Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Do you know that there is never a penalty to Godvernment agents LYING to citizens?So I take it death angel that you'd be opposed to the FBI using the crime of lying to agents in order squeeze cooperation from an aider of a terrorist of child pornographerI'm not a liberal and it's not "entrapment." The OP link said even an FBI higher up (forgot who and am not going back) asked "are we investigating a crime here, or just trying to get 'a lie'" Flynn was the focking Natl Sec Advisor to the President, and he was also a foreign representative. If the FBI was investigating Flynn and Turkey in relation to how he advised the President, and he lied …. I'd say drop him in a deep and dark and unfriendly hole. What he did was arguably worse the Snowden or Chelsea Manning.For this reason, no REAL liberal should ever support a law that criminalizes "lying" to investigators. It becomes their immediate goal from the start. If they can get someone to lie (or even appear to have lied) they can abuse that person to no end. It is the very essence of entrapment and that law MUST go.He may well have pled just to get the Feds to stop racking him, but that doesn't mean he didn't lie to FBI agents. He did. What Barr/Turley are saying is that the FBI's reason to interview Flynn was primarily to get him to lie, and this would create a tool for the FBI to squeeze Flynn by giving him a choice between financial ruin for his family or to betray Trump.
Not because I give a particular shit about a life-long Democrat like Flynn. Rather, I care about liberty. This power given to the FBI is way too easy to abuse.
Until that law is repealed, I will NEVER cooperate with the fucking suits without a hand-signed guarantee letter of absolute lifetime immunity from the FBI director him/herself. Even then, I might be hesitant. They can KISS MY ASS otherwise!!!
.
But the FBI already know the facts of what Flynn had done to dishonor himself and potentially harm the country.
When push comes to shove on this issue, the question is whether the FBI's underhanded tricks would bother you if they used them to lock up a child pornographer or even get a terrorist aider to flip.
Flynn's "entrapment" claim is basically: you had other evidence that let you determine the falsity of my statements, so you should never have asked me about those events in the first place. It's not my fault for lying, it's your fault for forcing me to lie by... Doing diligent investigative work...?Then why did he plead guilty?
Michael Flynn case should be dismissed to preserve justice
Some more documents reveal an unlawful reason for this case.thehill.com
Great timing !!!!!!!
From the article:
Previously undisclosed documents in the case of former national security adviser Michael Flynn offer us a chilling blueprint on how top FBI officials not only sought to entrap the former White House aide but sought to do so on such blatantly unconstitutional and manufactured grounds.
These new documents further undermine the view of both the legitimacy and motivations of those investigations under former FBI director James Comey. For all of those who have long seen a concerted effort within the Justice Department to target the Trump administration, the fragments will read like a Dead Sea Scrolls version of a “deep state” conspiracy.
***********************
Left wing ambush artists....fuck all of them.
It's calle EXTORTION, dumbass.
Michael Flynn case should be dismissed to preserve justice
Some more documents reveal an unlawful reason for this case.
Great timing !!!!!!!
From the article:
Previously undisclosed documents in the case of former national security adviser Michael Flynn offer us a chilling blueprint on how top FBI officials not only sought to entrap the former White House aide but sought to do so on such blatantly unconstitutional and manufactured grounds.
These new documents further undermine the view of both the legitimacy and motivations of those investigations under former FBI director James Comey. For all of those who have long seen a concerted effort within the Justice Department to target the Trump administration, the fragments will read like a Dead Sea Scrolls version of a “deep state” conspiracy.
***********************
Left wing ambush artists....fuck all of them.
