Trump: Pelosi, Schumer ready to make a deal after executive orders

President Trump on Monday said Democratic leaders suddenly want to make a deal on a coronavirus relief package after he blew past the stalled negotiations with executive orders to send aid to Americans.

Wondering how Republicans in Congress will respond when Biden issues to EOs to work around them.

This shit is a two-way street. We realize that, right?

They would take it to court like they have with EO's DumBama issued. That's the way our system works.

I think one thing we've come realize, with Trump, is just how much of our system of check and balances relies on the good faith of those we elect. And on the willingness of everyone involved - ie both parties - to honor them....

'honor' -- yeah, right.

Anyone else cheering for COVID?
 
President Trump on Monday said Democratic leaders suddenly want to make a deal on a coronavirus relief package after he blew past the stalled negotiations with executive orders to send aid to Americans.



He said Senate Minority Leader Charles E. Schumer and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, who spent the weekend decrying the executive action as illegal, sent word they want to meet with him.



“So now Schumer and Pelosi want to meet to make a deal. Amazing how it all works, isn’t it. Where have they been for the last 4 weeks when they were ‘hardliners’, and only wanted BAILOUT MONEY for Democrat run states and cities that are failing badly? They know my phone number!” Mr. Trump tweeted.


I don't care what the leftists say, President Trump is brilliant.

He set himself up for a win-win situation. In all cases when there is a stalemate, the MSM always blames the Republicans. If it's the Republican Congress, they blame them. If it's a Republican President, they blame him. After all, when was the last time the MSM reported a government shutdown was the Democrats fault? Never.

Trump issued this EO knowing it wouldn't stand in court. But if the Dems want to take it there, he can say they stopped him from helping the people. If they understand what he's doing and not take it to court to stop Trump, he gets everything he listed in the EO, and again, take complete credit for it.

No matter what the Dems do, they are going to look bad, and again, that's the brilliant move by President Trump.

Apparently they know they've been checkmated, and now have to try and figure something out.

It is a dumb move but you are too stupid to know that. There is no eviction moratorium so people can be evicted. Payments if any will take months. People will blame Trump and the Republicans when at the end of August people are being evicted and no payments are forthcoming.

Trump's EO included a national restriction on evictions, which I am against. As a landlord myself, I have no problem with people being protected against evictions if they are a victim of Covid. I do however have a problem with protecting all people being evicted whether it was Covid related or not.

I can understand your position, you still have to pay taxs and water bills etc. However the situation is people with kids who dont have the corona virus may still have been put out of work and have no income. To allow them to be evicted makes them homeless, through no fault of their own, its not like their bums or dont want to work. Its a kind damned if you do damned if you dont

Two points on that: For one, if somebody lost their job because of the virus, again, I'm okay with protection IF they have no income. Two, unemployment with the fed subsidies pay a lot of people more than when they were working. So if you were paying rent okay while working, why would you not be able to pay when you're bringing home more money? Or should I say, staying home for more money?

I've been a landlord for over 25 years now. Like any other group of people, some tenants can be irresponsible. If we had a general overall protection for all tenants, some might take that money and spend it foolishly because they can legally not pay rent. If there was a law protecting them, it doesn't mean they get free rent. You still have to pay all that back rent for the months they didn't pay, and then they will be in serious debt.

Eventually it will end up in the courts and be time consuming and costly for both. Fortunately for me, all my tenants are working and paying rent as usual. But they are such good tenants that if anybody ran into trouble because of the virus, I wouldn't need a law to help them out. I value their residency here.

That is not true. I see you received your talking points from Trump. The unemployment subsidies do not pay many people more than they were making when they were working. For some that is true. However some are also making less than they were making before.

Its true and the ones making less were very high paid people, the average worker made more on the stimulus unemployment.
Hardly.

Unemployment AND the extra $600 totaled $3200/month. That's a yearly salary of $38,000.

You think anyone making more than that is "highly paid"?

