Try Trump at the Ballot Box, Not in Court

[schmidlap]

It's very difficult to successfully prosecute someone as devious and ruthless as trump is. He's a professional criminal. Even when he gets caught, he somehow manages to buy his way out of it, or throw someone else under the bus in his place. There was a time when men who served our nation were actual Patriots with decency and integrity. That has become a rare thing these days. It should be a requirement in order to serve.

The Cry Baby Loser has not even contrived an excuse as to why he had absconded with classified government documents and refused to return them, necessitating that the government recover them as a vital matter of national security.

What was his scheme for the documents that he had stashed in a storeroom at his fat cat playground?

 

[kaz]

A falsehood

schmidlap: Duh, dar, I don't know what I was referring to, kaz, I really don't

Fucking ass

 

[schmidlap]

schmidlap: Duh, dar, I don't know what I was referring to, kaz, I really don't

Fucking ass

Well, Tinker Bell, you appear to still be benighted regarding excuses for your object of veneration absconding with classified documents.

Why did he stash them at Neverland-by-the-Sea and refuse to return them when the interests of national security and the law demanded that they be carefully protected by the National Archives and Records Administration?

 

[kaz]

Well, Tinker Bell, you appear to still be benighted regarding excuses for your object of veneration absconding with classified documents.

Why did he stash them at Neverland-by-the-Sea and refuse to return them when the interests of national security and the law demanded that they be carefully protected by the National Archives and Records Administration?

No one is as stupid as you think we are. Democrats have repeatedly said what you did, Trump is welcome to walk in by himself and be ignored and screamed at by one leftist after another trying to get on the news.

If you meant something different than YOUR PARTY, you'd have said so, not repeated their crap.

Give it up, seriously, you're a real stupid ass

 

[Lastamender]

Of course he is!
Lmfao!

Did he bring any meaningful charges or indictments? He is a RINO, and you are out of your league.

 

[MisterBeale]

"global oligarchy"?
"new international global order"?
Name names. Give sources. Offer evidence.

Here's What's Next on the Globalist Calendar​

Here's What's Next on the Globalist Calendar

by James Corbett corbettreport.com April 17, 2022 As you should know by now, the threat facing free humanity is not a secret conspiracy but a perfectly open one. Those seeking to monopolize the resources of the planet and institute a system of perfect technocratic control are, generally...

corbettreport.substack.com

"As you should know by now, the threat facing free humanity is not a secret conspiracy but a perfectly open one. Those seeking to monopolize the resources of the planet and institute a system of perfect technocratic control are, generally speaking, not secretive about their plans. On the contrary. Any number of publicly available records—from books and white papers to blog posts, fora and lectures—give an interested public plenty of lead time to prepare for the next steps in the unfolding globalist agenda.. . ."

<snip>

JUNE 2022: Stockholm+50​

". . . That's right, our good, planet-loving overlords at the United Nations are back to the scene of the crime to commemorate the 50th anniversary of the Stockholm conference with a new summit in the Swedish capital, this one with the characteristically uninspired name "Stockholm+50: a healthy planet for the prosperity of all – our responsibility, our opportunity."

Lest you think "Stockholm+50" is simply going to be an excuse for the global jet set to pat themselves on the back with a couple of forgettable political speeches or the unveiling of a new plaque, you should know that a great deal of planning has gone into this:

• The UN General Assembly has passed not one but two resolutions on the establishment of the conference and its agenda;
• A dedicated website for the conference has been created to keep up with the latest developments;
• A "blog by jurists for diplomats" entitled Pathway to the 2022 Declaration has been launched to influence the conversation surrounding the "Political Declaration" (capital letters and all) that "will be adopted" at the conference (emphasis theirs);
• And yet another website has been set up to host the "Declaration for Stockholm+50," which may or may not be the "Political Declaration" referenced above and which has been endorsed by a gaggle of globalist NGOs.