No. Flynn TWICE under oath admitted he broke the law by lying to investigators. You're lying, not me.Do you know that there is never a penalty to Godvernment agents LYING to citizens?So I take it death angel that you'd be opposed to the FBI using the crime of lying to agents in order squeeze cooperation from an aider of a terrorist of child pornographerI'm not a liberal and it's not "entrapment." The OP link said even an FBI higher up (forgot who and am not going back) asked "are we investigating a crime here, or just trying to get 'a lie'" Flynn was the focking Natl Sec Advisor to the President, and he was also a foreign representative. If the FBI was investigating Flynn and Turkey in relation to how he advised the President, and he lied …. I'd say drop him in a deep and dark and unfriendly hole. What he did was arguably worse the Snowden or Chelsea Manning.For this reason, no REAL liberal should ever support a law that criminalizes "lying" to investigators. It becomes their immediate goal from the start. If they can get someone to lie (or even appear to have lied) they can abuse that person to no end. It is the very essence of entrapment and that law MUST go.He may well have pled just to get the Feds to stop racking him, but that doesn't mean he didn't lie to FBI agents. He did. What Barr/Turley are saying is that the FBI's reason to interview Flynn was primarily to get him to lie, and this would create a tool for the FBI to squeeze Flynn by giving him a choice between financial ruin for his family or to betray Trump.
Not because I give a particular shit about a life-long Democrat like Flynn. Rather, I care about liberty. This power given to the FBI is way too easy to abuse.
Until that law is repealed, I will NEVER cooperate with the fucking suits without a hand-signed guarantee letter of absolute lifetime immunity from the FBI director him/herself. Even then, I might be hesitant. They can KISS MY ASS otherwise!!!
.
But the FBI already know the facts of what Flynn had done to dishonor himself and potentially harm the country.
When push comes to shove on this issue, the question is whether the FBI's underhanded tricks would bother you if they used them to lock up a child pornographer or even get a terrorist aider to flip.
Dont you see a problem there?
Btw, HE DIDNT LIE. He pled guilty to protect his son.
When a Godvernment with UNLIMITED RESOURCES comes against YOU, you cannot win.
Playing stupid on this is destroying your party with the few moderates you have left.
ROFL! Yeah, like you wouldn't have done the same thing if you were in a similar position. You are a terminal hypocrite.Well, now that may influence his decision to do what should not be done, thank you. Flynn seems to have had a weak character to begin with.Then why did he plead guilty?Michael Flynn case should be dismissed to preserve justice
Some more documents reveal an unlawful reason for this case.
Great timing !!!!!!!
From the article:
Previously undisclosed documents in the case of former national security adviser Michael Flynn offer us a chilling blueprint on how top FBI officials not only sought to entrap the former White House aide but sought to do so on such blatantly unconstitutional and manufactured grounds.
These new documents further undermine the view of both the legitimacy and motivations of those investigations under former FBI director James Comey. For all of those who have long seen a concerted effort within the Justice Department to target the Trump administration, the fragments will read like a Dead Sea Scrolls version of a “deep state” conspiracy.
***********************
Left wing ambush artists....fuck all of them.
It's calle EXTORTION, dumbass.
You mean he was forced to say that, dumbfuck. Statements made under duress aren't worth the paper they are written on. If I held a gun to your head and told you to sign over the dead to your property, would that mean I own it?No. Flynn TWICE under oath admitted he broke the law by lying to investigators. You're lying, not me.Do you know that there is never a penalty to Godvernment agents LYING to citizens?So I take it death angel that you'd be opposed to the FBI using the crime of lying to agents in order squeeze cooperation from an aider of a terrorist of child pornographerI'm not a liberal and it's not "entrapment." The OP link said even an FBI higher up (forgot who and am not going back) asked "are we investigating a crime here, or just trying to get 'a lie'" Flynn was the focking Natl Sec Advisor to the President, and he was also a foreign representative. If the FBI was investigating Flynn and Turkey in relation to how he advised the President, and he lied …. I'd say drop him in a deep and dark and unfriendly hole. What he did was arguably worse the Snowden or Chelsea Manning.For this reason, no REAL liberal should ever support a law that criminalizes "lying" to investigators. It becomes their immediate goal from the start. If they can get someone to lie (or even appear to have lied) they can abuse that person to no end. It is the very essence of entrapment and that law MUST go.He may well have pled just to get the Feds to stop racking him, but that doesn't mean he didn't lie to FBI agents. He did. What Barr/Turley are saying is that the FBI's reason to interview Flynn was primarily to get him to lie, and this would create a tool for the FBI to squeeze Flynn by giving him a choice between financial ruin for his family or to betray Trump.
