Trump's silence for over five hours is absolute proof of culpability

[PsychDoc]

The most compelling evidence of both guilt and culpability is Trump's stunning silence for over five hours while the horror was unfolding. This, in itself, is the ultimate proof of complicity. Any decent human being would have been in front of a microphone in 60 seconds decrying what was being undertaken on their behalf. Not Trump.

If he had said anything, you dimwits would be claiming that he was egging the protestors on.

Nope. If he implored them to obey the law and stand down how could anyone have criticized him of egging anyone on?

He did, moron,

Five hours later douche boy.

 

[Nostra]

The most compelling evidence of both guilt and culpability is Trump's stunning silence for over five hours while the horror was unfolding. This, in itself, is the ultimate proof of complicity. Any decent human being would have been in front of a microphone in 60 seconds decrying what was being undertaken on their behalf. Not Trump.

If he had said anything, you dimwits would be claiming that he was egging the protestors on.

Nope. If he implored them to obey the law and stand down how could anyone have criticized him of egging anyone on?

The libs and chinese would say that he secretly did using mind control like they are for saying he sent them to break into the capital despite his speech being recorded.

You're Damn right we have his speech recorded on video, and his crowd's reaction to it!

Cool.

Post where he said to go to the Capital and riot.

Why did those seditious terrorists want to kill Mike Pence?

I don't try to read the minds of leftist morons.

LOL

You're utterly deranged, dumbfuck, to think the seditious traitors who invaded the Capitol were "leftists."

BLM activist inside Capitol claims he was 'documenting' riots, once said 'burn it all down'

A Black Lives Matter activist and former Olympic speed skater who entered the Capitol Building Wednesday alongside a mob of pro-Trump protesters said Thursday he wanted to “document” the events as they unfolded.

www.foxnews.com

More Proof of BLM/Antifa Capitol Riot Involvement Emerges [UPDATED] – DB DAILY UPDATE

LOLOLOLOL

Dumbfuck, that's one arrest out of hundreds who are on the right.

You're flailing like a dying fish with a hook stuck in its mouth.

Ok, give me the names of those wanting to kill Mike Pence.

Until then, you don't know what their political leanings are, Moron.

Dismissed.

Don't need to chase you down your rabbit hole. There were a million protesters there. Thousands of them breached the police barricades. Hundreds stormed the Capitol and a couple of hundred have been arrested. Out of all those, you found one who was from the left. And he wasn't captured on video chanting, "hang Mike Pence." Your refusal to answer answers for you.

Thanks for admitting you don't have the names of those wanting to kill Pence, and are therefore ignorant of their political leanings.

LOL

Your fear is noted and laughed at.

Fear? Um...................Ok............

Yes, fear. I asked a simple question which has a simple answer and you ran from it under the guise that I don't know the names of the people chanting, "hang Mike Pence." I know why you ran. You even know why. So does everyone else here.

I’m right here. So, where did I run?

I answered your question, Dumbass. I told you I’m not a mind reader. unlike you, I deal in facts.....therefore I don’t have to claim I can read minds like you have to, Simpleton.

One need not be a mind reader to answer the question. That's what you ran from, pussy. Don't go near Trump, he'll grab you.

You asked my why someone stormed the capitol, Stupid.

I told you I’m not a mind reader, Dummy.

So, how did I run from anything when I gave you an answer, Halfwit?

No, I didn't ask you why they stormed the Capitol. That you think I asked you that only serves to once again expose just how fucked in the head you are.

And now everyone here sees not only are you fucked in the head but you're a pussy to boot.

Ok, you asked me to read their minds as to why they wanted to kill Pence.

My answer stands, Halfwit.

Who asked you to read their minds? You're imagining that too. And then using your imagination to avoid answering the question because you're a pussy.

How would one know what is going on in the minds of people he has never even heard of?

Because some of them said why they wanted to hang Pence. But g'head, keep running from the question like the pussy you are.

They did? Then why are you asking me?

What a dumbass!

To see if you would answer honestly. You proved you're a pussy instead.

My answer was an honest answer, Halfwit.

I have never heard anyone say why they did what they did, Dumbass.
You are flailing bigly.

 

[Nostra]

I guess Math Nerds can’t be expected to know basic English.

You got me, I'm old school and use older words that some don't understand.

