For those of us who have clung to the notion the system has held against

[martybegan]

That's a right wing fever dream, as you know.

it's reality.

Not that you care about reality, considering you think women can have penises.

 

[Billiejeens]

Every single one of their cases is falling apart. The snowflakes seem surprised.

Because they only talk to each other.

 

[Billiejeens]

the fbi has been carrying trump since comey submarined ms clinton with his bull shit.

fbi tried to clear trump after jan 6 with that bogus investigation, and seem to have screwed up the evidence of the secret documents, most treasonous act in american history.

You are 0-2 on that post

 

[Billiejeens]

It's a call to become more politically active.

Be as active as you want.
You are in a minority.
A small minority amplified by the media
A violent Minority.

 

[berg80]

it's reality.

Not that you care about reality, considering you think women can have penises.

Maybe you should speak to someone about your penis fetish. Just sayin'.

 

[berg80]

Be as active as you want.
You are in a minority.
A small minority amplified by the media
A violent Minority.

You know Trump lost the popular vote both times he ran, right?

You know polling indicates Repubs hold unpopular policy positions on abortion, gun control, the environment, and immigration, right?

Welcome to the real world.

 

[martybegan]

Maybe you should speak to someone about your penis fetish. Just sayin'.

Figures you can't respond to that accusation.

 

[Dekster]

the immense pressure exerted by Trumpery, it's time to acknowledge the wall has been breached. I for one as have consistently maintained Trumpery, in its fullest form, had been kept at bay. Even among Trump appointees who followed the law in rejecting his various schemes to upend the constitutional order. Especially those judges who threw out the worthless cases Team Kraken brought to their courtrooms seeking to press the case the 2020 election had been stolen. Until now, it had been tremendously encouraging to see such an essential element of the republic stand firm against the constant probing in order to exploit weaknesses. The aspects of law and rules that were not written in contemplation of a malevolent domestic threat seeking to harm the nation.

Then this happened.

Judge indefinitely delays Trump's classified documents criminal trial

U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon has indefinitely postponed former President Donald Trump’s classified documents trial in Florida pending the resolution of multiple pretrial issues.
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/do...lassified-documents-criminal-trial-rcna151145

Her statement has a kind of Kafkaesque, circular logic vibe. The unsaid part being, "The case can't possibly proceed until various motions are decided on. The ones I have put off deciding on."

Judge in Trump Documents Case Draws Attention for Slow Pace

Aileen Cannon has yet to set a trial date in the complex case accusing Donald J. Trump of mishandling classified materials, and has stirred confusion with some decisions.
Judge in Trump Documents Case Draws Attention for Slow Pace

How we got here can not be explained by a single event but rather by a confluence of them. First, the living, breathing anachronism that is the EC allowed for the colossal misjudgment of the minority to impose on the country a self-serving POS to be prez. A man who in the last weeks of his presidency, while he wasn't on the golf course instead of dealing with the affects of COVID, nominated an inexperienced, unqualified lawyer named Aileen Cannon to sit on the federal bench.

Her nomination was taken up by the eminently corrupt Mitch McConnell who never saw someone the Federalist Society put up for a judgeship that he didn't like. Then, in an immensely unfortunate turn of events for the service of justice, Cannon drew the assignment for the docs case.

This is a classic case of one error leading to another and another. And so we find ourselves, the non-MAGAist's among us, needing to recognize the gravity of the situation. The enemy is inside the walls. After the SC astonishingly took the immunity case for which there is no merit, Cannon's delay, and the recent decision by a GA appeals court to relitigate whether Fani Willis can continue to lead Trump's prosecution, the idea that the courts have held has become a quaint relic of the past. The destructive, insidious force that is Trumpery has a foothold that can not easily be dislodged. It's going to require hard work to do so. This is the time for lovers of democracy to do what Trump told his mob to do on Jan.6, fight like hell.

Yawns. This has always been problematic grounds legally--classified information. If you are going to use it then the defense and the jury have a right to it too which they can't see because they don't have the security clearance. It was an issue never resolved with some of the Gitmo detainees' lawyers wanting it then. In kiddie porn cases they let the defense inspect but not possess the porn but they cannot do this here because they don't even have the clearance to inspect. There just isn't a work around as to how to navigate certain evidence when the defense is barred from it but are generally entitled to it under our legal system if it is relevant to the case..

 

[Rawley]

Because they only talk to each other.

And listen the same news (propaganda) sources. They put all their eggs into this lawfare scheme and it's falling apart.

 

[Billiejeens]

And listen the same news (propaganda) sources. They put all their eggs into this lawfare scheme and it's falling apart.

