Tucker Carlson Blows 9/11 Open, Controlled Demolition, Implicates Israeli Agents. Prompted Real ID Even Though Suspects Were Known

LOL look how fast the Zionnist mods buried this in CT. NSA knows who they are.
The Juiws is going to get ya!!!

1761040117716.webp


:auiqs.jpg: :laughing0301:
 
Fully half the country watches Tucker Carlson. This is like a religious conversion for him.


"Showcasing US Senator Ron Johnson saying recently about WTC Building 7 on 9/11: “I don’t think you could find structural engineers that would say that thing came down any other way but controlled demolition,” former supporter of the government’s narrative on 9/11, Tucker Carlson, now has reversed himself and called for a new investigation.

Carlson joins some New York fire commissioners and many others who have called the official story necessarily false, and called for a new investigation.

WTC 7 is the third tower that fell in seconds on 9/11, although it was never hit by a plane.

In March 2025 the important firefighters’ professional journal Fire and Safety Journal of the Americas published an official position on WTC 7 which challenged the official story, writing:

“Sudden transition to freefall rules out a progressive collapse by fire or any other known natural mechanism other than explosive demolition.”

In his new docu-series “The 9/11 Files,” Carlson crosses into previously absolutely taboo territory by reporting the well-known fact – to those in the 9/11 truth community – that police had arrested five Israeli men later determined to be Israeli Mossad Secret Service agents, whose van tested positive for explosives and were carrying numerous false passports and large amounts of cash.

In 2001 Fox News reporter Carl Cameron reported that a highly placed investigator in the US government said there are “ties”between the “Dancing Israeli” Mossad agents arrests in NYC on 9/11 and the attacks. Cameron then said that any further information on links between the Israeli agents and 9/11 was “classified.”

The 9/11 Files Episode 4 (key episode, WTC 7, Israel)


Full series The 9/11 Files



Fox News Carl Cameran, US sources say there were “ties” between “dancing Israelis” and 9/11 but that it is “classified information”

...

Put most simply, engineers, physicists, and other scientists such as those at 2,000+ Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth try to explain that no steel skyscraper can collapse to the ground at the speed that a rock drops through thin air without the steel being cut to pieces from the inside.

In the illustration below, the reader must agree that the block on the upper right will reach the ground much faster than the one the left, because the massive resistance of the intact frame would slow it down, and more likely stop it altogether.

But if the government’s 9/11 account is true, both blocks reach the ground at the same time.

Carlson uses a clip of none other than President Trump, speaking right after the attacks, saying that as an experienced builder, he is absolutely certain that the buildings contained explosives.

image-3.png



The official 9/11 explanation, say many, violates fundamental laws of physics...

...

9/11 Kicks Off Move Toward Master Database, National Identification Real ID​

There is no better example of how 9/11 is still impacting Americans’ lives – and why it is still important – than the Trump administration’s push to roll out Real ID, a facial recognition and other biometrics -based ID which will consolidate all information about every American into a master, distributed database, which could eventually include medical records and financial transactions, all updated in real-time.

9/11 prompted the Real ID Act of 2005, which is only now being aggressively rolled-out by Trump. Real ID is being opposed as unconstitutional on both the left and the right. Constitutional case law centering on the Fourth Amendment, no search without a warrant, is still evolving.

The system has been called odious and un-American, and would resembled the total social control system now used in China.

MORE..."

You have to go to the very bowels of the internet to come up with this shit. Stay down there.
 
While it does appear very difficult to believe how all those towers fell as they did, the at least equally difficult thing to believe is that there was the time and the unobserved manpower to place the necessary explosives to so precisely function. In other words, the unbelievable is offset by the unbelievable.
 
Tucker makes outrageous claims that are not based in fact.
 
I remember hearing at the time of the event, that it was decided to take down Tower 7 via controlled demolition because the building was destabilized by underground fires.
So why has the story changed over the years?
Many reasons, but the simple one is that preparing a building for CD takes weeks or months. It could not possibly have been prepared for CD in 1 day, which is what your post demands.
 
All of them, obviously.

Talk amongst yourselves, you'll agree.


LOL!!!

So 2.5 mile thick ice age glacier is really under 70k years old??

LOL!!!



"Princeton University-led researchers have extracted 2 million-year-old ice cores from Antarctica "



and that didn't even get to the bottom, which is 2.5 miles thick....
 
LOL!!!

So 2.5 mile thick ice age glacier is really under 70k years old??

LOL!!!



"Princeton University-led researchers have extracted 2 million-year-old ice cores from Antarctica "



and that didn't even get to the bottom, which is 2.5 miles thick....

So 2.5 mile thick ice age glacier is really under 70k years old??

Over Illinois, how thick were they?
 
15th post
So 2.5 mile thick ice age glacier is really under 70k years old??

Over Illinois, how thick were they?


The Laurentide Ice Sheet was up to 2.5 miles (4 kilometers) thick, with its greatest thickness centered over Hudson Bay.

Goog AI

So tell us again that was only 70k years old...
 
hint - if you can get 2 million years of ice cores from AA without getting to the bottom, 2.5 miles down, then 2.5 mile thick glacier is probably a bit older than 70k years, which is what Milankovich claims...
 
The Laurentide Ice Sheet was up to 2.5 miles (4 kilometers) thick, with its greatest thickness centered over Hudson Bay.

Goog AI

So tell us again that was only 70k years old...

Maybe it took 100,000 years.
Is that not allowed?
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom