Uncensored2008
Libertarian Radical
Nothing indicates Indeependent trusts you, Farouk.I know, you're deranged. You trust the liars.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Nothing indicates Indeependent trusts you, Farouk.I know, you're deranged. You trust the liars.
Kari Lake lied about election fraud. You trust her.
Savvy?
Try asking about things I've actually said -- not what you imagine I've said.
Though I'm doing better than when he was president, even pre-covid, I never said he made my life worse.
The one lying is you, Farouk.
Scumbag.
How about the lie you just told about Kari Lake.
Did they outlaw Uber in you area, no competition for your cab?
I'm not a democrat.
But you are...
You're stupid! Nazis haven't existed since 1945.But you are a nazi, so there's that.
Bull shitthere's voter suppression in Georgia right now ... the difference is we Democrats accept the vote ... we don't go crying to every court in the land and say I was cheated because the republicans made it harder to vote.. we go to the court before the election an file suit to be able to vote on Saturday ... that all the Dems have done ......when the republicans try to stop voters being able to vote on Saturday ... that's a big difference then crying to some judge about voters fraud after your election because the vote didn't go her way ... that's what she trying to pull ... just like trump he had no evidence of voters fraud ...she has no evidence of voters fraud ... and you have no evidence of voters fraud ... mail-in ballots can't be forged, period ...mail in ballots can only be counted once ... if you can't understand that I'll be happy to explain it to you why they can only be counted once...
An ad hominem…how mature.you're kidding right ???
But you are a nazi,
so there's that.
You're stupid! Nazis haven't existed since 1945.
it will not go anywhere they will ask where your proof that the election was not fair ... they will ask her and her lawyers what your proof ... they will say she didn't win ... trumps went t the supreme court and they asked for proof he had none ... they said no poof case closed you lose ...Trump loaded up the ninth circuit with conservative judges. Let's hope Lake is victorious. Otherwise, this goes to the Supreme Court if needed.
U.S. Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals With HUGE "Standing" Ruling Ahead of Kari Lake Arizona Legal Showdowns | The Gateway Pundit | by Brian Lupo
Last month, The Gateway Pundit reported on a crucial Georgia Supreme Court ruling that gave standing to the voters in Georgia without individualized injury to bring suit in the state: Justice Peterson of the GA Supreme Court: “To that end, only plaintiffs with a cognizable injury can bring a...www.thegatewaypundit.com
have no idea what you mean by your reich prevailed it's a retarded response ...What about you Aldo Raine ? If the court finds that the election was tampered with (which really can't be denied), would you demand it be ignored since your Reich prevailed?
when the truth is spoken your IQ has no value to the subject at hand ... people with low IQ's, like yourself, are capable of understanding the truth ... the problem they have which is the same problem you have is what is the real truth ...Hey Dildo Brain, why can't you ever post anything meaningful? You claimed that "Truth Matters" yet you lack the IQ points to ever post anything meaningful or rational.
I guess you're just stupid...
to have election fraud by democrats you would have to have proof of fraud ... mail-in ballots can't be reproduced and proven as being fraudulent ballots it's impossible .... because the counter will not accept them ...the court will ask for your proof so wheres your proof skippy ...Yes, but the court MUST consider remedy in order to make a ruling. If no remedy is possible, they will throw it out,
This is one of those aspects of law that are often unconsidered. The court will not simply make a ruling, they will place an injunction, or otherwise act.
My question is what people would want or expect the court to do?
Prior to Hobbs being sworn in, they could block her swearing in, vacate the election, or perhaps some novel remedy I've not considered,
If the 9th were to vacate the election, this would be precedent setting and would end up in the Supreme Court, who would be unable to duck it and would finally have to deal with the national crisis of election fraud by democrats.
seems you are a little fascist skippy I guess you don't believe in the constitution of the united states ... you and the orange douche believe the same ...Petulant GOP.
boy do you like to throughout useless mumbo-jumbo ... I see what you do ... all these percentages of what people think is useless babble ... for any court to consider a complaint to be ruled on they have to have proof that there was fraud committed ... trump and his class clowns they had no proof of fraud being committed ... saying your proof of fraud was committed is you didn't win ... you just lost your battle skippy ...You failed to grasp the post you negged earlier.
Remedy - what is the cure? The court will NOT overturn an election two years ago. Potentially, given a legitimate justice department - which we don't have - prosecution of those who tampered with the election - including judges in Pennsylvania are a possible remedy. Once Biden was sworn in, there was no chance that the election would be overturned.
With the Arizona fiasco, Hobbs has not been sworn in and the court very well could overturn the election. IF the Reich can delay a ruling until January, after Hobbs is sworn in, that too will be off the table. What relief is the plaintiff seeking?
The court will not declare Lake the winner, but they could require a new election, in which case the Lt. Governor will rule until the special election is held.
The court has a momentous task. America has no faith in elections - for obvious reasons. If we continue to ignore outright fraud, then our system will collapse, which is the goal of the democrats.
{
In January 2021, shortly after the attack on the US Capitol, 59% of Americans said they had at least some confidence that US elections reflected the will of the people. That included 36% who were very confident that elections were representative of the public’s wishes.
Now, a year and a half later, only 42% have some confidence, and just 16% are very confident.
