The Lie of 9-11 and it's after effects

[TruthSeeker112125]

The one you posted last didn't even show where the plane hit the building. That you felt the need to lie about that reveals you're full of shit.

"Why are You Ignoring the three pictures that clearly show No Impact evidence from a Jet Air Liner?"????

 

[Political-Junkie]

"Why are You Ignoring the three pictures that clearly show No Impact evidence from a Jet Air Liner?"????

I didn't ignore them. I pointed out they're deceptive. Here's what was posted.

Here's what I posted.

The damage done to the first floor where AA77 is devastating, wide and consistent with a plane.

You posted this one of the same portion of the Pentagon. But it's deceptive because you can barely see the first floor where AA77 did the most damage to the exterior of the building because fire engines are blocking the view of most of the first floor. Why do that when I showed you a similar image but without anything obscuring the first floor?

Then you posted this to show none of the windows were damaged, as though that's evidence AA77 didn't hit the Pentagon.

But that's even more deceptive as your first image as that's not where AA77 flew into the Pentagon. That's why the windows in that picture are all intact. Whereas many of the windows where AA77 did hit the Pentagon are blown out. Why would you do that?

Then you posted this.

I'm not sure if that's smoke or water, but like your first image, it largely blocks visibility of the first floor where AA77 hit. Again, why are you trying so desperately to hide thd damage caused by AA77?

Here it is again. The damage done to the Pentagon caused by a 757-200 flown into it at over 500 MPG.

So what are you deceptively trying so desperately to hide this damage?

 

[TruthSeeker112125]

I didn't ignore them. I pointed out they're deceptive. Here's what was posted.

Here's what I posted.

The damage done to the first floor where AA77 is devastating, wide and consistent with a plane.

View attachment 1271124

You posted this one of the same portion of the Pentagon. But it's deceptive because you can barely see the first floor where AA77 did the most damage to the exterior of the building because fire engines are blocking the view of most of the first floor. Why do that when I showed you a similar image but without anything obscuring the first floor?

Then you posted this to show none of the windows were damaged, as though that's evidence AA77 didn't hit the Pentagon.

But that's even more deceptive as your first image as that's not where AA77 flew into the Pentagon. That's why the windows in that picture are all intact. Whereas many of the windows where AA77 did hit the Pentagon are blown out. Why would you do that?

Then you posted this.

View attachment 1271125

I'm not sure if that's smoke or water, but like your first image, it largely blocks visibility of the first floor where AA77 hit. Again, why are you trying so desperately to hide thd damage caused by AA77?

Here it is again. The damage done to the Pentagon caused by a 757-200 flown into it at over 500 MPG.

So what are you deceptively trying so desperately to hide this damage?

I post the initial pictures pictures taken of the "crash site", & You call then "Deceptive"?
I can see that You are , like the Crack addict, that denies that they are dying, & refuses any Medical treatment, .... Absolutely focused upon what the American people were told/shown, & that You are refusing Data, that is right in front of You, that absolutely shows that the initial damaged area at the Pentagon, is far smaller than what a Air Liner would've caused.
Those 3 pictures,..... Show that only the Office of Naval Intelligence, was destroyed.
The Facade, & Windows, to the Left, Right, & Above the Office, Are Intact!
Meaning,..... No Wings/Engines, nor Tail Fin, of the alleged Air Liner, hit the Pentagon.
"Why are You Ignoring the three pictures that clearly show No Impact evidence from a Jet Air Liner?"????"

 

[Political-Junkie]

I post the initial pictures pictures taken of the "crash site", & You call then "Deceptive"?
I can see that You are , like the Crack addict, that denies that they are dying, & refuses any Medical treatment, .... Absolutely focused upon what the American people were told/shown, & that You are refusing Data, that is right in front of You, that absolutely shows that the initial damaged area at the Pentagon, is far smaller than what a Air Liner would've caused.
Those 3 pictures,..... Show that only the Office of Naval Intelligence, was destroyed.
The Facade, & Windows, to the Left, Right, & Above the Office, Are Intact!
Meaning,..... No Wings/Engines, nor Tail Fin, of the alleged Air Liner, hit the Pentagon.
"Why are You Ignoring the three pictures that clearly show No Impact evidence from a Jet Air Liner?"????"

You're done. Yes, deceptive. The only reason for your deception is because even you know thd evidence supports the fact that AA77 did indeed hit the Pentagon.

