelines state:
  Abusive or illegal conduct are not acceptable here. Do not post:
  Violent content
  Illegal activity
  Risk to self or others
  Abusive language
  Hate speech
• 
  3/12/26
  Comment hidden
  Democrats are not friends of US citizens, as proven daily when they try to stop Voter ID, allow millions of illegals into the country, and complain and try to stop the US military from bombing Iran into extinction. If you see a democrat you should get in their face and tell them they arent wanted here anymore. Democrats are the party of lies, hate, death and destruction.
  This comment was deleted because it didn't meet our guidelines
  
  
  Democrats posting on MSN can be abusive as hell, but if someone dares to challenge them, look out, especially during this election cycle. Looks like the LSM is pushing down on the scales of fairness again.
  
  

You used profanity in 3 of the 4 comments. What exactly are you complaining about? Their profanity rules?

 

[alang1216]

I’ll try to dumb it down for you in the future.

No, it was already dumb, try going for clarity.

Speak for yourself. I’m more intelligent than that.

So you don't want to be immortal or go to heaven?

No. Americans want what they want regardless of whether it’s honest or fair or not. Americans rationalize that they are always honest and fair because no one celebrates evil even when they are being evil.

Nonsense.

You are becoming what you hate.

More nonsense.

 

[ding]

No, it was already dumb, try going for clarity.

If you were seeking for clarity, you would have asked a clarifying question instead of stating my post was "Too convoluted to follow." Why do you think it was dumb? (i.e. clarifying question)

So you don't want to be immortal or go to heaven?

Do you? Because I'm not the one obsessing over it. You are. My focus is on the journey. but I've told you that a dozen times, right? It's not some abstract future destination. God is in the present. Everything you believe about God and Christianity is wrong.

The kingdom of heaven is now. ~Jesus

Nonsense.

How is it nonsense? Americans want what they want regardless of whether it’s honest or fair or not. Americans rationalize that they are always honest and fair because no one celebrates evil even when they are being evil. You yourself said you never choose to be immoral.

More nonsense.

It's my observation. You're here to subvert the God of Abraham. Tell me I'm wrong.

 

[alang1216]

If you were seeking for clarity, you would have asked a clarifying question instead of stating my post was "Too convoluted to follow." Why do you think it was dumb? (i.e. clarifying question)

You wrote "So I think it's great when others criticize what they don't believe to arrive at what they do believe without ever challenging what they believe because it will eventually be done to them." A convoluted, mobius strip of a run on sentence.

How is it nonsense? Americans want what they want regardless of whether it’s honest or fair or not. Americans rationalize that they are always honest and fair because no one celebrates evil even when they are being evil. You yourself said you never choose to be immoral.

Because you don't get to decide what others think is fair, moral, honest, or evil.

It's my observation. You're here to subvert the God of Abraham. Tell me I'm wrong.

I can't subvert what doesn't exist.

 

[ding]

You wrote "So I think it's great when others criticize what they don't believe to arrive at what they do believe without ever challenging what they believe because it will eventually be done to them." A convoluted, mobius strip of a run on sentence.

It describes you to a "T." You are a cultural marxist critical theorist.

Because you don't get to decide what others think is fair, moral, honest, or evil.

I'm more than happy for people like you to rationalize away your poor behaviors. I love it when people normalize their deviance from the standard.

I can't subvert what doesn't exist.

That hasn't stopped you from trying.

 

[alang1216]

It describes you to a "T." You are a cultural marxist critical theorist.

"Cultural Marxism" is a term often used to describe a form of Critical Theory that shifts Marxist analysis from economics to culture, aiming to dismantle traditional Western structures (family, religion, nation-state) by identifying power dynamics between oppressor and oppressed groups.

If you're implying I'm on the side of oppressed groups, guilty. I guess that puts you on the opposite side, the oppressors.

I'm more than happy for people like you to rationalize away your poor behaviors. I love it when people normalize their deviance from the standard.

I love it when people take on the mantle of deciding what is normal, moral, right, etc.

That hasn't stopped you from trying.

If the facts subvert your God of Abraham, that's on you, not me.

 

[ding]

"Cultural Marxism" is a term often used to describe a form of Critical Theory that shifts Marxist analysis from economics to culture, aiming to dismantle traditional Western structures (family, religion, nation-state) by identifying power dynamics between oppressor and oppressed groups.

If you're implying I'm on the side of oppressed groups, guilty.

Your tactics are subversive because there is no line of sight to the groups you attack. All you know is that everything is wrong, so you make blanket attacks on the God of Abraham.

I guess that puts you on the opposite side, the oppressors.

