P1: A point to consider. A wall is expensive and only a symbol for security. It can be easily breached and thus maintenance will be an on going expense.
The wall is an antithesis of the Statue of Liberty, an money for the wall would be better spent on adding more portals, more Admin. Judges and lawyers, more diplomats and more modern technology even after trump gets his way.
P2. True. However Kim is a sociopathic despot and a murderer. Trump's interaction with him began with Trump's bellicose rhetoric and threats of fire and fury, aka Brinkmanship; now he's flipped and claims a love affair with a psychopath. Trump has no foreign policy experience and flies by the seat of his pants, never heading the expertise of foreign policy experts, diplomats and history.
Even a modest wall is a major obstacle for women, children, disabled, and older migrants. As for the young, healthy, males..., easily breached ? See Post # 123 and 128.
A wall expense ($15 Billion one time) is miniscule relative to the savings it will help bring. US is losing $148 Billion/year to immigrants' remittances, and that's just one item on a list of about 20.
If the wall is an antithesis to the Statue of Liberty, GOOD. The Statue of Liberty is long out of date and bad for America. We don't need more people coming here, except very small numbers, purely on MERIT (only).
As I've said before, walls have proven their value in 77 other countries around the world. Not a question.
Regarding North Korea, I feel a sense of relief since Trump has gotten relations with them on a more even keel. Good job.