Again, to highlight your deception, this is the damage to the first floor where AA77 hit the Pentagon. The damage to the first floor is wide and unmistakable, cause by a plane.

Your deception was posting 3 pictures of the Pentagon with zero pictures showing clear views of the first floor where the plane hit. In two of them, the view of the first floor is obscured.

And laughably, the third picture doesn't even show where the plane hit. Which you deceptively claimed all the windows were intact as evidence no plane hit the Pentagon.

I asked you why you are being so deceptive but you wouldn't answer. But that's ok, you don't have to answer. Your deception answered for you.

 

[TruthSeeker112125]

You're done. Yes, deceptive. The only reason for your deception is because even you know thd evidence supports the fact that AA77 did indeed hit the Pentagon.

Again, to highlight your deception, this is the damage to the first floor where AA77 hit the Pentagon. The damage to the first floor is wide and unmistakable, cause by a plane.

Your deception was posting 3 pictures of the Pentagon with zero pictures showing clear views of the first floor where the plane hit. In two of them, the view of the first floor is obscured.

And laughably, the third picture doesn't even show where the plane hit. Which you deceptively claimed all the windows were intact as evidence no plane hit the Pentagon.

I asked you why you are being so deceptive but you wouldn't answer. But that's ok, you don't have to answer. Your deception answered for you.

U R Now "straining to pull teeth out of a gnat!"

Why are You Ignoring the three pictures that clearly show No Impact evidence from a Jet Air Liner?"????

 

[Political-Junkie]

I post the initial pictures pictures taken of the "crash site", & You call then "Deceptive"?
I can see that You are , like the Crack addict, that denies that they are dying, & refuses any Medical treatment, .... Absolutely focused upon what the American people were told/shown, & that You are refusing Data, that is right in front of You, that absolutely shows that the initial damaged area at the Pentagon, is far smaller than what a Air Liner would've caused.
Those 3 pictures,..... Show that only the Office of Naval Intelligence, was destroyed.
The Facade, & Windows, to the Left, Right, & Above the Office, Are Intact!
Meaning,..... No Wings/Engines, nor Tail Fin, of the alleged Air Liner, hit the Pentagon.
"Why are You Ignoring the three pictures that clearly show No Impact evidence from a Jet Air Liner?"????"

Again, for the deceptive, you posted 3 images with none of them showing a clear view of the first floor. Not sure who you think you're fooling with your deception?

 

[Political-Junkie]

U R Now "straining to pull teeth out of a gnat!"

Why are You Ignoring the three pictures that clearly show No Impact evidence from a Jet Air Liner?"????

Now you're lying on top of your deception. I didn't ignore them. I replied about each of them.

Now I'm convinced you know AA77 hit the Pentagon. You're just trolling.

 

[LA RAM FAN]

U R Now "straining to pull teeth out of a gnat!"

Why are You Ignoring the three pictures that clearly show No Impact evidence from a Jet Air Liner?"????

The understatement on candysss sock puppet

 

[candycorn]

No PJ, if you are asserting that the picture of the wheel you show is from AA77 at the Pentagon, YOU prove it. That's your claim. Unbeknownst to you, it was disproved 20 years ago.

There is almost no end to the proof that AA77 hit the pentagon....

Passenger DNA from AA77
ATC tracking of AA77
Wreckage from AA77
Eye witness accounts from AA77

And of course the light poles that could only have been taken down by an aircraft along the same dimensions as AA77.

You can account for none of it little boy. Now run along.

 

[candycorn]

FACTUAL REALITYS LIKE THAT CANDYASS IS IN DENIAL ON,

I see I’m still living rent free in your head 15 years after I beat the holy shit out of you on AWE...

Trust me, there’s plenty of vacancy up here.

Why’d you change your user name? LOL

 

[PeterPilot]

candycorn

Why don't you call some friends in the FBI and ask them to have those surveillance tapes from surrounding areas returned? That way you could see what actually did the strike. Heck, you might even get to see what actually struck the light poles.

For some reason the federal government determined that the public was not allowed to see that. You know, National Security.

Your government does not want you to see what actually struck. One would think that if it had been AA77 those tapes would confirm it. Why is your government still holding those tapes if it is so certain that AA77 struck there? Give you amigos a call Candy-O

 

[candycorn]

candycorn

Why don't you call some friends in the FBI and ask them to have those surveillance tapes from surrounding areas returned? That way you could see what actually did the strike. Heck, you might even get to see what actually struck the light poles.

