Why is it that only in America are minorities considered incapable of of obtaining an ID?
It seems to be a way for the liberals to play the race card is all I can come up with.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Why is it that only in America are minorities considered incapable of of obtaining an ID?
Why is it that only in America are minorities considered incapable of of obtaining an ID?
I agree having some valid ID is sensible, regardless of whether voter fraud is an actual problem. But if state-issued ID do indeed present some with an unfair burden aqquiring them, why not use any legally recognized contract as proof of identity? Like the rental contract even poor people would have signed renting their apartments, or a sworn affidavit under pains and penalties or perjury, or some other legal document? Why wouldn't those qualify as 'valid ID?' Presumedly whoever rents to you was presented with some kind of satisfactory ID before you moved in, so why couldn't whatever proof was presented be used, or the rental contract itself?
A federal law decreeing that all Voter Registration Cards bear the registrant's photograph would solve this problem.
I agree having some valid ID is sensible, regardless of whether voter fraud is an actual problem. But if state-issued ID do indeed present some with an unfair burden aqquiring them, why not use any legally recognized contract as proof of identity? Like the rental contract even poor people would have signed renting their apartments, or a sworn affidavit under pains and penalties or perjury, or some other legal document? Why wouldn't those qualify as 'valid ID?' Presumedly whoever rents to you was presented with some kind of satisfactory ID before you moved in, so why couldn't whatever proof was presented be used, or the rental contract itself?
Why do some people insist that getting a valid ID is an unfair burden?
Way I heard it explained is that since most state-issued IDs are obtained from DMVs, there are usually few such offices in a state so a person might have to travel quite a ways to visit one. And if they don't have a car it can present quite a challenge to get to it.
I agree having some valid ID is sensible, regardless of whether voter fraud is an actual problem. But if state-issued ID do indeed present some with an unfair burden aqquiring them, why not use any legally recognized contract as proof of identity? Like the rental contract even poor people would have signed renting their apartments, or a sworn affidavit under pains and penalties or perjury, or some other legal document? Why wouldn't those qualify as 'valid ID?' Presumedly whoever rents to you was presented with some kind of satisfactory ID before you moved in, so why couldn't whatever proof was presented be used, or the rental contract itself?
Why do some people insist that getting a valid ID is an unfair burden?
I agree having some valid ID is sensible, regardless of whether voter fraud is an actual problem. But if state-issued ID do indeed present some with an unfair burden aqquiring them, why not use any legally recognized contract as proof of identity? Like the rental contract even poor people would have signed renting their apartments, or a sworn affidavit under pains and penalties or perjury, or some other legal document? Why wouldn't those qualify as 'valid ID?' Presumedly whoever rents to you was presented with some kind of satisfactory ID before you moved in, so why couldn't whatever proof was presented be used, or the rental contract itself?
you just proved that the liberal stance against voter id is invalid.
on a side note; requiring voter id is racist, you need an id to use ahca ins, therefore obama is a racist
A federal law decreeing that all Voter Registration Cards bear the registrant's photograph would solve this problem.
liberals would never go for that
In essence what conservatives are saying is that you must have a driver's license or passport to vote.
How about all the people that do not drive and aren't planning on leaving the country anytime soon?
Any state that requires a picture ID must implement a program whereby people can very easily obtain such an ID. Anything else is the denial of people's right to vote.
I agree having some valid ID is sensible, regardless of whether voter fraud is an actual problem. But if state-issued ID do indeed present some with an unfair burden aqquiring them, why not use any legally recognized contract as proof of identity? Like the rental contract even poor people would have signed renting their apartments, or a sworn affidavit under pains and penalties or perjury, or some other legal document? Why wouldn't those qualify as 'valid ID?' Presumedly whoever rents to you was presented with some kind of satisfactory ID before you moved in, so why couldn't whatever proof was presented be used, or the rental contract itself?
you just proved that the liberal stance against voter id is invalid.
on a side note; requiring voter id is racist, you need an id to use ahca ins, therefore obama is a racist
Nope. The ID validation for ACA checks your credit report and/or your tax returns.
I just went thru this when getting an ACA plan for my mother-in-law.
A federal law decreeing that all Voter Registration Cards bear the registrant's photograph would solve this problem.
liberals would never go for that
I'm a 'liberal' and I'd agree to that.
In essence what conservatives are saying is that you must have a driver's license or passport to vote.
How about all the people that do not drive and aren't planning on leaving the country anytime soon?
Any state that requires a picture ID must implement a program whereby people can very easily obtain such an ID. Anything else is the denial of people's right to vote.
In essence what conservatives are saying is that you must have a driver's license or passport to vote.
How about all the people that do not drive and aren't planning on leaving the country anytime soon?
Any state that requires a picture ID must implement a program whereby people can very easily obtain such an ID. Anything else is the denial of people's right to vote.
1. Nope, just a photo ID.
2. How many people don't have or can't obtain a photo ID? Do you know anyone like that?
3. Compare that to the potential for voter fraud, which is in the millions.
4. Why aren't you protesting voter ID laws in other countries?
In essence what conservatives are saying is that you must have a driver's license or passport to vote.
How about all the people that do not drive and aren't planning on leaving the country anytime soon?
Any state that requires a picture ID must implement a program whereby people can very easily obtain such an ID. Anything else is the denial of people's right to vote.
1. Nope, just a photo ID.
2. How many people don't have or can't obtain a photo ID? Do you know anyone like that?
3. Compare that to the potential for voter fraud, which is in the millions.
4. Why aren't you protesting voter ID laws in other countries?
1. As far as I know the only state issued photo IDs are drivers licenses and passports. I'm sure that there are some others but each would probably have a requirement more stringent than those. What other forms of state issued voter IDs are there? What type of identification do you need to get them? What are the requirements? What do they cost?
2. I went for years, when I was in my twenties, without any form of state issued photo ID. I might have had a library card or school ID but nothing that would qualify. Lot's of people don't have state issued photo IDs.
3. 'Potential for Voter Fraud' - are you joking? There have been almost no cases of voter fraud - and certainly not any evidence of millions of cases. This is nothing but wingnut nonsense. Denying millions of Americans the right to vote because of Conservative paranoid delusions is nonsense.
4. No, I work for a living. Sorry, but I can't just run around the world playing election police. Besides we have enough corruption and either nonsense going on in this country - thanks to people like you.
A federal law decreeing that all Voter Registration Cards bear the registrant's photograph would solve this problem.
liberals would never go for that
"To be eligible to register to vote in Texas, a person must be:
•A United States citizen;
•A resident of the Texas county in which application for registration is made;
•At least 18 years old on Election Day;
•Not finally convicted of a felony, or, if so convicted must have (1) fully discharged the sentence, including any term of incarceration, parole, or supervision, or completed a period of probation ordered by any court; or (2) been pardoned or otherwise released from the resulting disability to vote; and
•Not determined by a final judgment of a court exercising probate jurisdiction to be (1) totally mentally incapacitated; or (2) partially mentally incapacitated without the right to vote.
Accepted IDs;
•Texas driver license issued by the Texas Department of Public Safety (DPS)
•Texas Election Identification Certificate issued by DPS
•Texas personal identification card issued by DPS
•Texas concealed handgun license issued by DPS
•United States military identification card containing the person’s photograph
•United States citizenship certificate containing the person’s photograph
•United States passport
Texas Voting
The Election ID card is free of charge.
How is any of this a problem? So you need to prove you live in the County you are voting in, and that you are a US citizen. So what?