US Army officer ousted for calling out Israel

A. There’s no such thing.
B. The military doesn’t care.

Of course people can post on the Internet anonymously or not. If a certain powerful person or group of powerful people don’t like what is being said anonymously they will put resources together to pursue the identity of that person. If they don’t care about what is being said, they wont pursue anything.

The military is inclusive of all different types of people. The people in the military are prone to human error and emotion like any other group. Certainly, we expect them to be strong and exceptional .. Of course it’s human nature that the authorities in charge could agree or disagree with the anonymous statements by the guy. It simply depends on who is in charge.
 
cnm finds the fact that children are taught to die for Hamas to be FUNNY
Grau claims that she KNOWS the culture of the middle east but somehow
missed the concept of the GLORY OF THE SHAHID (shahid can approximately
be translated to "martyr"---but it comes from a root meaning WITNESS. ---
the concept is that a person who DIES FOR ISLAM ---is engaging in an act which
confirms (witnesses) its glory. Such a person goes to JANNAH (Paradise)
and actually creates salvation for all his family-----the family gains prestige and
many special considerations----even money---the program known as "pay for slay"---
ALSO includes-----pay for dying
 
Of course people can post on the Internet anonymously or not. If a certain powerful person or group of powerful people don’t like what is being said anonymously they will put resources together to pursue the identity of that person. If they don’t care about what is being said, they wont pursue anything.

The military is inclusive of all different types of people. The people in the military are prone to human error and emotion like any other group. Certainly, we expect them to be strong and exceptional .. Of course it’s human nature that the authorities in charge could agree or disagree with the anonymous statements by the guy. It simply depends on who is in charge.
A colonel, no less, VIOLATED CLEAR MILITARY RULES----it is not a matter of "opinion"
 
Talk about snowflakes.



"Colonel Nathan McCormack, who was tasked with helping advise the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff on Israel-related matters, has been removed from his position after his anti-Israel social media posts were brought to light.McCormack, who was the Levant and Egypt branch chief at the Joint Chiefs of Staff’s J5 planning directorate, according to his LinkedIn, posted several controversial tweets on his X account. He called Israel a “death cult” and referred to the Israeli government as “Netanyahu and his Judeo-supremacist cronies,” among other things, Jewish News Syndicate reported."


Wow the optics are awful for pro Israel no matter what people. Look at that American officer above getting disrespected.

The Colonel was in a position to observe and see the facts first hand, just not to comment truthfully about it.
 
"WASHINGTON DC, THE OTHER ZIONIST OCCUPIED TERRITORY"

But only to those supporting mass murder, like you.

How many genocides throughout history do you support? Jews? Native Americans? Ukrainians? Armenians? Rwandans?


I can't believe the moronic nonsense written by clueless dilettantes who have neither been to the Middle East nor missed a meal in their entire life.

There is absolutely no defense for the genocidal Zionist agenda.

It is long past time for loyal, compassionate and decent Americans to crate up our glut of grisly Holocaust theme parks and dump them on the Knesset steps.

The grandiose Holocaust theme park in Washington D.C., alone, extorts $ 100 Million out of American taxpayers to showcase fake props, dishonest pity mongering and other blatant frauds.

Traitorous Zionist shills and parasites have so deeply infected America that an honorable American Colonel can't criticize the criminal atrocities committed by Hitler's little Zionist colony without being eviscerated by craven and cowardly politicians owned by AIPAC etc.

Once again, we see that:

“If you would know who controls you see who you may not criticise.”

Tacitus
A quote by Tacitus


Thanks,
 
"WASHINGTON DC, THE OTHER ZIONIST OCCUPIED TERRITORY"




I can't believe the moronic nonsense written by clueless dilettantes who have neither been to the Middle East nor missed a meal in their entire life.

There is absolutely no defense for the genocidal Zionist agenda.

It is long past time for loyal, compassionate and decent Americans to crate up our glut of grisly Holocaust theme parks and dump them on the Knesset steps.

The grandiose Holocaust theme park in Washington D.C., alone, extorts $ 100 Million out of American taxpayers to showcase fake props, dishonest pity mongering and other blatant frauds.

Traitorous Zionist shills and parasites have so deeply infected America that an honorable American Colonel can't criticize the criminal atrocities committed by Hitler's little Zionist colony without being eviscerated by craven and cowardly politicians owned by AIPAC etc.

Once again, we see that:

“If you would know who controls you see who you may not criticise.”

