No, what we see are lies such as this from blind partisan rightwing hacks and Trump supporters.What we see is an FBI raid in which an anti-Trump judge
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
No, what we see are lies such as this from blind partisan rightwing hacks and Trump supporters.What we see is an FBI raid in which an anti-Trump judge
Clearly this sort of ignorance and stupidity is typical of the dishonest right.Oh. So the Commander in Chief has to get the permission of unelected, unaccountable bureaucrats to decide what he is to do with classified documents?
Sounds Constitutional.
SCI is not a classification. It's a caveat, and not a very restrictive one really in that world. All classifications have a "need to know" limitation, even Confidential. Having a clearance doesnt get you access to "all the infos".And the Top Secret class has SCI s well. Compartmented...which means only a few people can even see it on a need to know basis.
Some of these docs (presumably national security docs) were those
For the President it is. There are many things that the system has to do to "catch up" but not the President. His staff would need to inform which ever agency/entity produced or had governance over that information, but that's really it.Saying "this is declassified" is not the end, it is just the beginning of the process.
I knew a Marine back in Okinawa that got busted down a rank for having a document marked as SECRET in his possession even though the document had been declassified. But since the markings had not been changed he was still in violation of the laws and rules governing classified materials.
Without knowing what the documents actually are it's hard to say who "dropped the ball" IF they were declassified. The owning/governing entity would have to do all the record keeping regarding the declassification. So if the WH didnt generate the information/document it would just need to inform the entity that did and they would need to do the documentation if that makes sense.Clearly this sort of ignorance and stupidity is typical of the dishonest right.
It’s not about ‘permission’ – de-classifying information involves documentation and record-keeping required by Federal law to ensure the law is being followed – as enacted by Congress, authorized by the Constitution, reflecting the will of the people.
That's a ridiculous claim. It's a caveat, and not a very restrictive one
But they never did.His staff would need to inform which ever agency/entity produced or had governance over that information, but that's really it.
But that's not what happened.They could have just crossed out the markings and written UNCLASS (FOUO) on them.
Yes he isOh. So in your world, the Commander in Chief is beholden to rules that unelected, unaccountable bureaucrats made up.
And where did the unelectable, unaccountable bureaucrats get their authority over the Commander in Chief?
For the President it is. There are many things that the system has to do to "catch up" but not the President. His staff would need to inform which ever agency/entity produced or had governance over that information, but that's really it.
If they raided a former President's house because he had some improperly marked documents even boxes full of them....
That’s because you don’t like the hypocrisy and double standards being applied here.
It would amaze me if Trumps staffers were that flippant about handling Top Secret informationWut?
According to one of his staffers, Patel, he followed a policy of declaring everything he took from the premises, declassified, as was his right. If you are saying show the documentation that proves this, no one seems to know if there IS any set protocol for that. Do you support charging the man with spying for a foreign government because he has some formerly TS classified docs in his possession?
If they were coming after him over a violation related to NARA, it would be a first in our history but they are going for the whole smash. We all know what this is about and they will torture the truth until they can convict him of something that's actually a non-event for a Dem in the same situation and on top of that they'll claim he's DQd from running. Well, it isn't going to stop him from running so what is their ultimate goal? I believe they are setting the stage for refusing to accept his legitimacy when he wins in '24.
They're literally like a bunch of spoiled children who trash the place if they don't get their way. The rest of America is about fed the hell up with their nonsense.
The repubs are rallying around him....they are making a big mistake. When the rest of the story comes out...it will be embarrassing to them. I always thought Trump was evil.....he is a Monster.Even if this were the case, what does it say about a man who's a boss, and seemingly never has a clue about what's going on around him?
But it's not even an excuse, just because you don't know you're breaking the law, doesn't mean you're not breaking the law.
You would see that. It’s who you are - a left-wing partisan hack who voted for a candidate who destroyed classified info she was hiding on her server, and in violation of a subpoena. But when a Dem does it, A-OK!No, what we see are lies such as this from blind partisan rightwing hacks and Trump supporters.
But he would sell it to them.It would amaze me if Trumps staffers were that flippant about handling Top Secret information
Wave your hand and declare all documents you are taking home as unclassified. No questions asked, no official reclassification…just take the documents home with you.
In fact, what Trump is doing is declaring that the former Top Secret information in those documents can now be released to our enemies. That is what unclassified means.
As bad a President as I think Trump was, I doubt if even he would sink so low as to release Top Secret information to our enemies just because he is too lazy to secure it.
FYI presidents can declassify any classified documents. Before they leave the white house.Unsealed Search Warrant with receipt of items taken shows Trump had:
Top Secret Classified Documents
Confidential Classified Documents
Miscellaneous Secret Documents
YOU folks are beyond redemptionYou would see that. It’s who you are - a left-wing partisan hack who voted for a candidate who destroyed classified info she was hiding on her server, and in violation of a subpoena. But when a Dem does it, A-OK!
I doubt anyone would mark documents Trump is taking home Top Secret just for yucks and giggles.We don't actually know what was or wasn't (if anything) declassified. All we know is there were docs marked with a classification. I can write Top Secret TSI on the top of my grocery list, doesn't make it classified. You are and have been jumping to the conclusion you want because you want Trump to be guilty. Maybe he is, maybe he isnt. We will have to wait and see how it shakes out. If he did that while he was President then it was legal for him to do so. You can not like that that's what he did, and it might have been a really stupid thing to do, but it wouldnt be illegal. The President doesn't have to justify his decision to declassify something.
Trump deliberately took classified documents in order to sell our nuclear secrets to the Russians.Unsealed Search Warrant with receipt of items taken shows Trump had:
Top Secret Classified Documents
Confidential Classified Documents
Miscellaneous Secret Documents
Yes he is
Just like every other American