For some reason the federal government determined that the public was not allowed to see that. You know, National Security.

Your government does not want you to see what actually struck. One would think that if it had been AA77 those tapes would confirm it. Why is your government still holding those tapes if it is so certain that AA77 struck there? Give you amigos a call Candy-O

Just one of your logical fallacies....

If they haven’t been shown...how do you know they were confiscated?

Anyway, we do know about the:

DNA of the passengers
The bodies that were recovered
The wreckage that was found
The ATC tracking

All of this was brought up in federal court in the Mousaui (sp?) trial. Amazingly, nobody objected to the evidence being submitted.....imagine that!

We also know that 5 lightpoles wer felled by AA77 hitting the Pentagon. You say it didn’t happen.

We have the physial evidnce...you have nothing but your rather juvenile whining.

So we win...and you (as always) lose.

 

[PeterPilot]

25 years ago it was relatively common knowledge that the feds seized all the surveillance tapes from surrounding private entities, including at least 1 hotel. Also from the notorious "gas station" under the presumed flight path.

You might not have been born 25 years ago, and that could explain your abysmal ignorance of facts and physics.

 

[PeterPilot]

Why are you ignoring the light poles, the bodies sitting in their airplane seats in the Pentagon and
all the other airplane wreckage, luggage etc. inside the Pentagon?

There were no bodies sitting in their seats you goofball. April Gallop walked through the area to get her and her son out of the building. She reported no sign at all of any passenger carrying airliner.

You consistently promote falsehoods, making it appear that you get paid to post said falsehoods.

 

[LA RAM FAN]

There were no bodies sitting in their seats you goofball. April Gallop walked through the area to get her and her son out of the building. She reported no sign at all of any passenger carrying airliner.

You consistently promote falsehoods, making it appear that you get paid to post said falsehoods.

we all know he is a paid shill for langley same as sockpuppet political junkie AKA candyass is.

hey candyass,i see you got tired of using that one sock you used here years ago Obamerica after everybody figured out that was a sock of yours and decided for this new one Politcal junkie .

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

There were no bodies sitting in their seats you goofball. April Gallop walked through the area to get her and her son out of the building. She reported no sign at all of any passenger carrying airliner.

You consistently promote falsehoods, making it appear that you get paid to post said falsehoods.

April Gallop walked through the area to get her and her son out of the building. She reported no sign at all of any passenger carrying airliner.

She walked through the entire area? Cool story.

DURR

 

[candycorn]

25 years ago it was relatively common knowledge that the feds seized all the surveillance tapes from surrounding private entities, including at least 1 hotel. Also from the notorious "gas station" under the presumed flight path.

Yeah, you guys made it all up and you’re still going to that well.

You might not have been born 25 years ago, and that could explain your abysmal ignorance of facts and physics.

Speaking of facts...have you come up with something that explains the light poles yet?

 

[Political-Junkie]

Just one of your logical fallacies....

If they haven’t been shown...how do you know they were confiscated?

Anyway, we do know about the:

DNA of the passengers
The bodies that were recovered
The wreckage that was found
The ATC tracking

All of this was brought up in federal court in the Mousaui (sp?) trial. Amazingly, nobody objected to the evidence being submitted.....imagine that!

We also know that 5 lightpoles wer felled by AA77 hitting the Pentagon. You say it didn’t happen.

We have the physial evidnce...you have nothing but your rather juvenile whining.

So we win...and you (as always) lose.

It's over. No one has been able to dispute the evidence. Worse, they're now denying the evidence.

 

[Political-Junkie]

we all know he is a paid shill for langley same as sockpuppet political junkie AKA candyass is.

hey candyass,i see you got tired of using that one sock you used here years ago Obamerica after everybody figured out that was a sock of yours and decided for this new one Politcal junkie .

You need more laughing icons. 30 is not enough.

 

[candycorn]

It's over. No one has been able to dispute the evidence. Worse, they're now denying the evidence.

Its never over with these guys. They’ve been telling the same lies for 24 years. They don’t really believe what they’re saying...Dylan Avery essentialy spilled the beans on the whole “truther” angst when he said that afterwhile-- he admitted they were full of shit and said that it just became fun for him and his fellow conspiratards to have 'smart people engage in silly arguments’ or something to that effect. The editors of Popular Mechanics devoted a whole magazine to debunking them.