And they are all shocked everytime.

Berg made a plethora of posts regarding the 14th amendment because his Cult Media told him it was a slam dunk.

Scotus ruled 9-0
Every one of them said, "no".

He didn't have to be surprised
We told him.[/QUOTE]

 

[Billiejeens]

You know Trump lost the popular vote both times he ran, right?

You know polling indicates Repubs hold unpopular policy positions on abortion, gun control, the environment, and immigration, right?

Welcome to the real world.

You should know that there is no National Contest held to garner the most votes.
If there was, each of the candidates would campaign differently.
So, when someone mentions a loss in a non-existent contest, I know that they do not know how the USA elects Presidents.

The prevailing position in the USA on abortion is - Safe, legal and rare, which was Championed by Bill Clinton and is much closer to the Republican position than the abortion on demand, no restrictions position of The Democrat Party.
Approximately 10% support the no restrictions position.

 

[Billiejeens]

You know Trump lost the popular vote both times he ran, right?

You know polling indicates Repubs hold unpopular policy positions on abortion, gun control, the environment, and immigration, right?

Welcome to the real world.

Gun Control, Environment, and immigration?

I laugh

Inside your bubble I'm sure that there is only 1 opinion.

 

[berg80]

Figures you can't respond to that accusation.

While you're day dreaming about your penis fetish contemplate this.

U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon being so obviously in the tank for Donald Trump in indefinitely postponing his Mar-a-Lago trial set off a new round of recriminations over various tactical decisions Special Counsel Jack Smith made in bringing the classified documents case.

Smith should have picked a different venue than South Florida! He should have had Cannon recused already! If Garland hadn’t been so slow, this wouldn’t be an issue now!

None of those are availing here, and they miss the larger point that for the rule of law to mean anything it must be sturdier and more enduring than a few tactical decisions by a single prosecutor in a single case.

We can take that notion one step further: A lot of commentary and analysis over the last year has insisted that you can’t rely on the criminal justice system to rid us of Trump – the election is the real tool to remove the Trump threat.

It would be pedantic to say there’s no truth to that, but at the same time it turns the rule of the law on its head for it be susceptible to the results of any one election. No one prosecutor, no one case, no one election should be able to determine the fate of the rule of law.

Don’t Blame Jack Smith For The Erosion Of The Rule Of Law

No one prosecutor, no one case, no one election should be able to determine the fate of the rule of law.

talkingpointsmemo.com

 

[martybegan]

While you're day dreaming about your penis fetish contemplate this.

U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon being so obviously in the tank for Donald Trump in indefinitely postponing his Mar-a-Lago trial set off a new round of recriminations over various tactical decisions Special Counsel Jack Smith made in bringing the classified documents case.

Smith should have picked a different venue than South Florida! He should have had Cannon recused already! If Garland hadn’t been so slow, this wouldn’t be an issue now!

None of those are availing here, and they miss the larger point that for the rule of law to mean anything it must be sturdier and more enduring than a few tactical decisions by a single prosecutor in a single case.

We can take that notion one step further: A lot of commentary and analysis over the last year has insisted that you can’t rely on the criminal justice system to rid us of Trump – the election is the real tool to remove the Trump threat.

It would be pedantic to say there’s no truth to that, but at the same time it turns the rule of the law on its head for it be susceptible to the results of any one election. No one prosecutor, no one case, no one election should be able to determine the fate of the rule of law.

Don’t Blame Jack Smith For The Erosion Of The Rule Of Law

No one prosecutor, no one case, no one election should be able to determine the fate of the rule of law.

talkingpointsmemo.com

Not what I was talking about, dippy.

It's about the left's obsession with women having penises.

 

[SeaMajor7]

While you're day dreaming about your penis fetish contemplate this.

U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon being so obviously in the tank for Donald Trump in indefinitely postponing his Mar-a-Lago trial set off a new round of recriminations over various tactical decisions Special Counsel Jack Smith made in bringing the classified documents case.

Smith should have picked a different venue than South Florida! He should have had Cannon recused already! If Garland hadn’t been so slow, this wouldn’t be an issue now!

None of those are availing here, and they miss the larger point that for the rule of law to mean anything it must be sturdier and more enduring than a few tactical decisions by a single prosecutor in a single case.

We can take that notion one step further: A lot of commentary and analysis over the last year has insisted that you can’t rely on the criminal justice system to rid us of Trump – the election is the real tool to remove the Trump threat.

It would be pedantic to say there’s no truth to that, but at the same time it turns the rule of the law on its head for it be susceptible to the results of any one election. No one prosecutor, no one case, no one election should be able to determine the fate of the rule of law.