In addition to all of this, Stockholm will also host "World Environment Day 2022" on June 5th, 2022, the anniversary of the creation of UNEP. . . . "

<snip>

September 2023: Summit of the Future​

". . . Exactly as you would expect, the report's Summary begins by reminding us of the (globalist-concocted) "existential crises" that (the globalists constantly warn us) are threatening humanity's existence, such as COVID-19, geopolitical conflict and (of course) climate change. Naturally, this immediately turns into a demand that the peoples of the world:

"re-embrace global solidarity," which evidently entails "a global vaccination plan to deliver vaccines against COVID-19 into the arms of the millions of people who are still denied this basic lifesaving measure";

"renew the social contract between Governments and their people and within societies," which evidently entails "updated governance arrangements to deliver better public goods and usher in a new era of universal social protection, health coverage, education, skills, decent work and housing, as well as universal access to the Internet by 2030 as a basic human right";

"end the 'infodemic' plaguing our world by defending a common, empirically backed consensus around facts, science and knowledge," which evidently entails adopting "a global code of conduct that promotes integrity in public information";

. . . and a host of other globalist imperatives, from the creation of a new UN-led "Emergency Platform" that will be "triggered automatically in crises of sufficient scale and magnitude, regardless of the type or nature of the crisis involved," to the adoption of a new UN-led "Global Digital Compact" for "promoting a trustworthy Internet by introducing accountability criteria for discrimination and misleading content."

In other words, the usual globalist claptrap. . . . "

<snip>

MAY 2024: WHO Global Pandemic Treaty​

". . . In case you haven't heard of it yet, the next big push in global biopolitics is the call for a global pandemic treaty to further abrogate national sovereignty and to hand more power to the WHO to dictate global health policy in the name of stopping the next scamdemic. As I've stressed several times now, just as 9/11 was merely the public unveiling of the new "war on terror" governance paradigm, the COVID scamdemic was merely the public unveiling of the new "biosecurity" governance paradigm. It is this proposed global pandemic treaty that will start to hardwire that new governance paradigm into place, much like the PATRIOT Act began to hardwire the terror paradigm in place in the US.

The campaign pushing the formation of this treaty relies on an obvious Problem - Reaction - Solution narrative to nudge the public into accepting the next steps in the biosecurity agenda.

Problem: The WHO "failed" miserably in stopping the COVID "pandemic" from "ravaging the world."

Reaction: We need a global health organization with teeth!

Solution: A global pandemic treaty must be signed to hand more power to the WHO.

Once you realize that all proposals for giving more power to a small clique of unaccountable bureaucrats is introduced in this way—"you never want a serious crisis go to waste" as Rahm Emmanuel infamously observed—the manipulation becomes obvious. An "independent panel" set up to "review" the "problem" of the WHO's "failed" response to the scamdemic delivered a report in January that—to the surprise of absolutely no one—concluded that "the WHO's ability to enforce its advice, or enter countries to investigate the source of disease outbreaks, is severely curtailed" and thus new rules need to be set up at the global level to give the WHO more power to police the world for health threats. They even called it the WHO's "Chernobyl moment," implying that it should use this "disaster" as a chance to implement fundamental reforms. . . . "

<snip>

". . . And even then, they're not looking to hear from everyone. In fact, they have an entire page laying out the terms and conditions by which you can submit a comment in the first place, including stipulations that those wishing to comment "Refrain from making any statements unrelated to the topic at hand," that they present their comments "in a respectful manner, free of any profanity, ad hominem attacks, vulgarity, or other inappropriate language" and that they "declare the entity [they] represent and any other affiliations, engagement, or roles relevant to the public hearings or to WHO, in light of its mandate." Oh, and please keep in mind "that WHO is not able to ensure that all interested parties will be able to participate in the public hearings, and that thus WHO does not make any commitment or undertaking to allow you to participate in the public hearings."

But other than that, they totally want to hear from you.

. . . Oh, wait. Scratch that. The deadline for the public to submit their comments has already passed. I guess we're too late. Hmmm, perhaps we should have consulted the globalist calendar sooner."

“Pandemic Treaty” will hand WHO keys to global government Suggested clauses would incentivize reporting “pandemics”, and see nations punished for “non-compliance”​

“Pandemic Treaty” will hand WHO keys to global government

Kit Knightly The first public hearings on the proposed “Pandemic Treaty” are closed, with the next round due to start in mid-June. We’ve been trying to keep this issue on our fron…

off-guardian.org

" . . . . To translate these suggestions from bureaucrat into English:

• If you report “disease outbreaks” in a “timely manner”, you will get “financial resources” to deal with them.
• If you don’t report disease outbreaks, or don’t follow the WHO’s directions, you will lose out on international aid and face trade embargoes and sanctions.

In combination, these proposed rules would literally incentivize reporting possible “disease outbreaks”. Far from preventing “future pandemics”, they would actively encourage them.

National governments who refuse to play ball being punished, and those who play along getting paid off is not new. We have already seen that with Covid.

