Video offers a good recap of the 26-year continuing policy with every US administration to destroy Iran.

So youre OK with violent religious fanatics having nuclear weapons. That takes a a special kind of stupid. You also seem to think you can make and agreement with fanatics. More stupidity. Iran made an ass out of Obama and Biden
Iran is making an ass out of Trump. They werent close to a nuclear bomb under those presidents... you want to know how we know? Cuz they still didnt have one.

North Korea has about 16 nuclear weapons and long range rockets that have been functionally tested. If you really are concerned on nuclear fanatics then you are in the wrong part of the world dipshit. This is all a ruse to attack Iran as vengeance for October 7th. Just like the Iraq war was vengeance for 9/11. Since the real perps cant be convicted blowing up a bunch of Muslims is the next best thing.

And we wonder why there cant be peace in the middle east with people trying to score vengeance at every turn.
 
We didn’t lose in Vietnam. We just said “**** it” and left.

Iraq lost. Period.

And you’re too brain damaged to to grasp that Iran is pretty much dead on its feet already. That islamofascist regime is getting its ass kicked.

You also don’t grasp (in any way) why it needed to be attacked.

**** that mindless hate-filled stain on this planet.
23 years of searching for WMDs in Iraq and coming up empty means Iraq lost? :icon_rolleyes:
 
LOL Reagan should have brought the hammer down on Iran in 1983 when they killed 241 of our soldiers in a truck bomb attack. He didn't have the backbone to do it and thus set the "kick the can down the road" policy with Iran. Obama took it a step further and made it a priority to empower Iran with a worthless nuclear agreement and unfreezing many billions of assets which they promptly used to fund their Terrorist proxies, missile stockpiles and nuclear program. President Trump finally did what should have been done 40 years ago.
The US should brought the hammer down back in 1979, when the Islamists attacked the U.S. embassy and took American diplomats hostage. Not only did Jimmy Carter cause the revolution in 79, but his weakness gave precedent to 47 years of bad behavior by the terrorist regime in Iran. All of that is now coming to a screeching halt, thanks to Trump.
 
Beside the point. Hussein is at the end of his rope.

Iraq is now a very different country. Getting one’s ass kicked in war has that effect.
Lying our way into war has another effect. 23 years and still no WMDs, just thousands of lives pissed away along with $ 3 Trillion dollars...and counting. What did the great man say about his cult? "I love the poorly educated." Whose asses are getting kicked at the gas stations today?
 
Lying our way into war

You ignorantly presume that it was a lie. I doubt that you’re smart enough to really grasp that just because a claim turns out to be incorrect doesn’t mean that it was a lie. People and governments can be mistaken without lying, you tool.

Your reliance on that old canard doesn’t make you any less pointless.
 
We didn’t lose in Vietnam. We just said “**** it” and left.

Iraq lost. Period.

And you’re too brain damaged to to grasp that Iran is pretty much dead on its feet already. That islamofascist regime is getting its ass kicked.

You also don’t grasp (in any way) why it needed to be attacked.

**** that mindless hate-filled stain on this planet.
It isn`t going well for our fascist regime either.
 
  • Fact
Reactions: IM2
You ignorantly presume that it was a lie. I doubt that you’re smart enough to really grasp that just because a claim turns out to be incorrect doesn’t mean that it was a lie. People and governments can be mistaken without lying, you tool.

Your reliance on that old canard doesn’t make you any less pointless.
The UN weapons inspectors searched 700 sites and found no indications that WMDs ever existed in Iraq. We went on a killing spree anyway. It was PROVEN to be a lie.
 
  • Fact
Reactions: IM2
who threw the first punch Gator?

~S~
1776104251644.webp


Few events in modern Middle Eastern history have left as deep a scar as the coup of August 1953 that toppled Iranian Prime Minister Mohammad Mosaddegh. In one decisive episode, a democratically elected leader was removed in a covert Anglo-American operation, foreign powers reasserted control over Iranian oil, and the Shah’s autocracy was restored. For many Iranians, the coup became the symbol of Western betrayal, setting the stage for decades of anti-imperialism and fueling the anger that erupted in the 1979 revolution.

Legacy: Roots of Resentment

The coup’s consequences were profound.

Domestic Authoritarianism: The Shah, restored to power, ruled with increasing autocracy for the next 25 years. His reliance on Western backing and his creation of SAVAK deepened repression.

