Stryder50
Platinum Member
Since there are two near same threads (merge anyone?)
...
In October 2018, the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health published a report that, if one didn't know better, might make readers think the authors were involved in the gain-of-function research that likely created this virus. The report, titled "Technologies to Address Global Catastrophic Biological Risks," offers novel social control and mRNA vaccination ideas to deal with emerging pandemics "whether naturally emerging or reemerging, deliberately created and released, or laboratory engineered and escaped—that could lead to sudden, extraordinary, widespread disaster beyond the collective capability of national and international organizations and the private sector to control."
One of the many bone-chilling sections in this publication (pp. 45-47) provides a blueprint for "self-spreading vaccines," described as vaccines "genetically engineered to move through populations in the same way as communicable diseases, but rather than causing disease, they confer protection."
...
After noting that such an idea would violate the rules of informed consent (the irony!), and possibly spread allergic reaction, they add this shocking prediction about the challenge of such technology:
...
Anyone who tells you this is normal and expected is simply lying to you. These numbers are getting worse every week. The bottom line is that cases are spreading quicker, including out of season, post-vaccine. It would be one thing if the virus became more transmissible and less deadly, which is what we typically experience with a natural pandemic. However, the opposite is true. This virus has taken a painful toll on both the vaccinated and unvaccinated over the past few months, a phenomenon that is very well explained with a leaky vaccine that fails to sterilize the virus but causes viral immune escape and a degree of vaccine mediated enhancement.
Moreover, the notion that somehow the vaccines stop death is simply not true, especially not after they began to leak in efficacy after the first few months. We simply find no correlation anywhere in the world with higher vaccination rates and better outcomes. In fact, Israel is practically a textbook example of a leaky vaccine creating a degree of viral enhancement.
...
To blame this on the "Delta variant" makes no sense. When England got the first round of Delta in May, about two months before the American South got crushed and before Israeli research showed the vaccine leaking, Delta was actually much less virulent (described as a cold). At the time, I personally dismissed it as more of a cold because I was expecting this virus to continue behaving the way a natural virus would. Then the American South and Israel got hit hard. Now England is also experiencing a higher death rate. My friend who goes by "Gato" online provides this useful graphic on his Substack page, which shows the case fatality rate gradually rising, not falling, with higher vaccination rates in England.
...
Again, this makes no sense, according to the media narrative. There's no way a tiny percentage of unvaccinated adults can be responsible for making the virus spread more prolifically and become more virulent, especially as we see there are more cases per capita among the vaccinated over 30. What is clear is that this virus took a turn for the worse right around the six-month mark after the vaccines began to leak transmission. Then, it first slammed the unvaccinated people – just as we saw with the leaky chicken vaccine with Marek's disease – because the vaccinated still had a degree of preventive protection.
...
www.theblaze.com
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
For those whom didn't notice the link;
T e c h n o l o g i e s T o A d d r e s s
G l ob a l C a t a s t r o p h i c B i o l o g i c a l R i s k s
https://jhsphcenterforhealthsecurity.s3.amazonaws.com/181009-gcbr-tech-report.pdf
...
Horowitz: The data is in, and we are now worse off than before the experimental shots
...In October 2018, the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health published a report that, if one didn't know better, might make readers think the authors were involved in the gain-of-function research that likely created this virus. The report, titled "Technologies to Address Global Catastrophic Biological Risks," offers novel social control and mRNA vaccination ideas to deal with emerging pandemics "whether naturally emerging or reemerging, deliberately created and released, or laboratory engineered and escaped—that could lead to sudden, extraordinary, widespread disaster beyond the collective capability of national and international organizations and the private sector to control."
One of the many bone-chilling sections in this publication (pp. 45-47) provides a blueprint for "self-spreading vaccines," described as vaccines "genetically engineered to move through populations in the same way as communicable diseases, but rather than causing disease, they confer protection."
...
After noting that such an idea would violate the rules of informed consent (the irony!), and possibly spread allergic reaction, they add this shocking prediction about the challenge of such technology:
Whether this vaccine actually sheds the spike protein onto other people is still not yet proven (although Pfizer seems to indicate it can spread through skin-to-skin contact in "inhalation"), but the principle of mass vaccination with a faulty vaccine making a virus both more transmissible and more virulent is something that is hard to deny at this point. The reality is that more people have died from COVID-19 in 2021, with most adults vaccinated (and nearly all seniors), than in 2020 when nobody was vaccinated. Something is not adding up, and perhaps those who have been dabbling in gain-of-function research in recent years have the answer.
...
Anyone who tells you this is normal and expected is simply lying to you. These numbers are getting worse every week. The bottom line is that cases are spreading quicker, including out of season, post-vaccine. It would be one thing if the virus became more transmissible and less deadly, which is what we typically experience with a natural pandemic. However, the opposite is true. This virus has taken a painful toll on both the vaccinated and unvaccinated over the past few months, a phenomenon that is very well explained with a leaky vaccine that fails to sterilize the virus but causes viral immune escape and a degree of vaccine mediated enhancement.
Moreover, the notion that somehow the vaccines stop death is simply not true, especially not after they began to leak in efficacy after the first few months. We simply find no correlation anywhere in the world with higher vaccination rates and better outcomes. In fact, Israel is practically a textbook example of a leaky vaccine creating a degree of viral enhancement.
...
To blame this on the "Delta variant" makes no sense. When England got the first round of Delta in May, about two months before the American South got crushed and before Israeli research showed the vaccine leaking, Delta was actually much less virulent (described as a cold). At the time, I personally dismissed it as more of a cold because I was expecting this virus to continue behaving the way a natural virus would. Then the American South and Israel got hit hard. Now England is also experiencing a higher death rate. My friend who goes by "Gato" online provides this useful graphic on his Substack page, which shows the case fatality rate gradually rising, not falling, with higher vaccination rates in England.
...
Again, this makes no sense, according to the media narrative. There's no way a tiny percentage of unvaccinated adults can be responsible for making the virus spread more prolifically and become more virulent, especially as we see there are more cases per capita among the vaccinated over 30. What is clear is that this virus took a turn for the worse right around the six-month mark after the vaccines began to leak transmission. Then, it first slammed the unvaccinated people – just as we saw with the leaky chicken vaccine with Marek's disease – because the vaccinated still had a degree of preventive protection.
...
Horowitz: The data is in, and we are now worse off than before the experimental shots
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
For those whom didn't notice the link;
T e c h n o l o g i e s T o A d d r e s s
G l ob a l C a t a s t r o p h i c B i o l o g i c a l R i s k s
https://jhsphcenterforhealthsecurity.s3.amazonaws.com/181009-gcbr-tech-report.pdf