Tacitus
A quote by Tacitus


Thanks,
typical----grau decided that she KNOWS the LIFE EXPERIENCES of everyone who posts on this
board BECAUSE she sipped tea in parlors in the middle east. I wonder if she ever served
in the US military (gawd forbid) There was an interesting program that developed in the
Middle east which was actually a concerted effort to IMPOSE A STARVATION SIEGE on ----
guess who.......... this particular attempt goes back to 1946. It failed because of highly
innovative measures employed by the target population but it spawned a still existing, albeit
not entirely effective siege. The perpetrating "NATION" and its supporters still dance on
the dead bodies of more than 1 1/2 million christian babies in Biafra and over time---many times that number in what was East Pakistan (now BanglaDesh) Iran , what was once called "Palestine" and Sudan and Iran and Bosnia etc etc -----DEAD BY STARVATION SIEGE ----guess who the players are and were. ..........and, unfortunately, will be.
 
Yep, though not during a holocost/genocide, and you?
I served in a capacity in which I had access to LOTS AND LOTS
of juicy information that is, was and always will be ENTIRELY
confidential. (at least from my POV) There were genocides going on
when I served and there continue to be genocides today-----
but not in Gaza. There are nations motivated to commit genocides----
but it's not Israel
 
typical----grau decided that she KNOWS the LIFE EXPERIENCES of everyone who posts on this
board BECAUSE she sipped tea in parlors in the middle east. I wonder if she ever served
in the US military (gawd forbid) There was an interesting program that developed in the
Middle east which was actually a concerted effort to IMPOSE A STARVATION SIEGE on ----
guess who.......... this particular attempt goes back to 1946. It failed because of highly
innovative measures employed by the target population but it spawned a still existing, albeit
not entirely effective siege. The perpetrating "NATION" and its supporters still dance on
the dead bodies of more than 1 1/2 million christian babies in Biafra and over time---many times that number in what was East Pakistan (now BanglaDesh) Iran , what was once called "Palestine" and Sudan and Iran and Bosnia etc etc -----DEAD BY STARVATION SIEGE ----guess who the players are and were. ..........and, unfortunately, will be.
Grau giggles in response to a discussion of genocides committed ---mostly likely, during
her life-time
 
I served in a capacity in which I had access to LOTS AND LOTS
of juicy information that is, was and always will be ENTIRELY
confidential. (at least from my POV) There were genocides going on
when I served and there continue to be genocides today-----
but not in Gaza. There are nations motivated to commit genocides----
but it's not Israel
Grau decided that my post is false because she has special
information on MY LIFE-----and always giggles when real
genocides are discussed
 
So, it is ok if they are just doing it for shits and giggles.
is "shits and giggles" a commonly used expression in
the UK? I have seen it in print ONLY from limeys
"doing" what?
 
Talk about snowflakes.



"Colonel Nathan McCormack, who was tasked with helping advise the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff on Israel-related matters, has been removed from his position after his anti-Israel social media posts were brought to light.McCormack, who was the Levant and Egypt branch chief at the Joint Chiefs of Staff’s J5 planning directorate, according to his LinkedIn, posted several controversial tweets on his X account. He called Israel a “death cult” and referred to the Israeli government as “Netanyahu and his Judeo-supremacist cronies,” among other things, Jewish News Syndicate reported."


Wow the optics are awful for pro Israel no matter what people. Look at that American officer above getting disrespected.

You are not allowed to make public political statements when youre active duty, let alone statements against our official US position.
 
You are not allowed to make public political statements when youre active duty, let alone statements against our official US position.
the islamo nazi dogs don't know that ----EVEN the liars who CLAIM they were in the Military
 
15th post
You are not allowed to make public political statements when youre active duty, let alone statements against our official US position.
I don't know enough about your country to know if this is true, but if it is, then it's really fucked up. Anybody should be free to disagree with the government's official positions. If people can't, then it means the country is a dictatorship. As for active duty officers....I am not too sure about the legality of it, I guess that they can probably be disciplined in some way, probably on the grounds of compromising the national security or something or other. It's still not right though. People should have the freedom of conscience. People should be able to disagree with anything and everything their government does, regardless of whether they are directly employed by said government.
 
I don't know enough about your country to know if this is true, but if it is, then it's really fucked up. Anybody should be free to disagree with the government's official positions. If people can't, then it means the country is a dictatorship. As for active duty officers....I am not too sure about the legality of it, I guess that they can probably be disciplined in some way, probably on the grounds of compromising the national security or something or other. It's still not right though. People should have the freedom of conscience. People should be able to disagree with anything and everything their government does, regardless of whether they are directly employed by said government.
your ignorance and lack of judgement is astounding
 

New Topics

Latest Discussions

Back
Top Bottom