Not because I give a particular shit about a life-long Democrat like Flynn. Rather, I care about liberty. This power given to the FBI is way too easy to abuse.
Until that law is repealed, I will NEVER cooperate with the fucking suits without a hand-signed guarantee letter of absolute lifetime immunity from the FBI director him/herself. Even then, I might be hesitant. They can KISS MY ASS otherwise!!!
.
But the FBI already know the facts of what Flynn had done to dishonor himself and potentially harm the country.
When push comes to shove on this issue, the question is whether the FBI's underhanded tricks would bother you if they used them to lock up a child pornographer or even get a terrorist aider to flip.
Dont you see a problem there?
Btw, HE DIDNT LIE. He pled guilty to protect his son.
When a Godvernment with UNLIMITED RESOURCES comes against YOU, you cannot win.
Playing stupid on this is destroying your party with the few moderates you have left.
I personally agree that in this instance, the FBI interviewed him in HOPING that he'd lie, because they wanted to see if he'd tell them if Trump conspired with Vlad.
My question is whether it's ok for the FBI to interview a person suspected of aiding a terrorist or child pornographer hoping to catch a lie and use that to squeeze cooperation out of the liar. You appear to say it shouldn't be done. And I admit I'm all in favor of the FBI jamming it up these guys because I don't see another way to get the bad guys.
To protect his son. Does that make him an asshole or a good father? Flynn did what every good father would do. He's a freakin hero who should be treated as such. I understand Democrats prefer victims to heroes buy WTF is real? .Then why did he plead guilty?Michael Flynn case should be dismissed to preserve justice
Some more documents reveal an unlawful reason for this case.
Great timing !!!!!!!
From the article:
Previously undisclosed documents in the case of former national security adviser Michael Flynn offer us a chilling blueprint on how top FBI officials not only sought to entrap the former White House aide but sought to do so on such blatantly unconstitutional and manufactured grounds.
These new documents further undermine the view of both the legitimacy and motivations of those investigations under former FBI director James Comey. For all of those who have long seen a concerted effort within the Justice Department to target the Trump administration, the fragments will read like a Dead Sea Scrolls version of a “deep state” conspiracy.
***********************
Left wing ambush artists....fuck all of them.
About you need to know about your Flynn.________Flynn is a traitor.
Could you elaborate?
I doubt it. Yours is the typical child-like playground remark customary for the Democrats/Bolsheviks who post on this board---likely from being educated in the Teacher Union controlled public schools of rotting cities in the North.
But if you do elaborate---if you undertake to show how this 33 year decorated combat veteran three star general is a "traitor"----You need to come with facts and documentation. Or I am going to assume you are a half-wit goddamn liar.
You won't hear a peep.
About the best they have is that he disagreed on Islamic Policy with Obama.
These idiots don't have enough brain power to make their lungs function.Do you know that there is never a penalty to Godvernment agents LYING to citizens?So I take it death angel that you'd be opposed to the FBI using the crime of lying to agents in order squeeze cooperation from an aider of a terrorist of child pornographerI'm not a liberal and it's not "entrapment." The OP link said even an FBI higher up (forgot who and am not going back) asked "are we investigating a crime here, or just trying to get 'a lie'" Flynn was the focking Natl Sec Advisor to the President, and he was also a foreign representative. If the FBI was investigating Flynn and Turkey in relation to how he advised the President, and he lied …. I'd say drop him in a deep and dark and unfriendly hole. What he did was arguably worse the Snowden or Chelsea Manning.For this reason, no REAL liberal should ever support a law that criminalizes "lying" to investigators. It becomes their immediate goal from the start. If they can get someone to lie (or even appear to have lied) they can abuse that person to no end. It is the very essence of entrapment and that law MUST go.He may well have pled just to get the Feds to stop racking him, but that doesn't mean he didn't lie to FBI agents. He did. What Barr/Turley are saying is that the FBI's reason to interview Flynn was primarily to get him to lie, and this would create a tool for the FBI to squeeze Flynn by giving him a choice between financial ruin for his family or to betray Trump.