I don't see the oppression you see. So how can I be on the side of something that doesn't exist? And since you NEVER make a connection to said oppression, I believe you will be hard pressed to do anything more than arm waving propaganda.

I love it when people take on the mantle of deciding what is normal, moral, right, etc.

Then maybe you should stop making moral arguments that you expect everyone else to understand and accept. When I do evil, I'll be owning it. I won't be making a moral argument rationalization like you do. Unlike you, I choose to be immoral sometimes. Chew on this... you rationalize your subversion because of some vague perception of oppression that only you can see. You imagine the death of Christianity would lead to rosey goodness. That won't be the case. It will be the exact opposite.

If the facts subvert your God of Abraham, that's on you, not me.

Your facts are bullshit. But the interesting thing is that when I gave you the opportunity to state your beliefs out loud, you didn't. Rather than admitting you want Christianity to die, you gave this BS answer instead. It's not that you don't choose to be immoral. It's that you don't choose to admit you are immoral. Let me help you. I wish every militant atheists such as yourself to experience suffering. I want them to suffer and I want their loved ones to suffer. I say these things knowing full well it is immoral for me to wish for these things. You see... I have free will. I can choose to be moral and I can choose to be immoral. But what I refuse to do is to rationalize I am being moral when I'm not.

 

[alang1216]

Your tactics are subversive because there is no line of sight to the groups you attack. All you know is that everything is wrong, so you make blanket attacks on the God of Abraham.

Untrue. I think the closest thing you find is me stating there is no evidentiary link to the creator of the universe.

I don't see the oppression you see. So how can I be on the side of something that doesn't exist? And since you NEVER make a connection to said oppression, I believe you will be hard pressed to do anything more than arm waving propaganda.

Kind of like you saying I make blanket attacks on the God of Abraham?

Then maybe you should stop making moral arguments that you expect everyone else to understand and accept. When I do evil, I'll be owning it. I won't be making a moral argument rationalization like you do. Unlike you, I choose to be immoral sometimes. Chew on this... you rationalize your subversion because of some vague perception of oppression that only you can see. You imagine the death of Christianity would lead to rosey goodness. That won't be the case. It will be the exact opposite.

I can't imagine the death of Christianity but I'm cheered by its evolution.

Your facts are bullshit. But the interesting thing is that when I gave you the opportunity to state your beliefs out loud, you didn't. Rather than admitting you want Christianity to die, you gave this BS answer instead. It's not that you don't choose to be immoral. It's that you don't choose to admit you are immoral. Let me help you. I wish every militant atheists such as yourself to experience suffering. I want them to suffer and I want their loved ones to suffer. I say these things knowing full well it is immoral for me to wish for these things. You see... I have free will. I can choose to be moral and I can choose to be immoral. But what I refuse to do is to rationalize I am being moral when I'm not.

If you're looking for someone trying to kill Christianity, try a mirror.

 

[ding]

Untrue. I think the closest thing you find is me stating there is no evidentiary link to the creator of the universe.

I'm not buying it. You can deny it all you want. I know better.

Kind of like you saying I make blanket attacks on the God of Abraham?

I'm sure you do see it that way. How many years have you been arguing AGAINST the God of Abraham? Not to worry though, there is a great suffering on the horizon. God does his best work in tough times.

I can't imagine the death of Christianity but I'm cheered by its evolution.

You shouldn't be. Christians have forgotten God. Mind you, not all of them but enough that it is a disturbing trend.

If you're looking for someone trying to kill Christianity, try a mirror.

How so?

 

[ding]

I'm cheered by its evolution.

How so? Not for nothing, this is a trap question.

 

[alang1216]

I'm not buying it. You can deny it all you want. I know better.

That my problem with you, you know better.

I'm sure you do see it that way. How many years have you been arguing AGAINST the God of Abraham? Not to worry though, there is a great suffering on the horizon. God does his best work in tough times.

I just hope my suffering makes you happy.

 

[alang1216]

How so? Not for nothing, this is a trap question.

I'm cheered that Christians have stopped killing other Christians for their beliefs, stopped burning people at the stake, and stopped their overt anti-Semitism.

 

[JohnDB]

 

[ding]

That my problem with you, you know better.

Yes, I do.

I just hope my suffering makes you happy.

Not particularly.

 

[ding]

I'm cheered that Christians have stopped killing other Christians for their beliefs, stopped burning people at the stake, and stopped their overt anti-Semitism.

You saw that in your lifetime?

 

[ding]

If you're looking for someone trying to kill Christianity, try a mirror.

How so? Nothing is as it seems.