CrusaderFrank
Diamond Member
- May 20, 2009
- 153,053
- 78,269
- 2,645
Because until now, Republicans allowed democrats to get away with itWhy is it that the only folks charged with voter fraud were Republicans?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Because until now, Republicans allowed democrats to get away with itWhy is it that the only folks charged with voter fraud were Republicans?
This is part of why the Dems are having a conniption.
That, and they can't live off the taxpayers anymore.
HBCUs = Historically Below Customary University Standards.My youngest granddaughter is in the doctoral program at a well known HBCU. She has been an A student ever since elementary school. And, yes, she takes after me. (Although I don't have a PHd). Smart and beautiful. It runs in our family.![]()
You don’t seriously think there is a federal database of voters, do you?
Yep, all good. Except he should have been jailed or deported for fraudulent use of the SSN since the feds obviously knew it was fraud and where he worked. Try looking at the whole post without blinders on.so she was paid on what she put in: good. The remainders was not hers: good. And you agree: good.
Are those the two cringiest politicians we have ever seen? Seriously, i challenge anyone to produce an example worse than these two fucktards.
Translation:I don’t suppose it occurs to any of these Trump morons that using fake SSN’s on job a—locations has been going on for 40 years.
If the machine that counts votes cannot detect the same SSN being used 10,000 times
Translation:
Long-term fraud is OK with you.
Murder has been going on since Cain and Able, but we still try to prosecute offenders.Translation:
Long-term fraud is OK with you.
What part of the system positively identifies the person at the polling place?All eligible citizens are fundamentally considered “registered to vote” as long as they are of the correct age and have not had their franchise removed. So it becomes less a question of “who” is eligible to vote, the only remaining question is “where” they are eligible to vote.
What part of the system positively identifies the person at the polling place?
Then let the court so adjudicate, if so.Yep, all good. Except he should have been jailed or deported for fraudulent use of the SSN since the feds obviously knew it was fraud and where he worked. Try looking at the whole post without blinders on.
That is the problem. The court can't adjudicate if a corrupt leftist regime won't prosecute.Then let the court so adjudicate, if so.
But are on your ticket? Nah.
Then let this admin prosecute. I guarantee you the next Dem admin is going to show you what your 'lawfare' really is.That is the problem. The court can't adjudicate if a corrupt leftist regime won't prosecute.
Hopefully this admin will. Your last Dem admin showed what "lawfare" really is.Then let this admin prosecute. I guarantee you the next Dem admin is going to show you what your 'lawfare' really is.
IMHO - pertaining to federal election - there should be.
PREMISE:
The current model of “voter” registration is a carryover from the British system established during the birth of our country and was based on a time when:
During those times the idea of “Voter Registration” being localized made sense as the vast majority of the population was born, lived, and died in the same 100 mile circle.
- The main mode of transportation was shanks mare (feet)
- Cargo was moved by horse drawn wagons
- It could take days and multiple riders for information to travel from the State Capital to any point in the state and weeks if information needed to move from one end of the country to another (say Maine to Florida). As the country expanded that time could be measured in months (east coast to west coast).
That time is passed, we now live in the age of a highly mobile society with instant communications. Hell sitting here on the east coast I can pick up a phone, punch in a few numbers and be talking with my daughter stationed in Japan.
RECOMMENDATION:
Therefore I think it’s time to fundamentally change the core concept of “Voter Registration” from the current model of registering to vote and having to prove you are eligible to being automatically an eligible voter unless the franchised is removed for a reason (felony, death, mental incapacity, etc.).
This fundamental shift from “having to register to vote” to “eligible voter” would be based on the integration of various sources of information into a central clearing house that all states would be required to participate in for election for federal offices. If they decided to maintain a separate parallel system for state/local elections, they would be free to do so.
All eligible citizens are fundamentally considered “registered to vote” as long as they are of the correct age and have not had their franchise removed. So it becomes less a question of “who” is eligible to vote, the only remaining question is “where” they are eligible to vote.
This “Voter Electronic Eligibility Center” system would include:
Because of the data integration between the various agencies, the idea “voter eligibility” is shifted. There are no “purging the roles” based on inactivity. All citizens are considered active voters.
- Real time access to voter eligibility information via an encrypted secure network to state and local boards of election.
- State and local boards would be able to download voters whose address falls within their jurisdiction.
- State and local officials would have access to querying and updating individual statuses.
- Information would be integrated from various sources which provide input into the system.
- State Department responsible for vital records - births, deaths, etc.
- State Department of Taxation – current address, change of Address
- State Department of Motor Vehicles – current address, change of address
- State Departments of State – Court actions and restoration of franchise after removed by court action
- United States Postal Service – National valid addresses, change of address
- Social Security Administration – births deaths, etc.
- Federal Department of State – naturalization of new citizens
- The various Felony level courts at both the State and Federal level – removal of the franchise via felony conviction
Where you vote then becomes a function of your primary legal address (of which you will only have one). If you move, that address change will automatically be fed into the system and your information would be downloaded to the local elections office.
When you are born, you are automatically registered into the system and become “eligible to vote” at your 18th birthday. You just have to wait to get there of course.
If you die, when that death is registered it is automatically communicated to the VEEC making you ineligible to vote.
Now in my humble opinion, it would take 10-15 years for such a system. First you need funding. Then the IT experts and Database geeks are going to have to map out the secure communication systems and data interface software that will function between agencies. Then you are going to need a few years each of “Alpha” and “Beta” testing before it can really go live. But once all the players are in place it could really streamline what we view as “voter registration” making it so much easier for (a) us as individuals and (b) for the voting process in general.
WW
You will never get Republicans...
Did you see his response?You will never get Republicans to agree to any kind of national election management.
An ITIN is 10 digits. Easly distinguished as its first digit is always 9.No...they don't give them a SSN, they give them an ITIN. Though, I'm not sure how much difference there really is
Racist much?HBCUs = Historically Below Customary University Standards.