“Dribble” and “drivel” originally meant the same thing: drool.

They did? link?

 

[Correll]

The most compelling evidence of both guilt and culpability is Trump's stunning silence for over five hours while the horror was unfolding. This, in itself, is the ultimate proof of complicity. Any decent human being would have been in front of a microphone in 60 seconds decrying what was being undertaken on their behalf. Not Trump.

1. It is proof of nothing.

2. We have had 5 years of riots from you guys. YOur pretense that a riot occurring somewhere is a "horror" is demagogic bullshit.

 

[Winco]

You got me, I'm old school and use older words that some don't understand.

“Dribble” and “drivel” originally meant the same thing: drool.

They did? link?

Can you perform any simple task by yourself?

Or are you some kind of Socialist, saying......"Help me" I can't do it myself.

You RWI's are pathetic.

 

[Correll]

You got me, I'm old school and use older words that some don't understand.

“Dribble” and “drivel” originally meant the same thing: drool.

They did? link?

Can you perform any simple task by yourself?

Or are you some kind of Socialist, saying......"Help me" I can't do it myself.

You RWI's are pathetic.

Asking someone to back up a claim, is generally the way it is done.

 

[Nostra]

You got me, I'm old school and use older words that some don't understand.

“Dribble” and “drivel” originally meant the same thing: drool.

They did? link?

Can you perform any simple task by yourself?

Or are you some kind of Socialist, saying......"Help me" I can't do it myself.

You RWI's are pathetic.

I performed the simple task of exposing you as a liar.

 

[bripat9643]

The most compelling evidence of both guilt and culpability is Trump's stunning silence for over five hours while the horror was unfolding. This, in itself, is the ultimate proof of complicity. Any decent human being would have been in front of a microphone in 60 seconds decrying what was being undertaken on their behalf. Not Trump.

If he had said anything, you dimwits would be claiming that he was egging the protestors on.

Nope. If he implored them to obey the law and stand down how could anyone have criticized him of egging anyone on?

He did, moron,

Five hours later douche boy.

your assumptions are proof of nothing. He was probably just in shock about the whole thing.

 

[bripat9643]

You got me, I'm old school and use older words that some don't understand.

“Dribble” and “drivel” originally meant the same thing: drool.

They did? link?

Can you perform any simple task by yourself?

Or are you some kind of Socialist, saying......"Help me" I can't do it myself.

You RWI's are pathetic.

I performed the simple task of exposing you as a liar.

Yes, that is a simple task. He usually does that on his own.

 

[bripat9643]

You got me, I'm old school and use older words that some don't understand.

“Dribble” and “drivel” originally meant the same thing: drool.

They did? link?

Can you perform any simple task by yourself?

Or are you some kind of Socialist, saying......"Help me" I can't do it myself.

You RWI's are pathetic.

Why would he want to backup your claim? Are you a total fucking idiot?

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

He was probably just in shock about the whole thing.

 

[PsychDoc]

The most compelling evidence of both guilt and culpability is Trump's stunning silence for over five hours while the horror was unfolding. This, in itself, is the ultimate proof of complicity. Any decent human being would have been in front of a microphone in 60 seconds decrying what was being undertaken on their behalf. Not Trump.

If he had said anything, you dimwits would be claiming that he was egging the protestors on.

Nope. If he implored them to obey the law and stand down how could anyone have criticized him of egging anyone on?

He did, moron,

Five hours later douche boy.

your assumptions are proof of nothing. He was probably just in shock about the whole thing.

In shock or gleeful. God, you're a seriously dumb shit, aren't you?

 

[Correll]

The most compelling evidence of both guilt and culpability is Trump's stunning silence for over five hours while the horror was unfolding. This, in itself, is the ultimate proof of complicity. Any decent human being would have been in front of a microphone in 60 seconds decrying what was being undertaken on their behalf. Not Trump.

If he had said anything, you dimwits would be claiming that he was egging the protestors on.

Nope. If he implored them to obey the law and stand down how could anyone have criticized him of egging anyone on?

He did, moron,

Five hours later douche boy.

your assumptions are proof of nothing. He was probably just in shock about the whole thing.

In shock or gleeful. God, you're a seriously dumb shit, aren't you?

Explain why your guess is any better than his, or admit that you are the dumb shit.

