Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
No it doesn't. Presidential records do not belong to ex-presidents, they belong to National Archives, who have been trying to get them back since 2021.Doesn't matter.
It means the docs being there was legal.
Of course it's meaningless.
Warrant does not somehow disapear retroactively if after raid Trump suddenly claims that he declassified everything in his head.
No it doesn't. Presidential records do not belong to ex-presidents, they belong to National Archives, who have been trying to get them back since 2021.
Trump violated the Presidential Records Act by refusing to turn them over, even without much more serious classification issues.
Wrong.
The docs a president decides to turn over to NARA are up to him and there is no deadline.
The docs given to a president are totally up the president if he wants to copy, destroy, classify, declassify, or whatever.
...and in your expert opinion, what would you say is the purpose of the Presidential Records Act?
There are policies, procedures, and laws to be followed by the president. Trump of course does what he always does, whatever he wants to do. He knew that the presidential documents were not his too keep. The Director of the National Achieves meets with each new president to explain this and the procedures to be followed in record keeping so presidential transitions are orderly and in accordance with the law.That's not what's going on here.
These fuckers are trying to make what other presidents did in the past a crime if Trump does it. Mkay?
They criminalize everything that he does.
Prior to the Presidential Records of 1978, presidential records belong to the president. That changed beginning with the Reagan administration.Wrong.
The docs a president decides to turn over to NARA are up to him and there is no deadline.
The docs given to a president are totally up the president if he wants to copy, destroy, classify, declassify, or whatever.
The only legal basis for NARA to insist is the FOIA, and that would only imply criminal offenses if a president were to try to hide evidence of wrong doing.
It is not at all illegal for a president to destroy personal documents, redundant junk, something too classified for NARA, etc.
The president retains his individual right to privacy if he so wishes.
www.archives.gov
the server was wiped AFTER the subpoena dumbass as to the phones there is a dispute when they got smashed.Well looks like we have another nutter that hasn't actually read the link.
READ IT. Reconcile it with your claims, then post.
Crazy idea, I know.
again for the slow and stupid there is no punishment for that in the law. no crime was committed to warrant an FBI raidNo it doesn't. Presidential records do not belong to ex-presidents, they belong to National Archives, who have been trying to get them back since 2021.
Trump violated the Presidential Records Act by refusing to turn them over, even without much more serious classification issues.
Emails were erased (not "server wiped"). Not by Clinton, but by her IT management, who failed to follow Clinton's 60 day retention policy she set forth well before subpoena was issued.the server was wiped AFTER the subpoena dumbass as to the phones there is a dispute when they got smashed.
she illegally wiped the server AFTER ordered to turn it over retard. And she lied about emails being unclassified and having turned in all work related ones as well.Emails were erased (not "server wiped"). Not by Clinton, but by her IT management, who failed to follow Clinton's 60 day retention policy she set forth well before subpoena was issued.
So what did Clinton refuse to provide? Nothing is the correct answer.
Prior to the Presidential Records of 1978, presidential records belong to the president. That changed beginning with the Reagan administration.
The PRA changed the legal ownership of the official records of the President from private to public, and established a new statutory structure under which Presidents, and subsequently NARA, must manage the records of their Administrations The current president is made responsible for turning over records that the new president will need. Also the PRA required that personal records be stored separately from presidential records. And the Classification Act required that classified documents be stored and secured separately for other records.
So it should have been very clear in the presidential transition, as to what is to sent to Mar A Lago, the NARA storage facility in Chicago, and the NARA classified document storage in Maryland.
Presidential Records Act (PRA) of 1978 | National Archives
Can you quote that in the link provided?she illegally wiped the server AFTER ordered to turn it over retard.
He knows he's gone to far, so let me turn my dogs out.It seems every Trump transgression becomes more serious. It's like he's playing catch me if you can. This time he may have gone just one step too far for his lawyers to save him.
the dates have already been provided retard.Can you quote that in the link provided?
There is nothing supporting what you've just said. It's just a fantasy in your head.
Well then go ahead and QUOTE IT.the dates have already been provided retard.
I am not going to do your work for you the post is in this thread and available on line look it up IF your are so stupid you did not actually read the threadWell then go ahead and QUOTE IT.
Or maybe you don't know how to do basic copy and paste?
Really? So some laws are ignored? For who? Certainly not me. Dude, you make some of the stupidest arguments imaginable.Most restrictions, laws, etc., are for worst case scenarios, and are not supposed to be enforced blindly, to the letter.
For example, Hillary deliberately violated the State Department email and cellphone rules.
But it turns out, most people did.
So the letter of the law and restrictions are usually not applicable.
Well then ok, get lost, you have nothing.I am not going to
He can't.Well then go ahead and QUOTE IT.
If what you've just said is supported by linked material, then you should be able to quote it. Right? Whats the problem?
again STUPID there is no punishment for not turning over records and material no criminal act was done,Really? So some laws are ignored? For who? Certainly not me. Dude, you make some of the stupidest arguments imaginable.
Should law enforcement ignore all traffic violations?
Your idiotic Hillary argument is prime example of your stupidity.
By the way, just so you know, what Trump did comes under "worst case scenario."