Don’t Blame Jack Smith For The Erosion Of The Rule Of Law

No one prosecutor, no one case, no one election should be able to determine the fate of the rule of law.

talkingpointsmemo.com

Cry harder!

 

[Billiejeens]

While you're day dreaming about your penis fetish contemplate this.

U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon being so obviously in the tank for Donald Trump in indefinitely postponing his Mar-a-Lago trial set off a new round of recriminations over various tactical decisions Special Counsel Jack Smith made in bringing the classified documents case.

Smith should have picked a different venue than South Florida! He should have had Cannon recused already! If Garland hadn’t been so slow, this wouldn’t be an issue now!

None of those are availing here, and they miss the larger point that for the rule of law to mean anything it must be sturdier and more enduring than a few tactical decisions by a single prosecutor in a single case.

We can take that notion one step further: A lot of commentary and analysis over the last year has insisted that you can’t rely on the criminal justice system to rid us of Trump – the election is the real tool to remove the Trump threat.

It would be pedantic to say there’s no truth to that, but at the same time it turns the rule of the law on its head for it be susceptible to the results of any one election. No one prosecutor, no one case, no one election should be able to determine the fate of the rule of law.

Don’t Blame Jack Smith For The Erosion Of The Rule Of Law

No one prosecutor, no one case, no one election should be able to determine the fate of the rule of law.

talkingpointsmemo.com

Talking points memo

Gud Gawd

 

[RetiredGySgt]

Talking points memo

Gud Gawd

3 judges making decision against Trump for personal and political reasons, so they have to attack the one fair judge, they got nothing else.

 

[BackAgain]

the immense pressure exerted by Trumpery, it's time to acknowledge the wall has been breached. I for one as have consistently maintained Trumpery, in its fullest form, had been kept at bay. Even among Trump appointees who followed the law in rejecting his various schemes to upend the constitutional order. Especially those judges who threw out the worthless cases Team Kraken brought to their courtrooms seeking to press the case the 2020 election had been stolen. Until now, it had been tremendously encouraging to see such an essential element of the republic stand firm against the constant probing in order to exploit weaknesses. The aspects of law and rules that were not written in contemplation of a malevolent domestic threat seeking to harm the nation.

Then this happened.

Judge indefinitely delays Trump's classified documents criminal trial

U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon has indefinitely postponed former President Donald Trump’s classified documents trial in Florida pending the resolution of multiple pretrial issues.
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/do...lassified-documents-criminal-trial-rcna151145

Her statement has a kind of Kafkaesque, circular logic vibe. The unsaid part being, "The case can't possibly proceed until various motions are decided on. The ones I have put off deciding on."

Judge in Trump Documents Case Draws Attention for Slow Pace

Aileen Cannon has yet to set a trial date in the complex case accusing Donald J. Trump of mishandling classified materials, and has stirred confusion with some decisions.
Judge in Trump Documents Case Draws Attention for Slow Pace

How we got here can not be explained by a single event but rather by a confluence of them. First, the living, breathing anachronism that is the EC allowed for the colossal misjudgment of the minority to impose on the country a self-serving POS to be prez. A man who in the last weeks of his presidency, while he wasn't on the golf course instead of dealing with the affects of COVID, nominated an inexperienced, unqualified lawyer named Aileen Cannon to sit on the federal bench.

Her nomination was taken up by the eminently corrupt Mitch McConnell who never saw someone the Federalist Society put up for a judgeship that he didn't like. Then, in an immensely unfortunate turn of events for the service of justice, Cannon drew the assignment for the docs case.

This is a classic case of one error leading to another and another. And so we find ourselves, the non-MAGAist's among us, needing to recognize the gravity of the situation. The enemy is inside the walls. After the SC astonishingly took the immunity case for which there is no merit, Cannon's delay, and the recent decision by a GA appeals court to relitigate whether Fani Willis can continue to lead Trump's prosecution, the idea that the courts have held has become a quaint relic of the past. The destructive, insidious force that is Trumpery has a foothold that can not easily be dislodged. It's going to require hard work to do so. This is the time for lovers of democracy to do what Trump told his mob to do on Jan.6, fight like hell.

What a pointless and dishonestly-premised thread OP.

 

[blackhawk]

Short version I hate Trump and any who doesn’t waaaa, waaaa,waaaa.

 

[Rogue AI]

She did just what he put her in that seat to do.

Correctly interpret that laws and ensure a fair trial. Looks like it's working, unlike those kangaroo court cases in NYC, Fulton County, and whatever other clown shows you folks have planned.