UK stops sharing intel with the US while crimes being committed in the Caribean

Common sense. No fishermen use speed boats of that sort.

None, Zero, Nil, Zilch, Nada.
Common sense isn't very common with you people, if i was to attack my neighbor with an axe and told the judge i used common sense in thinking he would attack me the judge would think i was crazy and would be right, that's how crazy you sound.
 
Common sense isn't very common with you people, if i was to attack my neighbor with an axe and told the judge i used common sense in thinking he would attack me the judge would think i was crazy and would be right, that's how crazy you sound.
You're not very good at logic, are you....makes sense, you ARE a leftoid.
 
Absolutely it is. Always has been. The LAWS for the high seas have been established for centuries.

Try and educate yourself on the subject.
Are you banned by google?


The exact wording of Article 101 of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) reads as follows:

⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯
Article 101

Definition of piracy

Piracy consists of any of the following acts:

(a) Any illegal acts of violence or detention, or any act of depredation, committed for private ends by the crew or the passengers of a private ship or a private aircraft, and directed:
(i) On the high seas, against another ship or aircraft, or against persons or property on board such ship or aircraft;
(ii) Against a ship, aircraft, persons or property in a place outside the jurisdiction of any State;

(b) Any act of voluntary participation in the operation of a ship or of an aircraft with knowledge of facts making it a pirate ship or aircraft;

(c) Any act inciting or of intentionally facilitating an act described in subparagraph (a) or (b).

⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯

And even if a military ship has a reason to suspect a civilian ship in piracy, it doesn't mean that it has right just to sink it at sight.

Here is the text of Article 110 from the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS):

⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯
Article 110

Right of visit

1. A warship which has reasonable grounds for suspecting that a foreign ship (other than a ship entitled to complete immunity in accordance with articles 95 and 96) is engaged in any of the acts referred to in article 111 may proceed to verify the ship's right to fly its flag. To this end, verification may be effected by hailing the ship in question and inspecting its documents.

2. If after inspection it is clear that the suspicion was unjustified, the ship shall be compensated for any loss or damage that may have been sustained.

3. The right of visit may be exercised only if there are reasonable grounds for suspecting one of the following:
(a) That the ship is engaged in piracy;
(b) That the ship is engaged in the slave trade;
(c) That although flying a foreign flag or refusing to show its flag, the ship is, in reality, of the same nationality as the warship.

4. In cases where the nationality of the ship cannot be determined beyond doubt, it may also be visited.

5. In all cases, the exercise of the right of visit must be carried out with due regard for the safety of persons, ships and cargo and without causing undue delay.

⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯

The USA has bilateral treaties, allowing inspections of civilian ships, suspected in drug trafficking in high seas, with following countries: Colombia, Mexico, Peru, Guatemala, Ecuador. The USA has no right even to inspect civilian ships belonging to other countries.
 
Technically, the USA can recognise María Corina Machado as the legal leader of Venezuela and sign a bilateral treaty, allowing inspections of Venezuela's ships by UN NAVY. But it will both piss off most of Latin American countries and ruin her chances to become a real leader of Venezuela.
 
Delivering drugs is not "international crime". Not yet. If they are not under US flag they can deliver whatever they want.
These drugs are ILLEGAL--even within the countries where they are manufactured and delivering them into countries where they are illegal makes these people smugglers. Yeah, these seas are in the US sphere of influence and they are terrorists committing international crimes.
Do you want US alcohol-traffiking ship captured by Muslims and it's crew beheaded?
If you can show that they are delivering these goods to muslim countries, they would be smugglers as well. Try again.
If you don't want your military ships attacked by other ships (or unmanned boat, or cruise missiles or torpedoes) don't attack civilian ships in high seas.
Do whatever you think you want to do---but be ready for the consequences.
You can't establish rules for high seas just by yourself. There were a lot of fools, who tried to do so, believing that they are the only naval superpower.
You really should not attempt to discuss subjects that you know nothing about.
 
Are you banned by google?


The exact wording of Article 101 of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) reads as follows:

⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯
Article 101

Definition of piracy

Piracy consists of any of the following acts:

(a) Any illegal acts of violence or detention, or any act of depredation, committed for private ends by the crew or the passengers of a private ship or a private aircraft, and directed:
(i) On the high seas, against another ship or aircraft, or against persons or property on board such ship or aircraft;
(ii) Against a ship, aircraft, persons or property in a place outside the jurisdiction of any State;

(b) Any act of voluntary participation in the operation of a ship or of an aircraft with knowledge of facts making it a pirate ship or aircraft;

(c) Any act inciting or of intentionally facilitating an act described in subparagraph (a) or (b).

⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯

And even if a military ship has a reason to suspect a civilian ship in piracy, it doesn't mean that it has right just to sink it at sight.

Here is the text of Article 110 from the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS):

⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯
Article 110

Right of visit

1. A warship which has reasonable grounds for suspecting that a foreign ship (other than a ship entitled to complete immunity in accordance with articles 95 and 96) is engaged in any of the acts referred to in article 111 may proceed to verify the ship's right to fly its flag. To this end, verification may be effected by hailing the ship in question and inspecting its documents.

2. If after inspection it is clear that the suspicion was unjustified, the ship shall be compensated for any loss or damage that may have been sustained.

3. The right of visit may be exercised only if there are reasonable grounds for suspecting one of the following:
(a) That the ship is engaged in piracy;
(b) That the ship is engaged in the slave trade;
(c) That although flying a foreign flag or refusing to show its flag, the ship is, in reality, of the same nationality as the warship.

4. In cases where the nationality of the ship cannot be determined beyond doubt, it may also be visited.

5. In all cases, the exercise of the right of visit must be carried out with due regard for the safety of persons, ships and cargo and without causing undue delay.

⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯

The USA has bilateral treaties, allowing inspections of civilian ships, suspected in drug trafficking in high seas, with following countries: Colombia, Mexico, Peru, Guatemala, Ecuador. The USA has no right even to inspect civilian ships belonging to other countries.
Common criminals in unflagged ships are not subject to UN laws. The US reserves the right to take any and all actions it so chooses to defend its shores. Too bad if you don't like it.
 
Who told you they were drug boats? still waiting for an answer to that one.
Who told you they weren't? US intelligence agencies are working in the area. That is all I need. You're the one who disputes it, go ask that ship what authority they have, I'm sure they'll give you all the answers you need.
 
Technically, the USA can recognise María Corina Machado as the legal leader of Venezuela and sign a bilateral treaty, allowing inspections of Venezuela's ships by UN NAVY. But it will both piss off most of Latin American countries and ruin her chances to become a real leader of Venezuela.
The UN has no navy.
 
Back
Top Bottom