Not because I give a particular shit about a life-long Democrat like Flynn. Rather, I care about liberty. This power given to the FBI is way too easy to abuse.
Until that law is repealed, I will NEVER cooperate with the fucking suits without a hand-signed guarantee letter of absolute lifetime immunity from the FBI director him/herself. Even then, I might be hesitant. They can KISS MY ASS otherwise!!!
.
But the FBI already know the facts of what Flynn had done to dishonor himself and potentially harm the country.
When push comes to shove on this issue, the question is whether the FBI's underhanded tricks would bother you if they used them to lock up a child pornographer or even get a terrorist aider to flip.
Dont you see a problem there?
Btw, HE DIDNT LIE. He pled guilty to protect his son.
When a Godvernment with UNLIMITED RESOURCES comes against YOU, you cannot win.
Playing stupid on this is destroying your party with the few moderates you have left.
LOL! And you are still a screaming little Buffoon on the Interwebs. Still.You mean he was forced to say that, dumbfuck. Statements made under duress aren't worth the paper they are written on. If I held a gun to your head and told you to sign over the dead to your property, would that mean I own it?No. Flynn TWICE under oath admitted he broke the law by lying to investigators. You're lying, not me.Do you know that there is never a penalty to Godvernment agents LYING to citizens?So I take it death angel that you'd be opposed to the FBI using the crime of lying to agents in order squeeze cooperation from an aider of a terrorist of child pornographerI'm not a liberal and it's not "entrapment." The OP link said even an FBI higher up (forgot who and am not going back) asked "are we investigating a crime here, or just trying to get 'a lie'" Flynn was the focking Natl Sec Advisor to the President, and he was also a foreign representative. If the FBI was investigating Flynn and Turkey in relation to how he advised the President, and he lied …. I'd say drop him in a deep and dark and unfriendly hole. What he did was arguably worse the Snowden or Chelsea Manning.For this reason, no REAL liberal should ever support a law that criminalizes "lying" to investigators. It becomes their immediate goal from the start. If they can get someone to lie (or even appear to have lied) they can abuse that person to no end. It is the very essence of entrapment and that law MUST go.He may well have pled just to get the Feds to stop racking him, but that doesn't mean he didn't lie to FBI agents. He did. What Barr/Turley are saying is that the FBI's reason to interview Flynn was primarily to get him to lie, and this would create a tool for the FBI to squeeze Flynn by giving him a choice between financial ruin for his family or to betray Trump.
Not because I give a particular shit about a life-long Democrat like Flynn. Rather, I care about liberty. This power given to the FBI is way too easy to abuse.
Until that law is repealed, I will NEVER cooperate with the fucking suits without a hand-signed guarantee letter of absolute lifetime immunity from the FBI director him/herself. Even then, I might be hesitant. They can KISS MY ASS otherwise!!!
.
But the FBI already know the facts of what Flynn had done to dishonor himself and potentially harm the country.
When push comes to shove on this issue, the question is whether the FBI's underhanded tricks would bother you if they used them to lock up a child pornographer or even get a terrorist aider to flip.
Dont you see a problem there?
Btw, HE DIDNT LIE. He pled guilty to protect his son.
When a Godvernment with UNLIMITED RESOURCES comes against YOU, you cannot win.
Playing stupid on this is destroying your party with the few moderates you have left.
I personally agree that in this instance, the FBI interviewed him in HOPING that he'd lie, because they wanted to see if he'd tell them if Trump conspired with Vlad.
My question is whether it's ok for the FBI to interview a person suspected of aiding a terrorist or child pornographer hoping to catch a lie and use that to squeeze cooperation out of the liar. You appear to say it shouldn't be done. And I admit I'm all in favor of the FBI jamming it up these guys because I don't see another way to get the bad guys.
