Why not Melania?

Reflexive cult outburst^^

The pictures don't lie.
.

Exactly.

melania-epstein.jpg
 
Melania's connection to Epstein is far more solid than the one invented about Hillary.

This is a simple, undeniable fact.

She should be subpoenaed under the very same justification used to haul Hillary in front of pedophile-enabler Gym Jordan's committee.
 
Melania's connection to Epstein is far more solid than the one invented about Hillary.

This is a simple, undeniable fact.

She should be subpoenaed under the very same justification used to haul Hillary in front of pedophile-enabler Gym Jordan's committee.
Really? She have him at her house 17 times like Hillary did? Link. Please
 
Melania's connection to Epstein is far more solid than the one invented about Hillary.

This is a simple, undeniable fact.

She should be subpoenaed under the very same justification used to haul Hillary in front of pedophile-enabler Gym Jordan's committee.
Oh, they suddenly don't care about that, because it was a nothing burger.

These freaks are used to constant failure.
 

Goldman Sachs lawyer Kathryn Ruemmler asked to testify to House panel

The House committee investigating the notorious sex offender Jeffrey Epstein has asked Goldman Sachs’ top lawyer, Kathryn Ruemmler, to testify about her interactions with Epstein, her spokeswoman said Tuesday.

“Ms. Ruemmler welcomes the opportunity to appear before the Committee,” said Jennifer Connelly, her spokeswoman.

“At the time she interacted with Jeffrey Epstein, she was a practicing criminal defense attorney and shared a client with him,” Connelly said. “She has done nothing wrong and had no knowledge of any ongoing criminal activity on his part.”

Lutnick agrees to testify in House Oversight Probe


Or for that matter, why not Don?

Hillary Clinton calls for Trump to testify 'under oath' on Epstein before US House panel​


Khanna, a member of the House Oversight Committee, referenced former President Bill Clinton’s testimony before the committee last week, saying Clinton “set a precedent” for high-profile figures to testify.

“A new Clinton rule that means that Donald Trump should do the same — answer the questions. Howard Lutnick should do the same,” Khanna told “Meet the Press.” “I’m working with a Republican actually to subpoena Howard Lutnick next week, and I believe he will come before the committee.”


It seems to me there's been a lot of effort put forth by the regime to conceal trump's involvement in this matter. If there's nothing to hide why not release all the docs? Why not have Don testify under oath? Why not call Melania to testify? Why the special treatment? Didn't trump promise his followers he would get to the bottom of what happened?
Trump released the documents when his predecessor would not. All of the principals have said Trump had no involvement whatsoever, including one who is now deceased and had nothing to gain. This is the latest in a long line of phony allegations against Trump. Hillary is trying to divert from her perverted husband. If justice prevails both of them and 0bama will spend their remaining days in prison for their role in other crimes.
 
A silly headline fronting a Nothingburger Topic from our resident Nothin Burger hack .
Idiots with IQ's under 80 are your typical rabid TDS thread starters. They start so many Trump hate threads they have run out of anything approaching a rational topic.
 
Because he was forced to do so by a law passed by Congress.

It's like you are trying hard to fool yourself.
Wrong he already began the process before the law, but did get congressional approval and protection with a law authorizing more documents

Which frankly backfired bigly on the Dems
 
Wrong he already began the process before the law, but did get congressional approval and protection with a law authorizing more documents

Which frankly backfired bigly on the Dems
No, liar. He was forced. By a law.
 
15th post
these-women-have-never-met-each-other-v0-1kg8nnmu68ug1.jpeg

Melania states that she "partied" with Epstein and Maxwell, but that they "were not friends". Okay . . .
Yes, I’ve certainly been to parties where people i am not friends with were

Sorry you lack a social life
 
Back
Top Bottom