National Humiliation: The coup became a collective memory of betrayal. When revolution erupted in 1979, chants of “Death to America” and “Death to England” drew directly on the memory of 1953.

Cold War Geopolitics: For Washington, Iran became a key ally, hosting U.S. military bases and serving as a pillar of containment. Yet the very alliance sowed the seeds of future estrangement.

Oil Nationalism: Although Mosaddegh was defeated, the principle of oil sovereignty remained powerful. Later OPEC revolts against Western oil companies drew inspiration from Iran’s example.

Enduring Distrust: The coup poisoned U.S.–Iran relations. Even today, Iranian leaders cite 1953 as proof of American duplicity. For many Iranians, the coup explains why foreign influence must be resisted at all costs.

The coup of 1953 was a turning point in modern Iran. It crushed a democratic experiment, restored an autocratic Shah, and reasserted Western control over oil. For the United States and Britain, it was a Cold War victory; for Iranians, it was a national trauma. Its legacy shaped the revolutionary anger of 1979 and continues to color relations between Iran and the West.


America threw the first punch.
 
So youre OK with violent religious fanatics having nuclear weapons. That takes a a special kind of stupid. You also seem to think you can make and agreement with fanatics. More stupidity. Iran made an ass out of Obama and Biden
Wrong.

Today America is being run by violent religious fanatics with nuclear weapons.

Look no further than Otis.

1776104643159.webp
 
It isn`t going well for our fascist regime either.
Good thing we don’t have a regime and that our Administration isn’t fascist.
 
The UN weapons inspectors searched 700 sites and found no indications that WMDs ever existed in Iraq. We went on a killing spree anyway. It was PROVEN to be a lie.
It has never been confirmed. It may have been a misguided belief.

That still doesn’t make it a “lie.”

Words have meaning except when you shitlib morons use them.
 
America threw the first punch.







AI Overview



The conflict between Muslims and Christians began in the 7th century with Islamic expansion into Byzantine territories, sparking over 1,400 years of complex interaction
. Key confrontations included the early Arab conquests, the Iberian Reconquista, the Crusades, and the Ottoman expansion into Europe. While characterized by wars, this history also includes periods of peaceful coexistence, trade, and intellectual exchange.


Early Conflicts and Islamic Expansion (7th-11th Centuries)
  • Rapid Expansion: Following the birth of Islam in the 7th century, Muslim forces rapidly took Christian lands in Syria, Egypt, and North Africa.
  • Iberian Conquest: In 711 AD, Muslim forces invaded the Iberian Peninsula (Spain and Portugal), starting a conflict lasting over 700 years.
  • Battles in France: Muslim expansion into Europe was famously halted at the Battle of Tours (Poitiers) in 732 AD.
  • Mediterranean Conflict: Arab raids targeted southern Italy and Rome in the 9th century, with Sicily being occupied in the 10th century.

The Crusades (1096-1291)
  • Motivations: Christians launched the Crusades to regain control of Holy Land sites, such as Jerusalem, which had fallen under Muslim rule.
  • The Crusades: Spanning over two centuries, these eight or more major, violent expeditions saw limited success and high loss of life.
  • Legacy: Despite the violent nature, the Crusades also saw periods of diplomatic interaction, though often marked by religious fanaticism on both sides.

Later Medieval to Modern Conflicts
  • The Reconquista: The long process where Christian kingdoms gradually took back the Iberian Peninsula from Muslim rule, ending with the fall of Granada in 1492.
  • The Ottomans: The Ottoman Empire became a major threat to Christian Europe, seizing Constantinople in 1453 and expanding into the Balkans.
  • Colonialism: In the 18th-20th centuries, the dynamic shifted with European powers colonizing many Muslim-majority nations in Africa and Asia.

Themes in the Conflict
  • Geographical Overlap: The competition often stemmed from sharing borders and contesting the same areas, such as in the Iberian Peninsula and the Byzantine East.
  • Theological Tension: Major differences exist regarding the Trinity and the nature of Jesus, which are viewed differently in the Quran compared to Christian doctrine.


  • Interdependence: Alongside war, the two civilizations developed deep cultural and scientific connections, sharing advancements in medicine, philosophy, and trade.
    ~S~
 
Back
Top Bottom