You Trump haters are terminally stupid.
Apparently that does not include you.
Looks like Jebuz loves you and Obama.________Flynn is a traitor.
Could you elaborate?
I doubt it. Yours is the typical child-like playground remark customary for the Democrats/Bolsheviks who post on this board---likely from being educated in the Teacher Union controlled public schools of rotting cities in the North.
But if you do elaborate---if you undertake to show how this 33 year decorated combat veteran three star general is a "traitor"----You need to come with facts and documentation. Or I am going to assume you are a half-wit goddamn liar.
You won't hear a peep.
About the best they have is that he disagreed on Islamic Policy with Obama.
Did you have a point of some kind?LOL! And you are still a screaming little Buffoon on the Interwebs. Still.You mean he was forced to say that, dumbfuck. Statements made under duress aren't worth the paper they are written on. If I held a gun to your head and told you to sign over the dead to your property, would that mean I own it?No. Flynn TWICE under oath admitted he broke the law by lying to investigators. You're lying, not me.Do you know that there is never a penalty to Godvernment agents LYING to citizens?So I take it death angel that you'd be opposed to the FBI using the crime of lying to agents in order squeeze cooperation from an aider of a terrorist of child pornographerI'm not a liberal and it's not "entrapment." The OP link said even an FBI higher up (forgot who and am not going back) asked "are we investigating a crime here, or just trying to get 'a lie'" Flynn was the focking Natl Sec Advisor to the President, and he was also a foreign representative. If the FBI was investigating Flynn and Turkey in relation to how he advised the President, and he lied …. I'd say drop him in a deep and dark and unfriendly hole. What he did was arguably worse the Snowden or Chelsea Manning.For this reason, no REAL liberal should ever support a law that criminalizes "lying" to investigators. It becomes their immediate goal from the start. If they can get someone to lie (or even appear to have lied) they can abuse that person to no end. It is the very essence of entrapment and that law MUST go.He may well have pled just to get the Feds to stop racking him, but that doesn't mean he didn't lie to FBI agents. He did. What Barr/Turley are saying is that the FBI's reason to interview Flynn was primarily to get him to lie, and this would create a tool for the FBI to squeeze Flynn by giving him a choice between financial ruin for his family or to betray Trump.
Not because I give a particular shit about a life-long Democrat like Flynn. Rather, I care about liberty. This power given to the FBI is way too easy to abuse.
Until that law is repealed, I will NEVER cooperate with the fucking suits without a hand-signed guarantee letter of absolute lifetime immunity from the FBI director him/herself. Even then, I might be hesitant. They can KISS MY ASS otherwise!!!
.
But the FBI already know the facts of what Flynn had done to dishonor himself and potentially harm the country.
When push comes to shove on this issue, the question is whether the FBI's underhanded tricks would bother you if they used them to lock up a child pornographer or even get a terrorist aider to flip.
Dont you see a problem there?
Btw, HE DIDNT LIE. He pled guilty to protect his son.
When a Godvernment with UNLIMITED RESOURCES comes against YOU, you cannot win.
Playing stupid on this is destroying your party with the few moderates you have left.
I personally agree that in this instance, the FBI interviewed him in HOPING that he'd lie, because they wanted to see if he'd tell them if Trump conspired with Vlad.
My question is whether it's ok for the FBI to interview a person suspected of aiding a terrorist or child pornographer hoping to catch a lie and use that to squeeze cooperation out of the liar. You appear to say it shouldn't be done. And I admit I'm all in favor of the FBI jamming it up these guys because I don't see another way to get the bad guys.
You Trump haters are terminally stupid.
How them coal jobs doin? What's the unemployment rate? Where's them infrastructure jobs?
Trump Loyalists are terminally stupid. Which is you.
