Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Only the most stupid people believe that all 93 million want a job but have dropped out because they have given up.Yep just like the conspiracy that 93 million Americans of the working age are sitting idle because they choose to do so...............
There was hyperinflation since Nixon's reelection, yet Carter was able to keep UE at the mid 7% level the whole time, and St Ronnie couldn't.Again ignoring the Hyper inflation and results of Carter.No, the UE rate was in the middle 7% range and steady when St Ronnie took over. Reagan's policies then jacked it to 10.8%.The official unemployment rate was high for a few years under Reagan for the actions of Carter
Math challenged?I remember when the Bush Administration claimed to have "full employment" using the same methodology that "O" uses and the participation rate wasn't even close to when Clinton was in office. The conservatives sang praise to Bush from the highest mountains.
Funny how things change when the president is from the opposing party! Hypocrisy much?
Again ignoring the Hyper inflation and results of Carter.No, the UE rate was in the middle 7% range and steady when St Ronnie took over. Reagan's policies then jacked it to 10.8%.The official unemployment rate was high for a few years under Reagan for the actions of Carter
Actually in April 2000 Clinton had a 67.3% LPR and a 3.8% UE rateMath challenged?
5% unemployment with a 66.4% participation rate
versus
5% unemployment and a 62.6% participation rate.
which one is better??
PS_ the participation rate under clinton was never higher than 67.2
Actually in April 2000 Clinton had a 67.3% LPR and a 3.8% UE rateMath challenged?
5% unemployment with a 66.4% participation rate
versus
5% unemployment and a 62.6% participation rate.
which one is better??
PS_ the participation rate under clinton was never higher than 67.2
And the labor participation rate did what under Reagan......................The official unemployment rate was high for a few years under Reagan for the actions of Carter and hyper inflation....................The jobs did turn around.............The participation rate may be a different matter on how the Gov't calculates the rates..............I felt the same way when Reagan was president. After 26 weeks of unemployment, you no longer existed.
Bottom line....................more go into poverty now..............the rate is much higher than reported now.............and companies are hauling ass to foreign lands under the trade deals................Medium wage drops added to the list..............As a result of the off shoring of jobs.
Again ignoring the Hyper inflation and results of Carter.No, the UE rate was in the middle 7% range and steady when St Ronnie took over. Reagan's policies then jacked it to 10.8%.The official unemployment rate was high for a few years under Reagan for the actions of Carter
Lol, like Carter caused inflation.
Wait a second, Democrat tell us that Food Stamps and unemployment are signs of a healthy growing economy, it might be bad if people came off unemployment
Math challenged?I remember when the Bush Administration claimed to have "full employment" using the same methodology that "O" uses and the participation rate wasn't even close to when Clinton was in office. The conservatives sang praise to Bush from the highest mountains.
Funny how things change when the president is from the opposing party! Hypocrisy much?
5% unemployment with a 66.4% participation rate
versus
5% unemployment and a 62.6% participation rate.
which one is better??
PS_ the participation rate under clinton was never higher than 67.2
He is counting everyone in the country from the new born to the oldest to the lame and crazy, the right wing lazy, as eligible for employment.
Even using the few figures he cites, I'm trying really hard to determine how he arrives at the idea that 134 million people are out of work.
Don’t forget in the meantime we have a real unemployment rate that’s probably 21%. It’s not 6. I’s not 5.2 and 5.5. Our real unemployment rate–in fact, I saw a chart the other day, our real unemployment–because you have ninety million people that aren’t working. Ninety-three million to be exact.
If you start adding it up, our real unemployment rate is 42%.
Donald Trump Explains All
He is counting everyone in the country from the new born to the oldest to the lame and crazy, the right wing lazy, as eligible for employment.
Even using the few figures he cites, I'm trying really hard to determine how he arrives at the idea that 134 million people are out of work.
Don’t forget in the meantime we have a real unemployment rate that’s probably 21%. It’s not 6. I’s not 5.2 and 5.5. Our real unemployment rate–in fact, I saw a chart the other day, our real unemployment–because you have ninety million people that aren’t working. Ninety-three million to be exact.
If you start adding it up, our real unemployment rate is 42%.
Donald Trump Explains All
This is never a winning argument for the far right.
What exactly does that have to do with your fellow wing-nut traveller lying about retirees having no effect on the LPR, other than deflecting from their lie, of course?Why do you leftist like shipping in immigrants to take American jobs? Sounds anti-American to meFurther proof that the Right are the NO-Information Voters.Retirement does not affect the labor participation rate. Labor participation are those people who would like to participate, but can't.
Thank you.
Only the most stupid people believe that all 93 million want a job but have dropped out because they have given up.Yep just like the conspiracy that 93 million Americans of the working age are sitting idle because they choose to do so...............
The fact is only about 6 million of those 93 million want a job and less than 1 million have given up due to discouragement. The rest have health, transportation, child care, etc., problems.
Bureau of Labor Statistics Data
Not in Labor Force, Want a Job Now
Even using the few figures he cites, I'm trying really hard to determine how he arrives at the idea that 134 million people are out of work.
Don’t forget in the meantime we have a real unemployment rate that’s probably 21%. It’s not 6. I’s not 5.2 and 5.5. Our real unemployment rate–in fact, I saw a chart the other day, our real unemployment–because you have ninety million people that aren’t working. Ninety-three million to be exact.
If you start adding it up, our real unemployment rate is 42%.
Donald Trump Explains All
Its probably even higher. Think of all those toddlers and primary school kids who are refusing to go out and support themselves with gainful employment. Or worse....
.....can't find work.
Learn to read!Only the most stupid people believe that all 93 million want a job but have dropped out because they have given up.Yep just like the conspiracy that 93 million Americans of the working age are sitting idle because they choose to do so...............
The fact is only about 6 million of those 93 million want a job and less than 1 million have given up due to discouragement. The rest have health, transportation, child care, etc., problems.
Bureau of Labor Statistics Data
Not in Labor Force, Want a Job Now
who said they all wanted a job? Obama has too many depended on government