600 a week is more than most labor makes...most do not make 15 an hour and thats who needs the most help...anyone making over 50 grand shouldnt get it, they should have prepared for a rainy day
Well those folks who WOULD be making only $15/hr if they were not unemployed (ya know...the ones you claim to care about) ain't getting SHIT now

Blame Pulousy
Pelosi passed the HEROES Act three months ago that would have gotten them paid

Blame Moscow Mitch and Trump

So your suggestion is that when the Democrats pass something, the President should capitulate and just sign anything they throw in front of him even if he totally disagrees with it?
 
President Trump on Monday said Democratic leaders suddenly want to make a deal on a coronavirus relief package after he blew past the stalled negotiations with executive orders to send aid to Americans.



He said Senate Minority Leader Charles E. Schumer and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, who spent the weekend decrying the executive action as illegal, sent word they want to meet with him.



“So now Schumer and Pelosi want to meet to make a deal. Amazing how it all works, isn’t it. Where have they been for the last 4 weeks when they were ‘hardliners’, and only wanted BAILOUT MONEY for Democrat run states and cities that are failing badly? They know my phone number!” Mr. Trump tweeted.


I don't care what the leftists say, President Trump is brilliant.

He set himself up for a win-win situation. In all cases when there is a stalemate, the MSM always blames the Republicans. If it's the Republican Congress, they blame them. If it's a Republican President, they blame him. After all, when was the last time the MSM reported a government shutdown was the Democrats fault? Never.

Trump issued this EO knowing it wouldn't stand in court. But if the Dems want to take it there, he can say they stopped him from helping the people. If they understand what he's doing and not take it to court to stop Trump, he gets everything he listed in the EO, and again, take complete credit for it.

No matter what the Dems do, they are going to look bad, and again, that's the brilliant move by President Trump.

Apparently they know they've been checkmated, and now have to try and figure something out.

It is a dumb move but you are too stupid to know that. There is no eviction moratorium so people can be evicted. Payments if any will take months. People will blame Trump and the Republicans when at the end of August people are being evicted and no payments are forthcoming.

Trump's EO included a national restriction on evictions, which I am against. As a landlord myself, I have no problem with people being protected against evictions if they are a victim of Covid. I do however have a problem with protecting all people being evicted whether it was Covid related or not.

I can understand your position, you still have to pay taxs and water bills etc. However the situation is people with kids who dont have the corona virus may still have been put out of work and have no income. To allow them to be evicted makes them homeless, through no fault of their own, its not like their bums or dont want to work. Its a kind damned if you do damned if you dont

Two points on that: For one, if somebody lost their job because of the virus, again, I'm okay with protection IF they have no income. Two, unemployment with the fed subsidies pay a lot of people more than when they were working. So if you were paying rent okay while working, why would you not be able to pay when you're bringing home more money? Or should I say, staying home for more money?

I've been a landlord for over 25 years now. Like any other group of people, some tenants can be irresponsible. If we had a general overall protection for all tenants, some might take that money and spend it foolishly because they can legally not pay rent. If there was a law protecting them, it doesn't mean they get free rent. You still have to pay all that back rent for the months they didn't pay, and then they will be in serious debt.

Eventually it will end up in the courts and be time consuming and costly for both. Fortunately for me, all my tenants are working and paying rent as usual. But they are such good tenants that if anybody ran into trouble because of the virus, I wouldn't need a law to help them out. I value their residency here.

That is not true. I see you received your talking points from Trump. The unemployment subsidies do not pay many people more than they were making when they were working. For some that is true. However some are also making less than they were making before.

Its true and the ones making less were very high paid people, the average worker made more on the stimulus unemployment.
Hardly.

Unemployment AND the extra $600 totaled $3200/month. That's a yearly salary of $38,000.

You think anyone making more than that is "highly paid"?

600 a week is more than most labor makes...most do not make 15 an hour and thats who needs the most help...anyone making over 50 grand shouldnt get it, they should have prepared for a rainy day
Well those folks who WOULD be making only $15/hr if they were not unemployed (ya know...the ones you claim to care about) ain't getting SHIT now

What do you mean they ain't getting shit now? You can't get the 600 a week unless you are on your state unemployment. So what they are getting now is what they would be getting if they were laid off if there was no Covid around.
 
President Trump on Monday said Democratic leaders suddenly want to make a deal on a coronavirus relief package after he blew past the stalled negotiations with executive orders to send aid to Americans.