Yeah. Go paint a fucking wall, moron.Did you have a point of some kind?LOL! And you are still a screaming little Buffoon on the Interwebs. Still.You mean he was forced to say that, dumbfuck. Statements made under duress aren't worth the paper they are written on. If I held a gun to your head and told you to sign over the dead to your property, would that mean I own it?No. Flynn TWICE under oath admitted he broke the law by lying to investigators. You're lying, not me.Do you know that there is never a penalty to Godvernment agents LYING to citizens?So I take it death angel that you'd be opposed to the FBI using the crime of lying to agents in order squeeze cooperation from an aider of a terrorist of child pornographerI'm not a liberal and it's not "entrapment." The OP link said even an FBI higher up (forgot who and am not going back) asked "are we investigating a crime here, or just trying to get 'a lie'" Flynn was the focking Natl Sec Advisor to the President, and he was also a foreign representative. If the FBI was investigating Flynn and Turkey in relation to how he advised the President, and he lied …. I'd say drop him in a deep and dark and unfriendly hole. What he did was arguably worse the Snowden or Chelsea Manning.For this reason, no REAL liberal should ever support a law that criminalizes "lying" to investigators. It becomes their immediate goal from the start. If they can get someone to lie (or even appear to have lied) they can abuse that person to no end. It is the very essence of entrapment and that law MUST go.He may well have pled just to get the Feds to stop racking him, but that doesn't mean he didn't lie to FBI agents. He did. What Barr/Turley are saying is that the FBI's reason to interview Flynn was primarily to get him to lie, and this would create a tool for the FBI to squeeze Flynn by giving him a choice between financial ruin for his family or to betray Trump.
Not because I give a particular shit about a life-long Democrat like Flynn. Rather, I care about liberty. This power given to the FBI is way too easy to abuse.
Until that law is repealed, I will NEVER cooperate with the fucking suits without a hand-signed guarantee letter of absolute lifetime immunity from the FBI director him/herself. Even then, I might be hesitant. They can KISS MY ASS otherwise!!!
.
But the FBI already know the facts of what Flynn had done to dishonor himself and potentially harm the country.
When push comes to shove on this issue, the question is whether the FBI's underhanded tricks would bother you if they used them to lock up a child pornographer or even get a terrorist aider to flip.
Dont you see a problem there?
Btw, HE DIDNT LIE. He pled guilty to protect his son.
When a Godvernment with UNLIMITED RESOURCES comes against YOU, you cannot win.
Playing stupid on this is destroying your party with the few moderates you have left.
I personally agree that in this instance, the FBI interviewed him in HOPING that he'd lie, because they wanted to see if he'd tell them if Trump conspired with Vlad.
My question is whether it's ok for the FBI to interview a person suspected of aiding a terrorist or child pornographer hoping to catch a lie and use that to squeeze cooperation out of the liar. You appear to say it shouldn't be done. And I admit I'm all in favor of the FBI jamming it up these guys because I don't see another way to get the bad guys.
You Trump haters are terminally stupid.
How them coal jobs doin? What's the unemployment rate? Where's them infrastructure jobs?
Trump Loyalists are terminally stupid. Which is you.
Just as I thought: no point.Yeah. Go paint a fucking wall, moron.Did you have a point of some kind?LOL! And you are still a screaming little Buffoon on the Interwebs. Still.You mean he was forced to say that, dumbfuck. Statements made under duress aren't worth the paper they are written on. If I held a gun to your head and told you to sign over the dead to your property, would that mean I own it?No. Flynn TWICE under oath admitted he broke the law by lying to investigators. You're lying, not me.Do you know that there is never a penalty to Godvernment agents LYING to citizens?So I take it death angel that you'd be opposed to the FBI using the crime of lying to agents in order squeeze cooperation from an aider of a terrorist of child pornographerI'm not a liberal and it's not "entrapment." The OP link said even an FBI higher up (forgot who and am not going back) asked "are we investigating a crime here, or just trying to get 'a lie'" Flynn was the focking Natl Sec Advisor to the President, and he was also a foreign representative. If the FBI was investigating Flynn and Turkey in relation to how he advised the President, and he lied …. I'd say drop him in a deep and dark and unfriendly hole. What he did was arguably worse the Snowden or Chelsea Manning.For this reason, no REAL liberal should ever support a law that criminalizes "lying" to investigators. It becomes their immediate goal from the start. If they can get someone to lie (or even appear to have lied) they can abuse that person to no end. It is the very essence of entrapment and that law MUST go.He may well have pled just to get the Feds to stop racking him, but that doesn't mean he didn't lie to FBI agents. He did. What Barr/Turley are saying is that the FBI's reason to interview Flynn was primarily to get him to lie, and this would create a tool for the FBI to squeeze Flynn by giving him a choice between financial ruin for his family or to betray Trump.
