Why not Melania?

The general consensus of most Americans is that Trump sent Melania out to distract from his disastrous war of choice in Iran, to make Epstein the headlines of the day.

This disastrous war of choice, was a distraction from Epstein.

That's how bad this war is going for him.

We're fµcked as long his fat ass is in Office OP.
You’re weird dude

You think anyone has forgotten about how the Dem party covered for, protected and took direction from Epstein, as the files so detail? No, we haven’t…your deplorable and desperate attempts to deflect won’t change that
 
Because he was forced to do so by a law passed by Congress.

It's like you are trying hard to fool yourself.
Trump signed the law, genius. The question is why didn’t the Biden DOJ release the documents when they could have?
 
these-women-have-never-met-each-other-v0-1kg8nnmu68ug1.jpeg

Melania states that she "partied" with Epstein and Maxwell, but that they "were not friends". Okay . . .
She was at parties.....but Hillary invited her to the White House 17 times.
 
Last edited:

Goldman Sachs lawyer Kathryn Ruemmler asked to testify to House panel

The House committee investigating the notorious sex offender Jeffrey Epstein has asked Goldman Sachs’ top lawyer, Kathryn Ruemmler, to testify about her interactions with Epstein, her spokeswoman said Tuesday.

ā€œMs. Ruemmler welcomes the opportunity to appear before the Committee,ā€ said Jennifer Connelly, her spokeswoman.

ā€œAt the time she interacted with Jeffrey Epstein, she was a practicing criminal defense attorney and shared a client with him,ā€ Connelly said. ā€œShe has done nothing wrong and had no knowledge of any ongoing criminal activity on his part.ā€

Lutnick agrees to testify in House Oversight Probe


Or for that matter, why not Don?

Hillary Clinton calls for Trump to testify 'under oath' on Epstein before US House panel​


Khanna, a member of the House Oversight Committee, referenced former President Bill Clinton’s testimony before the committee last week, saying Clinton ā€œset a precedentā€ for high-profile figures to testify.

ā€œA new Clinton rule that means that Donald Trump should do the same — answer the questions. Howard Lutnick should do the same,ā€ Khanna told ā€œMeet the Press.ā€ ā€œI’m working with a Republican actually to subpoena Howard Lutnick next week, and I believe he will come before the committee.ā€


It seems to me there's been a lot of effort put forth by the regime to conceal trump's involvement in this matter. If there's nothing to hide why not release all the docs? Why not have Don testify under oath? Why not call Melania to testify? Why the special treatment? Didn't trump promise his followers he would get to the bottom of what happened?
The Clintons never testified until they decided they wanted to.

Melania can do the same.

What else ya got?
 
It is no hoax that Melania knew Jeff Epstein far better than Hillary did.

Sorry.

She should be subpoenaed under the same low standard Hillary was.
If either of them did anything wrong, we'll never know about it now.

The sad thing here is that this massive crime, a global sex ring for the elite using and abusing young girls, will all be pushed under the rug to protect one (1) guy.

In all seriousness, I wish Trump had never met Epstein. If he hadn't, this thing would have blown open by now and we'd be nailing perps for what they did to those girls. There wouldn't be massive "redactions", and ALL of the materials would be in indictments. Blanche even admits that much has been withheld.
 
There is no crime in a married man getting blowjob from a consenting female. It is a crime to lie under oath. He was not impeached for getting a Blowjob. He was impeached for lying under oath. Standard line from the Neo-GOP.
And how much is Melania presenting and doing her best to not "lie"... while also not telling the truth?

How confident does she feel that the Epstein files are out and nothing else will come out to contradict her story now.

Would she have said she wrote emails to G before the email came out? Of course not.
 
It is no hoax that Melania knew Jeff Epstein far better than Hillary did.

Sorry.

She should be subpoenaed under the same low standard Hillary was.
House R's see it as their duty to protect all things trump. Perhaps because they have enabled this unfolding disaster.
 
Maybe he asked her to do this to take some attention away from our Iran mess?

:dunno:
As someone I heard yesterday said, it's hard to keep track of what is being used to deflect from what. The war, the files, the grifting, the polls, the mental decline, the economy, the tariffs, there's a need for a lot of obfuscation.
 
Trump signed the law, genius. The question is why didn’t the Biden DOJ release the documents when they could have?
No, it isn't. The question is why isn't the trump regime complying with the law?
 
Trump signed the law, genius.
Because he was politically forced to do so.

He could have just ordered the release. Like he promised, for a year. But he had to be forced.

And you know exactly why. I know you operate under 'jihad rules' for your new, orange god, so you shamelessly lie and put on transparent acts. But we both know you know why he didn't release them.
 
Because he was politically forced to do so.

He could have just ordered the release. Like he promised, for a year. But he had to be forced.

And you know exactly why. I know you operate under 'jihad rules' for your new, orange god, so you shamelessly lie and put on transparent acts. But we both know you know why he didn't release them.
He signed the bill and he’s released the documents. The principals all said Trump had no involvement. All you got out of it was a big donut. But you haven’t answered. Why didn’t the Biden DOJ release them. I know you operate under jihad rules for your Alzheimer’s patient god, so you shamelessly lie and put on transparent acts. But we both know you know why Biden didn’t release them.
 
No, it isn't. The question is why isn't the trump regime complying with the law?
Are you upset thet Trump was exonerated by all the principals and the released files? When are you leftwingers going to actually do something to help people instead of bifching about Trump?
 
After being forced to do so, despite promising he would do it for a year.

Yes genius, we covered this.
That’s hilarious. As if Trump has ever been swayed by politics. You’re clearly thinking of the average politician.
 
15th post
Link?

I remember when a young intern blew Bubba Clinton, and got a cigar shoved up her c_nt and democrats circled the wagons about "consensual sex".

The "young intern" was free, white and over 21 and she willingly participated in all of these behaviours. Not the same thing at all, but nice attempt at deflection.
 
The Clintons never testified until they decided they wanted to.

Melania can do the same.

What else ya got?
The Clinton's were compelled to testify by means of a subpoena. Melania hasn't been asked to testify. Were you a short bus rider or are you intentionally being obtuse?
 
He signed the bill and he’s released the documents. The principals all said Trump had no involvement. All you got out of it was a big donut. But you haven’t answered. Why didn’t the Biden DOJ release them. I know you operate under jihad rules for your Alzheimer’s patient god, so you shamelessly lie and put on transparent acts. But we both know you know why Biden didn’t release them.

If Trump had "no involvement", why is he mentioned thousands of times in the files? More than ANYONE other than Epstein and Maxwell??? Why is there an FBI report from a victim saying he beat and raped her?

That victim has twice tried to sue Trump and withdrew her claim after her family was threatened.
 
Are you upset thet Trump was exonerated by all the principals and the released files?
Hmmmmmmmm, let's see. Well, that never happened so there's nothing to be upset about except that the regime has been in violation of the law, the Epstein File Transparency Act, for months.
 
Back
Top Bottom