He said Senate Minority Leader Charles E. Schumer and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, who spent the weekend decrying the executive action as illegal, sent word they want to meet with him.



“So now Schumer and Pelosi want to meet to make a deal. Amazing how it all works, isn’t it. Where have they been for the last 4 weeks when they were ‘hardliners’, and only wanted BAILOUT MONEY for Democrat run states and cities that are failing badly? They know my phone number!” Mr. Trump tweeted.


I don't care what the leftists say, President Trump is brilliant.

He set himself up for a win-win situation. In all cases when there is a stalemate, the MSM always blames the Republicans. If it's the Republican Congress, they blame them. If it's a Republican President, they blame him. After all, when was the last time the MSM reported a government shutdown was the Democrats fault? Never.

Trump issued this EO knowing it wouldn't stand in court. But if the Dems want to take it there, he can say they stopped him from helping the people. If they understand what he's doing and not take it to court to stop Trump, he gets everything he listed in the EO, and again, take complete credit for it.

No matter what the Dems do, they are going to look bad, and again, that's the brilliant move by President Trump.

Apparently they know they've been checkmated, and now have to try and figure something out.

It is a dumb move but you are too stupid to know that. There is no eviction moratorium so people can be evicted. Payments if any will take months. People will blame Trump and the Republicans when at the end of August people are being evicted and no payments are forthcoming.

Trump's EO included a national restriction on evictions, which I am against. As a landlord myself, I have no problem with people being protected against evictions if they are a victim of Covid. I do however have a problem with protecting all people being evicted whether it was Covid related or not.

I can understand your position, you still have to pay taxs and water bills etc. However the situation is people with kids who dont have the corona virus may still have been put out of work and have no income. To allow them to be evicted makes them homeless, through no fault of their own, its not like their bums or dont want to work. Its a kind damned if you do damned if you dont

Two points on that: For one, if somebody lost their job because of the virus, again, I'm okay with protection IF they have no income. Two, unemployment with the fed subsidies pay a lot of people more than when they were working. So if you were paying rent okay while working, why would you not be able to pay when you're bringing home more money? Or should I say, staying home for more money?

I've been a landlord for over 25 years now. Like any other group of people, some tenants can be irresponsible. If we had a general overall protection for all tenants, some might take that money and spend it foolishly because they can legally not pay rent. If there was a law protecting them, it doesn't mean they get free rent. You still have to pay all that back rent for the months they didn't pay, and then they will be in serious debt.

Eventually it will end up in the courts and be time consuming and costly for both. Fortunately for me, all my tenants are working and paying rent as usual. But they are such good tenants that if anybody ran into trouble because of the virus, I wouldn't need a law to help them out. I value their residency here.

That is not true. I see you received your talking points from Trump. The unemployment subsidies do not pay many people more than they were making when they were working. For some that is true. However some are also making less than they were making before.

Its true and the ones making less were very high paid people, the average worker made more on the stimulus unemployment.
Hardly.

Unemployment AND the extra $600 totaled $3200/month. That's a yearly salary of $38,000.

You think anyone making more than that is "highly paid"?

600 a week is more than most labor makes...most do not make 15 an hour and thats who needs the most help...anyone making over 50 grand shouldnt get it, they should have prepared for a rainy day

It's not the 600 bucks, it's the 600 bucks on top of your state unemployment.

So if you are getting 400 a week from the state, and 600 a week from the feds, you are grossing $1,000 a week. When you consider the taxes you are not paying like SS and Medicare, it's comparable to somebody making 60K a year. 60K a year for being laid off?

Let's say you were making $18.00 an hour, which in my state, isn't too bad. That's less than 38K a year gross. Now you get laid off and are getting close to 60K a year. Are you going to go out and look for a job? Of course not. You are 20K a year ahead of the game. Even if somebody offered you a job for $4.00 an hour more than you were making, you'd still be doing much better on unemployment.

This is the problem Republicans have with this extra money.
 
President Trump on Monday said Democratic leaders suddenly want to make a deal on a coronavirus relief package after he blew past the stalled negotiations with executive orders to send aid to Americans.

Wondering how Republicans in Congress will respond when Biden issues to EOs to work around them.

