The Lie of 9-11 and it's after effects

[TruthSeeker112125]

That's pretty deceptive of you. You post some images of the Pentagon, but in each one, the first floor is obscured so you don't see the magnitude of the damage, which was clearly caused by a plane, which in turn explains the lampposts you won't touch with a 10 foot light poles.

"Deceptive"?

You didn't look at the pictures apparently.

The first picture of this article below clearly shows the 1st thru the 4th floors of the Pentagon intact, with none of the Obvious damage that should be readily evident from the plane's wings, Tail Fin, & Engines hitting the building.

The windows, & Facade are INTACT, above, & to the left & right of the Office of Naval Intelligence.

You either are incapable of "Critical Thinking", as well as lacking a Desire for "The Truth",or,..... You're intentionally/Unintentionally Zealous for the Lie.

This firetruck was the first to respond to the Pentagon on 9/11

"It was just a miracle that we were in the right position; the Lord allowed us to live so we could help others that day."

www.wearethemighty.com

 

[Political-Junkie]

"Deceptive"?

You didn't look at the pictures apparently.

The first picture of this article below clearly shows the 1st thru the 4th floors of the Pentagon intact, with none of the Obvious damage that should be readily evident from the plane's wings, Tail Fin, & Engines hitting the building.

The windows, & Facade are INTACT, above, & to the left & right of the Office of Naval Intelligence.

You either are incapable of "Critical Thinking", as well as lacking a Desire for "The Truth",or,..... You're intentionally/Unintentionally Zealous for the Lie.

This firetruck was the first to respond to the Pentagon on 9/11

"It was just a miracle that we were in the right position; the Lord allowed us to live so we could help others that day."

www.wearethemighty.com

Yes, deceptive. Why would you do that?

You can't even see the first floor in that picture. Worse, that picture doesn't even show where the plane hit the building, which is why all those windows are intact.

Here's the image you tried to pass off as though that's where flight #77 hit the Pentagon.

And here's the damage you tried to hide, where flight #77 actually hit the Pentagon.

 

[LA RAM FAN]

The wheel you showed is not even close in size to the actual wheel of a Boeing.

he seems to braindead to comprehend that. he is obviously unaware that boeing manufactuers have even said that.

 

[LA RAM FAN]

Political-Junkie

he explained that to langley shill candyass several pages back and took him to school on it only to watch him do this-,he blatantly ignored it and you well as well obviously from all your ignorant blather you have posted here so there is no sense in him reposting it again.

 

[LA RAM FAN]

"Engine Parts"? ...... Not "Engines"? Specifically what is the Source of this Data, and include links, etc.?

"140 feet of damage",....... Where are You getting this from? The Office of Naval Intelligence was destroyed, & yet to the left & right, & above, The Office of Naval Intelligence, the "bulk of the damage", left many windows intact,............. Meaning, there was no impact indicated of a Jet Air Liner's wings hitting those windows!

"Have you explained what caused this wide path of flames?" Nope, that has not been part of this discussion.

You and a few others have this "Obsessive Fixation" on those poles,..... Is this a Doctor Phil Moment?

i wouldnt be at all surprised if he is a sock puppet of candyass his obsession of the light poles.


So, You ignore Posts# 1289 -1292 that show there was no damage from a Jet Air Liner's wings, engines, nor Tail Fin.

You Obviously can not handle The Truth, or You are Zealous for supporting the Treasonous Lie.

"And I'm fully confident when I say everyone here, including you, knows the reason you can't address it is because the only possible answer is it had to be a plane with a wide enough wingspan capable of both wings reaching out far enough to take them out."



winner truth seeker,loser political junkie err candyass CHECKMATED as always.

 

[Political-Junkie]

The wheel you showed is not even close in size to the actual wheel of a Boeing.

Looks the same to me.

If you think the wheel recovered from the Pentagon is not from a 757-200, prove it. Show the wheel from the 757-200 you think is larger, with proof it's on a 757-200.

 

[Robert W]

Ya'll, Jet Air Liners do not disintegrate upon impacting buildings such as the Pentagon, nor when crashing in to the ground!

Show us the B 52 wreckage since you claim airplanes do not disintegrate upon impact.

 

[TruthSeeker112125]

Show me where Jet planes from the beginning of their being "Commercialized", to Today, have,.... In many, many cases not left evidence of a Jet Air Liner having crashed.

I Believe that I've already posted at least one link herein this discussion, that shows many, many Air Liner Crashes, that without fail, were readily identifiable as Jet Air Liners.

As far as Your B52 post,... For some reason, the videos of that crash, shown on National News,are extremely blurry, and at this pint, that crash proves nothing.

Why are You Ignoring the three pictures that clearly show No Impact evidence from a Jet Air Liner?

 

[Political-Junkie]

Show me where Jet planes from the beginning of their being "Commercialized", to Today, have,.... In many, many cases not left evidence of a Jet Air Liner having crashed.

I Believe that I've already posted at least one link herein this discussion, that shows many, many Air Liner Crashes, that without fail, were readily identifiable as Jet Air Liners.

As far as Your B52 post,... For some reason, the videos of that crash, shown on National News,are extremely blurry, and at this pint, that crash proves nothing.

Why are You Ignoring the three pictures that clearly show No Impact evidence from a Jet Air Liner?

That's a logical fallacy. You say that as though there was nothing identifiable found from flight #77, which is not true. There was, you simply deny it. Then you establish your own made up conclusion based on that fallacy.