Two African countries – Burundi and Tanzania – had Presidents who banned the WHO from their borders, and refused to go along with the Pandemic narrative. Both Presidents died unexpectedly within months of that decision, only to be replaced by new Presidents who instantly reversed their predecessor’s covid policies.

Less than a week after the death of President Pierre Nkurunziza, the IMF agreed to forgive almost 25 million dollars of Burundi’s national debt in order to help combat the Covid19 “crisis”.

Just five months after the death of President John Magufuli, the new government of Tanzania received 600 million dollars from the IMF to “address the covid19 pandemic”.

It’s pretty clear what happened here, isn’t it?

Globalists backed coups and rewarded the perpetrators with “international aid”. The proposals for the Pandemic treaty would simply legitimise this process, moving it from covert back channels to overt official ones. . . . "

<snip>

" . . . We already know the other key points likely to be included in a pandemic treaty. They will almost certainly try to introduce international vaccine passports, and pour funding into big Pharma’s pockets to produce “vaccines” ever faster and with even less safety testing.

But all of that could pale in comparison to the legal powers potentially being handed to the director-general of the WHO (or whatever new “independent” body they may decide to create) to punish, rebuke or reward national governments.

A “Pandemic Treaty” that overrides or overrules national or local governments would hand supranational powers to an unelected bureaucrat or “expert”, who could exercise them entirely at his own discretion and on completely subjective criteria.

This is the very definition of technocratic globalism."

The Global Pandemic Treaty: What You Need to Know​

Episode 417 – The Global Pandemic Treaty: What You Need to Know | The Corbett Report

www.corbettreport.com

We’re At the Pivot Point

We will become a totalitarian globalist commie state unless enough people wake up, wise up and rise up… “The Terraforming of America Scot Faulkner The Left is moving rapidly to change America forever. Except for isolated pockets of resistance, such as during Virginia’s 2021 elections...

www.usmessageboard.com

https://www.youtube.com/worldeconomicforum

 

[schmidlap]

No one is as stupid as you think we are. Democrats have repeatedly said what you did, Trump is welcome to walk in by himself and be ignored and screamed at by one leftist after another trying to get on the news.

If you meant something different than YOUR PARTY, you'd have said so, not repeated their crap.

Give it up, seriously, you're a real stupid ass

You seem to need to revert to your hyper-partisan whinging.

Try to confront the reality:

A citizen absconded with classified government documents, stashed them in a party palace's storeroom, and refused to return them when the interests of national security and the law demanded that they be carefully protected by the National Archives and Records Administration.

Why did he do that?

 

[kaz]

You seem to need to revert to your hyper-partisan whinging.

Try to confront the reality:

A citizen absconded with classified government documents, stashed them in a party palace's storeroom, and refused to return them when the interests of national security and the law demanded that they be carefully protected by the National Archives and Records Administration.

Why did he do that?

Democrats said Trump could show up without a lawyer and they would take him apart. You attacked Trump for not coming on those terms, but you claim you didn't know the offer to testify did not include his defense team, just him.

So the question is, are you ignorant or stupid? Well, which are you?

 

[g5000]

Try Trump at the Ballot Box, Not in Court​

The voters already did that, and Trump reacted by attempting a coup.

He must pay the piper.

 

[kaz]

The voters already did that, and Trump reacted by attempting a coup.

He must pay the piper.

You forgot where Democrats stole the election. Wait, you didn't forget, you didn't care. Democrats are just love!

 

[schmidlap]

Democrats ...

Your defense of the Cry Baby Loser you venerate consists of desperate attempts to blame others.

Try to put your hyper-partisanship on hold and address the matter honestly:

A citizen absconded with classified government documents, stashed them in a party palace's storeroom, and refused to return them when the interests of national security and the law demanded that they be carefully protected by the National Archives and Records Administration. Why?

 

[kaz]

Your defense of the Cry Baby Loser you venerate consists of desperate attempts to blame others.

Try to put your hyper-partisanship on hold and address the matter honestly:

A citizen absconded with classified government documents, stashed them in a party palace's storeroom, and refused to return them when the interests of national security and the law demanded that they be carefully protected by the National Archives and Records Administration. Why?

Wow, you're Eric Swalwell, aren't you???

Rep. Eric Swalwell appears to fart on live TV

Here’s one act he had no problem passing. A congressman from California became the butt of everyone’s joke for appearing to fart on live television Monday night. Rep. Eric Swalwell was …

nypost.com

 

[schmidlap]

Wow, you're Eric Swalwell, aren't you???