This shit is a two-way street. We realize that, right?

They would take it to court like they have with EO's DumBama issued. That's the way our system works.

I think one thing we've come realize, with Trump, is just how much of our system of check and balances relies on the good faith of those we elect. And on the willingness of everyone involved - ie both parties - to honor them....

'honor' -- yeah, right.

Anyone else cheering for COVID?


Those days are gone, obama finished the working together and honor thing off
 
President Trump on Monday said Democratic leaders suddenly want to make a deal on a coronavirus relief package after he blew past the stalled negotiations with executive orders to send aid to Americans.

Wondering how Republicans in Congress will respond when Biden issues to EOs to work around them.

This shit is a two-way street. We realize that, right?

They would take it to court like they have with EO's DumBama issued. That's the way our system works.

I think one thing we've come realize, with Trump, is just how much of our system of check and balances relies on the good faith of those we elect. And on the willingness of everyone involved - ie both parties - to honor them....

'honor' -- yeah, right.

Anyone else cheering for COVID?


Those days are gone, obama finished the working together and honor thing off

Been gone for a long time. The only time Ds or Rs want restrained government is when they're not in charge.
 
President Trump on Monday said Democratic leaders suddenly want to make a deal on a coronavirus relief package after he blew past the stalled negotiations with executive orders to send aid to Americans.

Wondering how Republicans in Congress will respond when Biden issues to EOs to work around them.

This shit is a two-way street. We realize that, right?

They would take it to court like they have with EO's DumBama issued. That's the way our system works.

I think one thing we've come realize, with Trump, is just how much of our system of check and balances relies on the good faith of those we elect. And on the willingness of everyone involved - ie both parties - to honor them....

'honor' -- yeah, right.

Anyone else cheering for COVID?


Those days are gone, obama finished the working together and honor thing off

Been gone for a long time. The only time Ds or Rs want restrained government is when they're not in charge.

Or if they are cornered or if it benefits them
 
President Trump on Monday said Democratic leaders suddenly want to make a deal on a coronavirus relief package after he blew past the stalled negotiations with executive orders to send aid to Americans.



He said Senate Minority Leader Charles E. Schumer and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, who spent the weekend decrying the executive action as illegal, sent word they want to meet with him.



“So now Schumer and Pelosi want to meet to make a deal. Amazing how it all works, isn’t it. Where have they been for the last 4 weeks when they were ‘hardliners’, and only wanted BAILOUT MONEY for Democrat run states and cities that are failing badly? They know my phone number!” Mr. Trump tweeted.


I don't care what the leftists say, President Trump is brilliant.

He set himself up for a win-win situation. In all cases when there is a stalemate, the MSM always blames the Republicans. If it's the Republican Congress, they blame them. If it's a Republican President, they blame him. After all, when was the last time the MSM reported a government shutdown was the Democrats fault? Never.

Trump issued this EO knowing it wouldn't stand in court. But if the Dems want to take it there, he can say they stopped him from helping the people. If they understand what he's doing and not take it to court to stop Trump, he gets everything he listed in the EO, and again, take complete credit for it.

No matter what the Dems do, they are going to look bad, and again, that's the brilliant move by President Trump.

Apparently they know they've been checkmated, and now have to try and figure something out.

It is a dumb move but you are too stupid to know that. There is no eviction moratorium so people can be evicted. Payments if any will take months. People will blame Trump and the Republicans when at the end of August people are being evicted and no payments are forthcoming.

Trump's EO included a national restriction on evictions, which I am against. As a landlord myself, I have no problem with people being protected against evictions if they are a victim of Covid. I do however have a problem with protecting all people being evicted whether it was Covid related or not.

I can understand your position, you still have to pay taxs and water bills etc. However the situation is people with kids who dont have the corona virus may still have been put out of work and have no income. To allow them to be evicted makes them homeless, through no fault of their own, its not like their bums or dont want to work. Its a kind damned if you do damned if you dont

Two points on that: For one, if somebody lost their job because of the virus, again, I'm okay with protection IF they have no income. Two, unemployment with the fed subsidies pay a lot of people more than when they were working. So if you were paying rent okay while working, why would you not be able to pay when you're bringing home more money? Or should I say, staying home for more money?