 

[PsychDoc]

The most compelling evidence of both guilt and culpability is Trump's stunning silence for over five hours while the horror was unfolding. This, in itself, is the ultimate proof of complicity. Any decent human being would have been in front of a microphone in 60 seconds decrying what was being undertaken on their behalf. Not Trump.

If he had said anything, you dimwits would be claiming that he was egging the protestors on.

Nope. If he implored them to obey the law and stand down how could anyone have criticized him of egging anyone on?

He did, moron,

Five hours later douche boy.

your assumptions are proof of nothing. He was probably just in shock about the whole thing.

In shock or gleeful. God, you're a seriously dumb shit, aren't you?

Explain why your guess is any better than his, or admit that you are the dumb shit.

Fuck off brain dead righty

 

[Correll]

The most compelling evidence of both guilt and culpability is Trump's stunning silence for over five hours while the horror was unfolding. This, in itself, is the ultimate proof of complicity. Any decent human being would have been in front of a microphone in 60 seconds decrying what was being undertaken on their behalf. Not Trump.

If he had said anything, you dimwits would be claiming that he was egging the protestors on.

Nope. If he implored them to obey the law and stand down how could anyone have criticized him of egging anyone on?

He did, moron,

Five hours later douche boy.

your assumptions are proof of nothing. He was probably just in shock about the whole thing.

In shock or gleeful. God, you're a seriously dumb shit, aren't you?

Explain why your guess is any better than his, or admit that you are the dumb shit.

Fuck off brain dead righty

I accept your admission that you are the dumb shit.

 

[beautress]

The most compelling evidence of both guilt and culpability is Trump's stunning silence for over five hours while the horror was unfolding. This, in itself, is the ultimate proof of complicity. Any decent human being would have been in front of a microphone in 60 seconds decrying what was being undertaken on their behalf. Not Trump.

Trump has lawyers now, and he is likely to keep quiet while the demonmonsters destroy the truth, which has been their extreme wont going on five years.

 

[Mr. Friscus]

As I noted, Trumps call for the rally to march down to the Capitol, was a violation of the terms of their permit.

Is that really the hill you're now going to stand on?

If you want to impeach him over a violation of a permit, be my guest. What does this have to do with contrived claims from the left that do not stand up to direct quotations?

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

He was probably just in shock about the whole thing.

Well let's find out. Get this trial over with, then call in every person that was within 20 feet of Trump during the riot and have them testify under oath in Congress.

 

[Mr. Friscus]

In a one hour long speech, and weeks before riling and inciting his army,

one itty bitty line intentionally put in there to CYA, about being peaceful, is what you are claiming as an excuse or his stance when most everything else in his speech was rebel rousing?

Okee Dokee....

When one has to inject so much dramatic hyperbole and imagery to claims, it's usually telling it's based on assumptions. And you're free to your theories and assumptions, just don't expect other people to connect dots. Big claims require big evidence, and if all you have to back your claim is that he told his supporters to "fight", and that he questioned an election (Hillary Clinton, Democrats, and CNN in 2016 anyone?).. you have a very weak, uncompelling case.

 

[Crepitus]

like ABC, CBS, NBC, MSNBC, CNN who pushed a narrative of Russian collusion when no actual evidence existed?

Plenty of evidence, read the mueller report.

And that is where you are wrong. I did not read the report. I listed to every hour of his testimony. The only evidence that existed was circumstantial evidence. Nothing that can be proven that anyone intentionally colluded with Russia
You want circumstantial evidence?
You go to a bank. You make a transaction.
You then go to a Porsche dealership and buy a porsche.
The bank was robbed that day. The robbers took out the cameras so there is no video evidence of you being there and not there when the robbery took place. The robber wore a mask, so no identifiable evidence as well.
So now the FBI looks at who did banking that day within an hour of the robbery.
They interview you and ask you what you did after leaving the bank.
You tell them you bought a Porsche.
Bingo....you are now a suspect based on circumstantial evidence.

I actually pity you. You are living in a world of dreams.

Take care.

There was lots of evidence. Mueller's report lists hundreds of meetings and communications between Russian agents and tRump campaign people. Mueller's words in every instance were "doesn't in my opinion rise to the level of criminal conspiracy".

If there was no evidence why would he have said that?