UN agrees to let Iran inspect its own nuclear site. Yes, really.

The Iranians have lied repeatedly about their program and about the sites used for it. If they know they have a location where no outside inspections will take place, where do you think they will be doing their work prohibited under the treaty? Duh. This would be obvious to anyone with a clue.


with the way this "deal" has been created......do they really need to hide anything? the cowards and corrupt Europeans could not care less if Iran gets the bomb...I bet they could build the bomb on Iranian television and no one would lift a finger or say boo about it.....the leftards simply do not care.....
They figure it's Israel's problem. And they couldn't give two shits about Israel. They're all about trade relaitons.
Now of course the Saudis are shitting themselves. And they do or could care about the Saudis.
We will see a major realignment in power. The US is out as a reliable partner in anything. That leaves Israel, Saudi Arabia, Egypt, and who knows who else as free agents. Perhaps they will ally with India, or China, or both. The US withdrawl has created a power vacuum and nature abhors a vacuum.
 
No, this is not a satire article from The Onion.

We have actually agreed to let Iran inspect it's own nuclear site, and report back to us whether they have found any evidence they were developing a Bomb there.

I'll have to check again. This HAS to be a joke from The Onion.

In a related story, Barack Obama has agreed that Hillary Clinton can be the sole inspector to look through her own emails and tell us whether any of them were classified, or related to the American deaths in Benghazi etc.

And John Dean has agreed that Richard Nixon will be the only one allowed access to his White House tapes, to tell us whether he did anything illegal.

The only significant difference in these cases, is that neither Hillary nor Nixon has threatened to wipe other nations off the map.

Does the Obama administration actually think people will go along with this as a "legitimate inspection that puts the accusations to rest"?

-------------------------------------------------

News from The Associated Press

AP Exclusive: UN to let Iran inspect alleged nuke work site

Aug 19, 2:03 PM EDT
By GEORGE JAHN
Associated Press

VIENNA (AP) -- Iran, in an unusual arrangement, will be allowed to use its own experts to inspect a site it allegedly used to develop nuclear arms under a secret agreement with the U.N. agency that normally carries out such work, according to a document seen by The Associated Press.

Some countries are required to do no more than give a yearly accounting of the nuclear material they possess. But nations- like Iran - suspected of possible proliferation are under greater scrutiny that can include stringent inspections.

But the agreement diverges from normal inspection procedures between the IAEA and a member country by essentially ceding the agency's investigative authority to Iran. It allows Tehran to employ its own experts and equipment in the search for evidence for activities that it has consistently denied - trying to develop nuclear weapons.

And Kerry testified under oath before congress, that there were no side deals, can you say perjury?
 
It is a military site not involved in Iran's nuclear weapons program. Those sites identified as part of the nuclear weapons program are subject to no-notice inspections.

Inspection requests for sites in the future which are suspected of being involved in a nuclear weapons program will be reviewed by the P5 +1 commission. This much is a very common component of treaties, such as the ones we had with the USSR. We were not allowed to just traipse on into any USSR military base we felt like without notice.

This Parchin facility is not even suspected as currently being part of the nuclear program. It is suspected of having been more than a decade ago.

Because it is a military site, the sovereign state of Iran does not want outsiders snooping around, spying for the West when it isn't even part of the nuclear weapons program.
True. I was going more with the notion that Parchin has nothing to do with nukes, and this is probably another non-story planted in the media by neocons.


You guys are discussing this as if it is a real thing….it is a sham…..there is no deal, the inspections will be a joke, and as soon as Iran secures it's cash they will produce their bomb…on their timetable as soon as it is ready………pretending like this is anything other than a sham makes you guys seem silly…..
I am discussing the facts. You are being an emotional, illogical prig.

so you trust iran? lol
 
It is a military site not involved in Iran's nuclear weapons program. Those sites identified as part of the nuclear weapons program are subject to no-notice inspections.

Inspection requests for sites in the future which are suspected of being involved in a nuclear weapons program will be reviewed by the P5 +1 commission. This much is a very common component of treaties, such as the ones we had with the USSR. We were not allowed to just traipse on into any USSR military base we felt like without notice.

This Parchin facility is not even suspected as currently being part of the nuclear program. It is suspected of having been more than a decade ago.

Because it is a military site, the sovereign state of Iran does not want outsiders snooping around, spying for the West when it isn't even part of the nuclear weapons program.
True. I was going more with the notion that Parchin has nothing to do with nukes, and this is probably another non-story planted in the media by neocons.


You guys are discussing this as if it is a real thing….it is a sham…..there is no deal, the inspections will be a joke, and as soon as Iran secures it's cash they will produce their bomb…on their timetable as soon as it is ready………pretending like this is anything other than a sham makes you guys seem silly…..
I am discussing the facts. You are being an emotional, illogical prig.

so you trust iran? lol
Where was that ever said?

Trusting Iran is irrelevant to the particular detail being discussed. he may or may not trust Iran but his statements do not reflect either way.

We did not trust Russia either yet he drew clear parallels with Russian inspections.
 
It is a military site not involved in Iran's nuclear weapons program. Those sites identified as part of the nuclear weapons program are subject to no-notice inspections.

Inspection requests for sites in the future which are suspected of being involved in a nuclear weapons program will be reviewed by the P5 +1 commission. This much is a very common component of treaties, such as the ones we had with the USSR. We were not allowed to just traipse on into any USSR military base we felt like without notice.