I've been a landlord for over 25 years now. Like any other group of people, some tenants can be irresponsible. If we had a general overall protection for all tenants, some might take that money and spend it foolishly because they can legally not pay rent. If there was a law protecting them, it doesn't mean they get free rent. You still have to pay all that back rent for the months they didn't pay, and then they will be in serious debt.

Eventually it will end up in the courts and be time consuming and costly for both. Fortunately for me, all my tenants are working and paying rent as usual. But they are such good tenants that if anybody ran into trouble because of the virus, I wouldn't need a law to help them out. I value their residency here.

That is not true. I see you received your talking points from Trump. The unemployment subsidies do not pay many people more than they were making when they were working. For some that is true. However some are also making less than they were making before.

Correct, some. If your job was paying 65K a year, you are better off working.

A friend of mine stopped over and we were talking about this. He told me about his nephew. He worked part-time at some factory somewhere at $12.00 an hour. He worked 30 hours a week. Not good money, but he still lived at home and like a lot of younger people, just paid his parents some room and board. He lost the job and applied for unemployment and the fed addition. He went from grossing $320.00 a week to $800.00 a week with the combined state and fed unemployment.

I don't know this kid because I never met him. But I've known his parents since we were kids because we were all in the same grade and went to the same school. Both very good and hard working people. Do you think this kid was out looking for a job when the government was paying him that kind of money?
 
President Trump on Monday said Democratic leaders suddenly want to make a deal on a coronavirus relief package after he blew past the stalled negotiations with executive orders to send aid to Americans.

Wondering how Republicans in Congress will respond when Biden issues to EOs to work around them.

This shit is a two-way street. We realize that, right?

They would take it to court like they have with EO's DumBama issued. That's the way our system works.

I think one thing we've come realize, with Trump, is just how much of our system of check and balances relies on the good faith of those we elect. And on the willingness of everyone involved - ie both parties - to honor them....

'honor' -- yeah, right.

Anyone else cheering for COVID?
I'm not cheering for covid but perhaps because there shouldn't be a need to. IF Trump was sincerely interested in governing, we'd see people in baseball stadiums and students safely in class right now. But Trump identified what he thought he had to do, at a minimum, to get reelected (show some wall progress and gin up the econ and at least appear to be taking on Jina). A freaking respiratory virus has brought the econ to it's knees. It's like we are governed by Boris Johnson or Bolsonaro. And the UK might be doing a better job than us.

If anyone can get reelected with 300k needless deaths, maybe we should just anoint him emperor for life
 
President Trump on Monday said Democratic leaders suddenly want to make a deal on a coronavirus relief package after he blew past the stalled negotiations with executive orders to send aid to Americans.

Wondering how Republicans in Congress will respond when Biden issues to EOs to work around them.

This shit is a two-way street. We realize that, right?

They would take it to court like they have with EO's DumBama issued. That's the way our system works.

I think one thing we've come realize, with Trump, is just how much of our system of check and balances relies on the good faith of those we elect. And on the willingness of everyone involved - ie both parties - to honor them....

'honor' -- yeah, right.

Anyone else cheering for COVID?
I'm not cheering for covid but perhaps because there shouldn't be a need to. IF Trump was sincerely interested in governing, we'd see people in baseball stadiums and students safely in class right now. But Trump identified what he thought he had to do, at a minimum, to get reelected (show some wall progress and gin up the econ and at least appear to be taking on Jina). A freaking respiratory virus has brought the econ to it's knees. It's like we are governed by Boris Johnson or Bolsonaro. And the UK might be doing a better job than us.

If anyone can get reelected with 300k needless deaths, maybe we should just anoint him emperor for life

Oh man cmon, this damn virus is all over the world, over 20,000,000 people are infected and you want to blame trump...know what you should be blaming ANTIFA and BLM and the neverending rioting and looting
and all the college kids partying on the beach
 
If anyone can get reelected with 300k needless deaths, maybe we should just anoint him emperor for life

But that's just how broken the system is. Even when they needed to, even when the country desperately needed them to, Democrats couldn't nominate a decent candidate for President. Biden still might win, but only because our system is so fucked up that all he has to do is be slightly better than Trump. An abysmally low bar.
 
