Toddsterpatriot
Diamond Member
Federal Judges and Justices can be impeached and kicked off the bench.
"Democrats search for 67 votes to remove black judge from the Supreme Court"
I think you should push that!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Federal Judges and Justices can be impeached and kicked off the bench.
Imagine if a Supreme Court justice was married to a radical activist who defended a group charged with sedition, encouraged a rally challenging election results, and gave out awards to people with an interest in cases appearing before the Court.
As it turns out, you don’t have to imagine. That’s a description of Ginni Thomas, wife of Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas.
For years, Ginni Thomas has been a walking conflict of interest that everyone has seemingly agreed not to talk about. It’s not as if she tried to hide. She’s been a fixture in conservative circles since the 1980s. She has had her own lobbying firm for more than a decade.
![]()
Is Ginni Thomas a Threat to the Supreme Court?
Behind closed doors, Justice Clarence Thomas’s wife is working with many groups directly involved in controversial cases before the Court.www.newyorker.com
Certainly not a spouse.Doing Gawd's work, don't care.
I mean what, you don't think that the liberal shit stains on the court don't have minions working for them outside of SCOTUS?
Wow, seems that the washington compost and cbs"news" have infringed on the rights of the Thomas's by illegally obtaining some texts. I wonder how well that goes over with the 4th amendment, and how a Supreme Court Justice can get a class action lawsuit. Bankrupt those pieces of shit organization right into oblivion.I think Clarence is faking his illness and I wouldn`t be surprised if he faked his own death to be free of his treasonous wife. She was involved with the attempt to steal the election from the very beginning.
![]()
Ginni Thomas, Justice Clarence Thomas' wife, exchanged texts with Mark Meadows about efforts to overturn the 2020 election
CBS News and The Washington Post have obtained copies of numerous text messages exchanged between Thomas and Trump's White House chief of staff.www.cbsnews.com
There is no conflict of interests, she's not on the court and not working for the Federal Gov't.Imagine if a Supreme Court justice was married to a radical activist who defended a group charged with sedition, encouraged a rally challenging election results, and gave out awards to people with an interest in cases appearing before the Court.
As it turns out, you don’t have to imagine. That’s a description of Ginni Thomas, wife of Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas.
For years, Ginni Thomas has been a walking conflict of interest that everyone has seemingly agreed not to talk about. It’s not as if she tried to hide. She’s been a fixture in conservative circles since the 1980s. She has had her own lobbying firm for more than a decade.
![]()
Is Ginni Thomas a Threat to the Supreme Court?
Behind closed doors, Justice Clarence Thomas’s wife is working with many groups directly involved in controversial cases before the Court.www.newyorker.com
So what?Imagine if a Supreme Court justice was married to a radical activist who defended a group charged with sedition, encouraged a rally challenging election results, and gave out awards to people with an interest in cases appearing before the Court.
As it turns out, you don’t have to imagine. That’s a description of Ginni Thomas, wife of Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas.
For years, Ginni Thomas has been a walking conflict of interest that everyone has seemingly agreed not to talk about. It’s not as if she tried to hide. She’s been a fixture in conservative circles since the 1980s. She has had her own lobbying firm for more than a decade.
![]()
Is Ginni Thomas a Threat to the Supreme Court?
Behind closed doors, Justice Clarence Thomas’s wife is working with many groups directly involved in controversial cases before the Court.www.newyorker.com
I really would very much enjoy seeing you fuckers try to impeach Justice Thomas.Justice Thomas, the longest seated member of the Supreme Court, is too political and too connected to the far right wing of the Republican Party to remain on the Supreme Court.
Herein are some reasons, and when the Supreme Court does not have a Code of Ethics, the only remedy is impeachment:
![]()
Ginni and Clarence Thomas draw questions about Supreme Court ethics
Clarence Thomas, the U.S. Supreme Court's most senior justice, long celebrated by conservatives and reviled by liberals, is facing renewed scrutiny for potential conflicts of interest as he helms the court's newly empowered conservative majority and as public opinion of the court slumps to a...www.yahoo.com
Do it.Federal Judges and Justices can be impeached and kicked off the bench.
who defended a group charged with sedition
Is she on the Supreme Court? Nope. She is a private citizen, so where is the “conflict of interest?Imagine if a Supreme Court justice was married to a radical activist who defended a group charged with sedition, encouraged a rally challenging election results, and gave out awards to people with an interest in cases appearing before the Court.
As it turns out, you don’t have to imagine. That’s a description of Ginni Thomas, wife of Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas.
For years, Ginni Thomas has been a walking conflict of interest that everyone has seemingly agreed not to talk about. It’s not as if she tried to hide. She’s been a fixture in conservative circles since the 1980s. She has had her own lobbying firm for more than a decade.
![]()
Is Ginni Thomas a Threat to the Supreme Court?
Behind closed doors, Justice Clarence Thomas’s wife is working with many groups directly involved in controversial cases before the Court.www.newyorker.com
Obviously it's time for dem's to Lynch another black man because the rope broke the first time around.I really would very much enjoy seeing you fuckers try to impeach Justice Thomas.
Go for it.
Mind you charged is not convicted and the prosecution has a very high bar of proof here. The first thing they have to do is prove a conspiracy to overthrow the US gov't.What group was charged with sedition?
Some individuals were charged with sedition. I know of no group that has been charge with sedition.
Mind you charged is not convicted and the prosecution has a very high bar of proof here. The first thing they have to do is prove a conspiracy to overthrow the US gov't.
Imagine if a Supreme Court justice was married to a radical activist who defended a group charged with sedition, encouraged a rally challenging election results, and gave out awards to people with an interest in cases appearing before the Court.
As it turns out, you don’t have to imagine. That’s a description of Ginni Thomas, wife of Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas.
For years, Ginni Thomas has been a walking conflict of interest that everyone has seemingly agreed not to talk about. It’s not as if she tried to hide. She’s been a fixture in conservative circles since the 1980s. She has had her own lobbying firm for more than a decade.
![]()
Is Ginni Thomas a Threat to the Supreme Court?
Behind closed doors, Justice Clarence Thomas’s wife is working with many groups directly involved in controversial cases before the Court.www.newyorker.com
There were two radical leftwing activists actually on the court until Ginsburg died.Are you saying that her career should have ended when her husband was appointed to the court?
They also have to prove opportunity. In order to be convicted of attempting to overthrow the government, one would have to have had the ability to do so.
Both case and statutory law show otherwise.That is entirely false.
Imagine for a moment a man wants to commit a murder. He grabs a handgun, takes a bullet out of the box, loads it in the chamber, and sets out to find his target. At the local grocery store he catches up with the target and in the middle of a the produce section he draws the pistol and pulls the trigger. *click, click, click* Unknown to the man, the gun's firing pin was damaged, the primer on the round defective, and the whole thing had been doused in water leaving the powder wet. This thing was never going to fire. Nevertheless, the man is guilty of attempted murder.
Ineptitude is not a defense to a criminal act.
Both case and statutory law show otherwise.
If you and your militia of three get together and decide to overthrow the gov't but never implement a plan or attempt it you cannot be convicted of sedition.