Fort Fun Indiana
Diamond Member
- Mar 10, 2017
- 92,834
- 59,845
- 2,645
*and in the view of international lawIllegal in your view not their view
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
*and in the view of international lawIllegal in your view not their view
International Law as developed by Antisemitic Eurotrash. Spare me.*and in the view of international law
More flatulence from Farty. How typical. The headline is of course absolutely false. As for Pearl clutching, why DO you react in that faggoty fashion? You leftards despise the truth. You’re quite the little acolyte.Of course, this is embarrassing, childish equivocation, as the headline is factual. Why the pearl clutching? So your far right wing heroes got caught hanging with far right wing idiots. Did you put on your surprised face?
The best way of determine whether it is antisemitic or not (imo) is if Israel is being uniquely singled out for something many other countries do. For example, Hamas lobs rockets into Israel’s civilian areas, Israel has a right to respond and protect it’s citizens, like any other nation. Denying that while allowing other nations that right could be antisemitic. But objecting to settlement expansions, the unequal justice system, the way Jews, but not Palestinians can reclaim property…those sort of things are not anti-Semitic and labeling them as such shuts down debate and perpetrates injustice.In the vast majority of cases, the condemnation expressed for Israel is driven by antisemitism. There is no other way to explain why other countries, guilty of so much worse, barely get a passing frown, and all the venom goes to the little Jewish country. It is the double standards that reveal it.
But certainly, the snark with which people speak about “the Zionists,” as a synonym for Jews, is an even more obvious reveal of antisemitism.
Absolutely! And the goal of BDS is to dismantle Israel. How can a movement geared to the destruction of Israel, the one and only Jewish country in the world, be seen as anything other than antisemitic?Most democrats want Israel to give up every protection they have against a world that has vowed to drive Israel into the sea.
The aim of the Democrat Party is the end of the State of Israel. First the West Bank, then Gaza, then half of Jerusalem, then the Temple Mount.
Nah, spot on. Have your hissy, cultist. Changes nothing.More flatulence from Farty. How typical. The headline is of course absolutely false. As for Pearl clutching, why DO you react in that faggoty fashion? You leftards despise the truth. You’re quite the little acolyte.
The Muslim squad members were trying to get Congress to defund the Iron Dome in order to hang the Jews out to dry, so to speak.Most democrats want Israel to give up every protection they have against a world that has vowed to drive Israel into the sea.
The aim of the Democrat Party is the end of the State of Israel. First the West Bank, then Gaza, then half of Jerusalem, then the Temple Mount.
Half truth, as always.The Muslim squad members were trying to get Congress to defund the Iron Dome in order to hand the Jews out to dry, so to speak.
You have a “spot on” your underoos from your flatulence. It’s your hissy fit, bitch. Have a good soak in a tub. Wash yourself while you’re at it.Nah, spot on. Have your hissy, cultist. Changes nothing.
In the vast majority of cases, the condemnation expressed for Israel is driven by antisemitism. There is no other way to explain why other countries, guilty of so much worse, barely get a passing frown, and all the venom goes to the little Jewish country. It is the double standards that reveal it.
But certainly, the snark with which people speak about “the Zionists,” as a synonym for Jews, is an even more obvious reveal of antisemitism.
Objecting to very specific policies is not necessarily antisemitic, which is why I said criticism of Israel is antisemitic “in the vast majority of cases” and not “in 100% of the cases.” I agree there are exceptions, albeit rarely.The best way of determine whether it is antisemitic or not (imo) is if Israel is being uniquely singled out for something many other countries do. For example, Hamas lobs rockets into Israel’s civilian areas, Israel has a right to respond and protect it’s citizens, like any other nation. Denying that while allowing other nations that right could be antisemitic. But objecting to settlement expansions, the unequal justice system, the way Jews, but not Palestinians can reclaim property…those sort of things are not anti-Semitic and labeling them as such shuts down debate and perpetrates injustice.
That was excellent. A picture does indeed tell 1000 words.
Well, with all due respect, sometimes old people do get a little “pixilated.”I am old and became a registered democrat on the DAY I turned
21. I am descended from ONLY DEMOCRATS ----and I and my
forebears are and have been ALL LIBERAL. At the present time
the donkey is PIXILATED and FASCIST. I am still a registered
democrat but in the past few years have NOT voted for democrat
candidates -----at all
OMFG. You just demeaned Jews who won’t vote for Democrats, and then advanced the DISGUSTING LIE of the Democrat Party that “Israel is an apartheid state.” Do you Israel-haters even HEAR yourselves??Well, with all due respect, sometimes old people do get a little “pixilated.”
As for saying Democrats today are “FASCIST,” that is frankly a disgraceful example of Republican — really “Orwellian” — propaganda. It is violent language, part of Republican / MAGA “big lie” attacks on the Democratic Party.
I’m not a Democrat but I find it crude and offensive. It also seems to me especially inappropriate for Jews to speak this way, as they presumably should know something about real fascism and fascist anti-Semitic propaganda. Maybe you just spoke out emotionally about your disappointment with “the Donkey”?
The Democratic Party has aided Israel since its creation, and in Congress yearly supports it, voting for billions in taxpayer-paid assistance. Democrats like Schumer and Pelosi if anything have bent the stick too far toward supporting the only nuclear armed state in the Middle East. Israel has evolved into an economically and militarily powerful (if small) “apartheid state.” It is a truly tragic evolution, though not really surprising under the circumstances. Nobody, least of all I, have easy workable answers to resolving the deep Israeli / Palestinian enmity that exists.
But when critics, be they Democrats or Republicans or independents, speak out against real Israeli excesses — or oppose further U.S. aid — they ought not to be accused of being anti-Semites or … “FASCIST.”
Just pointing out your condemnation of Jews who won’t vote for the Party who is calling Israel an “Apartheid state.” Sad that you can’t see the disconnect.No point in talking with you. You seem completely hysterical and totally unable to maintain a civil discussion. Your charges against me are off-the-wall crazy.
Nothing hysterical about pointing out why a Jew might shy away from voting for the Party that targets the sole Jewish county for disproportionate condemnation and falsely calls it an apartheid country.More lies, hysteria, and lunacy from Lisa558.
If any of her friends are here, please talk to her — privately — and urge her to take her medicine.
Why are we funding it?The Muslim squad members were trying to get Congress to defund the Iron Dome in order to hang the Jews out to dry, so to speak.
No. Not in their view. Just like annexing parts of Ukraine and Georgia isn’t “illegal“ in Russia’s view.Illegal in your view not their view