TRUMP speaks out about "Marxists" thugs RE the J/6 debacle

  1. The first distinction to be made, is that Brunson v. Adams is NOT a Supreme Court “case” — it is a petition that will very likely be dismissed and therefore not be heard by SCOTUS. This was the fate of the many other petitions that have been filed by prominent attorneys, including Trump’s own legal team and others. Are we to believe that Raland Brunson, who is not a lawyer and is of dubious character, is going to succeed where other well funded top-tier legal teams have failed? Do you believe that?
  2. Claiming that Brunson v. Adams has any chance whatsoever at removing a sitting president from office, and further expunging over 300 members of congress and federal officials for failing to uphold their oaths of office, is an extraordinary claim. Such a claim would naturally require extraordinary evidence. The only evidence that exists in this “case” is that Brunson is deceitful and dishonest.
  3. The petition itself is full of fluffy legalese. When the average everyday American reads a legal document, their eyes gloss over. That’s unfortunate, because in this case many of the words and phrases Brunson threads together amount to little more than mindless jabber and poor grammar. I offer this excerpt as an example:
    https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch...a7b61-246a-45e5-8ce9-5c70b4e3f9b2_908x675.png

What do you believe?

Do you believe that Brunson v. Adams is going to be heard by the Supreme Court and used to oust Joe Biden, inaugurate Donald Trump, and make Raland Brunson a billionaire in the process?



Or do you believe that these guys might be shysters trying to dig themselves out of a financial hole created by their default on a million dollar mortgage?

Look at the face. Read the demeanor. Use your head. Trust your instinct.

You don’t have to agree with me. Just be honest with yourself.

Is this the guy who's going to save our country?

Or is this just another psyop distraction that is keeping American patriots from paying attention to what’s really going on? You decide.
 
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #4
  1. The first distinction to be made, is that Brunson v. Adams is NOT a Supreme Court “case” — it is a petition that will very likely be dismissed and therefore not be heard by SCOTUS. This was the fate of the many other petitions that have been filed by prominent attorneys, including Trump’s own legal team and others. Are we to believe that Raland Brunson, who is not a lawyer and is of dubious character, is going to succeed where other well funded top-tier legal teams have failed? Do you believe that?
  2. Claiming that Brunson v. Adams has any chance whatsoever at removing a sitting president from office, and further expunging over 300 members of congress and federal officials for failing to uphold their oaths of office, is an extraordinary claim. Such a claim would naturally require extraordinary evidence. The only evidence that exists in this “case” is that Brunson is deceitful and dishonest.
  3. The petition itself is full of fluffy legalese. When the average everyday American reads a legal document, their eyes gloss over. That’s unfortunate, because in this case many of the words and phrases Brunson threads together amount to little more than mindless jabber and poor grammar. I offer this excerpt as an example:
    https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https://bucketeer-e05bbc84-baa3-437e-9518-adb32be77984.s3.amazonaws.com/public/images/ccca7b61-246a-45e5-8ce9-5c70b4e3f9b2_908x675.png

What do you believe?​

Do you believe that Brunson v. Adams is going to be heard by the Supreme Court and used to oust Joe Biden, inaugurate Donald Trump, and make Raland Brunson a billionaire in the process?


Or do you believe that these guys might be shysters trying to dig themselves out of a financial hole created by their default on a million dollar mortgage?

Look at the face. Read the demeanor. Use your head. Trust your instinct.

You don’t have to agree with me. Just be honest with yourself.

Is this the guy who's going to save our country?

Or is this just another psyop distraction that is keeping American patriots from paying attention to what’s really going on? You decide.
You are mad

There are too many dumbass comments here to address them all and I shouldn't validate any of them anyhow.

you show some photo and ask us to hate them bc of... the way they LOOK?

one sick puppy

:cuckoo:
 


This is just unbelievable... told ya the US is gone

Ta-dum!!

 
  1. The first distinction to be made, is that Brunson v. Adams is NOT a Supreme Court “case” — it is a petition that will very likely be dismissed and therefore not be heard by SCOTUS. This was the fate of the many other petitions that have been filed by prominent attorneys, including Trump’s own legal team and others. Are we to believe that Raland Brunson, who is not a lawyer and is of dubious character, is going to succeed where other well funded top-tier legal teams have failed? Do you believe that?
  2. Claiming that Brunson v. Adams has any chance whatsoever at removing a sitting president from office, and further expunging over 300 members of congress and federal officials for failing to uphold their oaths of office, is an extraordinary claim. Such a claim would naturally require extraordinary evidence. The only evidence that exists in this “case” is that Brunson is deceitful and dishonest.
  3. The petition itself is full of fluffy legalese. When the average everyday American reads a legal document, their eyes gloss over. That’s unfortunate, because in this case many of the words and phrases Brunson threads together amount to little more than mindless jabber and poor grammar. I offer this excerpt as an example:
    https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https://bucketeer-e05bbc84-baa3-437e-9518-adb32be77984.s3.amazonaws.com/public/images/ccca7b61-246a-45e5-8ce9-5c70b4e3f9b2_908x675.png

What do you believe?​

Do you believe that Brunson v. Adams is going to be heard by the Supreme Court and used to oust Joe Biden, inaugurate Donald Trump, and make Raland Brunson a billionaire in the process?


Or do you believe that these guys might be shysters trying to dig themselves out of a financial hole created by their default on a million dollar mortgage?

Look at the face. Read the demeanor. Use your head. Trust your instinct.

You don’t have to agree with me. Just be honest with yourself.

Is this the guy who's going to save our country?

Or is this just another psyop distraction that is keeping American patriots from paying attention to what’s really going on? You decide.

They paid their $300 to petition the SCOTUS. They got a conference date, which is what they paid for. The SCOTUS predictably denied them cert.

If they've got another $300 they can repeat the process again. You can literally buy 5 minutes of the Supreme Court's time to reject your request.
 
So long as sore loser Baby Donald continues to peddle his Big Lie, there will be no-conscience lawyers lining up around the block to soak him and his rubes for as much money as they can grab.
 

Forum List

Back
Top