The biggest shifts over that time have come among Democrats and independents, even as Democrats remain the political group most likely to express confidence in American elections. In early 2021, 90% of Democrats said they were at least somewhat confident that elections reflected the will of the people; now, just 57% are. Among independents, the share who have at least some confidence has fallen from 54% to 38%. Among Republicans, by contrast, confidence has modestly increased but remained low, from 23% confident then to 29% now.}
CNN Poll: Americans' confidence in elections has faded since January 6 | CNN Politics
Most Americans lack confidence that the results of US elections reflect the will of the people, a sentiment that has grown steadily since January 2021, according to a new CNN poll conducted by SSRS.www.cnn.com
the answer to your question is her proof is she didn't win, so there must be fraud ... kind of makes me laugh tooWhich really can’t be denied? Has she presented any evidence whatsoever that the election has been tampered with? I don’t think so.
Sadly, the democrat party is the 4th Reich - Nazis reborn in a globalist mold,
- democrats have a scapegoat based on race. Whites are the new "Juden."
- hers a nonsence statement
- democrats are collectivist, seeking control of the means of production by their Reich.
- hers a nonsence statement
- democrats are totalitarian. Well duh.
- and hers another nonsence statement
- democrats supplant civil rights with group privilege
- this one i'm still laughing
- democrats eradicate the rule of law and create dictatorship based on the party
- lets see now who was it that wante to remove the senates count on the election oh that was the orange turdseems you missed that one skippy and who was it that said he will remove the constitution, again the ornge turd skippy
oh I love these rants list that really shows nonsense well done skippy with your nonsense list
- democrats forcibly suppress religion
- The state is the god of the democrats....... now this one is funny it seems it is you republivan who have this war on religon because we dems respect all religions ,,, wherea we say happy holiday instead of saying merry christmas ... seem it is you republicans who are suppressing religions ... we dems just show respect to other religions and that pisses you off
- democrats crush freedom of speech ... now this one is even more funny skippy ...how has any dem crushed your free speech ... telling lies isn't free speech ... your statements has to be said as truth as you and others state it ...so tell us what free speech as and dem was stopped skippy ...
- Hate speech laws, political correctness, cancel culture.... again just sayin it doesn't make it true ... hate speech seem to come from the right seems its ok for the police to murder black people that ok by you... when we object its now it's hate seach ... not lying to the people that the election was fraudulent is politicial correctness seems you're a bit delusional ...what is cancel culture ... seem to be a phrase you righties use a lot but never tell us what culture we canceled ...
- democrats create a police state and "Roger Stone" enemies for even minor process crimes in order to create terror
- The Opposition Candidate for 2024 is polling well ahead of Biden, so he had his goons kick their door in.... roger stone you sure open a can of worms here
- Stone was found guilty of obstruction of a congressional investigation, five counts of making false statements to Congress, and tampering with a witness. The verdict followed a trial in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia. Stone faces a prison sentence of up to five years for counts one to six and up to 20 years for count seven. He will be sentenced on February 6, 2020, by the Honorable Amy Berman Jackson.
According to the government’s evidence, in January 2017, the United States House of Representatives Select Permanent Committee on Intelligence (“House Intelligence Committee”) announced an investigation into allegations of Russian interference in the 2016 U.S. presidential election, including allegations that Russia was involved in the publication of documents related to the presidential election by WikiLeaks in 2016. On September 26, 2017, in testimony to the Committee, Stone made a number of false statements relating to the identity of a person he had referred to in August 2016 as his “back-channel” or “intermediary” to the head of WikiLeaks; whether he had asked that person to do anything on his behalf; whether he had written communications with that person; whether he discussed that person with anyone involved with the Trump campaign; and whether he had written communications with third parties about the head of WikiLeaks. On October 13, 2017, Stone sent the House Intelligence Committee a letter falsely stating that the person he had referenced in August 2016 was an individual named Randy Credico. Stone then engaged in witness tampering by urging Credico either to corroborate this false account, or to tell the Committee that he could not remember the relevant events, or to invoke his Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination to avoid testifying before the Committee. Credico ultimately invoked his Fifth Amendment right in response to a Committee subpoena. In announcing the verdict, U.S. Attorney Liu and Assistant Director Slater acknowledged the work of the FBI agents involved in the investigation and prosecution of Stone, as well as the efforts of those who worked on the case from the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Columbia, including Assistant U.S. Attorneys Jonathan Kravis and Michael Marando, Special Assistant U.S. Attorneys Adam Jed and Aaron Zelinsky, and Paralegal Specialist Amanda Rohde of the Fraud and Public Corruption Section.
all I can say is you're a 100% red blooded republican nut case ... case closed skippySadly, the democrat party is the 4th Reich - Nazis reborn in a globalist mold,
- democrats have a scapegoat based on race. Whites are the new "Juden."
- democrats are collectivist, seeking control of the means of production by their Reich.
- democrats are totalitarian. Well duh.
- democrats supplant civil rights with group privilege
- democrats eradicate the rule of law and create dictatorship based on the party
- democrats forcibly suppress religion
- The state is the god of the democrats
- democrats crush freedom of speech
- Hate speech laws, political correctness, cancel culture
- democrats create a police state and "Roger Stone" enemies for even minor process crimes in order to create terror
- The Opposition Candidate for 2024 is polling well ahead of Biden, so he had his goons kick their door in.
have no idea what you mean by your reich prevailed it's a retarded response ...