Hateful divisiveness of intolerant Left

[Lisa558]

I did go on to grad school.

What makes me considerably better at what I do than my peers who did is my reading skills.

You'll be shocked to learn how useful reading a lot of very good fiction is.

That’s the difference.

But anyone who plans to stop with a bachelors degree should NOT major in 19th c. Russian Studies. Or American History. Or English Lit. Or Ethnic Studies

 

[The5thHorseman]

That’s the difference.

But anyone who plans to stop with a bachelors degree should NOT major in 19th c. Russian Studies. Or American History. Or English Lit. Or Ethnic Studies

Why?

Someone has to write the recipes you've memorizing.

 

[surada]

I have a family full of them. My family in the midwest was poor and uneducated and continue along that track today.
I outgrew both decades ago.

Pretending to be wise, they became fools. - The Holy Bible

No you didn't. You're trying to impose your religious beliefs on people who don't agree with you. You didn't outgrow the lack of education.

 

[Lisa558]

Why?

Someone has to write the recipes you've memorizing.

Because people that have degrees in useless majors end up being able to support themselves, and then the prudent people have to pay for their “help” - including paying off a portion of their loans.

 

[The5thHorseman]

Because people that have degrees in useless majors end up being able to support themselves, and then the prudent people have to pay for their “help” - including paying off a portion of their loans.

I'm sure you meant "not being able", but were too eager to rebleat more talking point.

 

[Lastamender]

I'm sure you meant "not being able", but were too eager to rebleat more talking point.

Have you thought about the demands of trannies in the new government you are creating. They will not be met. They and gays are being used to destroy this country along with drug addicted academics. What do you think will happen when they are no longer useful?

Can you name one Communist country with gay rights?

 

[Lisa558]

Have you thought about the demands of trannies in the new government you are creating. They will not be met. They and gays are being used to destroy this country along with drug addicted academics. What do you think will happen when they are no longer useful?

Can you name one Communist country with gay rights?

What we happen to the trannies and gays is that they’ll be tossed aside like yesterday’s news - which they will be.

 

[ChemEngineer]

"Gay" is a one-word oxymoron. There is nothing "gay" about these bitter, grooming pedophiles who are extremely violent overall.
There are at least nine of the most prolific mass murderers in U.S. history who were homosexual.
They live dramatically shortened lifetimes, on average, for their chosen disease-ridden lifestyles.
The average homosexual pedophile molester has had 150 victims.
The Boy Scouts have 82,000 and have paid billions of dollars in settlements to them.

Another related one-word oxymoron is "feminist." There is nothing "feminine" about a "feminist."
In general they are ugly, fat, manly, hateful, and hate men, thought strangely enough, man try to look like a man.

 

[Orangecat]

I was a 19th Cent. Russian Studies major.

Lucrative career, that. Are you waiting for someone else to pay off your loan?

 

[Unkotare]

...

I was a 19th Cent. Russian Studies major.

Wow, you must be really old.

 

[The5thHorseman]

Wow, you must be really old.

Chronologically, perhaps.

 

[The5thHorseman]

Lucrative career, that. Are you waiting for someone else to pay off your loan?

I'm the one people go to when they struggle to understand the crap some white shoe partner has cobbled together.....or a complex investment thesis.

Did you work in HR?

 

[Orangecat]

I'm the one people go to when they struggle to understand the crap some white shoe partner has cobbled together.....or a complex investment thesis.

The only thing people would come to you for is nonsensical word salads, obviously.

Did you work in HR?

Nunya.

 

[The5thHorseman]

The only thing people would come to you for is nonsensical word salads, obviously.


Nunya.

That's better.

 

[The5thHorseman]

Have you thought about the demands of trannies in the new government you are creating. They will not be met. They and gays are being used to destroy this country along with drug addicted academics. What do you think will happen when they are no longer useful?

Can you name one Communist country with gay rights?

I don't feel compelled to address your fears.

Can you provide any data?

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

We have seen the Hateful divHateful divisiveness of intolerant Leftisiveness of intolerant Right

 

[ChemEngineer]

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=28022

Why I am not a liberal

By James Farah


Editor's note: WorldNetDaily Editor, Chief Executive Officer and daily columnist Joseph Farah is working
on a new book set for release in early 2003 called "Taking America Back," delineating the problems the
country faces and their solutions. In the meantime, you may wish to consider purchasing his most recent
book, "This Land Is Our Land."

© 2002 WorldNetDaily.com


When you write a treatise titled, "Why I am not a conservative," and follow it up with one titled,
"Why I am not a libertarian," you are, according to popular demand, obligated to publish a third
discourse titled, "Why I am not a liberal."


This may prove to be the toughest challenge of all. For me, it is like explaining why I am not a
communist, or why I am not a Nazi. Where does one begin? I've never been mistaken for a liberal.


Let's start here: Liberalism, as we know it in the United States in 2002, is an evil ideology
inflicting massive suffering, misery, injustice, oppression and death wherever it gains power
and influence.


You will notice I never use "liberal" or "liberalism" as an epithet. I rarely use the term at
all, because I believe it is a misnomer and a label that is widely misunderstood. But, for the
purposes of this column – and this column alone – I am going to critique liberalism just as I
critiqued conservatism and libertarianism.

Liberalism is the dominant ideology in Washington, D.C., today – no matter which
political party runs the White House or Congress. Liberalism controls the Republican Party only to
a slightly lesser degree than it controls the Democrats.

Liberalism proffers that it is a good idea to forcibly take the wealth and property rightfully
and legally acquired by one party and redistribute it to others. Of course, liberals always
take a sizable cut of the transaction for themselves – sometime as much as 80 percent.

