Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
www.defenseone.com
For true, we need an imbecile reaction smiley. How else one could react to your bs post?Yeah, Russian high tech signal detectors. LOL!
Here´s why using Starlink can be deadly for Ukrainian troops. Also: Starlink jamming and countermeasures, military usage and imposed restrictions.
Using Starlink Paints a Target on Ukrainian Troops
Units scramble for solutions as Russia learns to locate and jam the vital comsat links.
For true, we need an imbecile reaction smiley. How else one could react to your bs post?
This is coming at a time when China's technology is not so subtelly being suggested.Here´s why using Starlink can be deadly for Ukrainian troops. Also: Starlink jamming and countermeasures, military usage and imposed restrictions.
Using Starlink Paints a Target on Ukrainian Troops
Units scramble for solutions as Russia learns to locate and jam the vital comsat links.
But when you post something like Post #2, you are.You're not an imbecile just because you're Russian.
But when you post something like Post #2, you are.
You made a claim, so you need to back it up.Tell me just how high tech the Russian "Starlink detectors" are.
Maybe you can post some specs?
Russia has invented lots of military equipment in the last years and Putin said recently that stuff is now entering series production.It might be suggested that Russia's arms related technology is leading the world?
Or it could be suggested that it's China's?
I would definitely suspect it's the latter's.
China's citizens could be much less motivated by profit and instead are motivated by a sense of their system is in their best interests.
i'm sure China and Russia have been sharing the latest technology for many years now. Do you know if China or the US has Russia's Skaar torpedo or equivalent yet?Russia has invented lots of military equipment in the last years and Putin said recently that stuff is now entering series production.
Russia´s jamming capabilities were proven in Syria, when Russia jammed the entire Nato-communication and downed many of Trump´s Tomahawks using electronic warfare.
Never heard about that.i'm sure China and Russia have been sharing the latest technology for many years now. Do you know if China or the US has Russia's Skaar torpedo or equivalent yet?
It's a super-cavitating torpedo the Russians came up with that travels underwater at something like 200 to 300 knots.Never heard about that.
Well it was called Shkval, not Skaar. The initial design was to be nuclear tipped, but later versions were supposedly all conventional.It's a super-cavitating torpedo the Russians came up with that travels underwater at something like 200 to 300 knots.
Now they have apparently made a later model to carry a nuclear warhead.
Both. Don't repeat false information.Well it was called Shkval, not Skaar. The initial design was to be nuclear tipped, but later versions were supposedly all conventional.
Mostly correct and the reason the USN claims to have abandoned the project.Iran claimed to have them, never confirmed.
The USN did experiments with super-cavitating torpedoes decades ago. Short-range, rocket-powered, not maneuverable due to the speed- at 200kts the turn radius is really large.
Search out the information more thoroughly, as to the latest. Has the USN abandoned the project?Another Russki "super-weapon" that's supposed to instill fear in the USN- not really, but oh well....
4-9 miles depending on version. Not far away enough for the launch platform to survive a nuclear blast.What is the range of these things according to your information? 30 miles? Kilometers?
We have different sources of information.4-9 miles depending on version. Not far away enough for the launch platform to survive a nuclear blast.
Think of it as an underwater "Davy Crockett".
Post-World War II Torpedoes of Russia/USSR - NavWeaps
www.navweaps.com
Post your source.We have different sources of information.
Read up on the 'Skaar' and get back to me.