ROFL every single liberal response to this thread has been Trump lies...how can so many be so naive about how much DEMOCRATS LIE...amazing
Trump doesnt lie, he merely disagrees with libtards and gives his reasons which they can only grasp as lies since it rejects their sordid and twisted view of the world.
 
I'm not cheering for covid but perhaps because there shouldn't be a need to. IF Trump was sincerely interested in governing, ....
FULL STOP

Trump has accomplished more than you can comprehend apparently.

There is no failure on his part to act, only on your part to educate yourself, loser.
 
It's like if you're selling your used car. You want 16K for it. So you advertise it for 17K. Somebody comes along that likes the car, and makes an offer of 15K which you refuse. You barter back and forth, and finally agree to 16K. It's all you wanted for the car in the first place.
Trump knows how this game works.
Only in this case the buyers 'Democrats' wanted you to throw your house in for free to seal the deal.
 
If I hear Sandra Smith on FOX news say one more time today that "The republicans didn't like it when Obama signed executive orders"....
Sandra you ignorant bitch....we are fighting our way out of a pandemic you stupid never Trumper......I can't watch this happen to a once fair and impartial news agency.....
Tell me what you watch I'll tell you who you are.

How can you stand watching the clowns at FOX? do you have a functioning brain? Because I can tell you that even when I hardly spoke any English, I knew they were clowns just from their facial expressions. Wake up and nourish your brain if you still have one.
I watch them all....they are all out of touch with middle America...maybe the big networks should move to the mid west and hire from there....the news would be much more in line with the thinking of average Americans.....the coasts are filled with freaks.....tattooed pierced purple hair freaks....
 
President Trump would have never wrote it if he didn't have the ability to fund it. I don't know how that's done, but I would think that since it's an EO, the House is obligated to fund it.
The states alrady pay unemployment insurance, and much of that comes from the Federal government NOW.

Trump increased how much the Feds are contributing to the regular unemployment dole, and h as added more on top of that.

Kudlow was on last night and said for example, if the states give $100 normally, the Federalis will add a flat $300 to that via unemployment benefits, while another $300 additional is coming for an interum period.

With the Presidents ability to fungiblate the money around, he can easily do this as SCOTUS upheld on the Wall funding. Both fall under the emergency powers of the President.
 
anyone making over 50 grand shouldnt get it, they should have prepared for a rainy day
If we are talking unemployment, how are they making over $50k?

And we pay into unemployment insurance, so it isnt an entitlement, bubba, so they have to pay at least the minimum.
 
If anyone can get reelected with 300k needless deaths, maybe we should just anoint him emperor for life

But that's just how broken the system is. Even when they needed to, even when the country desperately needed them to, Democrats couldn't nominate a decent candidate for President. Biden still might win, but only because our system is so fucked up that all he has to do is be slightly better than Trump. An abysmally low bar.
I'm not convinced it's the political system. But what was Biden's base is now Trump's, or at least the non-racist base of Trump. And Trump has guaranteed that the gop will demographically be reduced in each election.

Socially there is a rise of exclusionary groups on both sides of the political spectrum. Our public education was the engine of meritocracy and now it's a debt engine for lenders. The working class (at least the white) perceives standards of living declining. I'm not sold at the being accurate, but there's no doubt the real winners in the economy are banker types who don't actually lend money to create any good or service for consumption.
 
Let's say you were making $18.00 an hour, which in my state, isn't too bad. That's less than 38K a year gross. Now you get laid off and are getting close to 60K a year. Are you going to go out and look for a job? Of course not. You are 20K a year ahead of the game. Even if somebody offered you a job for $4.00 an hour more than you were making, you'd still be doing much better on unemployment.
This is the problem Republicans have with this extra money.
And that is what the Republicans get insultingly wrong.

Which would you take: Unemployment that pays the same but can end in a few months, or a permanent job that gives you a reason to get your dead ass out of bed, in the shower and starting your day?

I have had a lot of unemployment time since my back surgery, and I promise you I would go back to work for the same pay if I could.

Right now I have been unavailable to work due to Pancreatitis and cant claim it.
 

Forum List

Back
Top