My friend Walter Williams accurately describes this process as "legalized theft." There is no better
way to explain it. Legalized theft is the central creed of liberalism. Liberalism is not possible
without it. All manner of justifications and rationalizations are made for this process – the
greater good, helping the poor, leveling the playing field. No matter what you call it, theft is
theft.

But theft is only the beginning of the evil liberals spread.
Liberalism also kills.

It kills in a thousand different ways. Let me give you a few:

Since the 1973 Roe v. Wade Supreme Court ruling, more than 30 million unborn babies
have been killed in America. Liberals, in general, seem to have more respect and
reverence for bald eagle eggs than unborn humans.

By actively working to disarm the American population, in direct violation of
the U.S. Constitution, liberals condemn the defenseless to death – often at the hands of
criminals they help spring from prison.

Through opposition to missile defense and civil defense, liberals leave the entire
civilian population open to annihilation at the hands of a nuclear-armed madman, an
accidental launch by a nuclear power and terrorist attacks.

Through over-deployment of the armed forces all over the world and wars like
Vietnam, liberals kill U.S. soldiers and foreign soldiers and civilians without so
much as a care about the constitutional basis for their actions.

Liberalism is less an ideology than utopian wishful thinking. It cares not about the actual
results of its policies, only about doing something. The "something" that it does always
empowers government at the expense of people.

Liberalism, as we know it today, is simply a new name for an old-fashioned idea formerly known
as socialism. It stands on its head the basic concept of liberty as the Founding Fathers
thought of it. Liberals think the government that governs most, governs best.

The sheer volume of laws it passes is staggering.
No one has the time to read them, let alone live by them. Yet, each new law is another nail in the
coffin of a free society.

Liberalism believes government is the best vehicle for solving problems – not the worst, not
the course of last resort.

Government is the god of liberalism. And that's why I am in no danger of being mistaken for one.
My god is God.

 

[BackAgain]

For all your prattle about Stanford, it remains the most sought after admission in the world.

I was a 19th Cent. Russian Studies major.

No wonder you’re so abysmally ignorant.

 

[The5thHorseman]

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=28022

Why I am not a liberal

By James Farah


Editor's note: WorldNetDaily Editor, Chief Executive Officer and daily columnist Joseph Farah is working
on a new book set for release in early 2003 called "Taking America Back," delineating the problems the
country faces and their solutions. In the meantime, you may wish to consider purchasing his most recent
book, "This Land Is Our Land."

© 2002 WorldNetDaily.com


When you write a treatise titled, "Why I am not a conservative," and follow it up with one titled,
"Why I am not a libertarian," you are, according to popular demand, obligated to publish a third
discourse titled, "Why I am not a liberal."


This may prove to be the toughest challenge of all. For me, it is like explaining why I am not a
communist, or why I am not a Nazi. Where does one begin? I've never been mistaken for a liberal.


Let's start here: Liberalism, as we know it in the United States in 2002, is an evil ideology
inflicting massive suffering, misery, injustice, oppression and death wherever it gains power
and influence.


You will notice I never use "liberal" or "liberalism" as an epithet. I rarely use the term at
all, because I believe it is a misnomer and a label that is widely misunderstood. But, for the
purposes of this column – and this column alone – I am going to critique liberalism just as I
critiqued conservatism and libertarianism.

Liberalism is the dominant ideology in Washington, D.C., today – no matter which
political party runs the White House or Congress. Liberalism controls the Republican Party only to
a slightly lesser degree than it controls the Democrats.

Liberalism proffers that it is a good idea to forcibly take the wealth and property rightfully
and legally acquired by one party and redistribute it to others. Of course, liberals always
take a sizable cut of the transaction for themselves – sometime as much as 80 percent.

My friend Walter Williams accurately describes this process as "legalized theft." There is no better
way to explain it. Legalized theft is the central creed of liberalism. Liberalism is not possible
without it. All manner of justifications and rationalizations are made for this process – the
greater good, helping the poor, leveling the playing field. No matter what you call it, theft is
theft.

But theft is only the beginning of the evil liberals spread.
Liberalism also kills.

It kills in a thousand different ways. Let me give you a few:

Since the 1973 Roe v. Wade Supreme Court ruling, more than 30 million unborn babies
have been killed in America. Liberals, in general, seem to have more respect and
reverence for bald eagle eggs than unborn humans.

By actively working to disarm the American population, in direct violation of
the U.S. Constitution, liberals condemn the defenseless to death – often at the hands of
criminals they help spring from prison.

Through opposition to missile defense and civil defense, liberals leave the entire
civilian population open to annihilation at the hands of a nuclear-armed madman, an
accidental launch by a nuclear power and terrorist attacks.

Through over-deployment of the armed forces all over the world and wars like
Vietnam, liberals kill U.S. soldiers and foreign soldiers and civilians without so
much as a care about the constitutional basis for their actions.

Liberalism is less an ideology than utopian wishful thinking. It cares not about the actual
results of its policies, only about doing something. The "something" that it does always
empowers government at the expense of people.

Liberalism, as we know it today, is simply a new name for an old-fashioned idea formerly known
as socialism. It stands on its head the basic concept of liberty as the Founding Fathers
thought of it. Liberals think the government that governs most, governs best.

The sheer volume of laws it passes is staggering.
No one has the time to read them, let alone live by them. Yet, each new law is another nail in the
coffin of a free society.

Liberalism believes government is the best vehicle for solving problems – not the worst, not
the course of last resort.

Government is the god of liberalism. And that's why I am in no danger of being mistaken for one.
My god is God.

What a steaming pile.

 

[The5thHorseman]

No wonder you’re so abysmally ignorant.

Easy, FlyOver...

You know you aren't up for the test.