Rep. Eric Swalwell appears to fart on live TV

Here’s one act he had no problem passing. A congressman from California became the butt of everyone’s joke for appearing to fart on live television Monday night. Rep. Eric Swalwell was …

nypost.com

Your inability to rationalize why a citizen would abscond with classified government documents, stash them in a storage room, and refuse to return them to where the law and patriotism demands as a matter of national security is blatant.

No one is above the law, not even those you venerate.

 

[kaz]

Your inability to rationalize why a citizen would abscond with classified government documents, stash them in a storage room, and refuse to return them to where the law and patriotism demands as a matter of national security is blatant.

No one is above the law, not even those you venerate.

Your inability to understand that Trump LITERALLY had the power himself to instantly declassify government documents is driven by that you're a party partisan hack. If it were the other way around, you'd be drooling in disbelief that Republicans believed the guy who declassifies them could possibly commit a crime by taking them.

Sit down, read this 10 times and realize I'm right and it's bull shit. I.E., grow the fuck up, liar

 

[schmidlap]

... Trump LITERALLY had the power himself to instantly declassify government documents i

And there is no documentation of his ever having even pretended to declassify the classified documents with which he had absconded for reasons he can't explain.

There is a set protocol for a president declassifying documents
.
Kel McClanahan, executive director of the National Security Counselors: “He can just say, ‘I decide that this should be declassified,’ and it’s declassified.”

 

[kaz]

And there is no documentation of his ever having even pretended to declassify the classified documents with which he had absconded for reasons he can't explain.

There is a set protocol for a president declassifying documents
.
Kel McClanahan, executive director of the National Security Counselors: “He can just say, ‘I decide that this should be declassified,’ and it’s declassified.”

You didn't answer the question. What is your claim he didn't declassify them based on? What EXACTLY did he not do since he could do it instantly? He took them and didn't do what? Rub his ears? Jump up and down three times? What?

And again, if it were a Democrat, you'd be foaming at the mouth how stupid what you are doing is, you'd lose your mind. This shows again what a pathetic partisan hack you are

 

[schmidlap]

What is your claim he didn't declassify them based on?

Trump, nor anyone else, has produced any documentation of his ever having gone through the process required to declassify the classified documents with which he had absconded and stashed in a storage room, ignoring months of requests from the National Archives that he return them to where national security requires them to be.

Bradley Moss, a Washington, D.C.-based lawyer who works on national security cases:​

"Merely proclaiming a document or group of documents declassified and doing nothing more would not suffice." ​

​

"He had to identify the specific documents he was declassifying, he needed to memorialize the order in writing for bureaucratic and historical purposes, and he needed to have staff physically modify the classification markings on the documents themselves," Moss said. "Until that was done, the documents, per the security classification procedures, still have to be handled, transmitted and stored as if they were classified."​

​

[PolitiFact - Could Trump argue he declassified the documents found in the Mar-a-Lago search?]​

 

[BlindBoo]

Trump LITERALLY had the power himself to instantly declassify government documents

Well it's in the courts hands now. Problem is the Neo-GOP radicals will likely call any court ruling against their Exalted One just more corruption.

 

[MagicMike]

Your inability to understand that Trump LITERALLY had the power himself to instantly declassify government documents is driven by that you're a party partisan hack. If it were the other way around, you'd be drooling in disbelief that Republicans believed the guy who declassifies them could possibly commit a crime by taking them.

Sit down, read this 10 times and realize I'm right and it's bull shit. I.E., grow the fuck up, liar

Wrong.
That's bullshit.
There is a process for declassification and he didn't follow it.
Period.
Full stop.

 

[kaz]

Trump, nor anyone else, has produced any documentation of his ever having gone through the process required to declassify the classified documents with which he had absconded and stashed in a storage room, ignoring months of requests from the National Archives that he return them to where national security requires them to be.

Bradley Moss, a Washington, D.C.-based lawyer who works on national security cases:​

"Merely proclaiming a document or group of documents declassified and doing nothing more would not suffice." ​

​

"He had to identify the specific documents he was declassifying, he needed to memorialize the order in writing for bureaucratic and historical purposes, and he needed to have staff physically modify the classification markings on the documents themselves," Moss said. "Until that was done, the documents, per the security classification procedures, still have to be handled, transmitted and stored as if they were classified."​

​

[PolitiFact - Could Trump argue he declassified the documents found in the Mar-a-Lago search?]​

Exactly. All you have is the opinion of a leftist DC lawyer.

So you can just assume he didn't and persecute him. After your lies about Russia, Russia, Russia, no one can take you seriously, and you still don't have a clue