Not because I give a particular shit about a life-long Democrat like Flynn. Rather, I care about liberty. This power given to the FBI is way too easy to abuse.
Until that law is repealed, I will NEVER cooperate with the fucking suits without a hand-signed guarantee letter of absolute lifetime immunity from the FBI director him/herself. Even then, I might be hesitant. They can KISS MY ASS otherwise!!!
.
But the FBI already know the facts of what Flynn had done to dishonor himself and potentially harm the country.
When push comes to shove on this issue, the question is whether the FBI's underhanded tricks would bother you if they used them to lock up a child pornographer or even get a terrorist aider to flip.
Dont you see a problem there?
Btw, HE DIDNT LIE. He pled guilty to protect his son.
When a Godvernment with UNLIMITED RESOURCES comes against YOU, you cannot win.
Playing stupid on this is destroying your party with the few moderates you have left.
I personally agree that in this instance, the FBI interviewed him in HOPING that he'd lie, because they wanted to see if he'd tell them if Trump conspired with Vlad.
My question is whether it's ok for the FBI to interview a person suspected of aiding a terrorist or child pornographer hoping to catch a lie and use that to squeeze cooperation out of the liar. You appear to say it shouldn't be done. And I admit I'm all in favor of the FBI jamming it up these guys because I don't see another way to get the bad guys.
You Trump haters are terminally stupid.
How them coal jobs doin? What's the unemployment rate? Where's them infrastructure jobs?
Trump Loyalists are terminally stupid. Which is you.
The police entrap innocent citizens all the time? Wow.
Except Flynn wasn't innocent.
Also, the cops never ask you a leading question unless they already know the answer. Flynn was pretty stupid for trying to lie to them.
The record is clear about Flynn lying and selling the US out to curry favor with the Russians for Trump. Surely you have been keeping up with this subject. I mean really, we are how many years into DJTs presidency? If not, Google the info yourself. I for one am done spoon feeding you Orange Imbeciles information and facts about the Orange-COVID-19 Failure In Office.________Flynn is a traitor.
Could you elaborate?
I doubt it. Yours is the typical child-like playground remark customary for the Democrats/Bolsheviks who post on this board---likely from being educated in the Teacher Union controlled public schools of rotting cities in the North.
But if you do elaborate---if you undertake to show how this 33 year decorated combat veteran three star general is a "traitor"----You need to come with facts and documentation. Or I am going to assume you are a half-wit goddamn liar.
Flynn's "entrapment" claim is basically: you had other evidence that let you determine the falsity of my statements, so you should never have asked me about those events in the first place. It's not my fault for lying, it's your fault for forcing me to lie by... Doing diligent investigative work...?Then why did he plead guilty?Michael Flynn case should be dismissed to preserve justice
Some more documents reveal an unlawful reason for this case.
Great timing !!!!!!!
From the article:
Previously undisclosed documents in the case of former national security adviser Michael Flynn offer us a chilling blueprint on how top FBI officials not only sought to entrap the former White House aide but sought to do so on such blatantly unconstitutional and manufactured grounds.
These new documents further undermine the view of both the legitimacy and motivations of those investigations under former FBI director James Comey. For all of those who have long seen a concerted effort within the Justice Department to target the Trump administration, the fragments will read like a Dead Sea Scrolls version of a “deep state” conspiracy.
***********************
Left wing ambush artists....fuck all of them.
It's calle EXTORTION, dumbass.