This Parchin facility is not even suspected as currently being part of the nuclear program. It is suspected of having been more than a decade ago.

Because it is a military site, the sovereign state of Iran does not want outsiders snooping around, spying for the West when it isn't even part of the nuclear weapons program.
True. I was going more with the notion that Parchin has nothing to do with nukes, and this is probably another non-story planted in the media by neocons.


You guys are discussing this as if it is a real thing….it is a sham…..there is no deal, the inspections will be a joke, and as soon as Iran secures it's cash they will produce their bomb…on their timetable as soon as it is ready………pretending like this is anything other than a sham makes you guys seem silly…..
I am discussing the facts. You are being an emotional, illogical prig.

so you trust iran? lol
Where was that ever said?

Trusting Iran is irrelevant to the particular detail being discussed. he may or may not trust Iran but his statements do not reflect either way.

We did not trust Russia either yet he drew clear parallels with Russian inspections.
:Trust but verify." -Ronald Reagan.
 
Hmm, seems like no liberals want to talk about this.

Who can blame them? Their hero and his administration are proving to be the country's supreme embarrassment.
Even some democrats are jumping ship from Obama's lame deal with Iran.
 
Who is it again that inspects US sites?


We aren't the bad guys…..that you have a hard time figuring that out shows how bad the government education system (controlled by the education wing of the democrat party) has educated you……or you have a genetically broken moral compass…...
 
Who has used nuclear weapons on other countries?


The United States…to end a war we didn't start and to end the slaughter, and live medical experiments on innocent men, women and children and to save the lives of our men who would have had to fight against the Japanese on their home island….

See….if you had a real education and a functioning moral compass you would know those things……

Iran…will use the money from this sham to murder innocent men, women and children and will use their nuclear weapon to murder innocent men women and children…see the difference?
 
I wonder why the Parchin facility was not included in the actual deal, and why this is a separate deal between Iran and the IAEA? Parchin is an actual military base, which even under the deal itself is treated differently from nuclear sites. And as the article mentions, Parchin's importance is we and the IAEA have suspected for a long time that Iran experimented with 'high explosive detonators" for nuclear weapons.
The suspected work stopped more than ten years ago:

The IAEA has cited evidence, based on satellite images, of possible attempts to sanitize the site since the alleged work stopped more than a decade ago.

The IAEA is letting the Iranians film and photograph the site:

Iran is to provide agency experts with photos and videos of locations the IAEA says are linked to the alleged weapons work, "taking into account military concerns."

That wording suggests that - beyond being barred from physically visiting the site - the agency won't get photo or video information from areas Iran says are off-limits because they have military significance.

While the document says the IAEA "will ensure the technical authenticity" of Iran's inspection, it does not say how.

It was reported that is stopped but it never did.
 
Who has used nuclear weapons on other countries?


See….this is a lesson for you….who is the bad guy…

A man uses a gun to murder an innocent man to take his money or rape his wife…..

A man uses a gun to stop a man from murdering an innocent man, or rape the man's wife……

Who is the bad guy?
 
I wonder why the Parchin facility was not included in the actual deal, and why this is a separate deal between Iran and the IAEA? Parchin is an actual military base, which even under the deal itself is treated differently from nuclear sites. And as the article mentions, Parchin's importance is we and the IAEA have suspected for a long time that Iran experimented with 'high explosive detonators" for nuclear weapons.
The suspected work stopped more than ten years ago:

The IAEA has cited evidence, based on satellite images, of possible attempts to sanitize the site since the alleged work stopped more than a decade ago.

The IAEA is letting the Iranians film and photograph the site:

Iran is to provide agency experts with photos and videos of locations the IAEA says are linked to the alleged weapons work, "taking into account military concerns."

That wording suggests that - beyond being barred from physically visiting the site - the agency won't get photo or video information from areas Iran says are off-limits because they have military significance.

While the document says the IAEA "will ensure the technical authenticity" of Iran's inspection, it does not say how.

It was reported that is stopped but it never did.


You can't reason with 500…..if he had been around in the 30s he would be telling you…"Hitler only wants some room for his people……"
 
Kerry has to be the dumbest motherfucker on planet Earth.
you hold that title.

in the agreement we have with iran, if we suspect nuclear weapons development we can make that case and inspect. this agreement between iran and the iaea does not change that.
 
Kerry has to be the dumbest motherfucker on planet Earth.
He's a typical liberal. Hates his own country, stabs his friends in the back, does everything he can to weaken the U.S.

How does going to war with iran and spending trillions to rebuild it = a stronger America?


and in the first place...you fell for the "no agreement means war" crap Obama was lying about.......you maintain the sanctions...tighten them, and do any number of other things to bring down their government.
unilateral sanctions would not be very effective.
 
OBAMA has an Iranian woman as his CLOSE aid and we are shocked over this DEAL he's went and make with the DEVIL.

THIS MAN doesn't care one bit about us a country he hates and wanted to TRANSFORM it by giving it away to all our ENEMIES and filling it with Illegal Immigrants.

yet some of you still STANDS behind the two TRAITORS Obama/Kerry
 
OBAMA has an Iranian woman as his CLOSE aid and we are shocked over this DEAL he's went and make with the DEVIL.

THIS MAN doesn't care one bit about us a country he hates and wanted to TRANSFORM it by giving it away to all our ENEMIES and filling it with Illegal Immigrants.
do you even realize that this is separate and apart from the deal we have with iran?
 

Forum List

Back
Top