You also ignore evidence you can't readily explain.

And you make claims based on complete falsehoods.

Wrap that all up in a taco and that lunch you're eating is basically your entire position.

 

[PeterPilot]

Looks the same to me.

View attachment 1270742
View attachment 1270744
View attachment 1270743

If you think the wheel recovered from the Pentagon is not from a 757-200, prove it. Show the wheel from the 757-200 you think is larger, with proof it's on a 757-200.

No PJ, if you are asserting that the picture of the wheel you show is from AA77 at the Pentagon, YOU prove it. That's your claim. Unbeknownst to you, it was disproved 20 years ago.

 

[Political-Junkie]

No PJ, if you are asserting that the picture of the wheel you show is from AA77 at the Pentagon, YOU prove it. That's your claim. Unbeknownst to you, it was disproved 20 years ago.

I did. I showed an image of the wheel found at the Pentagon and I showed an image of a wheel on a 757-200. They appear to me to be the same type. You claim it's disproven. Show how.

 

[PeterPilot]

I did. I showed an image of the wheel found at the Pentagon and I showed an image of a wheel on a 757-200. They appear to me to be the same type. You claim it's disproven. Show how.

As one making the claim, same for federal government, you must prove your claim. Common sense for those of us into facts show that no Boeing crashed at the Pentagon. Yes, they want people to believe that fantasy, and many gullible people like you still do 25 years later, but gullible humans are a dime-a-dozen.

They could not prove a Boeing was there 25 years ago, and you cannot prove it today. Follow Occam PJ, if you even know who Occam is. The reason all the facts show there was no Boeing there is simply because there was no Boeing there.

 

[Political-Junkie]

As one making the claim, same for federal government, you must prove your claim. Common sense for those of us into facts show that no Boeing crashed at the Pentagon. Yes, they want people to believe that fantasy, and many gullible people like you still do 25 years later, but gullible humans are a dime-a-dozen.

They could not prove a Boeing was there 25 years ago, and you cannot prove it today. Follow Occam PJ, if you even know who Occam is. The reason all the facts show there was no Boeing there is simply because there was no Boeing there.

Then we're done here. I showed two separate pictures appearing to be the same type of wheel. So it's proven a d you're not showing anything to prove otherwise.

That was easy.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

As one making the claim, same for federal government, you must prove your claim. Common sense for those of us into facts show that no Boeing crashed at the Pentagon. Yes, they want people to believe that fantasy, and many gullible people like you still do 25 years later, but gullible humans are a dime-a-dozen.

They could not prove a Boeing was there 25 years ago, and you cannot prove it today. Follow Occam PJ, if you even know who Occam is. The reason all the facts show there was no Boeing there is simply because there was no Boeing there.

Common sense for those of us into facts show that no Boeing crashed at the Pentagon.

But you're a nutjob. No common sense in sight.

Occam's Razor? Excellent!

What's that say about the lightpoles?

Besides you're a pusssy?

 

[LA RAM FAN]

Show me where Jet planes from the beginning of their being "Commercialized", to Today, have,.... In many, many cases not left evidence of a Jet Air Liner having crashed.

I Believe that I've already posted at least one link herein this discussion, that shows many, many Air Liner Crashes, that without fail, were readily identifiable as Jet Air Liners.

As far as Your B52 post,... For some reason, the videos of that crash, shown on National News,are extremely blurry, and at this pint, that crash proves nothing.

Why are You Ignoring the three pictures that clearly show No Impact evidence from a Jet Air Liner?

because he is a sock puppet of paid shill from langly candyass thats why,he gave it away he is a sockpuppet of him with the obsession of the lightpoles candyass has that you took him to school on several pages back,LOL

 

[LA RAM FAN]

No PJ, if you are asserting that the picture of the wheel you show is from AA77 at the Pentagon, YOU prove it. That's your claim. Unbeknownst to you, it was disproved 20 years ago.

FACTUAL REALITYS LIKE THAT CANDYASS IS IN DENIAL ON,

 

[LA RAM FAN]

As one making the claim, same for federal government, you must prove your claim. Common sense for those of us into facts show that no Boeing crashed at the Pentagon. Yes, they want people to believe that fantasy, and many gullible people like you still do 25 years later, but gullible humans are a dime-a-dozen.

They could not prove a Boeing was there 25 years ago, and you cannot prove it today. Follow Occam PJ, if you even know who Occam is. The reason all the facts show there was no Boeing there is simply because there was no Boeing there.

A FACT CANDYASS CANNOT ACCEPT.

 

[TruthSeeker112125]

That's a logical fallacy. You say that as though there was nothing identifiable found from flight #77, which is not true. There was, you simply deny it. Then you establish your own made up conclusion based on that fallacy.

You also ignore evidence you can't readily explain.

And you make claims based on complete falsehoods.

Wrap that all up in a taco and that lunch you're eating is basically your entire position.

"Why are You Ignoring the three pictures that clearly show No Impact evidence from a Jet Air Liner?"????

 

[Political-Junkie]

"Why are You Ignoring the three pictures that clearly show No Impact evidence from a Jet Air Liner?"????

The one you posted last didn't even show where the plane hit the building. That you felt the need to lie about that reveals you're full of shit.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

"Why are You Ignoring the three pictures that clearly show No Impact evidence from a Jet Air Liner?"????

Why are you ignoring the light poles, the bodies sitting in their airplane seats in the Pentagon and
all the other airplane wreckage, luggage etc. inside the Pentagon?